阿勒泰林区放牧前后草地生态系统健康评价

殷锡凯; 叶茂; 赵凡凡; 周泉

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.06.029

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

阿勒泰林区放牧前后草地生态系统健康评价

试验研究

- 阿勒泰林区放牧前后草地生态系统健康评价
- Ecosystem Health Evaluation of Grassland Ecosystem Before and After Grazing in Aletai Forest Region
- 水土保持通报 2021年41卷第6期页码：220-225
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 新疆师范大学地理科学与旅游学院,新疆,乌鲁木齐,830054
  2. 新疆干旱区湖泊环境与资源实验室,新疆,乌鲁木齐,830054
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  阿尔泰山生态保护管理规划项目
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.06.029
  中图分类号： S812.6
- 纸质出版：2021
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
殷锡凯, 叶茂, 赵凡凡, 等. 阿勒泰林区放牧前后草地生态系统健康评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(6):220-225.

Yin Xikai, Ye Mao, Zhao Fanfan, et al. Ecosystem Health Evaluation of Grassland Ecosystem Before and After Grazing in Aletai Forest Region[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(6): 220-225.
殷锡凯, 叶茂, 赵凡凡, 等. 阿勒泰林区放牧前后草地生态系统健康评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(6):220-225. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.06.029.

Yin Xikai, Ye Mao, Zhao Fanfan, et al. Ecosystem Health Evaluation of Grassland Ecosystem Before and After Grazing in Aletai Forest Region[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(6): 220-225. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.06.029.

摘要

[目的] 对阿勒泰林区放牧前后的草地生态系统进行健康评价，为该区退化草地恢复与管理提供科学依据。[方法] 运用了VOR综合指数生态系统健康评价模型，并结合物种多样性测度中的Margalef丰富度指数、Simpson优势度指数、Shannon-Wiener多样性指数和Alatalo均匀度指数，对阿勒泰林区草地生态系统整体状况进行了评估。[结果] ①各监测点Margalef指数差异表现在旅游区放牧前后差异极显著（p<0.01），牧道放牧前后差异显著（p<0.05）；前山山坡、牧道的Simpson指数和Shannon-Wiener指数的放牧前后均表现出差异极显著（p<0.01）；各监测点Alatalo指数放牧前后差异不显著。②阿勒泰林区放牧后草地生态系统结构较稳定；阿勒泰林区放牧前后草地生态系统健康的组织力（O）、恢复力（R）值差异显著（p<0.05）。③VOR指数表现为牧道放牧前后差异极显著（p<0.01），其他监测点的VOR指数放牧前后差异不显著。④各监测点放牧前后草地健康状况评价结果一致，为“健康”状态，但各监测点的VOR综合指数值存在差异。[结论] 阿勒泰林区放牧后草地生态系统结构较稳定，监测点旅游区的Margalef丰富度放牧前后差异极显著（p<0.01），前山山坡、牧道的Simpson优势度和Shannon-Wiener多样性放牧前后均差异极显著（p<0.01）；各监测点放牧前后草地健康状况评价为“健康”。

Abstract

[Objective] The health of the grassland ecosystem before and after grazing in the Altay forest area was assessed

in order to provide a scientific basis for the restoration and management of degraded grassland in the area.[Methods] The VOR ecosystem health evaluation model was used combined the Margalef richness index

Simpson dominance index

Shannon-Wiener diversity index

and Alatalo evenness index to evaluate the overall status of the grassland ecosystem in the Aletai forest area.[Results] ① The Margalef index of each monitoring point was high significantly different before and after grazing in tourist areas (p<0.01)

and was significantly different before and after grazing in pastoral roads (p<0.05); The Simpson index and Shannon-Wiener index of the front mountain slopes and pastoral roads showed extremely significant differences before and after grazing (p<0.01); The Altalo index of each monitoring site had no significant difference before and after grazing. ② The structure of the grassland ecosystem after grazing in the Aletai forest area was relatively stable; The organizational strength (O) and the resilience (R) value of the healthy grassland ecosystem before and after grazing in the Aletai forest area were significantly different (p<0.05). ③ The VOR index showed that the difference before and after grazing was extremely significant (p<0.01)

while the VOR index of other monitoring points had no significant difference. ④ The evaluation results of the health status of the grassland before and after grazing at each monitoring point were consistent

which was a "healthy" state

but the VOR composite index value of each monitoring point was different.[Conclusion] The grassland ecosystem structure is relatively stable after grazing in the Aletai forest area. The Margalef abundance in the tourist area of the monitoring point is significantly different before and after grazing (p<0.01). The Simpson dominance and Shannon-Wiener diversity of the front mountain slopes and pastoral roads are all different before and after grazing. The health status of the grassland before and after grazing at each monitoring point was evaluated as "healthy".

关键词

Keywords

references

赵同谦, 欧阳志云, 贾良清, 等.中国草地生态系统服务功能间接价值评价[J].生态学报, 2004, 24(6):1101-1110.

Costanza R, Mageau M T. What is a healthy ecosystems[J]. Aquatic Ecology, 1999, 33(1):105-115.

单贵莲, 陈功, 刘钟龄, 等.典型草原健康评价的VOR和CVOR指数[J].草地学报, 2012, 20(3):401-406.

Allen E. Forest health assessment in Canada[J]. Ecosystem Health, 2001, 7(1):28-34.

侯扶江, 于应文, 傅华, 等.阿拉善草地健康评价的CVOR指数[J].草业学报, 2004, 13(4):117-126.

刘春青, 张韬, 刘佳慧, 等.辉腾锡勒风电场草地生态系统健康评价[J].西北林学院学报, 2019, 34(2):213-221.

赵玉婷, 李文龙, 陈迪, 等.高寒牧区草地生态系统健康动态评价:以甘南地区为例[J].草业科学, 2017, 34(1):16-29.

吴蓉蓉, 史惠兰, 王维, 等.青海河南高寒草地生态系统健康评价[J].安徽大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 42(3):98-108.

徐丽君.华北农牧交错带紫花苜蓿人工草地健康评价[D].北京:中国农业科学院, 2009.

邹蕴.锡林浩特市露天矿区草地生态系统健康评价[D].内蒙古呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学, 2019.

都耀庭.聚类分析法在高寒草甸生态系统健康评价中的应用:以青海玉树县为例[J].土壤通报, 2014, 45(2):307-313.

侯扶江, 徐磊.生态系统健康的研究历史与现状[J].草业学报, 2009, 18(6):210-225.

姜佳昌, 孙斌, 潘冬荣, 等.基于VOR指数的肃南县草地生态系统健康评价[J].中国草食动物科学, 2020, 40(4):39-43.

俞鸿千, 蒋齐, 王占军, 等. VOR, CVOR指数在宁夏干旱风沙区荒漠草原健康评价中的应用:以盐池县为例[J].草地学报, 2018, 26(3):584-590.

Costanza R, d'Arge R, de Groot R. et a1. The value of world's ecosystem services and natural captial[J]. Nature, 1997, 387(6630):253-260.

Richard T W, Wui Y A. The economic value of wetland services:A meta-analysis[J]. Ecological Economics, 2001, 37(2):257-270.

高雅, 林慧龙.草地生态系统服务价值估算前瞻[J].草业学报, 2014, 23(3):290-301.

张晓娜, 蒙仲举, 杨振奇.不同封育措施下希拉穆仁荒漠草原土壤质量评价[J].土壤通报, 2018, 49(4):788-793.

董世魁, 汤琳, 张相锋, 等.高寒草地植物物种多样性与功能多样性的关系[J].生态学报, 2017, 37(5):1472-1483.

张建贵, 王理德, 姚拓, 等.祁连山高寒草地不同退化程度植物群落结构与物种多样性研究[J].草业学报, 2019, 28(5):15-25.

韩晓玲.浅谈阿勒泰市草地生态环境保护对策[J].当代畜牧, 2013, 31(32):10-11.

俞婷.阿勒泰市草地退化的原因及对策分析[D].新疆乌鲁木齐:新疆农业大学, 2012.

加那尔别克·黑勒白.阿勒泰市草原退化的主要原因及其治理对策[J].现代农业研究, 2018, 24(7):63-64.

王小红, 陈玉兰.阿勒泰市退牧还草工程效益分析[J].天津农业科学, 2018, 24(1):30-32.

张炜.新疆退牧还草补偿机制绩效分析[D].新疆乌鲁木齐:新疆农业大学, 2013.

马克平.生物群落多样性的测度方法(Ⅰ):

多样性的测度方法(上)[J].生物多样性, 1994, 2(3):162-168.

马克平, 刘玉明.生物群落多样性的测度方法(Ⅰ):

多样性的测度方法(下)[J].生物多样性, 1994, 2(4):231-239.

Lu Fan, Li Zizhen. A model of ecosystem health and its application[J]. Ecological Modeling, 2003, 170(1):55-59.

Ptthoff M, Jackson L E. Soil biological and chemical properties in restored perennial grassland in California[J]. Restoration Ecology, 2005, 13(1):61-73.

王立新, 刘钟龄, 刘华民, 等.内蒙古典型草原生态系统健康评价[J].生态学报, 2008, 28(2):544-550.

薛睿, 郑淑霞, 白永飞.不同利用方式和载畜率对内蒙古典型草原群落初级生产力和植物补偿性生长的影响[J].生物多样性, 2010, 18(3):300-311.

Rosen E, van der Maare E. Restoration of alvar vegetation on Oland, Sweden[J]. Applied Vegetation Science, 2000, 3(1):65-72.

Oesterheld M, McNaughton S J. Effects of stress and time for recovery on the amount of compensatory growth after grazing[J]. Oecologia, 1991, 85(3):305-313.

李西良, 刘志英, 侯向阳, 等.放牧对草原植物功能性状及其权衡关系的调控[J].植物学报, 2015, 50(2):159-170.

Fan Jianling, Jin Hao, Zhang Chuanhong, et al. Grazing intensity induced alternations of soil microbial community composition in aggregates drive soil organic carbon turnover in a desert steppe[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2021, 40(10):73-87.

浏览量

753

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

砒砂岩区4种人工林林下草本植物多样性与土壤理化性质

喀斯特石漠化生态治理区结构与物种多样性研究

高寒草地群落物种多样性与土壤环境因子的关系

京西百花山区植物群落凋落物对土壤种子库的影响

榆林风沙草滩区物种多样性研究