1. 南宁师范大学 自然资源与测绘学院,广西,南宁,530001
2. 北部湾环境演变与资源利用教育部重点实验室,广西,南宁,530001
3. 广西壮族自治区自然资源生态修复中心,广西,南宁,530022
纸质出版:2021
移动端阅览
林树高, 刘少坤, 陆汝成, 等. 2003-2018年广西城市紧凑度与土地利用效益关系的时空特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(4):300-309.
Lin Shugao, Liu Shaokun, Lu Rucheng, et al. Spatial and Temporal Characteristics of Relationship Between Urban Compactness and Land Application Efficiency in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region During 2003-2018[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(4): 300-309.
林树高, 刘少坤, 陆汝成, 等. 2003-2018年广西城市紧凑度与土地利用效益关系的时空特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(4):300-309. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.04.040.
Lin Shugao, Liu Shaokun, Lu Rucheng, et al. Spatial and Temporal Characteristics of Relationship Between Urban Compactness and Land Application Efficiency in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region During 2003-2018[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(4): 300-309. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.04.040.
[目的] 探明城市紧凑度与土地利用效益的交互关系,为促进地区新型城市化和高质量可持续发展提供依据。[方法] 在推演城市紧凑度与土地利用效益耦合机制的基础上建立指标体系,以广西壮族自治区为例,运用加权求和法、耦合协调度模型分析2003—2018年二者关系的时空特征。[结果] ①2003—2018年广西城市紧凑度呈波动上升趋势,紧凑度指数由0.301升至0.433,高紧凑度城市主要在桂中和桂北,低紧凑度城市集中于桂西北和桂东南两侧,中紧凑度城市环高紧凑度城市分布;②广西城市土地利用效益经历了“稳步优化—加速增长”的梯度提升过程,评分由0.363跃至0.574,土地利用效益呈现“南北高—东西低”的空间格局;③广西城市紧凑度与土地利用效益耦合协调度由0.408低速升至0.504,协调类型从勉强协调向初级协调过渡,各市经历了“濒临失调—勉强协调—初级协调”的演变过程,协调类型总体上呈现“点面—簇团—线性带状”的格局演变。[结论] 广西城市紧凑度与土地利用效益的相互促进作用偏弱、协调关系不紧密,促进二者协调发展对解决城市化过程中所产生的负面问题具有重要作用。
[Objective] The interactive relationship between urban compactness and land use efficiency was explored
in order to provide a basis for promoting new urbanization and high-quality sustainable development in the region. [Methods] The index system was established based on the model of coupling urban compactness and land use efficiency
and the spatial and temporal characteristics of the relationship between them in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region from 2003 to 2018 were analyzed by using the weighted summation method and the coupling coordination degree model. [Results] ① The urban compactness of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region from 2003 to 2018 showed a fluctuated upward trend
and the compactness index increased from 0.301 to 0.433. The high compactness cities were mainly distributed in central and Northern Guangxi
the cities of low compactness were concentrated in Northwest Guangxi and Southeast Guangxi on both sides
and the cities of medium compactness were ringed around the cities of high compactness. ② The land use efficiency of cities in Guangxi had experienced the gradient improvement process of “steady optimization-accelerated growth”
and the scores had risen from 0.363 to 0.574. The land use efficiency showed the spatial pattern of high in the north and south
and low in the east and west. ③ The coordination degree of coupling between urban compactness and land use efficiency in Guangxi area increased from 0.408 to 0.504 at a low speed
the coordination type transitions from barely coordinated to primary coordination. Each city experienced the evolution process of “on the verge of disorder—barely coordinated—primary coordination”. In general
the coordination type showed the pattern of “point surface—cluster—linear belt”. [Conclusion] The mutual promotion role of urban compactness and land use efficiency in Guangxi area is weak
and their coordination relationship is not close. Promoting the coordinated development of them plays an important role in solving the negative problems in the process of urbanization.
田俊峰, 王彬燕, 王士君.东北三省城市土地利用效益评价及耦合协调关系研究[J].地理科学, 2019, 39(2):305-315.
龙花楼.论土地利用转型与乡村转型发展[J].地理科学进展, 2012, 31(2):131-138.
张荣天, 焦华富.转型期省际城镇土地利用绩效格局演变与机理[J].地理研究, 2014, 33(12):2251-2262.
Dantzig G, Saaty T. Compact city:A plan for a livable urban environment[J]. Operations Research, 1974, 22(2):446-448.
Conticelli E. Compact city as a model achieving sustainable development[M]. Cham:Springer International Publishing, 2019.
Ewing R, Rong F. The impact of urban form on US residential energy use[J]. Housing Policy Debate, 2008, 19(1):1-30.
Abdullahi S, Pradhan B, Jebur M N. GIS-based sustainable city compactness assessment using integration of MCDM, Bayes theorem and RADAR technology[J]. Geocarto International, 2015, 30(4):365-387.
Posada H M. Informal housing, spatial structure, and city compactness[J]. Journal of Regional Science, 2018, 58(4):822-836.
Abdullahi S, Pradhan B, Mojaddadi H. City compactness:Assessing the influence of the growth of residential land use[J]. Journal of Urban Technology, 2018, 25(1):21-46.
Salvati A, Coch H, Morganti M. Effects of urban compactness on the building energy performance in Mediterranean climate[J]. Energy Procedia, 2017, 122:499-504.
Echenique M H, Hargreaves A J, Mitchell G, et al. Growing cities sustainably:Does urban form really matter?[J]. Journal of the American Planning Association, 2012, 78(2):121-137.
潘竟虎, 韩文超.近20年中国省会及以上城市空间形态演变[J].自然资源学报, 2013, 28(3):470-480.
唐尧, 宋瑜, 谢俊杰.2000-2010年中国城市空间形态紧凑度变化特征分析[J].生态科学, 2016, 35(3):134-139.
Zhao Fangqi, Tang Lina, Qiu Quanyi, et al. The compactness of spatial structure in Chinese cities:Measurement, clustering patterns and influencing factors[J]. Ecosystem Health and Sustainability, 2020, 6(1):743-763.
黄永斌, 董锁成, 白永平.中国城市紧凑度与城市效率关系的时空特征[J].中国人口·资源与环境, 2015, 25(3):64-73.
田成诗, 李金.大型城市紧凑度与能源效率的关系研究[J].自然资源学报, 2018, 33(10):1781-1795.
曹小曙, 梁斐雯, 陈慧灵.特大城市空间形态差异对交通网络效率的影响[J].地理科学, 2019, 39(1):41-51.
刘润佳, 把多勋.中国省会城市紧凑度与城镇化水平关系[J].自然资源学报, 2020, 35(3):586-600.
杨丽霞, 夏浩, 苑韶峰.基于耦合协调度的土地利用经济效益空间差异分析:以浙江省为例[J].中国土地科学, 2015, 29(11):83-88.
朱文娟, 孙华.江苏省城市土地利用效益时空演变及驱动力研究[J].中国土地科学, 2019, 33(4):103-112.
刘畅, 师学义, 梁旭琴, 等. 基于物元模型的资源型城市土地利用效益动态评价研究[J].水土保持研究, 2015, 22(4):122-126.
梁红梅, 刘卫东, 刘会平, 等. 深圳市土地利用社会经济效益与生态环境效益的耦合关系研究[J].地理科学, 2008, 28(5):636-641.
朱从谋, 李武艳, 徐保根.长三角城市群城乡建设用地时空关联特征及其利用效益研究[J].中国土地科学, 2019, 33(8):63-70.
薛建春, 郑海潮, 王雅荣.基于熵值法的呼包鄂区域土地利用效益与城市化水平耦合协调研究[J].水土保持通报, 2019, 39(3):256-262.
唐永超, 王成新, 王瑞莉, 等. 基于精明发展的城市扩张与土地利用效益的耦合研究:以济南市主城区为例[J].人文地理, 2020, 35(4):91-98.
0
浏览量
963
下载量
3
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621