自然解决方案背景下的辽宁省森林生态系统服务主导功能评估

许庭毓; 牛香; 王兵; 宋庆丰

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.05.026

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

自然解决方案背景下的辽宁省森林生态系统服务主导功能评估

试验研究

- 自然解决方案背景下的辽宁省森林生态系统服务主导功能评估
- Evaluation on Leading Functions of Forest Ecosystem Services in Liaoning Province Based on Nature-based Solutions
- 水土保持通报 2021年41卷第5期页码：191-197
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 中国林业科学研究院森林生态环境与保护研究所,北京,100091
  2. 国家林业和草原局森林生态环境重点实验室,北京,100091
  3. 江西大岗山森林生态系统国家野外科学观测研究站, 江西分宜,336606
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项“天然林保护工程生态效益监测评估及示范”（CAFYBB2020ZD002-2）;国家重点研发计划项目（2017YFC0503804）;中国森林资源核算及林业绿色发展研究项目（2019131046）
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.05.026
  中图分类号： S718.5
- 纸质出版：2021
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
许庭毓, 牛香, 王兵, 等. 自然解决方案背景下的辽宁省森林生态系统服务主导功能评估[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(5):191-197.

Xu Tingyu, Niu Xiang, Wang Bing, et al. Evaluation on Leading Functions of Forest Ecosystem Services in Liaoning Province Based on Nature-based Solutions[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(5): 191-197.
许庭毓, 牛香, 王兵, 等. 自然解决方案背景下的辽宁省森林生态系统服务主导功能评估[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(5):191-197. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.05.026.

Xu Tingyu, Niu Xiang, Wang Bing, et al. Evaluation on Leading Functions of Forest Ecosystem Services in Liaoning Province Based on Nature-based Solutions[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(5): 191-197. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.05.026.

摘要

[目的

]

对辽宁省森林生态系统的主导服务功能进行评估，并分析其作为基于自然的解决方案的意义和可行性，为探索符合中国国情的基于自然的解决方案（NbS）提供理论依据。[方法

]

基于辽宁省2017年森林资源2类调查数据，根据中华人民共和国国家标准《森林生态系统服务功能评估规范》（GB/T38582-2020），应用分布式测算方法，对辽宁省森林生态系统绿色水库、绿色碳库、净化环境氧吧库和生物多样性基因库4项主导服务功能进行评估，并探讨其对于解决社会挑战的贡献。[结果

]

全省4大主导功能价值量分别为：1.71×10

，8.24×10

，3.40×10

，9.69×10

元/a。森林生态系统服务功能整体上呈现：辽东山区>辽西北地区>辽中南平原沿海地区的分布格局，丹东市、抚顺市和本溪市各项服务功能较高，沈阳市、锦州市和盘锦市各项服务功能较低。[结论

]

在全球变化和实现可持续发展目标时间越来越紧迫的背景下，基于自然的解决方案的内涵与生态系统服务对人类福祉的贡献不谋而合。森林生态系统各项服务功能的充分发挥有助于解决气候变化、生物多样性丧失、环境退化等问题。

Abstract

[Objective] The leading functions of forest ecosystem services in Liaoning Province were evaluated

and their significance and feasibility as a nature-based solutions were analyzede in order to provide a theoretical basis for exploring nature-based solutions (NbS) suitable to conditions in China.[Methods] Based on the second-category survey data of forest resources in Liaoning Province in 2017

in accordance with the National Standard of the People's Republic of China "Specifications for assessment of forest ecosystem services" (GB/T38582-2020)

the distributed measurement method was used to assess and evaluate the four leading service functions (i.e.

green reservoir

green carbon pool

environmental oxygen bar pool

and biodiversity gene pool)

and their contributions to solving social challenges were discussed.[Results] The monetary values of the four leading functions of the province were 1.71×1011

8.24×1010

3.40×1010

and 9.69×1010 yuan/year

respectively. The distribution pattern of the services was mountainous areas in Eastern Liaoning>Northwestern Liaoning>coastal areas of central and Southern Liaoning. Dandong

Fushun

and Benxi had higher service functions

and Shenyang

Jinzhou

and Panjin cities had lower service functions.[Conclusion] In the context of global climate change and the increasingly urgent time to achieve the sustainable development goals

the connotation of NbS coincides with the contribution of ecosystem services to human well-being. The full use of various ecosystem services provided by forests can help solve problems related to climate change

biodiversity loss

and environmental degradation.

关键词

Keywords

references

康蓉, 李楠, 史贝贝.生态经济学视角下"基于自然的解决方案"的欧盟经验[J].西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2020, 50(6):135-146.

Tarrasón D, Ravera F, Reed M S, et al.Land degradation assessment through an ecosystem services lens:Integrating knowledge and methods in pastoral semi-arid systems[J]. Journal of Arid Environments, 2016, 124:205-213.

Vu Q M, Le Q B, Frossard E, et al. Socio-economic and biophysical determinants of land degradation in Vietnam:An integrated causal analysis at the national level[J]. Land Use Policy, 2014, 36:605-617.

Keesstra S D, Bouma J, Wallinga J, et al. The significance of soils and soil science towards realization of the United Nations sustainable development goals[J]. SOIL, 2016, 2(2):111-128.

Favretto N, Stringer L C, Dougill A J, et al. Multi-criteria decision analysis to identify dryland ecosystem service trade-offs under different rangeland land uses[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2016, 17:142-151.

Turner K G, Anderson S, Gonzales-Chang M, et al. A review of methods, data, and models to assess changes in the value of ecosystem services from land degradation and restoration[J]. Ecological Modelling, 2016, 319:190-207.

World Bank. Biodiversity, Climate change, and adaptation:Nature-based solutions from the world bank portfolio[R]. Washington DC:World Bank, 2008.

Nuno A, Bunnefeld N, Milner-Gulland E J. Managing social-ecological systems under uncertainty:Implementation in the real world[J]. Ecology & Society, 2014, 19(2), 52.

European Commission. Towards an EU research and innovation policy agenda for nature-based solutions and re-naturing cities[R]. Brussels:Final Report of the Horizon 2020 Expert Group on Nature-Based Solutions and Re-naturing Cities, 2015.

Maes J, Jacobs S. Nature-based solutions for Europe's sustainable development[J].Conservation Letters, 2017, 10(1):121-124.

Song Yinan, Kirkwood N, Maksimovic C, et al. Nature based solutions for contaminated land remediation and brownfield redevelopment in cities:A review[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 663:568-579.

Kabisch N, Frantzeskaki N, Pauleit S, et al. Nature-based solutions to climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban areas:Perspectives on indicators, knowledge gaps, barriers, and opportunities for action[J]. Ecology & Society, 2016, 21(2):39.

Cohen-Shacham E, Walters G, Janzen C, et al. Nature-based solutions to address global societal challenges[M]. Switzerland:IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature, 2016:2-4.

IUCN. Global Standard for Nature-based Solutions:A User-friendly Framework for the Verification, Design and Scaling up of NbS:First edition[M]. IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature, 2020:1-7.

Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-being:Synthesis[M]. Washington:Island Press, 2005:49-64.

王兵, 任晓旭, 胡文.中国森林生态系统服务功能及其价值评估[J].林业科学, 2011, 47(2):145-153.

Davies L, Kwiatkowski L, Gaston K J, et al. UK National Ecosystem Assessment:Technical Report[M]. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, 2011:566-571.

罗明, 应凌霄, 周妍.基于自然的解决方案的全球标准之准则透析与启示[J].中国土地, 2020, 411(4):9-13.

Hobbie S E, Grimm N B. Nature-based approaches to managing climate change impacts in cities[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society (B:Biological Sciences), 2020, 375(1794), 20190124.

国家市场监督管理总局, 国家标准化管理委员会.GB/T 38582-2020森林生态系统服务功能评估规范[S].北京:中国标准出版社, 2020.

辽宁省2020年气候公报[N].辽宁日报, 2021-03-23.

赵景柱, 肖寒, 吴刚.生态系统服务的物质量与价值量评价方法的比较分析[J].应用生态学报, 2000, 11(2):290-292.

United Nations Statistics Division. System of Environmental-Economic Accounting 2012[R]. World Bank Publications, 2017:85-87.

辽宁省统计局.辽宁统计年鉴2018[M].北京:中国统计出版社, 2018:83-135.

郑晓非, 张志全, 胡远满, 等.辽宁省土地利用与生态环境协调发展研究[J].水土保持研究, 2008, 15(4):212-215.

王兵, 鲁绍伟, 尤文忠, 等.辽宁省森林生态系统服务价值评估[J].应用生态学报, 2010, 21(7):1792-1798.

高香玲, 初艳波, 张士利.辽宁省森林生态系统服务功能动态变化分析[J].辽宁林业科技, 2012(1):30-32.

刘润, 王兵, 牛香, 等.2006-2014年辽宁省森林生态系统服务功能价值评估[J].温带林业研究, 2019, 2(2):1-6.

王玲.辽宁省退耕还林建设管理突出矛盾剖析[J].绿色科技, 2019(5):129-130, 133.

赵实.辽宁省三北防护林体系建设成效及展望[J].绿色科技, 2018(5):195-196.

浏览量

800

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

辽宁省矿区水土流失现状及治理方略

宁夏回族自治区“一河三山”区域生态资源本底状况分析及评价

生态示范区的可持续发展综合评价研究

南亚热带丘陵赤红壤区农业可持续发展的土壤水分管理探讨

水资源可持续发展中政府管制的作用分析