1. 甘肃农业大学 林学院,甘肃,兰州,730070
2. 甘肃省水利科学研究院,甘肃,兰州,730030
纸质出版:2021
移动端阅览
马瑞, 张富, 周波, 等. 甘肃省淤地坝工程的溃坝风险评价模型[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(4):139-144.
Ma Rui, ZHANG Fu, Zhou Bo, et al. Risk Assessment Model for Dam Break in Gansu Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(4): 139-144.
马瑞, 张富, 周波, 等. 甘肃省淤地坝工程的溃坝风险评价模型[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(4):139-144. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.04.020.
Ma Rui, ZHANG Fu, Zhou Bo, et al. Risk Assessment Model for Dam Break in Gansu Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(4): 139-144. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.04.020.
[目的
]
运用淤地坝工程溃坝风险评价模型,确定淤地坝工程发生溃决可能性的大小,为淤地坝运行管理提供技术支撑。[方法
]
通过调研和对溃坝风险问题的梳理,形成淤地坝工程溃坝风险评价指标体系,运用层次分析法确定指标权重,构建了甘肃省淤地坝工程溃坝风险评价模型。[结果
]
该模型包含水文风险(B
1
)、运行风险(B
2
)、管理风险(B
3
)、工程风险(B
4
)4个风险类型模块(其权重分别为0.12,0.13,0.12,0.63)及其下的16个具体评价指标;水面/泥面距拦泥坝高的距离(D
1
)、剩余淤积库容(D
4
)、有无3个管理负责人(D
7
)、坝体变形(D
12
)分别是4个风险类型模块的最大权重评价指标;对各指标的评分标准作了规定,依据综合风险得分将输出的风险等级和预警等级各划分为3级。[结论
]
淤地坝工程溃坝风险评价模型由输入、分析和输出3个模块组成,层次清晰,架构明确。评估模型的构建可对汛期淤地坝工程风险的评价提供实时预警数据。
[Objective] By constructing risk assessment model for dam break
the possibility of dam break was determined to provide technical support for check dam operation and management. [Methods] The risk assessment index system of check dam engineering was established through investigation and analysis of dam break risk problems. The weights of indexes were determined by analytic hierarchy process and the risk assessment model of dam break in Gansu Province was constructed. [Results] The model includes hydrological risk indexes (B1)
operation risk indexes (B2)
management risk indexes (B3)
and engineering risk indexes (B4)
a total of four risk types modules (with weights of 0.12
0.13
0.12
0.63
respectively) and 16 specific evaluation indexes. Distance between water surface/mud surface and the height of dam(D1)
the available silting tank volume (D4)
the presence or absence of three management directors (D7)
and the dam deformation (D12) are the maximum weight indexes of the four risk index modules. The scoring standard of each index was stipulated in the study
and the output risk level as well as early warning level were divided into 3 levels according to the comprehensive risk score. [Conclusion] The risk assessment model of check dam is composed of three modules: input
analysis
and output
which has clear hierarchy and structure. The construction of the assessment model can provide real-time warning data for risk assessment of check dam before rainfall events.
王志坚, 李冰, 王楠.坝系工程除险加固时标准和洪水组合问题探讨[J].中国水土保持, 2019(11):12-16.
黄河上中游管理局.黄土高原淤地坝安全运用管理探讨[J].中国水土保持, 2020(10):27-29.
惠波, 惠露, 郭玉梅.黄土高原地区淤地坝"淤满"情况及防治策略[J].人民黄河, 2020, 42(5):108-111, 115.
王丹, 哈玉玲, 李占斌, 等. 宁夏典型流域淤地坝系运行风险评价[J].中国水土保持科学, 2017, 15(3):17-25.
杭朋磊.黄土高原淤地坝系洪灾溃决风险评价[D].陕西西安:西安理工大学, 2020.
杨瑞, 李子龙, 王丹, 等. 黄土高原小流域淤地坝系安全评价[J].延安大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 37(1):41-45.
袁水龙, 张卫华, 王湛.黄土丘陵区小流域淤地坝系安全评价体系研究[J].西部大开发(土地开发工程研究), 2018, 3(5):40-45, 50.
钟少华.王茂沟流域淤地坝风险评价与除险方法研究[D]. 陕西西安:西安理工大学, 2020.
段茂志.淤地坝溃坝风险评价与实时预警模型设计[D]. 陕西西安:西安理工大学, 2019.
马建业, 张扬, 袁水龙.淤地坝系安全运行保障技术探析[J].中国水土保持, 2019(5):6-8, 31.
李继忠.安定区淤地坝工程安全运用管理现状与对策[J].中国水土保持, 2019(8):18-20.
惠波, 王答相, 张涛.关于新时期黄土高原地区淤地坝建设管理的几点思考[J].中国水土保持, 2020(2):23-26.
杨稳新.紧抓新时代发展机遇促进陕西淤地坝高质量发展[J].中国水土保持, 2020(9):68-69, 83.
0
浏览量
1130
下载量
8
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621