1. 江西理工大学 土木与测绘工程学院,江西,赣州,341000
2. 江西省赣江上游水文水资源监测中心,江西,赣州,341000
3. 嘉应学院地理科学与旅游学院,广东,梅州,514015
4. 江西理工大学 资源与环境工程学院,江西,赣州,341000
纸质出版:2021
移动端阅览
曾金凤, 刘祖文, 刘友存, 等. 基于IHA-RVA法的东江源区生态水文情势变化分析[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(6):157-164.
Zeng Jinfeng, Liu Zuwen, Liu Youcun, et al. Eco-hydrological Regime of Source Area of Dongjiang River Based on IHA-RVA[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(6): 157-164.
曾金凤, 刘祖文, 刘友存, 等. 基于IHA-RVA法的东江源区生态水文情势变化分析[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(6):157-164. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.06.022.
Zeng Jinfeng, Liu Zuwen, Liu Youcun, et al. Eco-hydrological Regime of Source Area of Dongjiang River Based on IHA-RVA[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(6): 157-164. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.06.022.
[目的] 研究东江源区流域生态水文情势的变化,为明确流域生态修复目标和开展生态修复措施提供参考依据,为水利部水环境水生态监测试点工作顺利开展提供经验。[方法] 选取江西省寻乌县的寻乌水背水文站和定南县的定南胜前水文站两个国家站1980—2020年的逐日流量数据,运用生态水文指标变化范围法(IHA-RVA)以及水文改变度法综合评价流域的水文情势改变程度。[结果] ①东江源区整体水文改变度为50.1%,属中度改变,其中寻乌水影响大于定南水; ②32个水文改变指标中,高低流量的频率及延时受影响最小,改变度为26.3%,属低改变; ③流量变化率及概率最大61.5%,属中度改变,特别是最大1 d流量、变换次数、1月均值流量、5月均值流量等指标发生严重变异; ④以鱼类资源变化响应分析验证,源区鱼类资源减少。[结论] 水库运行对东江源区周边生态系统影响较大,亟需适时调控河流的流量,使区域经济与生态环境保护协调发展。
[Objective] The changes of eco-hydrological regime in the source region of Dongjiang River basin were studied
in order to provide a basis for clarifying the objectives of eco-restoration and carrying out eco-restoration measures
and to provide experience for the smooth development of the pilot work of water environment and water ecology monitoring of the Ministry of Water Resources.[Methods] The daily flow data of Xunwu shuibei hydrological station in Xunwu County of Jiangxi Province and Dingnan Shengqian hydrological station in Dingnan County from 1980 to 2020 were selected
to comprehensively evaluate the degree of hydrological change of the basin by using IHA-RVA (indicators of hydrologic alteration
IHA; range of variability approach
RVA) method and hydrologic change degree method.[Results] ① The hydrological change degree of the source region of Dongjiang River was 50.1%
which belonged to moderate change
in which the effect of Xunwu Water was greater than Dingnan Water. ② Among the 32 IHA hydrological indexes
the frequency and delay of high and low flow were the least affected
and the degree of change was 26.3%. ③ The maximum flow change rate was 61.5%
which belonged to moderate change
especially the maximum 1-day flow
transformation times
the mean flow in January
the mean flow in May and other indicators have serious variation. ④ According to the analysis of fish resources change
the fish resources in the source region decreased.[Conclusion] The operation of the reservoir has a great impact on the surrounding ecosystem of the source region of the Dongjiang River
and it is urgent to regulate the flow of the river to coordinate the development of regional economy and ecological environment protection.
王雨.一国两制下的跨境水资源治理[J].热带地理, 2017, 37(2):154-162.
Proff L R, Allan J D, Bain M B, et al. The natural flow regime:A paradigm for river conservation and restoration[J]. Bioscience, 1997, 47(11):22-29.
邓信翠, 陈洋波.1990-2018年东江流域土地利用变化及其驱动力[J].水土保持通报, 2020, 40(6):236-242, 258, 331.
陈栋为, 陈晓宏, 李种., 等.基于RVA法的水利工程对河流水文情势改变的累积效应研究:以东江流域为例[J].水文, 2011, 31(2):54-57.
Richter B D. How much water does a river need[J]. Freshwater Biology, 1997, 37(2):231-249.
David L G, Robin L. Restoring ecological integrity of great rivers:Historical hydrographs aid in defining reference conditions for the Missouri River[J]. Hydrobiologia, 2000, 422/423:29-48.
陈启慧, 郝振纯, 夏自强, 等.葛洲坝对长江径流过程的影响[J].长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4):522-526.
Richter B D, Mathews R, Wigington H R. Ecologically sustainable water management:Managing river flows for ecological integrity[J]. Ecological Applications, 2003, 13(1):206-224.
Rwin E R, Freeman M C. Proposal for adaptive management to conserve biotic integrity in a regulated segment of the Tallapoosa River, Alabama, USA[J]. Conservation Biology, 2010, 16(5):1212-1222.
李舒, 齐青松.基于IHA-RVA法的人类活动对窟野河流域水文情势影响评估[J].水电能源科学, 2021, 39(4):24-26, 63.
Mwedzi T, Katiyo L, Mugabe F T, et al. A spatial assessment of stream-flow characteristics and hydrologic alterations, post dam construction in the Manyame catchment, Zimbabwe[J]. Water SA, 2016, 42(2):194-202.
胡娜, 林凯荣, 何艳虎, 等.东江上游龙川站水文情势变化分析[J].水电能源科学, 2014, 32(5):10-13.
胡晓张, 刘壮添, 孙倩雯, 等.东江中下游河道近期洪水水文情势变化分析[J].人民珠江, 2016, 37(11):1-7.
Richter B D, Baumgartner J V, Braun D P, et al. A spatial assessment of hydrologic alteration within a river network[J]. River Research & Applications, 1998, 14(4):329-340.
Richter B D, Baumgartner J V, Powell J, et al. A method for assessing hydrologic alteration within ecosystems[J]. Conservation Biology, 1996, 10(4):1163-1174.
Richter B D, Braun D P, Mendelson M A, et al. Threats to imperiled freshwater Fauna[J]. Conservation Biology, 2010, 11(5):1081-1093.
李兴拼, 黄国如, 江涛.RVA法评估枫树坝水库对径流的影响]J].水电能源科学, 2009, 27(3):18-21.
罗志勇, 杨炳良, 管晓祥, 等.不同水文模型在金溪流域的模拟与适应性研究[J].华北水利水电大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 39(3):6-12.
李紫妍, 刘登峰, 黄强, 等.基于多种水文学方法的汉江子午河生态流量研究[J].华北水利水电大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 38(1):8-12.
薛联青, 张卉, 张洛晨, 等.基于改进RVA法的水利工程对塔里木河生态水文情势影响评估[J].河海大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 45(3):189-196.
张文浩, 瞿思敏, 徐瑶, 等.泼河水库对潢河径流过程及水文情势的影响[J].水资源保护, 2021, 37(3):61-65.
王鸿翔, 赵颖异, 卓志宇, 等.基于IHA-RVA法的资水流域水文情势评估[J].华北水利水电大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 40(2):16-21, 51.
任影, 周明迪, 马朝霞.出山店水库建设后水文情势变化对鱼类资源的影响[J].河南水利与南水北调, 2020, 49(12):42-44.
郭文献, 李越, 王鸿翔, 等.基于IHA-RVA法三峡水库下游河流生态水文情势评价[J].长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(9):2014-2021.
邹多录.江西省寻邬水的鱼类资源[J].动物学杂志, 1988, 23(3):15-17.
邓凤云, 张春光, 赵亚辉, 等.东江源头区鱼类物种多样性及群落组成的特征[J].动物学杂志, 2013, 48(2):161-173.
0
浏览量
1034
下载量
2
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621