1. 长江水利委员会 长江科学院,湖北,武汉,430010
2. 水利部 山洪地质灾害防治工程技术研究中心,湖北,武汉,430010
3. 长江水资源保护科学研究所,湖北,武汉,430051
4. 河海大学 水利水电学院,江苏,南京,210098
纸质出版:2021
移动端阅览
郭宜薇, 丁文峰, 朱秀迪, 等. 三峡库区重金属含量空间分布及污染状况[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(6):105-112.
Guo Yiwei, Ding Wenfeng, Zhu Xiudi, et al. Spatial Distribution and Pollution Characteristics of Heavy Metal Contents in Three Gorges Reservoir Area[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(6): 105-112.
郭宜薇, 丁文峰, 朱秀迪, 等. 三峡库区重金属含量空间分布及污染状况[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(6):105-112. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.06.015.
Guo Yiwei, Ding Wenfeng, Zhu Xiudi, et al. Spatial Distribution and Pollution Characteristics of Heavy Metal Contents in Three Gorges Reservoir Area[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(6): 105-112. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.06.015.
[目的
]
对三峡库区坡面土壤与消落带沉积泥沙中重金属含量特征开展研究,为该区重金属污染评价提供理论与数据支持。[方法
]
在三峡库区选取53个采样点,分析区域内坡面土壤与消落带沉积泥沙中Cr,Cu,Pb,Zn,Mn 5种重金属元素的含量,利用单因子污染指数法、内梅罗综合指数法、地累积指数法和潜在生态风险指数法开展污染状况评价。[结果
]
研究区域内重金属含量平均值大小依次为:Mn>Zn>Cr>Cu>Pb,仅Cu,Zn和Mn存在污染。Zn和Mn在消落带沉积泥沙与坡面土壤中皆富集,而Cu仅在坡面土壤中富集。研究区域内重金属在空间分布上呈上、下游高,中游低分布。单因子污染指数法表明,研究区内仅存在Zn (P
ia
=1.07)的轻度污染与Mn (P
ia
=2.65)的中度污染。研究区域内梅罗综合指数为2.93,为中度污染。根据地累积指数法,研究区域内仅存在Mn轻度污染,其余重金属皆为无污染。Cr,Cu,Pb,Zn,Mn的潜在生态危害皆为轻微生态危害;研究区域的综合生态危害指数为14.09,为轻微生态危害。[结论
]
研究区域内Cr含量主要受到研究区地质背景影响,而Cu,Pb,Zn和Mn含量同时受到地质背景与人类活动的影响。研究区内存在Mn和Zn污染,且有轻微生态危害。
[Objective] The content characteristics of heavy metals in slope soil and sediment in fluctuating zone in the Three Gorges reservoir area were studied
in order to provide theoretical and data support for heavy metal pollution assessment in this area.[Methods] Three Gorges reservoir area was selected as the study area. Fifty-three sample points were selected to analyze the contents of heavy metals (Cr
Cu
Pb
Zn and Mn) in slope soil and fluvial zone sediments. The pollution situation was assessed by the methods of the single factor pollution index
Nemero pollution index
geo-accumulation index and potential ecological risk index
and the map of heavy metals content was formed by combining the geographic information system.[Results] The average contents of heavy metals were Mn>Zn>Cr>Cu>Pb
and only Cu
Zn
and Zn had pollution. Zn and Mn enriched in both sediment in water level fluctuating zone and slop soil
while Cu only enriched in slop soil. The spatial distribution of heavy metals showed a pattern as high in upper and lower reaches while low in the middle reach. The singe factor pollution index method show that there were only light pollution of Zn and moderate pollution of Mn in study area. The Nemerow composite index of the study area was 2.93
which was moderate. According to the geo-accumulation index
there was only slight pollution of Mn
the other heavy metals were pollution-free. The potential ecological risk of Cr
Cu
Pb
Zn
and Mn were slight ecological hazard. The comprehensive ecological risk index of the study area was 14.09
which was slight ecological risk.[Conclusion] The content of Cr in the study area is mainly affected by the geological background contents of the study area
while the content of Cu
Pb
Zn
and Mn are affected by both geological background contents of the study area and human activities. There are Mn and Zn pollution in the study area
and there is slight ecological harm.
余成, 陈爽, 张路.坦噶尼喀湖东北部入湖河流沉积物重金属分布特征与生态风险评价[J].环境科学, 2016, 37(2):499-506.
杨阳, 周正朝, 张福平, 等.沣河沿岸土壤重金属分布特征及来源分析[J].干旱区研究, 2014, 31(2):237-243.
杨阳, 周正朝, 王欢欢, 等.沣河沿岸土壤和优势植物重金属富集特征和潜在生态风险[J].生态学报, 2013, 33(21):6834-6843.
刘昭, 周宏, 曹文佳, 等.清江流域地表水重金属季节性分布特征及健康风险评价[J].环境科学, 2021, 42(1):175-183.
黄宏伟, 肖河, 王敦球, 等.漓江流域水体中重金属污染特征及健康风险评价[J].环境科学, 2021, 42(4):1714-1723.
方志青, 陈秋禹, 尹德良, 等.三峡库区支流河口沉积物重金属分布特征及风险评价[J].环境科学, 2018, 39(6):2607-14.
王图锦.三峡库区消落带重金属迁移转化特征研究[D].重庆:重庆大学, 2011.
黄迪, 杨燕群, 肖选虎, 等.土壤重金属生物有效性评价技术进展[J].现代化工, 2019, 39(S1):89-94, 8.
谢红勇, 扈志洪.三峡库区消落带生态重建原则及模式研究[J].开发研究, 2004(3):36-39.
刘佳瑞.三峡库区消落带植物生长特征及与重金属相互作用机理研究[D].湖北武汉:湖北工业大学, 2020.
刘丽琼, 魏世强, 江韬.三峡库区消落带土壤重金属分布特征及潜在风险评价[J].中国环境科学, 2011, 31(7):1204-1211.
李乐, 刘常富.三峡库区面源污染研究进展[J].生态科学, 2020, 39(2):215-226.
牛晓旭.基于水华发生程度的三峡库区澎溪河与磨刀溪水环境比较[D].重庆:西南大学, 2019.
曾立雄, 肖文发, 黄志霖, 等.三峡库区不同退耕还林模式水土流失特征及其影响因子[J].长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(1):146-152.
陈明, 蔡青云, 徐慧, 等.水体沉积物重金属污染风险评价研究进展[J].生态环境学报, 2015, 24(6):1069-1074.
祝培甜, 赵中秋, 陈勇, 等.江苏省某镇土壤重金属污染评价[J].环境工程学报, 2017, 11(4):2535-2541.
Hazzeman H, Ahmad Z A. The geoaccumulation index and enrichment factor of mercury in mangrove sediment of Port Klang, Selangor, Malaysia[J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2013, 6:4119-4128.
陈文轩, 李茜, 王珍, 等.中国农田土壤重金属空间分布特征及污染评价[J].环境科学, 2020, 41(6):2822-33.
季建万, 沙晋明, 金彪, 等.平潭岛土壤重金属污染评价及生态风险研究[J].福建师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 34(5):73-82.
徐争启, 倪师军, 庹先国, 等.潜在生态危害指数法评价中重金属毒性系数计算[J].环境科学与技术, 2008(2):112-115.
李新宇, 吴庆梅, 叶翠, 等.三峡库区重庆段重点水域沉积物中重金属污染现状及源解析[J].重庆师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 34(2):36-41.
唐将, 钟远平, 王力.三峡库区土壤重金属背景值研究[J].中国生态农业学报, 2008(4):848-852.
雷国建, 陈志良, 刘千钧, 等.广州郊区土壤重金属污染程度及潜在生态危害评价[J].中国环境科学, 2013, 33(S1):49-53.
Luo Lei, Ma Yibing, Zhang Shuzhen, et al. An inventory of trace element inputs to agricultural soils in China[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2009, 90(8):2524-2530.
龚宇, 向晓军, 李征南, 等.应用因子分析法研究三峡库区忠县-万州地区重金属的主要来源[J].江西农业学报, 2011, 23(4):159-161, 66.
张显强, 谌金吾, 孙敏.三峡库区消落带土壤重金属污染及植物富集特征[J].环境化学, 2020, 39(9):2490-2497.
陈明, 郑小俊, 陶美霞, 等.桃江流域河流沉积物中重金属污染特征与风险评价[J].环境化学, 2020, 39(10):2784-2791.
莫福孝, 秦宇.三峡库区消落带土壤重金属含量特征及污染评价[J].安徽农学通报, 2013, 19(15):16-18.
廖和平, 洪惠坤, 陈智.三峡移民安置区土地生态安全风险评价及其生态利用模式:以重庆市巫山县为例[J].地理科学进展, 2007, 26(4):33-43.
王林泉, 罗玉红, 戴泽龙, 等.香溪河沉积物重金属形态分布特征及生态风险评价[J].农业环境科学学报, 2017, 36(8):1610-1617.
Bai Junhong, Jia Jia, Zhang Guangliang, et al. Spatial and temporal dynamics of heavy metal pollution and source identification in sediment cores from the short-term flooding riparian wetlands in a Chinese delta[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2016, 219:379-388.
黄岁梁.泥沙解吸重金属污染物动力学模式研究[J].地理学报, 1995(06):497-505.
杨丹, 谢宗强, 樊大勇, 等.三峡水库蓄水对消落带土壤Cu, Zn, Cr, Cd含量的影响[J].自然资源学报, 2018, 33(7):1283-1290.
罗友进, 韩国辉, 余端, 等.三峡库区土壤重金属污染评价及其来源[J].长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(8):1800-1808.
卢珏安.三峡库区主要支流氮磷与金属元素分布特征、来源及风险评价[D].四川绵阳:西南科技大学, 2019.
叶琛, 李思悦, 卜红梅, 等.三峡水库消落区蓄水前土壤重金属含量及生态危害评价[J].土壤学报, 2010, 47(6):1264-1269.
0
浏览量
893
下载量
3
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621