暴雨条件下灌木对边坡稳定性的影响模拟试验

祁玉超; 兰惠娟; 王道杰; 何松膛; 方迎潮; 陈文乐; 赵鹏; 裴曾莉; 田雨

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.04.009

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

暴雨条件下灌木对边坡稳定性的影响模拟试验

试验研究

- 暴雨条件下灌木对边坡稳定性的影响模拟试验
- Simulated Experiment on Effects of Shrub on Slope Stability Under Rainstorm Condition
- 水土保持通报 2021年41卷第4期页码：61-68
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 中国科学院、水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所山地灾害与地表过程重点实验室,四川,成都,610041
  2. 中国科学院大学,北京,100049
  3. 国家管网集团西南管道有限责任公司,四川,成都,610041
  4. 四川省富顺县城关中学,四川,自贡,643200
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目“大规模灾害风险评估及综合调控原理和模式”（41790434）;中国科学院战略性先导科技专项（A类）“美丽中国”（XDA230090403）;中国科学院、水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所所青年基金项目（SDS-QN-2108）
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.04.009
  中图分类号： S157.1
- 纸质出版：2021
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
祁玉超, 兰惠娟, 王道杰, 等. 暴雨条件下灌木对边坡稳定性的影响模拟试验[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(4):61-68.

Qi Yuchao, Lan Huijuan, Wang Daojie, et al. Simulated Experiment on Effects of Shrub on Slope Stability Under Rainstorm Condition[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(4): 61-68.
祁玉超, 兰惠娟, 王道杰, 等. 暴雨条件下灌木对边坡稳定性的影响模拟试验[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(4):61-68. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.04.009.

Qi Yuchao, Lan Huijuan, Wang Daojie, et al. Simulated Experiment on Effects of Shrub on Slope Stability Under Rainstorm Condition[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(4): 61-68. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.04.009.

摘要

[目的

]

研究暴雨条件下不同灌木种植模式对不同坡度边坡的固坡效应，探索灌木固坡发挥效用的临界坡度，为生态工程措施在山地灾害防治中的应用提供科学依据。[方法

]

通过制作灌木模型开展室内降雨试验，探究4种坡度（20°，35°，50°，60°）条件下4种灌木种植模式（稀植、适中种植、密植、裸坡）对边坡稳定性的影响，并利用考虑灌木自重和根系牵引力影响下的修正公式计算边坡安全系数（F

）。[结果

]

①20°和35°的灌木边坡发生沟蚀破坏，与种植模式无关；裸坡、50°灌木边坡和60°稀植、密植灌木边坡发生渐进式破坏；60°适中种植灌木边坡发生整体滑移式破坏。②在20°和35°边坡上种植灌木能够在降雨过程中有效增强边坡的稳定性，减少4%～70%坍塌量；在50°和60°边坡上种植灌木不仅会降低边坡的稳定性，还会增加10%～33%的坍塌量。[结论

]

灌木固坡不能简单归结为有效或者无效，和坡体的坡度密切相关，因此要注意不同坡度上种植方式的选择。

Abstract

[Objective] The effects of different shrub planting patterns on slope stability with different slope degrees under rainstorm condition were studied to explore the critical slope degrees for shrubs to stabilize slopes

and to provide a scientific basis for scientific biological engineering to manage mountain disasters. [Methods] Indoor rainfall experiments were carried out by making shrub models to explore the impact of four shrub planting modes (sparse planting

moderate planting

dense planting

bare slope) on slope stability on slopes with different slope degrees (20°

35°

50°

60°). The slope safety factor (Fs) was calculated by using a correction formula considering the influence of shrub weight and root traction. [Results] ① Gully erosion occurred on shrub slopes at 20° and 35°

which was independent of the planting mode; On bare slopes

50° shrub slopes

and 60° sparsely and densely planted shrub slopes

the damage occurred progressively; Overall slipping failure occurred on moderately planted shrub slopes of 60°. ② Planting shrubs on gentle slopes of 20° and 35° could effectively enhance the stability of the slope during rainfall and reduce the amount of collapse by 4% to 70%; Planting shrubs on steep slopes of 50° and 60° could not only decrease the stability of the slope

but also increase the amount of collapse by 10% to 33%. [Conclusion] Slope stabilization by shrubs can not be simply attributed to effective or ineffective

it is closely related to the slope gradient

so attention should be paid to the choice of planting methods on different slopes.

关键词

Keywords

references

崔鹏.中国山地灾害研究进展与未来应关注的科学问题[J].地理科学进展, 2014, 33(2):145-152.

崔鹏.我国泥石流防治进展[J].中国水土保持科学, 2009, 7(5):7-13, 31.

崔鹏, 陈晓清, 柳素清, 等. 风景区泥石流防治特点与技术[J].地学前缘, 2007, 14(6):172-180.

Faivre N, Fritz M, Freitas T, et al. Nature-based solutions in the EU:Innovating with nature to address social, economic and environmental challenges[J]. Environmental Research, 2017, 159:509-518.

Ghestem M, Sidle R C, Stokes A. The influence of plant root systems on subsurface flow:Implications for slope stability[J]. Bioscience, 2011, 61(11):869-879.

Khan Y A, Lateh H. Plant root reinforcement against local failure mechanism of natural slope[M]//Engineering Geology for Society and Territory (Volume 2). Springer, Cham, 2015:1275-1280.

Stokes A, Douglas G B, Fourcaud T, et al. Ecological mitigation of hillslope instability:Ten key issues facing researchers and practitioners[J]. Plant and Soil, 2014, 377(1):1-23.

魏丽, 陈双溪, 边小庚. 暴雨型滑坡灾害因素分析及预测试验研究[J]. 应用气象学报, 2007, 18(5):682-689.

吴建召, 陈爱民, 崔羽, 等. 干热河谷常见植物地表形态特征与泥沙拦截的关系[J].应用与环境生物学报, 2018, 24(6):1236-1246.

Keim R F, Skaugset A E. Modelling effects of forest canopies on slope stability[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2003, 17(7):1457-1467.

陈文乐, 杜鹃, 方迎潮, 等. 泥石流频发区典型乔灌植物根系的固土效应[J].水土保持通报, 2019, 39(5):32-39.

Lan Huijuan, Wang Daojie, He Songtang, et al. Experimental study on the effects of tree planting on slope stability[J]. Landslides, 2020, 17(4):1021-1035.

Burylo M, Hudek C, Rey F. Soil reinforcement by the roots of six dominant species on eroded mountainous marly slopes (Southern Alps, France)[J]. Catena, 2011, 84(1/2):70-78.

何群.客运专线全风化花岗岩改良土隧-隧过渡段动力特性及稳定性研究[D].湖南长沙:中南大学, 2007.

吴宏伟.大气-植被-土体相互作用:理论与机理[J].岩土工程学报, 2017, 39(1):1-47.

沈有信, 张彦东, 刘文耀.泥石流多发干旱河谷区植被恢复研究[J].山地学报, 2002, 20(2):188-193.

苑淑娟.4种植物单根抗拉力学特性的研究[D].内蒙古呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学, 2010.

陈晓清, 崔鹏, 韦方强.良好植被区泥石流防治初探[J].山地学报, 2006, 24(3):333-339.

吴景海, 王德群, 陈环.土工合成材料加筋砂土三轴试验研究[J].岩土工程学报, 2000, 22(2):199-204.

Shi Xuguo, Yang Chao, L. Zhang, et al. Mapping and characterizing displacements of active loess slopes along the upstream Yellow River with multi-temporal InSAR datasets[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 674:200-210.

Cammeraat E, van Beek R, Kooijman A. Vegetation succession and its consequences for???は?????????ど??ㄠ????扅爠?孰??嵮?塊畝?堠楐慬湡杮穴栠潡畮???畯潩?圬攠渲稰栰愵漬?′?椸用?天愺欱申渵??攴琷?愼汢?￣?愲渲摝猠汋楩摭攠獄?漠湉?琠桓攬??潥敥猠獃?倠汥慴琠敡慬甮?潍景??桬楩湮慧???汥愠瑣敯獮瑴?獩瑢慵瑴楩獯瑮椠捯獦?瑴潲来敥瑳栠整牯?睳楨瑡桬?慯?挠汬潡獮敤?汬潩潤步嬠?嵥??乬慯瑰畭牥慮汴??慮稠慡爠摳獴????ㄠ????????????????づ???扝爮?孅??嵬??湩湣潡獬???剧??呥桥敲?慮湧挬栠漲爰愱朳攬?漶昱?氶攵攸欭?猶攸攮搼汢楲渾杛猲?瑝栠敓?攠晌晩敪捵瑮?漠晈?爠潂潩瑮?汬敩測朠瑘桩?愠湑摩?獵潡楮氬?獥瑴爠敡湬朮琠桅學?嵥???湥湮慴污獬?潡普??潴瑨慥湯祲?????ぬ?????????????????扣牡?嬠??嵯??敲楴浩?剳????卲歯慯畴札獳敯瑩??????坲敦楡汣敥爠????即瑬潯牰慥朠数?潯晴?督慴瑩敯牮?潊湝?瘠敊杯敵瑲慮瑡楬漠湯?甠湍摯敵牮?獡楩浮甠汓慣瑩敥摮?牥愬椠渲昰愲氰氬?漱昷?瘱愱爩示椲渷朸?椭渲琷改渵献椼瑢祲嬾?崲???撜盢愬渠捤旞猟?椠满?圬愠瑉攮爠?劗斩珎漖生爩掗攴獏???ゐせ???名??????????????戠爳?嬨??崺?圸愭渷朱?堠椸渴瀮椼湢杲??娲栵慝渠权?奬慬晩敳湯杮???畊?剃甬椠??敤瑥?慳汯???愠湇漮瀠祕?獩瑮潧爠慡朠散?捭慢灩慮捥楤琠祳?潯晰?砠敨特潤灲桯祬瑯楧捹?獳桴牡畢扩獬?楴湹?乭潯牤瑥桬眠整獯琠敩牤湥??桩楦湹愠孳?嵩???潬略爠湣慯汮?潩晴??祮摳爠潦汯潲朠祬???び????????????????by vegetation in the humid tropics[J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 1996, 21(8):737-747.

徐则民, 黄润秋, 唐正光, 等. 植被护坡的局限性及其对深层滑坡孕育的贡献[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2005(3):438-450.

Watson A, Phillips C, Marden M. Root strength, growth, and rates of decay:root reinforcement chages of two tree species and their contribution to slope stability[J]. Plant and Soil, 1999, 217(1):39-47.

李广信.关于《建筑边坡工程技术规范GB50330-2013》的讨论[J].岩土工程学报, 2016, 38(12):2322-2326.

Loaiciga H A, Johnson J M. Infiltration on sloping terrain and its role on runoff generation and slope stability[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2018, 561:584-597.

杨宗佶, 蔡焕, 雷小芹, 等. 非饱和地震滑坡堆积体降雨破坏水-力耦合行为试验[J].岩土力学, 2019, 40(5):1869-1880.

Riestenberg M M, Sovonick-Dunford S. The role of woody vegetation in stabilizing slopes in the Cincinnati area, Ohio[J]. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 1983, 94(4):506-518.

卢有谦, 韦昌富, 蔡国庆, 等. 风化花岗岩土的持水特性研究[J].岩土工程学报, 2018, 40(S2):96-100.

Gao Hang, Xu Xiangzhou, Zhang Hongwu, et al. How effective is vegetation in reducing gravity erosion on loess gully sidewall under intense rainfalls?[J]. Land Degradation & Development, 2020, 31(17):2605-2619.

Wang Zhijie, Jiao Juying, Rayburg S, et al. Soil erosion resistance of "Grain for Green" vegetation types under extreme rainfall conditions on the Loess Plateau, China[J]. Catena

浏览量

789

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

中国典型河口三角洲生态系统服务价值的时空异质性

黄河中游沙家湾小流域风沙环境特征及其入沟过程

2000—2023年吉林省黑土核心保护区撂荒耕地遥感监测及水土保持效应

吉林省西部地区新增耕地变化及其驱动机制的多尺度探测

基于CiteSpace的中国荒漠植物多样性研究现状与热点分析