1. 新疆大学 资源与环境科学学院,新疆,乌鲁木齐,830046
2. 新疆环疆绿源环保科技有限公司,新疆,乌鲁木齐,830000
3. 新疆大学 生命科学与技术学院,新疆,乌鲁木齐,830046
4. 新疆林业科学院,新疆,乌鲁木齐,830000
5. 卡拉麦里山有蹄类野生动物自然保护区管理中心,新疆,乌鲁木齐,830000
纸质出版:2021
移动端阅览
田燕菲, 刘冬志, 初红军, 等. 卡拉麦里山有蹄类野生动物自然保护区金矿生态恢复区的土壤理化性质和植被群落特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(5):107-114.
Tian Yanfei, Liu Dongzhi, Chu Hongjun, et al. Soil Physicochemical Properties and Vegetation Community Characteristics in a Gold Mine at Ungulates Wildlife Nature Reserve in Kalamaili Mountain[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(5): 107-114.
田燕菲, 刘冬志, 初红军, 等. 卡拉麦里山有蹄类野生动物自然保护区金矿生态恢复区的土壤理化性质和植被群落特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(5):107-114. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.05.015.
Tian Yanfei, Liu Dongzhi, Chu Hongjun, et al. Soil Physicochemical Properties and Vegetation Community Characteristics in a Gold Mine at Ungulates Wildlife Nature Reserve in Kalamaili Mountain[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(5): 107-114. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.05.015.
[目的] 调查实施生态修复措施后的矿区土壤状况与植物群落的恢复情况,为矿区修复治理措施提供评价依据。[方法] 以新疆卡拉麦里山有蹄类野生动物自然保护区的金矿生态恢复区为研究对象,通过样方法和室内试验,进行研究区植被特征、植物群落多样性调查和土壤理化性质检测分析。[结果] 与原生对照区相比,经过生态修复工作的金矿生态修复区土壤pH值、电导率、有机质、总氮、全钾的含量普遍较低;植物物种较少,以人为撒播草种的藜科植物占优势;植物群落多样性指数低,与原生对照联系紧密;植物群落主要受土壤有机质、有效磷、速效钾等含量的影响。[结论] 在进行生态修复措施后,青河大沙沟和富蕴大沙沟的土壤理化性质和植物群落改善较明显,恢复效果显著。金矿恢复区由于恢复时间较短,所以植物种类稀少,群落稳定性低,土壤理化性质的含量普遍不高,还需要时间进行恢复。
[Objective] The restoration of soil and plant communities in a mining area after the implementation of ecological restoration measures was investigated in order to provide a basis for the evaluation of restoration measures in the mining area.[Methods] The study was conducted in the gold mine ecological restoration area at Ungulated Wildlife Nature Reserve in the Kalamaili Mountain of Xinjiang Wei Autonomous Region. The vegetation characteristics
plant community diversity
and soil physical and chemical properties were investigated and analyzed through sampling methods and laboratory experiments.[Results] Soil pH value
electrical conductivity
organic matter
total nitrogen
and total potassium in the gold mine ecological restoration area were generally lower than in the primary control area. There were fewer plant species
and the Chenopodiaceae plants from human sowing were dominant. The plant community diversity index was low and was closely related to the diversity index in the native control area. The plant community was mainly affected by the contents of soil organic matter
available phosphorus
and rapidly available potassium.[Conclusion] The soil physical and chemical properties and plant communities of Qinghe Dashagou and Fuyun Dashagou improved significantly after the ecological restoration measures
and the restoration effect was significant. Due to the short time available for recovery observations in this study
there were few plant species
low community stability
and generally low content of soil physical and chemical properties at all gold recovery areas. Therefore
these areas require still more time to recover.
苑塏烨, 白玉锋, 徐海量, 等.阿尔泰山采金矿区植被恢复效果初探[J].土壤通报, 2016, 4(4):966-972.
徐海量.矿区恢复典型案例分析:以卡拉麦里自然保护区为例[J].新疆林业, 2018(4):33-36.
马国飞, 满苏尔·沙比提.托木尔峰自然保护区喀拉玉尔滚河上游河谷土壤理化性状特征[J].干旱地区农业研究, 2018, 36(1):251-256.
丁青坡, 王秋兵, 魏忠义, 等.抚顺矿区不同复垦年限土壤的养分及有机碳特征研究[J].土壤通报, 2007, 38(2):262-267.
Ribeiro R A, Giannini T C, Gastauer M, et al. Topsoil application during the rehabilitation of a manganese tailing dam increases plant taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2018, 227:386-394.
王梦, 张继卫, 李昊宇, 等.哈密大南湖二矿区土壤理化性质分析[J].陕西农业科学, 2020, 66(3):70-76.
田佳榕, 马伟波, 戚旭东, 等.内蒙古某铁矿尾矿库生态修复区的植被恢复效果[J].农业资源与环境学报, 2020, 37(4):601-608.
金立群, 李希来, 孙华方, 等.高寒矿区排土场不同坡向植被和土壤特征研究[J].土壤, 2020, 52(4):831-839.
冯锦, 初雯雯, 端肖楠.新疆卡拉麦里山有蹄类自然保护区蒙古野驴mtDNA D-loop区的遗传多样性及系统发育研究[J].野生动物学报, 2018, 39(4):737-744.
徐文轩, 杨维康, 张弛, 等.准噶尔盆地东部卡拉麦里山有蹄类自然保护区主要植物群落及其特征[J].植物生态学报, 2016, 40(5):502-507.
鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析方法[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社, 2000.
韩轶, 杨永梅, 郭志林, 等.大青山小井沟自然植物群落及其土壤环境特征调查[J].干旱区资源与环境, 2020, 34(12):115-121.
Margalef R. Information theory in ecology[J]. International Journal of General Systems, 1958, 3:36-71.
Greenberg J H. The measurement of linguistic diversity[J]. Language, 1956, 32(1):109-115.
Magurran A E. Why diversity?[M]//Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement. Dordrecht:Springer Netherlands, 1988:1-5.
Pielou E C. Ecological Diversity[M]. New York:Wiley, 1975.
郗金标, 张福锁, 毛达如, 等.新疆盐渍土分布与盐生植物资源[J].土壤通报, 2005, 36(3):299-303.
韩煜, 王琦, 赵伟, 等.草原区露天煤矿开采对土壤性质和植物群落的影响[J].生态学杂志, 2019, 38(11):3425-3433.
Herrera M A, Salamanca C P, Barea J M. Inoculation of woody legumes with selected arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobia to recover desertified Mediterranean ecosystems[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1993, 59(1):129-133.
乌仁其其格, 张德平, 雷霆.呼伦贝尔草原采煤塌陷区植物群落变化分析:以内蒙古宝日希勒煤矿区为例[J].干旱区资源与环境, 2016, 30(12):141-145.
李晓娜, 张微微, 赵春桥, 等.延庆区荒滩地土壤理化性质及其对植物多样性的影响[J].草地学报, 2019, 27(3):695-701.
龚艳宾, 郭建斌, 赵秀海, 等.吉林蛟河天然阔叶红松林草本植物多样性及其与土壤因子的关系[J].浙江农林大学学报, 2016, 33(4):620-628.
0
浏览量
738
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621