南宁师范大学 自然资源与测绘学院,广西,南宁,530001
纸质出版:2021
移动端阅览
李文辉, 周兴, 钟锦玲. 2009-2018年中国农用地多功能利用与乡村发展的时空耦合关系[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(5):244-254.
Li Wenhui, Zhou Xing, Zhong Jinling. Spatiotemporal Coupling Relation Between Multi-functional Use of Agricultural Land and Rural Development in China During 2009-2018[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(5): 244-254.
李文辉, 周兴, 钟锦玲. 2009-2018年中国农用地多功能利用与乡村发展的时空耦合关系[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(5):244-254. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.05.033.
Li Wenhui, Zhou Xing, Zhong Jinling. Spatiotemporal Coupling Relation Between Multi-functional Use of Agricultural Land and Rural Development in China During 2009-2018[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(5): 244-254. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.05.033.
[目的] 探讨中国农用地多功能利用与乡村发展的协调水平及其时空异质性特征,助力乡村振兴。[方法] 重构农用地多功能利用与乡村发展指标体系,应用TOPISIS模型测算2009—2018年中国农用地多功能利用与乡村发展指数,引入耦合协调度模型、空间自相关模型分析两者的协调水平、时空演变特征及集聚程度。[结果] ①中国农用地多功能利用指数与乡村发展水平持续上升,二者在空间分布上呈“东部>中部>东北>西部”的特征且表现出均衡发展的趋势。②中国农用地多功能利用与乡村发展协调水平略有提升,各省份已由濒临失调为主优化为初级协调类型为主,耦合协调类型呈“东高西低,中部以湖北省为高值”的分布特征,西部初级协调类型呈由分散布局演变为集中排列的地理特征,优化趋势显著。③中国各省份间耦合协调性Moral’s I始终保持正值,空间集聚程度较高,中部江西、安徽、河南成为区域极化中心,西部与东北多为“L-L”型。[结论] 中国农用地多功能利用与乡村发展耦合协调水平地域差异明显,随着乡村振兴实施进程的加快,有逐渐均衡的态势。统筹推进乡村土地综合整治,开展生态治理与修复和优化产业布局是促进农用地多功能利用与乡村高质量协调发展,缩短区域差距的重要措施。
[Objective] The coordination level and spatiotemporal heterogeneity between multifunctional agricultural land use and rural development in China were analyzed in order to promote rural revitalization.[Methods] The multi-functional agricultural land use and rural development index system were reconstructed. The TOPISIS model was used to measure the multi-functional agricultural land use and rural development index in China from 2009 to 2018. Coupling coordination degree model and spatial autocorrelation model were introduced to analyze the coordination level
spatiotemporal evolution characteristics
and agglomeration degree of the two indexes.[Results] ① The multifunctional index of agricultural land use and the level of rural development in China continued to rise over time
and their spatial distribution showed that the distribution characteristics followed the order of "east>middle>northeast>west"
and implied a trend of balanced development. ② The coordination level of multi-functional use of agricultural land and rural development in China had improved slightly over time
and all provinces had been optimized from the near-imbalance type to the primary coordination type. Additionally
the distribution characteristics of coupling coordination types were "high in the east and low in the west with Hubei Province as the high value in the central part". The geographical characteristics of primary coordination types in the west changed from a scattered layout to a centralized arrangement
and the optimization trend was significant. ③ Moral's I of coupling coordination among provinces in China had always been positive with a high degree of spatial agglomeration. Jiangxi
Anhui
and He'nan Province in Central China had become the regional polarization center
while the western and northeastern regions were mostly low-low (L-L) type.[Conclusion] The level of coupling and coordination of multi-functional agricultural land use and rural development in China has obvious regional differences. As implementation of rural revitalization accelerates
there has been a trend towards gradual equilibrium. Promoting the comprehensive improvement of rural land
carrying out ecological management and restoration
and optimizing industrial layout are the important means for promoting multi-functional use of agricultural land and high-quality coordinated development of rural areas
as well as shortening of the regional gap.
王琪, 王永生, 杜国明, 等.基于人地关系的干旱区耕地流转空间分异特征与驱动机制的地理探测[J].农业资源与环境学报, 2021, 38(2):241-248.
张路路, 郑新奇, 孟超, 等.湖南省土地多功能耦合协调度时空分异[J].中国土地科学, 2019, 33(3):85-94.
陈昕昕.农村内生发展动力与城乡融合发展[J].农业经济, 2018(12):35-37.
单玉红, 王琳娜.农户分化对农地功能供给多样化的影响路径[J].资源科学, 2020, 42(7):1405-1415.
李平星, 陈雯, 孙伟.经济发达地区乡村地域多功能空间分异及影响因素:以江苏省为例[J].地理学报, 2014, 69(6):797-807.
杨忍, 罗秀丽, 陈燕纯.中国县域乡村地域多功能格局及影响因素识别[J].地理科学进展, 2019, 38(9):1316-1328.
霍达.加快实现我国农村经济的高质量发展[J].人民论坛·学术前沿, 2020(13):108-111.
张正峰, 张阿曼.中国县域乡村发展类型及时空变化[J].资源科学, 2020, 42(2):207-216.
武晓雯.乡村振兴战略视角下新疆地方农业多功能性研究[J].北方园艺, 2020(11):153-161.
魏后凯, 苑鹏, 芦千文.中国农业农村发展研究的历史演变与理论创新[J].改革, 2020(10):5-18.
赵映慧, 赵旭朦, 宁静, 等.基于市域尺度的东北地区农地集约利用研究[J].中国农业资源与区划, 2020, 41(3):169-177.
蒲实, 袁威.中国改革开放39年农业用地制度研究[J].中国土地科学, 2017, 31(7):91-96.
黎毅, 王燕, 罗剑朝.农地流转、生计策略与农户收入:基于西部6省市调研分析[J].农村经济, 2020(9):51-58.
窦韦强, 安毅, 秦莉, 等.农用地土壤重金属生态安全阈值确定方法的研究进展[J].生态毒理学报, 2019, 14(4):54-64.
龙花楼, 屠爽爽.论乡村重构[J].地理学报, 2017, 72(4):563-576.
龙花楼, 戈大专, 王介勇.土地利用转型与乡村转型发展耦合研究进展及展望[J].地理学报, 2019, 74(12):2547-2559.
毛锦凰, 王林涛.乡村振兴评价指标体系的构建:基于省域层面的实证[J].统计与决策, 2020, 36(19):181-184.
张挺, 李闽榕, 徐艳梅.乡村振兴评价指标体系构建与实证研究[J].管理世界, 2018, 34(8):99-105.
巴哥尔拉, 刘国勇, 王钿.乡村振兴战略背景下新疆农业农村现代化发展水平测度[J].北方园艺, 2020(17):145-152.
李鑫, 马晓冬, Khuong Manh-ha, 等.城乡融合导向下乡村发展动力机制[J].自然资源学报, 2020, 35(8):1926-1939.
何杰, 金晓斌, 梁鑫源, 等.城乡融合背景下淮海经济区乡村发展潜力:以苏北地区为例[J].自然资源学报, 2020, 35(8):1940-1957.
李志龙.乡村振兴-乡村旅游系统耦合机制与协调发展研究:以湖南凤凰县为例[J].地理研究, 2019, 38(3):643-654.
徐维祥, 李露, 周建平, 等.乡村振兴与新型城镇化耦合协调的动态演进及其驱动机制[J].自然资源学报, 2020, 35(9):2044-2062.
肖丽群, 邓群钊, 林永钦, 等.基于熵权TOPSIS模型的江西省土地利用多功能及其障碍因素动态分析[J].水土保持通报, 2020, 40(1):176-183.
唐跃文, 曹巍, 陈国生, 等.省域农业现代化指数与乡村文化指数耦合协调发展分析[J].经济地理, 2020, 40(7):158.
0
浏览量
946
下载量
4
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621