1. 华电西藏能源有限公司DG水电分公司,西藏,山南,856200
2. 云南华辰水电工程咨询有限公司,云南,昆明,650000
3. 三峡库区生态环境教育部工程研究中心, 三峡大学,湖北,宜昌,443002
4. 中国电建集团西北勘测设计研究院有限公司,陕西,西安,710000
纸质出版:2021
移动端阅览
朱蒙恩, 沙利云, 周明涛, 等. 西藏高寒地区不同边坡生态修复类型土壤的肥力变化[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(4):158-165.
Zhu Mengen, Sha Liyun, Zhou Mingtao, et al. Soil Fertility Changes of Various Slope Ecological Restoration Types in Tibet Alpine Region[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(4): 158-165.
朱蒙恩, 沙利云, 周明涛, 等. 西藏高寒地区不同边坡生态修复类型土壤的肥力变化[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(4):158-165. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.04.023.
Zhu Mengen, Sha Liyun, Zhou Mingtao, et al. Soil Fertility Changes of Various Slope Ecological Restoration Types in Tibet Alpine Region[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(4): 158-165. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.04.023.
[目的] 对西藏DG水电站6种不同边坡生态修复类型土壤的肥力变化进行对比研究,为西藏水电工程扰动区生态环境的修复提供理论依据和技术支撑。[方法] 采用实地测量和室内试验等方法,分析不同边坡生态修复类型的肥力变化特征及植被生长情况,并用相关性分析确定边坡土壤肥力时空变化与植被生长情况之间的相关性,探讨影响边坡植被生长土壤的肥力主控因素。[结果] 在6种边坡生态修复类型土壤中有机质和氮元素波动变化均较大,随季节变化呈现先降低后增加再降低的趋势,而pH值、速效磷、速效钾变化相对较小。从不同边坡对比结果来看,边坡的土壤养分含量从高到低依次均为:弃土弃渣地 > 土质边坡 > 一般施工场地 > 土石混合边坡 > 岩质边坡 > 施工硬化地表,不同边坡的植被恢复生长状况方面,与土壤养分含量呈现相同的排序。各肥力指标中氨氮、硝氮、速效磷与植被生长情况的相关性最高,其次为速效钾、有机质,而与pH值相关性最低,说明氨氮、硝氮、速效磷对边坡植被生长效果的影响较大。[结论] 在不同边坡的土壤肥力状况中,弃土弃渣地表现最佳,而岩质边坡和施工硬化地表均表现较差,且土壤肥力中氨氮、硝氮、速效磷含量与植被生长情况紧密相关。
[Objective] A comparative study of the fertility changes in six different slope ecological restoration types was conducted
in order to provide theoretical basis and technical support for the ecological environment restoration in the DG hydropower project disturbed area
Tibet
China. [Methods] Field measurement and laboratory tests were conducted to analyze the fertility change characteristics and vegetation growth status in different types of slope ecological restoration. The spatio-temporal changes of soil fertility and its correlation with vegetation growth were determined by the correlation analysis method
and the main control factors of the fertility in vegetation growth were discussed as well. [Results] The fluctuation of organic matter and nitrogen elements changed greatly in the six types of slope ecological restoration
which decreased first
then increased
and decreased finally with the seasonal change
while the change of pH value
available phosphorus and available potassium were relatively small. From the comparison of different slopes
the soil fertility from high to low showed as: spoil ground > soil slope > general construction site > earth rock mixed slope > rock slope > construction hardened surface. The vegetation restoration and growth status of different slopes showed the same order as the soil nutrient content. The ammonia nitrogen
nitrate nitrogen and available phosphorus had the highest correlation with vegetation growth
followed by available potassium and organic matter
while pH value had the lowest correlation
indicating that ammonia nitrogen
nitrate nitrogen and available phosphorus had the greatest impacts on slope vegetation growth. [Conclusion] Among the fertility conditions of different slopes
the performance of spoil ground is the best
while the restoration of rock slope and construction hardened surface is the poorest
and the contents of ammonia nitrogen
nitrate nitrogen and available phosphorus in fertility are closely related to vegetation growth.
黄润秋.论中国西南地区水电开发工程地质问题及其研究对策[J].地质灾害与环境保护, 2002, 13(1):1-5.
曾旭, 陈芳清, 许文年, 等. 大型水利水电工程扰动区植被的生态恢复:以向家坝水电工程为例[J].长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(11):1074-1079.
梁轶.水电规划陆生生态环境影响评价研究[D].陕西西安:西北大学, 2008.
应丰, 李健, 王静, 等. 高寒高海拔地区水电站施工扰动区生态修复技术及植物物种选择[J].中国水土保持, 2018(1):36-39.
许文年, 夏振尧, 周明涛, 等. 植被混凝土生态防护技术理论与实践[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社, 2012.
Ministry of Works and Transport. Use of Bio-engineering in the Road Sector(geo-environmental unit)[M]. Katmandu:Nepal ministry of Works and Transport, 1999.
赵冰琴, 夏振尧, 许文年, 等. 工程扰动区边坡生态修复技术研究综述[J].水利水电技术, 2017, 48(2):130-137.
周德培, 张俊云.植被护坡工程技术[M].北京:人民交通出版社, 2003:44-47.
张俊云, 李绍才, 周德培.岩石边坡植被护坡技术(2):厚层基材的组成及特性[J].路基工程, 2000(5):4-6.
杨阳, 杨建英, 赵平, 等. 两种框格梁生态护坡技术及其应用效果:以安徽岳武高速公路为例[J].中国水土保持科学, 2015, 13(5):118-124.
吕东旭.土工格室生态挡墙工程性状研究[D].陕西西安:长安大学, 2003.
闫峰.浅谈蜂巢约束系统护坡在中小河流域治理工程中的运用[J].林业科技情报, 2014, 46(2):64-65.
梁爱学, 李统益, 王清茹, 等. 植生带边坡防护技术研究[J].公路交通科技(应用技术版), 2007(4):163-166.
Cheng Hu, Xu Wennian, Luo Ting, et al. Microbial functional diversity as affected by different engineered eco-restoration methods at Xiangjiaba Hydropower Station[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2020, 146(3):1-13.
Luo Aidao, Yan Zongling, Zhai Wenguang. Initial Analysis on the Improvement of Highway Slop Landscape Based on the Ecological Protection[C]//4th International Conference on Sustainable Energy and Environmental Engineering, 2016.
董康, 李师翁, 康文龙, 等. 青藏公路沿线土壤微生物数量变化及其影响因素研究[J].冰川冻土, 2013, 35(2):457-464.
Sharma Sharma, Szele Zaodia, Schilling Rolf, et al. Influence of freeze-thaw stress on the structure and function of microbial communities and denitrifying populations in soil[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2006, 72(3):2148-2154.
张琳瑶, 刘大翔, 许文年, 等. 冻融循环条件下生境基材中3种功能微生物数量变化规律研究[J].冰川冻土, 2017, 39(5):1122-1129.
蔡晓布, 张永青, 邵伟.不同退化程度高寒草原土壤肥力变化特征[J].生态学报, 2008, 28(3):1034-1044.
陈伟, 魏虹, 李昌晓, 等. 三峡库区不同土地利用方式土壤肥力变化:以汝溪河流域为例[J].西南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 38(1):96-100.
Rivera Desiree, Mejías Violeta, Jáuregui Berta, et al. Spreading topsoil encourages ecological restoration on embankments:Soil fertility, microbial activity and vegetation cover[J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(7):e101413.
Li Ruirui, Kan Shasha, Zhu Mengke, et al. Effect of different vegetation restoration types on fundamental parameters, structural characteristics and the soil quality index of artificial soil[J].Soil and Tillage Research, 2018, 184:11-23.
水利部水利水电规划设计总院.土工试验方法标准[M].北京:中国计划出版社, 2019.
Spellerberg I F, Fedor P J. A tribute to Claude Shannon (1916-2001) and a plea for more rigorous use of species richness, species diversity and the ‘Shannon-Wiener’ Index[J]. Global Ecology & Biogeography, 2003, 12(3):177-179.
0
浏览量
979
下载量
3
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621