1. 山东农业大学 林学院 山东泰山森林生态系统国家定位研究站,山东,泰安,271018
2. 淮河水利委员会 淮河流域水土保持监测中心站,安徽,蚌埠,233001
纸质出版:2021
移动端阅览
高睿瑜, 袁利, 张荣华, 等. 豫东北黄泛区2019年土壤侵蚀特征——以河南省兰考县为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(5):166-173.
Gao Ruiyu, Yuan Li, Zhang Ronghua, et al. Soil Erosion Characteristics in Yellow River Alluvial Area in Northeast He'nan Province in 2019—Taking Lankao County as a Case[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(5): 166-173.
高睿瑜, 袁利, 张荣华, 等. 豫东北黄泛区2019年土壤侵蚀特征——以河南省兰考县为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(5):166-173. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.05.023.
Gao Ruiyu, Yuan Li, Zhang Ronghua, et al. Soil Erosion Characteristics in Yellow River Alluvial Area in Northeast He'nan Province in 2019—Taking Lankao County as a Case[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(5): 166-173. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.05.023.
[目的
]
探索豫东北黄泛区2019年土壤侵蚀时空特征,为区域水土流失防治、生态环境建设和经济社会发展提供数据参考。[方法
]
选取兰考县为研究对象,以多源遥感影像为基础数据,通过风蚀模型、CSLE模型计算土壤风蚀和水蚀模数,以半月为时间单元,研究土壤侵蚀及其影响因子2019年内变化规律,综合分析2019年土壤侵蚀特征。[结果
]
①风力因子变化呈“M”型,第3—9,21—22个半月值较高;表土湿度因子半月变化呈“波浪型”,第13—18个半月值较高;降雨侵蚀力因子、林园草植被覆盖与生物措施因子B均值的变化为“先升高再降低”,前者第9—16个半月值较高,后者第12—18个半月值较高。②风蚀模数变化呈“M型”,第4—9,21—22个半月风蚀较强;全年累计风蚀模数在0~5 186.31 t/(km
2
·a)范围内,均值为153.26 t/(km
2
·a);仪封乡、张君墓镇风蚀模数较高,多分布在水浇地、采矿用地上。③水蚀模数变化呈“先升高再降低”趋势,第12—18个半月水蚀相对较强;全年累计水蚀模数在0~8 028.86 t/(km
2
·a)范围内,均值为9.54 t/(km
2
·a);东坝头乡、城关镇存在水蚀较强区域,主要在采矿用地上。④2019年兰考县共17个半月出现水土流失,占全年的70.83%;第4—9个半月水土流失面积最多;均为风蚀。全年水土流失面积为271.66 km
2
,占全县面积的24.34%;主要为轻度风蚀,占水土流失面积的96.83%。风蚀主要在仪封乡、张君墓镇、谷营镇和东坝头乡,水蚀主要在仪封乡。[结论
]
兰考县2019年土壤侵蚀主要发生在第4—9,21—22个半月,以轻度风蚀为主,主要分布在仪封乡、张君墓镇、谷营镇和东坝头乡。水土流失监测与防治应重点关注此时间内水浇地、采矿用地上的侵蚀。
[Objective] The temporal and spatial characteristics of soil erosion in the Yellow River alluvial area of Northeast He'nan Province in 2019 were analyzed in order to provide reference data for regional soil erosion control
ecological environment construction
and economic and social development.[Methods] The study was conducted in Lankao County. The multi-source remote sensing images were used as the basic data to calculated wind erosion and water erosion modulus using a wind erosion model and the CSLE model. Soil erosion and its influencing factors for each half-month in 2019 were studied
and the characteristics of soil erosion in 2019 were comprehensively analyzed.[Results] ① The half-month U values changed over time
following an "M" shape. The values were higher during the 3rd-9th and the 21st-22nd half-month periods. The half-month value of W showed a "wave-like" change
where values were higher during the 13th-18th half-month periods. The values of R and the average values of B with respect to forest
garden
and grass first increased and then decreased with time during 2019; the former had higher values in the 9th-16th half-month periods
and the latter had higher values in the 12th-18th half-month periods. ② The half-month wind erosion modulus in Lankao County showed a "wave-like" shape. Wind erosion was strong in the 4th-9th and the 21st-22nd half-month periods. The cumulative wind erosion modulus for the entire year was in the range of 0-5 186.31 t/(km2·yr)
with an average value of 153.26 t/(km2·yr). The wind erosion modulus of Yifeng Township and Zhangjun Tomb Town was relatively high
and these high values were mostly located on irrigated land and mining land. ③ The half-month water erosion modulus in Lankao County first increased and then decreased with time. During the 12th-18th half-month periods
water erosion was relatively strong. The annual cumulative water erosion modulus ranged from 0-8 028.86 t/(km2·yr)
and the average value was 9.54 t/(km2·yr). There were strong water erosion areas in Dongbatou Township and Chengguan Town
mainly on mining land. ④ Soil erosion in Lankao County in 2019 occurred in 17 half-month periods
accounting for 70.83% of the year. During the 4th-9th half-month periods
Lankao County had the largest soil erosion area
and all of the erosion in this area was wind erosion. The area of soil erosion was 271.66 km2 in 2019
accounting for 24.34% of the county's area. Erosion was mainly due to mild wind erosion
accounting for 96.83% of the area of soil erosion. Wind erosion mainly occurred in Yifeng Township
Zhangjun Tomb Town
Guying Town
and Dongbatou Township. Water erosion mainly occurred in Yifeng Township.[Conclusion] Soil erosion in Lankao County in 2019 mainly occurred in the 4th-9th and 21st-22nd half-months
and was mainly in the form of mild wind erosion
mainly distributed in Yifeng Township
Zhangjun Tomb Town
Guying Town
and Dongbatou Township. Future efforts to monitor and prevent soil erosion should focus on erosion occurring on irrigated land and mining land during these time periods.
张洪江.土壤侵蚀原理[M].2版.北京:中国林业出版社, 2008.
王友胜.淮河流域黄泛区风水侵蚀格局及其驱动因子研究[D].山东泰安:山东农业大学, 2012.
赵存玉.鲁西北风沙化农田的风蚀机制、防治措施:以夏津风沙化土地为例[J].中国沙漠, 1992, 12(3):46-50.
姬生勋, 刘玉涛, 董智, 等.黄泛平原风沙区不同造林年限林地土壤风蚀与理化性质的变化[J].水土保持研究, 2011, 18(3):158-161.
宋胜明, 刘霞, 张荣华, 等.黄泛风沙区耕地土壤风蚀影响因子的通径分析[J].水土保持通报, 2017, 37(3):249-253.
毛玉磊.河南省黄泛平原风沙化土地形成及分布特征研究[D].山东泰安:山东农业大学, 2015.
袁利, 张春强, 张芷温, 等.淮河流域黄泛平原风沙区水土流失格局[J].中国水土保持, 2019(12):10-13.
张乐.鲁西北黄泛区土壤侵蚀研究[D].北京:北京林业大学, 2019.
樊爱鹏.山东黄泛平原风沙区风沙化状况与生态建设发展研究[D].山东泰安:山东农业大学, 2013.
高睿瑜, 张芷温, 李文龙, 等.2018-2019年河南省兰考县土地利用变化对耕地风蚀的影响[J].水土保持通报, 2021, 41(1):112-117, 124.
张国平.基于遥感和GIS的中国土壤风力侵蚀研究[D].北京:中国科学院研究生院(遥感应用研究所), 2002.
刘宝元, 郭索彦, 李智广, 等.中国水力侵蚀抽样调查[J].中国水土保持, 2013(10):26-34.
曹月娥, 吴芳芳, 张婷婷, 等.基于风蚀模型的准东地区土壤风蚀研究[J].干旱区资源与环境, 2018, 32(3):94-99.
顾治家, 谢云, 李骜, 等.利用CSLE模型的东北漫川漫岗区土壤侵蚀评价[J].农业工程学报, 2020, 36(11):49-56.
李子轩, 赵辉, 邹海天, 等.基于CSLE模型和抽样单元法的县域土壤侵蚀估算方法对比[J].农业工程学报, 2019, 35(14):141-148.
中华人民共和国水利部.SL 190-2007土壤侵蚀分类分级标准[S].北京:中国水利水电出版社, 2008.
0
浏览量
892
下载量
1
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621