土地利用变化对泥沙连通性及泥沙输移的影响——以重庆市涪陵页岩气开采区为例

冯斌; 张学伍; 徐敏; 胡海峰

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.06.024

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

土地利用变化对泥沙连通性及泥沙输移的影响——以重庆市涪陵页岩气开采区为例

试验研究

- 土地利用变化对泥沙连通性及泥沙输移的影响——以重庆市涪陵页岩气开采区为例
- Effects of Landscape Pattern Change on Sediment Connectivity and Sediment Transport—Taking Fuling Shale Gas Production Area in Fuling Area of Chongqing City as a Case Area
- 水土保持通报 2021年41卷第6期页码：171-179
- 作者机构：
  
  中煤科工重庆设计研究院(集团)有限公司,重庆,400016
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家重大专项“大型油气田及煤层气开发及勘探评价：涪陵页岩气开发示范工程”（2016ZX05060-023）
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.06.024
  中图分类号： F301.2;S157.1
- 纸质出版：2021
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
冯斌, 张学伍, 徐敏, 等. 土地利用变化对泥沙连通性及泥沙输移的影响——以重庆市涪陵页岩气开采区为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(6):171-179.

Feng Bin, Zhang Xuewu, Xu Min, et al. Effects of Landscape Pattern Change on Sediment Connectivity and Sediment Transport—Taking Fuling Shale Gas Production Area in Fuling Area of Chongqing City as a Case Area[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(6): 171-179.
冯斌, 张学伍, 徐敏, 等. 土地利用变化对泥沙连通性及泥沙输移的影响——以重庆市涪陵页岩气开采区为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(6):171-179. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.06.024.

Feng Bin, Zhang Xuewu, Xu Min, et al. Effects of Landscape Pattern Change on Sediment Connectivity and Sediment Transport—Taking Fuling Shale Gas Production Area in Fuling Area of Chongqing City as a Case Area[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(6): 171-179. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.06.024.

摘要

[目的

]

探究人类活动强烈干扰区景观格局变化对泥沙传输过程的影响，为控制土壤流失为目标的土地利用优化提供科学参考。[方法

]

运用土壤侵蚀方程、泥沙连通指数等方法分析了页岩气开采区重庆市涪陵区城东片区页岩气开采前后（2010—2019年）土地利用格局的变化，及其泥沙连通性和泥沙输移的响应。[结果

]

①研究区2010—2019年，耕地减少，建设用地及林草用地增加。②因土地利用格局变化导致的土壤侵蚀变化微弱，整个研究区土壤侵蚀量减小，从2010年的3.12减小到2019年2.78 t/（hm

·a），整个区域的侵蚀策源地是旱耕地。③2010—2019年，整个研究区的连通性指数（IC）呈现减小趋势，从-0.46减小到-0.65，整个区域泥沙输移比减小，泥沙流失量由0.83 t/（hm

·a）减少到0.62 t/（hm

·a）。[结论

]

土地利用变化除影响土壤侵蚀量外，还影响了泥沙连通性进而减小了土壤流失量。重庆市页岩气开采未造成区域土壤流失发生明显增大，阻断旱耕地的泥沙连通性仍是控制区域土壤流失的有效途径。

Abstract

[Objective] The effects of landscape change on the sediment transport process were studied in order to provide an important basis for the optimization of land use to control soil loss.[Methods] The earliest shale gas mining area in the eastern part of Fuling District of Chongqing City was selected as the research area. The changes in the landscape pattern before and after shale gas mining between 2010 and 2019 were analyzed. Moreover

the response of sediment connectivity and sediment transport to landscape changes was analyzed. The observing data from 16 runoff plots were used to calibrate sediment loads.[Results] ① From 2010 to 2019

the cultivated land decreased

and the construction land

forest and grass land increased; ② The change in soil erosion caused by landscape pattern change was weak

and the amount of soil erosion in the entire study area was 2.78 t/(ha·yr) in 2019. The source of erosion in the entire region was dry farmland; ③ The connectivity index IC of the entire study area decreased from -0.46 in 2010 to -0.65 in 2019. The sediment transport coefficient in the entire region decreased

and the soil loss modulus in the entire region decreased from 0.83 t/(ha·yr) in 2010 to 0.62 t/(ha·yr) in 2019.[Conclusion] The land use change reduced the amount of soil loss by affecting the connectivity of sediment in addition to soil erosion. The shale gas mining in Chongqing City has not caused a significant increase in regional soil erosion. Blocking the connectivity of sediment in dry farmland is still an effective way to control regional soil erosion.

关键词

Keywords

references

郑明国, 蔡强国, 陈浩.黄土丘陵沟壑区植被对不同空间尺度水沙关系的影响[J].生态学报, 2007, 27(9):3572-3581.

Pimentel D, Kounang N. Ecology of soil erosion in ecosystems[J]. Ecosystems, 1998, 1(1):416-426.

王计平, 杨磊, 卫伟, 等.黄土丘陵区景观格局对水土流失过程的影响:景观水平与多尺度比较[J].生态学报, 2011, 31(19):5531-5541.

陈利顶, 吕一河, 傅伯杰, 等.基于模式识别的景观格局分析与尺度转换研究框架[J].生态学报, 2006, 26(3):663-670.

Tischendorf L, Fahrig L. How should we measure landscape connectivity?[J]. Landscape Ecology, 2000, 15(7):633-641.

刘金涛, 韩小乐, 刘建立, 等.山坡表层关键带结构与水文连通性研究进展[J].水科学进展, 2019, 30(1):112-122.

Kevin J M, Jeffrey J M. Hydrological connectivity of hillslopes and streams:Characteristic time scales and nonlinearities[J]. Water Resources Research, 2010, 46(10):W10543.

Bracken L J, Wainwright J, Ali G A, et al. Concepts of hydrological connectivity:Research approaches, pathways and future agendas[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2013, 119:17-34.

Borselli L, Cassi P, Torri D. Prolegomena to sediment and flow connectivity in the landscape:A GIS and field numerical assessment[J]. Catena, 2008, 75(3):268-277.

Cavalli M, Trevisani S, Comiti F, et al. Geomorphometric assessment of spatial sediment connectivity in small Alpine catchments[J]. Geomorphology, 2013, 188:31-41.

Vigiak O, Borselli L, Newham L T H, et al. Comparison of conceptual landscape metrics to defne hillslope-scale sediment delivery ratio[J]. Geomorphology, 2012:138, 74-88.

Nieuwenhuyse B H J V, Antoine M, Wyseure G, et al. Pattern-process relationships in surface hydrology:Hydrological connectivity expressed in landscape metrics[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2011, 25(24):3760-3773.

Ore G, Bruins H J. Design features of ancient agricultural terrace walls in the Negev desert:Human-made geodiversity[J]. Land Degradation & Development, 2012, 23(4):409-418.

Croke J, Mockler S, Fogarty P, et al. Sediment concentration changes in runoff pathways from a forest road network and the resultant spatial pattern of catchment connectivity[J]. Geomorphology, 2005, 68(3):257-268.

Preston T M, Kim K. Land cover changes associated with recent energy development in the Williston Basin; Northern Great Plains, USA[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2016, 566/567:1511-1518.

陈宏坤, 杜显元, 张心昱, 等.页岩气开发对植被和土壤的影响研究进展[J].生态学报, 2018, 38(18):6383-6390.

Rajbanshi J, Bhattacharya S. Assessment of soil erosion, sediment yield and basin specific controlling factors using RUSLE-SDR and PLSR approach in Konar River basin, India[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2020, 587:124935.

章文波, 谢云, 刘宝元.利用日雨量计算降雨侵蚀力的方法研究[J].地理科学, 2002, 22(6):705-711.

范丽丽, 沈珍瑶, 刘瑞民.基于GIS的大宁河流域土壤侵蚀评价及其空间特征研究[J].北京师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 43(5):563-566.

Desmet P J, Govers G. A GIS procedure for the automated calculation of the USLE LS factor on topographically complex landscape units[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 1996, 51(5):427-433.

Dai Z H, Feng X. B, Zhang C, et al. Assessment of mercury erosion by surface water in Wanshan mercury mining area[J]. Environmental Research, 2013, 125:2-11.

Yang D W, Kanae S, Oki T, et al. Global potential soil erosion with reference to land use and climate changes[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2003, 17(14), 2913-2928.

Li Xiaosong, Wu Bingfang, Zhang Lei. Dynamic monitoring of soil erosion for upper stream of Miyun Reservoir in the last 30 years[J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2013, 10(5):801-811.

刘婷, 邵景安.三峡库区不同土地利用背景下的土壤侵蚀时空变化及其分布规律[J].中国水土保持科学, 2016, 14(3):1-9.

张鹏, 尹忠东, 尚河英.川中紫色土区林地型小流域不同用地类型的土壤侵蚀特征[J].生态科学, 2017, 36(3):8-14.

熊杰, 曾源, 朱亮, 等.近25年三峡库区土地覆被变化及驱动力分析[J].长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10):2368-2378.

史铁丑, 徐晓红.重庆市典型县撂荒耕地图斑的提取与验证[J].农业工程学报, 2016, 32(24):261-267.

俱战省, 文安邦, 严冬春, 等.三峡库区小流域修正通用土壤流失方程适用性分析[J].农业工程学报, 2015, 31(5):121-129, 131, 130.

Cammeraat E L H. Scale dependent thresholds in hydrological and erosion response of a semi-arid catchment in Southeast Spain[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2004, 104(2):317-332.

刘宇.土壤侵蚀研究中的景观连通度:概念、作用及定量[J].地理研究, 2016, 35(1):195-202.

Prugh L R. An evaluation of patch connectivity measures[J]. Ecological Applications, 2009, 19(5):1300-1310.

高旭彪, 孙厚才, 赵永军, 等.长江上游川中紫色土丘陵区小流域泥沙输移比空间尺度效应研究[J].水土保持通报, 2007, 27(6):130-133, 151.

浏览量

932

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

黄土高原南部土地利用/覆被变化的土壤侵蚀效应

典型干旱区山地-绿洲-荒漠生态系统服务价值的时空演变

土地利用和气候变化对河北省水生态系统服务的影响

海河流域气候-土地利用-生态治理对水生态系统服务的影响

三江源地区多情景土地利用变化对碳储量与生境质量的影响