广西龙脊梯田区森林类型对土壤水力特性的影响

王醒; 方荣杰; 张帅普; 黄卉; 黄朗; 吴忠军

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.05.013

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

广西龙脊梯田区森林类型对土壤水力特性的影响

试验研究

- 广西龙脊梯田区森林类型对土壤水力特性的影响
- Soil Hydraulic Characteristics of Different Forest Types in a Longji Terraced Field in Guangxi Region
- 水土保持通报 2021年41卷第5期页码：92-98
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 桂林理工大学, 广西环境污染控制理论与技术重点实验室,广西,桂林,541004
  2. 桂林理工大学, 岩溶地区水污染控制与用水安全保障协同创新中心,广西,桂林,541004
  3. 桂林理工大学, 旅游与风景园林学院,广西,桂林,541004
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  桂林市科学研究与技术开发计划项目重大专项“龙脊梯田景观资源可持续利用技术集成研究与旅游产业示范”（20180102-2）
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.05.013
  中图分类号： S714.5
- 纸质出版：2021
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
王醒, 方荣杰, 张帅普, 等. 广西龙脊梯田区森林类型对土壤水力特性的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(5):92-98.

Wang Xing, Fang Rongjie, Zhang Shuaipu, et al. Soil Hydraulic Characteristics of Different Forest Types in a Longji Terraced Field in Guangxi Region[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(5): 92-98.
王醒, 方荣杰, 张帅普, 等. 广西龙脊梯田区森林类型对土壤水力特性的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(5):92-98. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.05.013.

Wang Xing, Fang Rongjie, Zhang Shuaipu, et al. Soil Hydraulic Characteristics of Different Forest Types in a Longji Terraced Field in Guangxi Region[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(5): 92-98. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.05.013.

摘要

[目的

]

研究不同森林类型土壤水力特性的变化特征，为区域生态景观建设与水源涵养功能提升提供科学依据。[方法

]

以广西壮族自治区龙脊梯田区不同森林类型（竹林、杉木林、混交林）和梯田为研究对象，调查不同土层（10，20，40，60 cm）土壤物理特性，分析土壤水力性质差异及其影响因素。[结果

]

①龙脊梯田土壤质地主要为粉砂质壤土；各层次土壤黏粒含量差异显著，而粉粒和砂粒含量差异不显著； ②杉木林和混交林各层次土壤容重差异性不显著，竹林与梯田下层土壤容重均显著大于上层；土壤毛管孔隙度、总孔隙度、田间持水量总体呈现：混交林>杉木林>竹林>梯田； ③竹林土壤渗透能力最强，杉木林和混交林次之，梯田最弱； ④相同土壤吸力下，混交林和杉木林土壤体积含水率大小相当，土壤持水能力均大于竹林和梯田。土壤容重、孔隙度（毛管孔隙度、总孔隙度）是土壤渗透性和持水性的主要影响因子，其中饱和导水率与土壤容重呈显著负相关，与孔隙度呈显著正相关；土壤水分特征曲线拟合参数θ

与土壤容重、孔隙度（毛管孔隙度、总孔隙度）分别呈极显著负、正相关，α与土壤孔隙度呈显著正相关。[结论

]

竹林土壤渗透性能最强，而土壤持水能力较弱，杉木林、混交林均具有较强的土壤持水能力，能发挥很好的水源涵养功能。

Abstract

[Objective] Variation of soil hydraulic characteristics under different forest types were studied to provide a scientific basis for regional ecological landscape construction and selection of water resource conservation forests.[Methods] Different forest types (bamboo forest

chinese fir forest

mixed forest) and terraced fields were selected as the research objects at a Longji terraced field in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Reion. The main soil properties were measured in different soil layers (10

60 cm) to sduty soil hydraulic characteristics and their influencing factors.[Results] ① The soil texture of Longji terraces was silty loam. The clay content of the soil had significant differences

but the silt and sand content had no significant differences in different layers. ② Soil bulk density differences in different layers of chinese fir forest and mixed forest were not significant

but the soil bulk density in the lower layer of bamboo forest and terraced field was significantly higher than that in the upper layer. The soil capillary porosity

total porosity

and field water holding capacity followed the order of mixed forest >chinese fir forest > bamboo forest > terraces. ③ The soil permeability of bamboo forest was the greatest

followed by chinese fir forest and mixed forest

and was lowest in the terraced fields. ④ Under the same soil suction

the volumetric soil moisture content of mixed forest and chinese fir forest were similar

and the soil water holding capacity was greater than that of bamboo forest and terraced field. Soil bulk density and porosity (capillary porosity and total porosity) were the main factors influencing soil permeability and water holding capacity. The saturated water conductivity had a significant negative correlation with soil bulk density and a significant positive correlation with porosity. The soil water characteristic curve fitting parameter θs was significantly negatively and positively correlated with soil bulk density and porosity (capillary porosity and total porosity)

respectively

and α was significantly positively correlated with soil porosity.[Conclusion] Bamboo forest had the greatest soil permeability

but the lowest soil water-holding capacity. Both chinese fir forest and mixed forest had large soil water-holding capacity

and can be instrumental in promoting good water conservation.

关键词

Keywords

references

郭宇嘉, 牛庆花, 陆贵巧, 等.承德市第三乡林场不同林分类型枯落物和土壤的持水特性[J].水土保持通报, 2018, 38(3):38-44.

孙欧文, 蔡建国, 吴家森, 等.浙江省典型森林类型枯落物及林下土壤水文特性[J].水土保持研究, 2019, 26(1):118-123.

周玉杰, 李建华, 王春燕, 等.海南岛3种森林类型的土壤特性及水源涵养功能[J].安徽农业科学, 2017, 45(36):165-167.

杨振奇, 秦富仓, 李晓琴, 等.砒砂岩区主要造林树种枯落物及林下土壤持水特性[J].水土保持学报, 2017, 31(3):118-122.

Yu Miaozi, Zhang Lulu, Xu Xuexuan, et al. Impact of land-use changes on soil hydraulic properties of Calcaric Regosols on the Loess Plateau, NW China[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 2015, 178(3):486-498.

Pinheiro E A R, de Jong van Lier Q, Šimunek J. The role of soil hydraulic properties in crop water use efficiency:A process-based analysis for some Brazilian scenarios[J]. Agricultural Systems, 2019, 173:364-377.

胡传旺, 王辉, 刘常, 等.南方典型土壤水力特征差异性分析[J].水土保持学报, 2017, 31(2):97-102.

Shwetha P, Varija K. Soil water retention curve from saturated hydraulic conductivity for sandy loam and loamy sand textured soils[J]. Aquatic Procedia, 2015, 4:1142-1149.

Olorunfemi I E, Fasinmirin J T. Land use management effects on soil hydrophobicity and hydraulic properties in Ekiti State, forest vegetative zone of Nigeria[J]. Catena, 2017, 155:170-182.

Owuor S O, Butterbach-Bahl K, Guzha A C, et al.Conversion of natural forest results in a significant degradation of soil hydraulic properties in the Highlands of Kenya[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2018, 176:36-44.

纪月, 杜琳青, 田鹏, 等.米仓山不同退耕年限土壤理化性质变化特征[J].水土保持通报, 2020, 40(5):48-54.

卢勇, 余加红, 唐晓云.神奇的龙脊梯田[J].国土资源科普与文化, 2018(1):10-18.

王龙, 宋维峰, 杨寿荣, 等.广西龙脊梯田区森林枯落物水文效应研究[J].水土保持研究, 2011, 18(6):84-88.

邵晖, 黄晶, 左腾云.桂林龙胜龙脊梯田整治水资源平衡分析[J].中国农学通报, 2011, 27(14):227-232.

邓羽松, 丁树文, 蔡崇法, 等.鄂东南崩岗剖面土壤水分特征曲线及模拟[J].土壤学报, 2016, 53(2):355-364.

李玉庆, 蒙强, 张存, 等.西藏林芝地区土壤水分特征曲线适用性研究[J].灌溉排水学报, 2017, 36(10):75-81.

Van Genuchten M T. A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1980, 44(5):892-898.

吕娇, Mustaq Shah, 崔义, 等.土壤紧实度和凋落物覆盖对城市森林土壤持水、渗水能力的影响[J].北京林业大学学报, 2020, 42(8):102-111.

孟红旗, 熊仁鹏, 王崇, 等.采煤沉陷区不同土地利用类型土壤水分、有机质和质地的空间变异性[J].土壤学报, 2018, 55(4):911-922.

孟红旗, 赵同谦, 徐华山, 等.河岸带耕地降雨径流产流特征分析[J].农业环境科学学报, 2009, 28(4):749-754.

文慧, 倪世民, 冯舒悦, 等.赣南崩岗的发育阶段及部位对土壤水力性质的影响[J].农业工程学报, 2019, 35(24):136-143.

牛晓倩, 贾小旭, 刘成功, 等.关中平原农田土壤水力参数空间分异与模拟[J].水土保持学报, 2021, 35(1):198-204.

李源, 宋维峰, 马建刚.中国西南水梯田土壤水分特性研究:以哈尼梯田为例[J].水土保持学报, 2021, 35(2):160-169.

陈印平, 夏江宝, 刘俊华.不同农田防护林下盐碱地土壤水分特征曲线差异对比[J].中国水土保持科学, 2019, 17(5):18-24.

王辉, 杨小宝, 田大作, 等.紫鹊界梯田区不同土地利用类型土壤入渗特征研究[J].灌溉排水学报, 2012, 31(5):123-126.

冯天骄, 卫伟, 陈利顶, 等.黄土丘陵区小流域不同整地措施长期影响下的土壤水力学特性[J].环境科学, 2017, 38(9):3860-3870.

浏览量

865

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

黄土丘陵区退耕地植被恢复过程中土壤入渗特征的变化

黄土丘陵半干旱区典型人工林土壤水分特征

重庆市四面山几种人工林地土壤水分特性研究

EN-1固化剂对4种土壤饱和导水率的影响研究

西藏县域生态-经济-社会耦合协调发展的时空演变及预测