1. 中国科学院 水利部 成都山地灾害与环境研究所,四川,成都,610041
2. 中国科学院大学,北京,100049
纸质出版:2021
移动端阅览
陆传豪, 邓利梅, 崔荣阳, 等. 川中丘陵区桤木、柏木对紫色土风化与养分特征的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(6):34-42.
Lu Chuanhao, Deng Limei, Cui Rongyang, et al. Effects of Alder and Cypress on Weathering and Nutrient Characteristics of Purple Soil in Hilly Area of Central Sichuan Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(6): 34-42.
陆传豪, 邓利梅, 崔荣阳, 等. 川中丘陵区桤木、柏木对紫色土风化与养分特征的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(6):34-42. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.06.006.
Lu Chuanhao, Deng Limei, Cui Rongyang, et al. Effects of Alder and Cypress on Weathering and Nutrient Characteristics of Purple Soil in Hilly Area of Central Sichuan Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(6): 34-42. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.06.006.
[目的] 研究川中丘陵区桤木、柏木树种对紫色土风化与养分特征的影响,为该区水土流失防治与农业生产提供科学依据。[方法] 选择川中丘陵区万安小流域为研究区,以桤木、柏木为研究对象,运用野外调查、剖面挖掘采样等方法,研究桤木、柏木对紫色土剖面风化与养分的影响。[结果] ①桤木、柏木下土壤剖面分形维数分别为2.07和2.13,较对照分别提高了6.47%和9.03%,其中柏木对物理风化的提升幅度高于桤木。②桤木、柏木、对照剖面的化学风化程度差异并不显著,桤木、柏木生长对土壤剖面化学风化的影响较小。③桤木、柏木下土壤剖面综合肥力指数较之对照分别提高了14.08%和11.27%,其中桤木的提升效果优于柏木,其对有机质、全N、碱解N、速效K的提升尤为显著。④桤木、柏木根系分布密度与剖面分形维数、综合肥力指数均呈现较强的正相关关系(p<0.05),但与化学风化指数的相关关系并不显著(p>0.05)。[结论] 桤木、柏木在提升川中丘陵区紫色土物理风化速率与养分特征方面均发挥了积极的作用。
[Objective] The influence of alder and cypress on the weathering and nutrient characteristics of purple soil profiles in the hilly area of Central Sichuan Province was analyzed
in order to provide a scientific basis for soil erosion control and agricultural production.[Methods] The Wanan basin in the hilly area of Central Sichuan Province was selected as the study area
and alder and cypress were used as the study objects. Field survey and profile excavation were conducted to study the effects of alder and cypress on the weathering and nutrients of purple soil profiles.[Results] ① The profile fractal dimension of alder and cypress were 2.07 and 2.13
respectively
which increased by 6.47% and 9.03%
respectively
compared with the control
among which the effect of cypress was better than that of alder. ② The differences in chemical weathering between alder
cypress
and control profiles were not significant. Alder and cypress growth has less effect on chemical weathering of the profile. ③ The integrated fertility index of alder and cypress profile increased by 14.08% and 11.27%
respectively
compared with the control. Alder showed a better enhancement effect than cypress
which was especially obvious in organic matter
total N
alkali-hydrolyzable N
and effective K. ④ The root distribution density of alder and cypress showed a significant positive correlation (p<0.05) with the profile fractal dimension and the integrated fertility index
however
the correlation with chemical weathering index was not significant (p>0.05).[Conclusion] Alder and cypress significantly promote the physical weathering rate and nutrients characteristics of purple soil in the hilly area of Central Sichuan Province.
Hasenmueller E A, Xin G, Weitzman J N, et al. Weathering of rock to regolith:The activity of deep roots in bedrock fractures[J]. Geoderma, 2017, 300(1):11-31.
郝丽婷, 吴发启.黄土丘陵沟壑区坝地和梯田土壤养分特征与演变[J].水土保持通报, 2019, 39(5):16-22.
Graham R C, Allen M F, Jimenez O J, et al. The importance of limestone bedrock and dissolution karst features on tree root distribution in northern Yucatan, Mexico[J]. Plant Soil, 2013, 362(1):37-50.
Jackson G, Sheldon J. The vegetation of magnesian limestone cliffs at Markland Grips near Sheffield[J]. Journal of Ecology, 1949, 37(1):38-50.
Almeida M T, Mouga T, Barracosa P. The weathering ability of higher plants. The case of
Ailanthus altissima
(Miller) Swingle[J]. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad, 1994, 33(4):333-343.
李勇, 张晴雯, 李璐, 等.植物根系强化黄土土层化学风化速率的作用[J].水土保持学报, 2005, 19(1):5-9.
张璐, 文石林, 蔡泽江, 等.湘南红壤丘陵区不同植被类型下土壤肥力特征[J].生态学报, 2014, 34(14):3996-4005.
冯嘉仪, 储双双, 王婧, 等.华南地区5种典型林分类型土壤肥力综合评价[J].华南农业大学学报, 2018, 39(3):73-81.
王芳, 黄玫, 孙希华, 等.大小兴安岭林区不同林型土壤养分综合评价[J].水土保持通报, 2013, 33(1):182-187.
余泓, 潘剑君, 李加加, 等.长三角地区农用地土壤肥力特征及综合评价:以朱林镇为例[J].土壤通报, 2017, 48(2):372-379.
温淑红, 李生宝, 许浩, 等.宁南黄土丘陵区不同生态恢复模式对土壤养分的影响[J].水土保持通报, 2015, 35(5):199-204.
中国科学院成都分院土壤研究室.中国紫色土(上篇)[M].北京:科学出版社, 1991.
朱波, 况福虹, 高美荣, 等.土层厚度对紫色土坡地生产力的影响[J].山地学报, 2009, 27(6):735-739.
龚固堂, 陈俊华, 黎燕琼, 等.四川盆地4种柏木林分类型的水文效应[J].生态学报, 2011, 31(10):2716-2726.
杨小林, 朱波, 董玉龙, 等.紫色土丘陵区小流域非点源氮迁移特征研究[J].水利学报, 2013, 44(3):276-283.
田琳琳, 朱波, 汪涛, 等.川中丘陵区农田源头沟渠玉米季中氧化亚氮排放及其影响因素[J].环境科学, 2017, 38(5):2074-2083.
谢贤健.不同岩性风化物分形特征及其与渗透系数关系研究[J].水土保持研究, 2017, 24(5):204-208.
张丹.紫色母岩成土的物理作用机制[D].北京:中国科学院研究生院, 2013.
刘光崧.土壤理化分析与剖面描述[D].北京:中国标准出版社, 1996.
谢和平, 高峰, 周宏伟, 等.岩石断裂和破碎的分形研究[J].防灾和减灾工程学报, 2003, 23(4):1-9.
Macias G, Cuerda C, Diaz D, et al. Application of the Rosin-Rammler and Gates-Gaudin-Schuhmann models to the particle size distribution analysis of agglomerated cork[J]. Materials Characterization, 2004, 52(2):159-164.
赵吉霞.模拟酸雨对典型紫色母岩风化特征的影响[D].北京:中国科学院大学, 2018.
郭媛媛, 莫多闻, 毛龙江, 等.澧阳平原岩板垱剖面地球化学特征与风化强度研究[J].地理科学, 2013, 33(3):335-341.
杜静.四川盆地紫色丘陵区成土特征[D].重庆:西南大学, 2014.
陈轩敬, 赵亚南, 柴冠群, 等.长期不同施肥下紫色土综合肥力演变及作物产量响应[J].农业工程学报, 2016, 32(1):139-144.
谢军, 方林发, 徐春丽, 等.西南紫色土不同施肥措施下土壤综合肥力评价与比较[J].植物营养与肥料学报, 2018, 24(6):1500-1507.
樊维.裂隙岩体植物根劈作用机理研究[D].重庆:重庆交通大学, 2016.
0
浏览量
834
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621