1. 南京林业大学 南方现代林业协同创新中心, 江苏省水土保持与生态修复重点实验室,江苏,南京,210037
2. 淮河水利委员会 淮河流域水土保持监测中心站,安徽,蚌埠,233001
纸质出版:2021
移动端阅览
齐斐, 张春强, 刘霞, 等. 基于M-K检验和地统计分析的沂蒙山区降雨侵蚀力时空变化趋势研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(5):146-153.
Qi Fei, Zhang Chunqiang, Liu Xia, et al. Spatiotemporal Variation Trend Analysis of Rainfall Erosivity in Yimeng Mountain Region Based on M-K Test and Geostatistical Analysis[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(5): 146-153.
齐斐, 张春强, 刘霞, 等. 基于M-K检验和地统计分析的沂蒙山区降雨侵蚀力时空变化趋势研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(5):146-153. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.05.020.
Qi Fei, Zhang Chunqiang, Liu Xia, et al. Spatiotemporal Variation Trend Analysis of Rainfall Erosivity in Yimeng Mountain Region Based on M-K Test and Geostatistical Analysis[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(5): 146-153. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.05.020.
[目的
]
分析降雨侵蚀力的时空变化特征,为区域土壤流失监测和水土保持工作提供数据支撑。[方法
]
利用沂蒙山国家级水土流失重点治理区及其周边71个雨量站1980—2018年逐日雨量资料,综合运用冷暖季日雨量公式、M-K检验、地统计插值等方法,对降雨侵蚀力的时空变化趋势进行分析。[结果
]
①降雨量和侵蚀性降雨量成中度月集中性(FI>53,CI>0.17),降雨侵蚀力具有高度月度集中性(FI=399.88,CI=0.24),年内变化曲线呈单峰形,峰顶位于7—8月; ②研究区多年平均降雨量743.52 mm,多年平均降雨侵蚀力3 656.87 MJ·mm/(hm
2
·h·a),空间上呈现北低南高,西低东高的分布趋势; ③降雨侵蚀力年际波动属中等变异,总体呈不显著增长趋势。空间上在西北部上升趋势显著(z>1.96),在南部少量区域呈不显著的下降趋势(z
<
0)。[结论
]
降雨侵蚀力增加会导致区域水土流失风险提升,因此,应针对区域降雨侵蚀力增加区域,加强水土流失综合防治工作,实现生态环境与经济社会的可持续发展。
[Objective] The spatial and temporal variation characteristics of rainfall erosivity were analyzed in order to provide data support for regional soil loss monitoring and soil and water conservation.[Methods] Based on daily rainfall data from 71 rainfall stations in Yimeng Mountain region and its surrounding areas from 1980 to 2018
the temporal and spatial variation trend of rainfall erosivity was analyzed using the daily rainfall formula
M-K test
geostatistical analysis
and so on.[Results] ① Rainfall and erosive rainfall had a moderate monthly concentration (FI>53
CI>0.17)
rainfall erosivity had a high monthly concentration (FI=399.88
CI=0.24)
and the annual variation curve was unimodal
with the peak occurring from July to August. ② The annual average rainfall in the study area was 744 mm
and the annual average rainfall erosivity was 3 657 MJ·mm/(hm2·h·a)
showing a spatial distribution trend of low in the north and high in the south
low in the west and high in the east. ③ The interannual variation of rainfall erosivity was moderate
and the overall trend was not significant. Spatially
there was a significant upward trend in the northwest (z>1.96) and an insignificant downward trend in the south (z<0.05).[Conclusion] The increase in rainfall erosivity will increase the risk of regional soil and water loss. Therefore
comprehensive prevention and control of soil and water loss should be strengthened so as to realize the sustainable development of the ecological environment and economic society.
Liu Baoyuan, Xie Yun, Li Zhiguang, et al. The assessment of soil loss by water erosion in China[J]. International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 2020, 8(4):430-439.
Liu Baoyuan, Zhang Keli, Xie Yun. An Empirical Soil Loss Equation[C]//Proceedings 12th International Soil Conservation Organization Conference, Beijing, 2002.
Wischmeier W H, Smith D D. Predicting Rainfall Erosion Losse:A Guide To Conservation Planning[M]. Agriculture Handbook, 1978. No.537. USDA.
Wischmeier W H, Smith D D. Rainfall energy and its relationship to soil loss[J]. Transactions American Geophysical Union, 1958, 39(2):285-291.
杨轩.降雨侵蚀力计算方法研究进展[J].安徽农业科学, 2019, 47(16):5-8.
李维杰.太行山脉不同量级降雨侵蚀力时空变化特征[D].重庆:西南大学, 2019.
Arnoldus H M J. Methodology used to determine the maximum potential average annual soil loss due to sheet and rill erosion in Morocco[EB/OL]. FAO Soils Bulletin, 1977(34):39-51.
Foster G R, Lane L J, Nowlin J D, et al. stimating erosion and sediment yield on field-sized areas[J].Transactions of the ASAE, 1981, 24(5):1253-1262.
Bonilla C A, Vidal K L. Rainfall erosivity in central Chile[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2011, 410(1/2):126-133.
谢云, 章文波, 刘宝元.用日雨量和雨强计算降雨侵蚀力[J].水土保持通报, 2001, 21(6):53-56.
郭新波, 王兆骞, 张如良.浙江红壤区降雨侵蚀力季节分布与日雨量模型研究[J].水土保持学报, 2001, 15(3):35-37.
史志华, 郭国先, 曾之俊, 等.武汉降雨侵蚀力特征与日降雨侵蚀力模型研究[J].中国水土保持, 2006(1):22-24.
吴素业.安徽大别山区降雨侵蚀力简化算法与时空分布规律[J].中国水土保持, 1994(4):12-13.
杨轩, 梁音, 方继青, 等.基于日降雨信息的月降雨侵蚀力模型[J].土壤学报, 2010, 47(2):216-222.
章文波, 谢云, 刘宝元.利用日雨量计算降雨侵蚀力的方法研究[J].地理科学, 2002, 22(6):705-711.
Zhu Dayun, Xiong Kangning, Xiao Hua. Multi-time scale variability of rainfall erosivity and erosivity density in the karst region of Southern China, 1960-2017[J]. Catena, 2021, 197:104977.
殷水清, 章文波, 谢云, 等.基于高密度站网的中国降雨侵蚀力空间分布[J].中国水土保持, 2013(10):45-51.
董林垚, 郑艳霞, 程冬兵, 等.气候变化对降雨侵蚀力的影响研究综述[J].长江科学院院报, 2015, 32(3):59-63.
温天福, 张范平, 胡建民, 等.1958-2014年赣江流域降雨侵蚀力时空变化特征[J].水土保持研究, 2020, 27(1):7-14, 20.
唐亦汉, 陈晓宏.近50年珠江流域降雨多尺度时空变化特征及其影响[J].地理科学, 2015, 35(4):476-482.
马良, 姜广辉, 左长清, 等.江西省50余年来降雨侵蚀力变化的时空分布特征[J].农业工程学报, 2009, 25(10):61-68.
肖蓓, 崔步礼, 姜宝福, 等.山东省不同地形区降雨侵蚀力时空变化特征[J].地球环境学报, 2019, 10(3):267-280.
冯若昂, 刘加珍, 陈永金, 等.山东省多年降雨侵蚀力及其增长率变化分析[J].自然灾害学报, 2017, 26(5):83-92.
Oliver J E. Monthly precipitation distribution:A comparative index[J]. The Professional Geographer, 1980, 32(3):300-309.
王朋辉, 张陶, 于小磊.近65年桂林市降雨侵蚀力变化特征与周期演化[J].贵州师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 37(2):23-28.
鲁向晖, 张海娜, 白桦, 等.赣江流域1986-2015年降雨侵蚀力时空变化特征[J].长江科学院院报, 2020, 37(10):51-58.
张优, 王娟, 张杰, 等. GIS与地统计学的土壤水分空间插值方法[J].四川师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 42(5):703-710.
马良, 左长清, 孙勐, 等.山东省降雨侵蚀力空间分布特征及简易方程的研究[J].水土保持研究, 2010, 17(2):28-31.
刘正佳, 刘占仁, 王丝丝, 等.基于日降雨的沂蒙山区降雨侵蚀力时空变化研究[J].水土保持研究, 2012, 19(2):34-37.
0
浏览量
998
下载量
5
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621