水利部 水土保持监测中心,北京,100055
纸质出版:2021
移动端阅览
王海燕, 丛佩娟, 袁普金, 等. 国家水土保持重点工程效益综合评价模型研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(6):119-126.
Wang Haiyan, Cong Peijuan, Yuan Pujin, et al. Comprehensive Evaluation Model of National Key Project Benefits of Soil and Water Conservation[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(6): 119-126.
王海燕, 丛佩娟, 袁普金, 等. 国家水土保持重点工程效益综合评价模型研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(6):119-126. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.06.017.
Wang Haiyan, Cong Peijuan, Yuan Pujin, et al. Comprehensive Evaluation Model of National Key Project Benefits of Soil and Water Conservation[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(6): 119-126. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.06.017.
[目的] 研究水土流失治理效益评价指标体系、评价模型与评价标准,为国家水土保持重点工程绩效评价、实施效果后评价等工作提供技术支撑。[方法] 采用频度分析法筛选评价指标,采用层次分析法确定评价指标权重。[结果] 提出水土保持工程效益评价指标体系,并构建综合评价模型。模型包含土壤固持与保护、水源涵养、生态改善、收益增加、防灾减灾等5大类15个指标。在此基础上,提出了优秀、良好、缓慢改善、恶化、极度恶化5级评价标准。[结论] 水土保持工程效益综合评价模型涵盖了生态、经济、社会等多方面因素以及各因素之间相互作用关系,可为国家水土保持重点工程实施效果提供直观的、综合的、可量化的评价结果。
[Objective] The evaluation index system
evaluation model and evaluation standard of water and soil conservation benefits were studied
in order to provide technical support for the performance evaluation and post implementation effect evaluation of national key projects of water and soil conservation.[Methods] The frequency analysis method was used to screen the evaluation indexes
and the analytic hierarchy process was used to determine the index weight.[Results] The evaluation index system of the benefits of national soil and water conservation projects was proposed
and the comprehensive evaluation model was established. The model included 15 indicators in five categories:soil fixation and protection
water conservation
ecological improvement
income increase
disaster prevention and reduction. Based on this
the evaluation criteria was proposed including:excellent
good
slow improvement
deterioration and extreme deterioration.[Conclusion] The comprehensive evaluation model for soil and water conservation benefit evaluation covers many factors such as ecology
economy and society
and it also covers the interaction relationship between different factors
which can provide intuitive
comprehensive and quantifiable evaluation results for the implementation effects of national key soil and water conservation projects.
水利部水土保持司.水土保持70年[J].中国水土保持, 2019, (10):3-7.
刘江南, 基于自然水文过程健康的城市湿地评价指标体系筛选研究[J].水利规划与设计, 2021(5):69-73, 83.
王效科, 杨宁, 吴凡, 等.生态效益评价内容和评价指标筛选[J].生态学报, 2019, 39(15):5442-5449.
任红.绥中县宽邦镇大栗小流域综合治理工程效益评价[J].黑龙江水利科技, 2021, 49(4):230-240.
苏长芳.谢家沟小流域水土流失治理及其效益评价[J].水利发展研究, 2021, 21(3):61-64.
关红.砂下小流域水土保持效益评价[J].水土保持应用技术, 2021(1):25-27, 42.
高嵩.秦州区退耕还林工程20周年效益综合评价[J].林业科技通讯, 2021(1):34-36.
焦爱玲.小流域水土保持综合治理措施及效益分析[J].农业科技与信息, 2021(6):8-9.
王彦武, 牛莉婷, 张峰.黄土区高标准梯田生态服务功能及其价值[J].水土保持学报, 2019, 33(6):190-196.
王晶, 白清俊.黄土高原生态系统服务价值研究探析[J].土地开发工程研究, 2020, 5(2):63-72.
文慧, 冯舒悦, 王军先, 等.南方红壤区不同崩岗侵蚀治理模式及评价指标体系研究[J].中国水土保持, 2019(9):40-44.
李宗杰, 宋玲玲, 田青, 等.甘肃省水土保持综合治理效益分析[J].环境科学与技术, 2016, 39(11):182-1189.
熊强辉.喀斯特石漠化区综合治理效益评价[D].贵州贵阳:贵州财经大学.2016.
浦朝涌.科学做好水土保持率目标确定和应用[J].中国水土保持, 2021(3):1-3.
李永敏, 郭华明.黄土高原农业生态环境治理效果评价体系初探[J].环境保护, 1999(10):22-23.
0
浏览量
1390
下载量
4
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621