1. 重庆理工大学 管理学院,重庆,400054
2. 重庆理工大学 乡村振兴与区域高质量发展研究中心,重庆,400054
纸质出版:2021
移动端阅览
杨光明, 桂青青, 陈也, 等. 基于灰色关联理论的三峡库区2015-2019年生态安全时空演变特征研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(5):348-356.
Yang Guangming, Gui Qingqing, Chen Ye, et al. Spatial and Temporal Evolution Characteristics of Ecological Security in Three Gorges Reservoir Area During 2015-2019 Based on Grey Relational Theory[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(5): 348-356.
杨光明, 桂青青, 陈也, 等. 基于灰色关联理论的三峡库区2015-2019年生态安全时空演变特征研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(5):348-356. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.05.044.
Yang Guangming, Gui Qingqing, Chen Ye, et al. Spatial and Temporal Evolution Characteristics of Ecological Security in Three Gorges Reservoir Area During 2015-2019 Based on Grey Relational Theory[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(5): 348-356. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.05.044.
[目的] 研究三峡库区生态安全变化趋势与影响因素,为推动三峡库区生态安全发展提供科学依据。[方法] 基于压力—状态—响应模型(PSR)建立生态安全指标体系,采用熵值法、层次分析法对2015—2019年的生态安全状况做出评价。利用灰色系统理论,构建了灰色关联度的评价模型,并根据三峡库区2015—2019年数据,定量评价该区生态安全动态变化情况,并采用灰色聚类法加以验证。[结果] ①2015—2019年库区生态安全关联度较高,单位土地面积农药施用量、植被减少表土损失量、生态服务指数、环保投资比等的关联度均高于0.7。②2015—2019年库区生态安全部分地区综合评价指数呈上升趋势,部分地区综合评价指数略有下降。③三峡库区的PSR指数集聚特征随时间变化并不明显,H-H集聚区主要集中于主城区,符合经济发展一般规律;L-L集聚区主要集中于边缘地区的夷陵、秭归等区县;L-H和H-L集聚区主要集中分布于L-L以及H-H集聚区的周边区县。[结论] 三峡库区的生态安全受部分指标影响显著,应从影响指标入手推进三峡库区生态安全建设,且三峡库区的区县之间存在较大差异。因此,充分发挥部分区县的带动作用是建成三峡库区生态安全的关键。
[Objective] The trend and influencing factors of ecological security in the Three Gorges Reservoir area were studied in order to provide a scientific basis for promoting the development of ecological security in this area.[Methods] Based on pressure-status-response (PSR) model
an ecological security index system was established
and the ecological security status during 2015-2019 was evaluated by the entropy method and the analytic hierarchy process. According to data from the Three Gorges Reservoir area during 2015-2019
the dynamic changes of ecological security in this area were revealed by quantitative evaluation
and verification was performed using the grey clustering method.[Results] ① From 2015 to 2019
the correlation degree of ecological security in the reservoir area was greater than 0.7 for factors such as the application amount of pesticides per unit land area
the amount of topsoil loss caused by vegetation reduction
the ecological service index
and the environmental protection investment ratio. ② From 2015 to 2019
the comprehensive evaluation index of ecological security in some areas of the reservoir area showed an upward trend
while the comprehensive evaluation index of some areas decreased slightly. ③ The agglomeration characteristics of the PSR index in the Three Gorges Reservoir area did not change significantly with time. The high-high agglomeration area was mainly concentrated in the main urban area
which was in line with the general law of economic development. The low-low agglomeration areas were mainly concentrated in Yiling
Zigui
and other counties in the marginal areas. The low-high and high-low agglomeration areas were mainly distributed in the counties surrounding the low-low and high-high agglomeration areas.[Conclusion] The ecological security of the Three Gorges Reservoir area was significantly affected by some indicators. Ecological security construction of the Three Gorges Reservoir area should be promoted based on the important impact factors
and there are great differences between the districts and counties in the Three Gorges Reservoir area. Giving full attention and consideration to the leading role of some districts and counties is the key to the construction of an ecological security system in the Three Gorges Reservoir area.
崔胜辉, 洪华生, 黄云凤, 等.生态安全研究进展[J].生态学报, 2005, 25(4):861-868.
王军, 钟莉娜.景观生态学在土地整治中的应用研究进展[J].生态学报, 2017, 37(12):3982-3990.
朱卫红, 苗承玉, 郑小军, 等.基于3S技术的图们江流域湿地生态安全评价与预警研究[J].生态学报, 2014, 34(6):1379-1390.
曹秉帅, 邹长新, 高吉喜, 等.生态安全评价方法及其应用[J].生态与农村环境学报, 2019, 35(8):953-963.
谢玲, 严土强, 高一薄.基于PSR模型的广西石漠化地区土地生态安全动态评价[J].水土保持通报, 2018, 38(6):315-321.
王耕, 苏柏灵, 王嘉丽, 等.基于GIS的沿海地区生态安全时空测度与演变:以大连市瓦房店为例[J].生态学报, 2015, 35(3):670-677.
李建春, 袁文华.基于GIS格网模型的银川市土地生态安全评价研究[J].自然资源学报, 2017, 32(6):988-1001.
王洋, 董晓光, 王海帆, 等.基于PSR-TOPSIS模型的郑州市土地生态安全评价及障碍因子诊断[J].河南农业大学学报, 2020, 54(5):845-852.
赵疏航, 何刚, 朱艳娜, 等.基于EES-TOPSIS模型的水土生态安全评价与预测[J].哈尔滨商业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 36(6):751-759.
翟彦放.基于GIS技术的三峡库区生态空间统计方法[J].地理空间信息, 2020, 18(2):64-65, 70.
李月臣, 刘春霞, 闵婕, 等.三峡库区生态系统服务功能重要性评价[J].生态学报, 2013, 33(1):168-178.
孙芬, 吴涌泉, 刘秀华, 等.基于GIS的三峡库区土地生态安全评价:以丰都县沿江地区为例[J].中国农学通报, 2012, 28(8):240-247.
庄伟, 廖和平, 潘卓, 等.基于变权TOPSIS模型的三峡库区土地生态安全评估:以巫山县为例[J].西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 36(8):106-112.
魏兴萍.基于PSR模型的三峡库区重庆段生态安全动态评价[J].地理科学进展, 2010, 29(9):1095-1099.
孙德亮, 张凤太.基于DPSIR-灰色关联模型的重庆市土地生态安全评价[J].水土保持通报, 2016, 36(5):191-197.
龚巧灵, 官冬杰.基于BP神经网络的三峡库区重庆段水资源安全评价[J].水土保持研究, 2017, 24(6):292-299.
王波, 张洪江, 杜士才, 等.三峡库区天然次生林凋落物森林水文效应研究[J].水土保持通报, 2009, 29(3):83-87.
张军以, 苏维词, 张凤太.基于PSR模型的三峡库区生态经济区土地生态安全评价[J].中国环境科学, 2011, 31(6):1039-1044.
张凤太, 苏维词, 周继霞.基于熵权灰色关联分析的城市生态安全评价[J].生态学杂志, 2008, 20(7), 1249-1254.
倪九派, 李萍, 魏朝富, 等.基于AHP和熵权法赋权的区域土地开发整理潜力评价[J].农业工程学报, 2009, 25(5):202-209.
魏兴萍.基于灰色关联分析三峡库区重庆段生态安全[J].水土保持研究, 2010, 17(4):124-128, 133.
郑华伟, 夏梦蕾, 张锐, 等.基于熵值法和灰色预测模型的耕地生态安全诊断[J].水土保持通报, 2016, 36(3):284-289, 296.
孟展, 张锐, 刘友兆, 等.基于熵值法和灰色预测模型的土地生态系统健康评价[J].水土保持通报, 2014, 34(4):226-231.
0
浏览量
858
下载量
1
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621