1. 河南理工大学 应急管理学院,河南,焦作,454000
2. 河南理工大学 安全与应急管理研究中心,河南,焦作,454000
纸质出版:2021
移动端阅览
崔凯凯, 刘德林, 李翔海. 黄河河南段流域洪灾的社会脆弱性评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(5):304-310.
Cui Kaikai, Liu Delin, Li Xianghai. Evaluation on Social Vulnerability to Flood Hazards in He'nan Section of Yellow River Basin[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(5): 304-310.
崔凯凯, 刘德林, 李翔海. 黄河河南段流域洪灾的社会脆弱性评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(5):304-310. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.05.039.
Cui Kaikai, Liu Delin, Li Xianghai. Evaluation on Social Vulnerability to Flood Hazards in He'nan Section of Yellow River Basin[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(5): 304-310. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.05.039.
[目的] 分析黄河河南段流域洪灾的社会脆弱性,为河南省沿黄区域的防洪救灾能力建设和风险管理提供科学依据。[方法] 以黄河流域河南段沿岸的7个地级市、1个省(管)市作为评价单元,从敏感性和社会应对水平两个维度选取了16个评价指标,并运用变异系数法确定指标权重,通过构建洪灾社会脆弱性模型,得出各评价单元的敏感性、社会应对水平和社会脆弱性指数。[结果] ①根据敏感性和社会应对水平指数特征,将河南段沿岸分为3种类型:低敏感性—低应对水平(濮阳、三门峡、济源、焦作市);高敏感性—低应对水平(开封、新乡市);高敏感性—高应对水平(洛阳、郑州市);②开封、濮阳市洪灾社会脆弱性等级为Ⅲ;洛阳、郑州市洪灾社会脆弱性等级为Ⅰ;其余区域等级为Ⅱ;③从空间分布上来看,高社会脆弱性区域主要分布于黄河河南段流域的下游地区,中上游区域除洛阳、郑州市外都属于中等脆弱性区,整体处于中低脆弱性水平。[结论] 洪灾社会脆弱性较高的区域主要是由于社会应对水平较低,对防灾减灾能力建设投入不够所造成。
[Objective] In order to provide a scientific basis for capacity construction and risk management of flood hazards
the social vulnerability to flood in He'nan section of the Yellow River basin was studied.[Methods] Seven prefecture-level city and one provincial (administrated) city along the southern reaches of the Yellow River basin were chosen as the basic assessment unit
and 16 indices were identified from two aspects:sensitivity and social response to flood hazards. The weights of indices were determined using coefficients of variation
and the sensitivity
social response level
and social vulnerability index were calculated using the social vulnerability model.[Results] ① According to the level of sensitivity and social response capacity
social vulnerability was classified as one of three types in He'nan section of the Yellow River basin:low sensitivity-low response capacity (Puyang
Sanmenxia
Jiyuan
and Jiaozuo cities); high sensitivity-low response capacity (Kaifeng
Xinxiang cities); high sensitivity-high response capacity (Luoyang
Zhengzhou cities). ② The social vulnerability level for flood disasters in Kaifeng and Puyang City belonged to level Ⅲ
Luoyang and Zhengzhou cities belonged to level Ⅰ
and other cities belonged to level Ⅱ. ③ From the perspective of spatial distribution
the areas of high social vulnerability were mainly distributed in the lower reaches of the He'nan section of the Yellow River. In the areas of the middle and upper reaches
Luoyang and Zhengzhou belonged to the low social vulnerability classification
and other areas belonged to middle social vulnerability classification.[Conclusion] Areas with high social vulnerability to flood hazards were mainly caused by the low social response capacity and insufficient investment in disaster prevention and mitigation capacity construction.
应急管理部.2020年全国自然灾害基本情况[J].中国减灾, 2021(3):60.
张情.河流洪水灾害风险评价及对策研究[D].辽宁大连:大连理工大学, 2014.
靖凤伟, 杨永国, 邓世赞, 等.洪水灾害模拟及评估[J].地理空间信息, 2011, 9(4):122-124, 193.
付意成, 魏传江, 王启猛, 等.区域洪灾风险评价体系研究[J].灾害学, 2009, 24(3):27-32.
李国芳, 郑玲玉, 童奕懿, 等.长江三角洲地区城市化对洪灾风险的影响评价[J].长江流域资源与环境, 2013, 22(3):386-391.
于文金, 闫永刚, 吕海燕, 等.基于GIS的太湖流域暴雨洪涝灾害风险定量化研究[J].灾害学, 2011, 26(4):1-7.
田玉刚, 覃东华, 杜渊会.洞庭湖地区洪水灾害风险评估[J].灾害学, 2011, 26(3):56-60.
马定国, 刘影, 陈洁, 等.鄱阳湖区洪灾风险与农户脆弱性分析[J].地理学报, 2007, 62(3):321-332.
葛怡, 史培军, 刘婧, 等.中国水灾社会脆弱性评估方法的改进与应用:以长沙地区为例[J].自然灾害学报, 2005, 14(6):54-58.
刘德林, 梁恒谦.区域自然灾害的社会脆弱性评估:以河南省为例[J].水土保持通报, 2014, 34(5):128-134.
陈轶, 陈睿山, 葛怡.我国城市社区洪涝灾害社会脆弱性与韧性的研究及思考[J].城市建筑, 2018(35):32-34.
汪群, 虞刘悦, 吴兆丹, 等.长江经济带城市洪涝脆弱性评估:以南京、武汉和成都为例[J].水利经济, 2020, 38(3):55-61, 85-86.
黄晶, 佘靖雯.长江三角洲城市群洪涝灾害脆弱性评估及影响因素分析[J].河海大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2020, 22(6):39-45, 110-111.
高超, 张正涛, 刘青, 等.承灾体脆弱性评估指标的最优格网化方法:以淮河干流区暴雨洪涝灾害为例[J].自然灾害学报, 2018, 27(3):119-129.
文玉钊, 李小建, 刘帅宾.黄河流域高质量发展:比较优势发挥与路径重塑[J].区域经济评论, 2021(2):70-82.
左其亭, 张志卓, 李东林, 等.黄河河南段区域划分及高质量发展路径优选研究框架[J].南水北调与水利科技(中英文), 2021, 19(2):209-216.
刘德林.基于GIS的河南省洪灾风险评价[J].水土保持通报, 2014, 34(3):126-129.
游温娇, 张永领.洪灾社会脆弱性指标体系研究[J].灾害学, 2013, 28(3):215-220.
李畅, 冯滔, 石倩, 等.洪灾社会脆弱性熵权法评价及其时间序列分析:以2001-2012年湖北省荆州市为例[J].灾害学, 2015, 30(3):110-117.
贺山峰, 杜丽萍, 高秀华.河南省县域单元自然灾害社会脆弱性评价[J].水土保持研究, 2015, 22(6):293-297.
马建琴, 何胜, 郝秀平, 等.基于层次分析和变异系数法的土壤含水率计算[J].人民黄河, 2015, 37(9):135-139.
0
浏览量
932
下载量
6
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621