黄土高原水蚀风蚀交错区沙地枯落物的水源涵养功能

王盛琦; 傅文慧; 寇建村; 白玛嘎翁; 乔千洛; 杨文权

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.05.005

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

黄土高原水蚀风蚀交错区沙地枯落物的水源涵养功能

试验研究

- 黄土高原水蚀风蚀交错区沙地枯落物的水源涵养功能
- Water Conservation Capacity of Litters on Sandy Land in Wind-Water Erosion Crisscross Region of Loess Plateau
- 水土保持通报 2021年41卷第5期页码：30-37
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 西北农林科技大学草业与草原学院, 陕西杨凌,712100
  2. 西北农林科技大学生命科学学院, 陕西杨凌,712100
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目“黄土高原水热季节耦合对苹果园白三叶降解形成土壤有机质的影响机理”（31302027）
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.05.005
  中图分类号： S714;S152.7
- 纸质出版：2021
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
王盛琦, 傅文慧, 寇建村, 等. 黄土高原水蚀风蚀交错区沙地枯落物的水源涵养功能[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(5):30-37.

Wang Shengqi, Fu Wenhui, Kou Jiancun, et al. Water Conservation Capacity of Litters on Sandy Land in Wind-Water Erosion Crisscross Region of Loess Plateau[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(5): 30-37.
王盛琦, 傅文慧, 寇建村, 等. 黄土高原水蚀风蚀交错区沙地枯落物的水源涵养功能[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(5):30-37. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.05.005.

Wang Shengqi, Fu Wenhui, Kou Jiancun, et al. Water Conservation Capacity of Litters on Sandy Land in Wind-Water Erosion Crisscross Region of Loess Plateau[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(5): 30-37. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.05.005.

摘要

[目的] 明确黄土高原水蚀风蚀交错区枯落物对沙地水文效应的影响，为该地区退耕还林后生态水文效益的评估提供理论依据。[方法] 以小叶杨（Populus simonii）、柠条（Caragana korshinskii）和白羊草（Bothriochloa ischaemum）枯落物覆盖样地为研究对象，并以裸沙地作为对照，利用熵权法探究枯落物覆盖对沙地水源涵养功能的影响。[结果] ①枯落物最大持水率、最大拦蓄率、有效拦蓄率和最大吸湿比均表现为：白羊草>小叶杨>柠条，但枯落物持水量和拦蓄量则表现为：小叶杨>柠条>白羊草。②枯落物覆盖降低了土壤容重，提高了总孔隙度、饱和持水量、毛管持水量和平均入渗速率。③水源涵养功能综合评价值表现为：柠条枯落物覆盖样地（0.889）>小叶杨枯落物覆盖样地（0.484）>白羊草枯落物覆盖样地（0.228）>裸沙地（0.038）。④稳渗速率、土壤有效持水量和土壤非毛管孔隙度的水源涵养功能权重比例最高，分别为15.3%，14.8%和14.8%。[结论] 枯落物有效地改善了沙地水文效应，在优化水源涵养功能的条件下，建议适宜种植灌木，可搭配种植乔木和草本植物。

Abstract

[Objective] The influence of litters on the hydrological effect of sandy land in the wind-water erosion crisscross region of the Loess Plateau was explored in order to provide a theoretical basis for the evaluation of eco-hydrological benefits after the implementation of the ‘Grain for Green’ project in this area.[Methods] Litter-covered sites of Populus simonii

Caragana korshinskii

and Bothriochloa ischaemum were selected as the research objects

and bare sandy land was taken as the control in order to reveal the effects of litter cover on water conservation capacity in sandy land by using the entropy weight method.[Results] ① The maximum water holding rate

maximum retention rate

effective retention rate and maximum hygroscopicity rate of litter followed the order of B. ischaemum > P. simonii > C. korshinskii. The water holding capacity and retention capacity of litters followed the order of P. simonii > C. korshinskii > B. ischaemum. ② Litter cover reduced the soil bulk density

but increased total porosity

saturated water holding capacity

capillary water holding capacity

and mean infiltration rate. ③ The comprehensive evaluation value of water conservation capacity followed the order of litter-covered sites of C. korshinskii (0.889) > litter-covered sites of P. simonii (0.484) > litter-covered sites of B. ischaemum (0.228) > bare sandy lands (0.038). ④ Stable infiltration rate

soil effective water holding capacity

and soil non-capillary porosity accounted for the highest water conservation function weights

which accounted for 15.3%

14.8%

and 14.8%

respectively.[Conclusion] Litters effectively improve the hydrology of sandy land. The results of this study suggest that shrubs be planted to optimize water conservation capacity

and that trees and herbs can be planted together.

关键词

Keywords

references

Li Xiang, Niu Jianzhi, Xie Baoyuan. The Effect of Leaf Litter Cover on Surface Runoff and Soil Erosion in Northern China[J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(9):107789.

Sato Y, Kumagai T, Kume A, et al. Experimental analysis of moisture dynamics of litter layers-the effects of rainfall conditions and leaf shapes[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2004, 18(16):3007-3018.

栾莉莉, 张光辉, 孙龙, 等.黄土丘陵区典型植被枯落物持水性能空间变化特征[J].水土保持学报, 2015, 29(3):225-230.

Robertson S M, Hornung M, Kennedy V H. Water chemistry of throughfall and soil water under four tree species at Gisburn, Northwest England, before and after felling[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2000, 129(1/2/3):101-117.

高迪, 郭建斌, 王彦辉, 等.宁夏六盘山不同林龄华北落叶松人工林枯落物水文效应[J].林业科学研究, 2019, 32(4):26-32.

刘京晶, 马岚, 薛孟君, 等.不同处理下油松枯落物减流减沙效应试验研究[J].水土保持学报, 2019, 33(4):126-132.

王忠禹.黄土丘陵区典型植被枯落物分布特征及其水文效应[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学, 2019.

杨良辰, 张春茹.沿坝地区3种典型林分类型枯落物层与土壤层水源涵养能力综合评价[J].水土保持研究, 2018, 25(6):177-182.

杨家慧, 谭伟, 卯光宪, 等.黔中不同龄组柳杉人工林枯落物水源涵养能力综合评价[J].水土保持学报, 2020, 34(2):296-301.

Liu Yu, Cui Zeng, Huang Ze, et al. The influence of litter crusts on soil properties and hydrological processes in a sandy ecosystem[J]. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2019, 23(5):2481-2490.

刘军.基于熵权和TOPSIS集成的农作物综合评价[J].安徽农业科学, 2010, 38(12):6078-6079.

Kumada S, Kawanishi T, Hayashi Y, et al. Effects of different mobilities of leaf and woody litters on litter carbon dynamics in arid ecosystems in Western Australia[J]. Ecological Modelling, 2009, 220(20):2792-2801.

曹云生, 赵艳玲.不同灌木林分枯落物层与土壤层水源涵养能力研究[J].水土保持研究, 2019, 26(6):179-183.

Scherer-Lorenzen M, Bonilla J L, Potvin C. Tree species richness affects litter production and decomposition rates in a tropical biodiversity experiment[J]. Oikos, 2007, 116(12):2108-2124.

Yan Yuchun, Xin Xiaoping, Xu Xingliang, et al. Vegetation patches increase wind-blown litter accumulation in a semi-arid steppe of Northern China[J]. Environmental Research Letters, 2016, 11(12):124008.

Tilman D, Reich P B, Knops J, et al. Diversity and productivity in a long-term grassland experiment[J]. Science, 2001, 294(5543):843-845.

王波, 张洪江, 杜士才, 等.三峡库区天然次生林凋落物森林水文效应研究[J].水土保持通报, 2009, 29(3):83-87.

刘宇, 张洪江, 张友焱, 等.晋西黄土丘陵区不同人工林枯落物持水特性研究[J].水土保持通报, 2013, 33(6):69-74.

韩友志, 邢兆凯, 顾宇书, 等.浑河上游白桦冷杉等4种林分枯落物储量及持水特性[J].东北林业大学学报, 2011, 39(11):15-18.

田超, 杨新兵, 李军, 等.冀北山地阴坡枯落物层和土壤层水文效应研究[J].水土保持学报, 2011, 25(2):97-103.

胡淑萍, 余新晓, 岳永杰.北京百花山森林枯落物层和土壤层水文效应研究[J].水土保持学报, 2008, 22(1):146-150.

孙昌平, 刘贤德, 雷蕾, 等.祁连山不同林地类型土壤特性及其水源涵养功能[J].水土保持通报, 2010, 30(4):68-72.

周巧稚, 毕华兴, 孔凌霄, 等.晋西黄土区不同密度刺槐林枯落物层水文生态功能研究[J].水土保持学报, 2018, 32(4):115-121.

何文华, 张洪江, 程金花, 等.重庆四面山5种人工林土壤入渗特性对比[J].中国水土保持科学, 2015, 13(2):50-55.

田育新, 李锡泉, 吴建平, 等.小流域森林生态系统林地土壤渗透性能研究[J].水土保持研究, 2006, 13(4):173-175.

艾彪, 黄云, 朱元皓, 等.赣南丘陵区典型林分水源涵养功能评价[J].水土保持通报, 2021, 41(1):197-205.

浏览量

1017

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

太岳山不同郁闭度油松人工林枯落物及土壤水文效应

冀西北地区不同生态系统枯落物的水文效应

红壤侵蚀区几种水土保持林水文效应研究

老秃顶子自然保护区不同森林类型土壤贮水与入渗特征研究

子午岭林区辽东栎、油松、柴松群落特征及其枯枝落叶层水文效应研究