基于遥感生态指数的东江源区2000-2019年生态环境质量评价

周萌; 刘友存; 孟丽红; 焦克勤; 李奇; 邹心怡

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.04.032

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

基于遥感生态指数的东江源区2000-2019年生态环境质量评价

试验研究

- 基于遥感生态指数的东江源区2000-2019年生态环境质量评价
- Evaluation of Ecological Environment Quality of Dongjiang River Headwaters Based on Remote Sensing Ecological Index During 2000-2019
- 水土保持通报 2021年41卷第4期页码：231-240
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 江西理工大学土木与测绘工程学院,江西,赣州,341000
  2. 江西理工大学资源与环境工程学院,江西,赣州,341000
  3. 赣南师范大学地理与环境工程学院,江西,赣州,341000
  4. 中国科学院西北生态环境资源研究院,甘肃,兰州,730000
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目“稀土矿区典型流域水沙过程与氨氮及重金属多界面迁移机制研究”（41861002）;江西省自然科学基金资助项目（20202BABL203031）;江西省教育厅科技项目（GJJ202015）;江西省创新创业高层次人才“千人计划”项目（JXSQ2018106054）
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.04.032
  中图分类号： X87;X826
- 纸质出版：2021
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
周萌, 刘友存, 孟丽红, 等. 基于遥感生态指数的东江源区2000-2019年生态环境质量评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(4):231-240.

Zhou Meng, Liu Youcun, Meng Lihong, et al. Evaluation of Ecological Environment Quality of Dongjiang River Headwaters Based on Remote Sensing Ecological Index During 2000-2019[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(4): 231-240.
周萌, 刘友存, 孟丽红, 等. 基于遥感生态指数的东江源区2000-2019年生态环境质量评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(4):231-240. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.04.032.

Zhou Meng, Liu Youcun, Meng Lihong, et al. Evaluation of Ecological Environment Quality of Dongjiang River Headwaters Based on Remote Sensing Ecological Index During 2000-2019[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(4): 231-240. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.04.032.

摘要

[目的] 对2000—2019年东江源区域生态环境变化进行分析，从而为该区水源地的保护和利用提供科学依据。[方法] 以东江源为研究对象，选取2000，2004，2009，2014和2019年5期的Landsat影像数据，提取绿度（NDVI）、湿度（WET）、干度（NDBSI）和热度（LST）4项指标，采用主成分分析法与遥感生态指数（RSEI）法，对东江源生态环境质量进行了评价分析。[结果] 2000—2019年研究区的RSEI指数分别为0.356，0.538，0.332，0.608和0.637，生态环境质量呈现上升、下降和上升趋势，总体上生态环境质量明显改善。生态环境较好的区域主要分布在植被覆盖率较高的中部和东南部，较差的区域主要分布在人类活动密切的东部和西北部的城镇区。研究区内优良等级的生态环境质量占主导地位，其面积比例由2000年的0.204 9%上升到2019年的92.346 4%，生态环境明显变好。热度（LST）和干度指标（NDBSI）重心偏移变化较小，为1.616 km和1.482 km，而绿度（NDVI）和湿度指标（WET）受人口密度和开发程度的影响，绿地分布和土壤含水量随着建设用地的开发而开始分散，使偏移量增大。[结论] 在2000—2019年，除城市交通造成周边的环境质量下降外，其余地区较之前都有明显的改善。植被覆盖和城市用地之间的关系是造成东江源生态环境变化的主要成因。

Abstract

[Objective] The ecological environmental changes in the headwaters of Dongjiang River in 2000—2019 were analyzed to provide scientific basis for the protection and utilization of the water source area. [Methods] Based on Landsat image data of 2000

2004

2009

2014 and 2019

four indexes including green degree (NDVI)

humidity (WET)

dryness (NDBSI) and heat (LST) were extracted. Principal component analysis and remote sensing ecological index (RSEI) were used. The ecological environment quality of the headwaters of Dongjiang River was evaluated and analyzed. [Results] From 2000 to 2019

the RSEI index in the study area was 0.356

0.538

0.332

0.608 and 0.637

respectively. The ecological environment quality showed an upward trend

a downward trend and an upward trend. Overall

the ecological environment quality was significantly improved. The regions with better ecological environment were mainly distributed in the central and southeastern areas with higher vegetation coverage

while the regions with worse ecological environment were mainly distributed in the eastern and northwestern urban areas with close human activities. In the study area

the ecological environment quality of excellent level was dominant

and its area proportion had increased from 0.204 9% in 2000 to 92.346 4% in 2019

indicating that the ecological environment had significantly improved. The shift of gravity center of heat (LST) and dryness index (NDBSI) was 1.616 km and 1.482 km

while the shift of green density (NDVI) and moisture index (WET) was affected by population density and development degree. The distribution of green land and soil moisture began to scatter with the development of construction land

which increased the shift. [Conclusion] From 2000 to 2019

except for the deterioration of the surrounding environmental quality caused by urban transportation

the rest of the region had significant improvement compared with the previous period. The relationship between vegetation cover and urban land use was the main cause of ecological environment change in the headwaters of Dongjiang River.

关键词

Keywords

references

Erik Stokstad. Can a dire ecological warning lead to action[J]. Science, 2019, 364(6440):517-518.

Liu Youcun, Lu Miaojie, Huo Xueli, et al. A Bayesian analysis of Generalized Pareto Distribution of runoff minima[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2016, 30(3):424-432.

叶亚平, 刘鲁君.中国省域生态环境质量评价指标体系研究[J].环境科学研究, 2000, 13(3):33-36.

付哲, 周云轩, 刘殿伟, 等. 生态环境质量的空间模糊综合评价研究:以吉林省西部为例[J].干旱区资源与环境, 2005, 19(5):97-102.

李恺.层次分析法在生态环境综合评价中的应用[J].环境科学与技术, 2009, 32(2):183-185.

高志强, 刘纪远, 庄大方.基于遥感和GIS的中国土地资源生态环境质量同人口分布的关系研究[J].遥感学报, 1999, 3(1):3-5.

国家环境保护总局.HJ/T192-2006生态环境状况评价技术规范(试行)[S].北京:中国环境科学出版社, 2006.

张洪敏, 张艳芳, 田茂, 等. 基于主成分分析的生态变化遥感监测:以宝鸡市城区为例[J].国土资源遥感, 2018, 30(1):203-209.

徐涵秋.区域生态环境变化的遥感评价指数[J].中国环境科学, 2013, 33(5):889-897.

刘智才, 徐涵秋, 李乐, 等. 基于遥感生态指数的杭州市城市生态变化[J].应用基础与工程科学学报, 2015, 23(4):728-739.

Estoque R C, Murayama Y, Myint S W. Effects of landscape composition and pattern on land surface temperature:An urban heat island study in the megacities of Southeast Asia[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 577:359-369.

Goward S N, Xue Y, Czajkowski K P. Evaluating land surface moisture conditions from the remotely sensed temperature/vegetation index measurements:An exploration with the simplified simple biosphere model[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2002, 79(2/3):225-242.

Coutts A M, Harris R J, Phan T, et al. Thermal infrared remote sensing of urban heat:Hotspots, vegetation, and an assessment of techniques for use in urban planning[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2016, 186:637-651.

Caccamo G, Chisholm L A, Bradstock R A, et al. Assessing the sensitivity of MODIS to monitor drought in high biomass ecosystems[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2011, 115(10):2626-2639.

张恩伟, 彭双云, 冯华梅.基于GIS和RUSLE的滇池流域土壤侵蚀敏感性评价及其空间格局演变[J].水土保持学报, 2020, 34(2):115-122.

Liu Youcun, Ding Qianqian, Chen M, et al. Analyses of Runoff and Sediment Transport and their Drivers in a rare earth mine drainage basin of the Yangtze River, China[J]. Water, 2020, 12(8):2283.

边晓辉, 刘燕, 丁倩倩, 等. 浙江省湖州市土地利用和覆被变化对热岛效应的响应[J].水土保持通报, 2019, 39(3):263-269, 275.

王宁, 杨光, 韩雪莹, 等. 内蒙古1990-2018年土地利用变化及生态系统服务价值[J].水土保持学报, 2020, 34(5):244-250.

王勇, 王世东.基于RSEI的生态质量动态变化分析:以丹江流域(河南段)为例[J].中国水土保持科学, 2019, 17(3):57-65.

朱冬雨, 陈涛, 牛瑞卿, 等. 基于移动窗口遥感生态指数的矿区生态环境监测与评价[J/OL].武汉大学学报(信息科学版):(202001-08)[2020-12-30]. https://doi.org/10.13203/j.whugis20190122.

Baig M H A, Zhang L, Shuai Tong, et al. Derivation of a tasselled cap transformation based on Landsat 8 at-satellite reflectance[J]. Remote Sensing Letters, 2014, 5(4/6):423-431.

Chen Chao, Fu Jiaoqi, Zhang Shai, et al. Coastline information extraction based on the tasseled cap transformation of Landsat-8OLI images[J]. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 2019, 217(5):281-291.

王君, 杨晓梅, 隋立春, 等. 西安市1995-2016年植被覆盖度动态变化监测及景观格局分析[J].生态科学, 2019, 38(6):81-91.

Masina M, Lambertini A, Irene Daprà, et al. Remote sensing analysis of surface temperature from heterogeneous data in a maize field and related water stress[J]. Remote Sensing, 2020, 12(15):2-31.

Xu Hanqiu. A new index for delineating built-up land features in satellite imagery[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2008, 29(13/14):4269-4276.

Roy P S, Rikimaru A, Miyatake S. Tropical forest cover density mapping[J]. Tropical Ecology, 2002, 43(1):39-47.

徐涵秋.利用改进的归一化差异水体指数(MNDWI)提取水体信息的研究[J].遥感学报, 2005, 9(5):589-595.

浏览量

1031

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

2000—2024年黄河源园区生态环境质量变化及其驱动因素

基于遥感生态指数模型的杨凌农业高新技术产业示范区生态环境评价

基于遥感生态指数的焦作市生态环境动态监测与评价

2000—2020年漳河上游生态环境质量动态监测及驱动因素分析

2000—2020年渭河流域生态环境质量时空变化及其驱动因素