1980-2018年粤港澳大湾区人为干扰度的时空特征

王小军; 张楚然; 廖倚凌; 刘光旭; 王炳香; 余剑

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.03.043

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

1980-2018年粤港澳大湾区人为干扰度的时空特征

试验研究

- 1980-2018年粤港澳大湾区人为干扰度的时空特征
- Spatial and Temporal Characteristics of Hemeroby Degree in Guangdong-Hongkong-Macao Greater Bay Area During 1980-2018
- 水土保持通报 2021年41卷第3期页码：333-341
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 华南师范大学地理科学学院,广东,广州,510631
  2. 赣南师范大学地理与环境工程学院,江西,赣州,341000
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  江西省社会科学规划项目“生态红线划定区景观格局变化及其优化机制”（19GL30）;江西省教育厅项目（JXJG-18-14-5）;广东省科技创新战略专项资金攀登计划项目（pdjh2020b0169）;华南师范大学挑战杯金种子培育项目（20DKKA01）
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.03.043
  中图分类号： P967;X87;TP79
- 纸质出版：2021
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
王小军, 张楚然, 廖倚凌, 等. 1980-2018年粤港澳大湾区人为干扰度的时空特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(3):333-341.

Wang Xiaojun, Zhang Churan, Liao Yiling, et al. Spatial and Temporal Characteristics of Hemeroby Degree in Guangdong-Hongkong-Macao Greater Bay Area During 1980-2018[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(3): 333-341.
王小军, 张楚然, 廖倚凌, 等. 1980-2018年粤港澳大湾区人为干扰度的时空特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(3):333-341. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.03.043.

Wang Xiaojun, Zhang Churan, Liao Yiling, et al. Spatial and Temporal Characteristics of Hemeroby Degree in Guangdong-Hongkong-Macao Greater Bay Area During 1980-2018[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(3): 333-341. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.03.043.

摘要

[目的] 研究大湾区人为干扰因素的时空特征，为解决区域经济迅速发展衍生的一系列人地关系问题及可持续发展提供参考。[方法] 基于土地利用数据分析1980—2018年人为干扰时空特征，利用地理探测器分析人为干扰度空间分异的自然与社会驱动因素。[结果] ①湾区用地类型以林地、耕地为主，但城镇用地和其他建设用地在近40 a增长了4.25倍。②近40 a湾区以中度人为干扰为主，但向重度和完全干扰发展；人为干扰总强度在较发达城市高，欠发达城市低；人为干扰平稳度以高度平稳为主，但不平稳区域在2010—2018年迅速扩张。③人为干扰总强度空间分布主要受夜间灯光指数、交通密度、年均温、高程和坡度影响；因子交互作用主要表现为双因子增强和非线性增强；湾区内部城市的人为干扰总强度主要受社会经济因素驱动，外围城市主要受自然环境因素驱动。[结论] 大湾区人为干扰呈扩张与升高趋势，在地形地貌限制下，人为活动强弱驱动干扰度以城市为中心和次中心向外扩展。

Abstract

[Objective] The spatial and temporal characteristics of human disturbance in the Guangdong-Hongkong-Macao Greater Bay Area (GHMGBA) was determined in order to provide reference data for solving a series of human-land relationship problems and sustainable development caused by rapid regional economic development. [Methods] The temporal and spatial characteristics of hemeroby from 1980 to 2018 were analyzed

and the spatial heterogeneity of hemeroby from natural and social driving factors was analyzed by using GeoDetector. [Results] ① Land use in the GHMGBA was classified mainly as forest land and cultivated land

but urban land and other construction land had increased by 4.25 times in the past 40 years. ② During the past 40 years

the GHMGBA was dominated by moderate hemeroby

but had developed towards severe and complete. The total intensity of hemeroby was higher in more developed cities and lower in under developed cities. The stability of hemeroby was generally highly stable

but the unstable area expanded rapidly during 2010—2018. ③ The spatial distribution of the total intensity of hemeroby was mainly affected by night light index

traffic density

annual average temperature

elevation

and slope. The factor interaction was mainly manifested as two-factor enhancement and nonlinear enhancement. The total intensity of hemeroby in core cities in the GHMGBA was mainly driven by socio-economic factors

and the total intensity of hemeroby in peripheral cities was mainly driven by natural environmental factors. [Conclusion] The hemeroby of the GHMGBA is expanding and increasing. Under the constraints of topography and geomorphology

the intensity of human activities drives the degree of hemeroby to expand with the city as the center and the sub-center.

关键词

Keywords

references

Jalas J. Hemerobe und hemerochore pflanzenarten. Ein terminologischer reformversuch[J]. Acta Societatis Pro Fau-Na Et Flora Fennica, 1955,72(11):1-15.

Sukopp H. Der Einfluss des Menschen auf die Vegetation[J]. Plant Ecology,1969,17:360-371.

刘世梁,刘芦萌,武雪,等.区域生态效应研究中人类活动强度定量化评价[J].生态学报,2018,38(19):6797-6809.

Kiedrzyński M, Kiedrzyńska E, Witoslawski P, et al. Historical land use, actual vegetation, and the hemeroby levels in ecological evaluation of an urban river valley in perspective of its rehabilitation plan[J]. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 2014,23(1):109-117.

Arnold J, Kleemann J, Fürst C. A differentiated spatial assessment of urban ecosystem services based on land use data in Halle, Germany[J]. Land, 2018,7(3):101.

Walz U, Stein C. Indicators of hemeroby for the monitoring of landscapes in Germany[J]. Journal for Nature Conservation, 2014,22(3):279-289.

陈爱莲,朱博勤,陈利顶,等.双台河口湿地景观及生态干扰度的动态变化[J].应用生态学报,2010,21(5):1120-1128.

刘晓娜,张微微,李红.基于LUCC的密云水库上游流域人为干扰动态变化[J].生态与农村环境学报,2016,32(6):951-957.

曾兰,吴良林.基于LUCC的生态环境人为干扰度分析:以广西巴马瑶族自治县为例[J].江西农业学报,2019,31(2):103-108,114.

李鸿伟,赵锐锋,王福红.人类土地利用干扰对黑河中游湿地时空变化的影响[J].干旱区地理,2018,41(2):375-383.

侯伟,翟亮,田莉,等.基于PSR模型的景观人为干扰度综合分析:以北京市为例[J].地理与地理信息科学,2019,35(6):90-96.

宋文杰,张清,刘莎莎,等.基于LUCC的干旱区人为干扰与生态安全分析:以天山北坡经济带绿洲为例[J].干旱区研究,2018,35(1):235-242.

王小军,刘光旭,肖彤.气候变化情景下油茶生长的适宜性特征[J].热带地理,2020,40(5):868-880.

朱孟珏,傅晓婷.粤港澳大湾区土地利用效率的时空特征及其影响机制[J].热带地理,2017,37(6):814-823.

冯珊珊,樊风雷.基于不透水面的粤港澳大湾区景观格局时空变化[J].应用生态学报,2018,29(9):2907-2914.

Dai Erfu, Wu Zhou, Du Xiaodan. A gradient analysis on urban sprawl and urban landscape pattern between 1985 and 2000 in the Pearl River Delta, China[J]. Frontiers of Earth Science, 2018,12(4):791-807.

王文静,韩宝龙,郑华,等.粤港澳大湾区生态系统格局变化与模拟[J].生态学报,2020,40(10):3364-3374.

曹君,张正栋,陈宋佳,等.1996-2015年粤港澳大湾区生态系统服务对景观格局变化的响应[J].华南师范大学学报(自然科学版),2020,52(5):93-105.

肖红克,李洪忠,王莉,等.粤港澳大湾区土地利用及生态系统服务价值的变化:以广佛肇为例[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(1):290-297.

李玮麒,兰泽英,陈德权,等.广州市土地利用多情景模拟及其生态风险时空响应[J].水土保持通报,2020,40(4):204-210,227,2.

周炳中,陈浮,包浩生,等.长江三角洲土地利用分类研究[J].资源科学,2002,24(2):88-92.

刘光旭,毛梦瑶,相爱存.基于景观格局的赣江上游区生态风险变化研究[J].赣南师范学院学报,2016,37(3):72-76.

王秀兰,包玉海.土地利用动态变化研究方法探讨[J].地理科学进展,1999,18(1):81-87.

郭少壮,白红英,孟清,等.1980-2015年秦岭地区景观格局变化及其对人为干扰的响应[J].应用生态学报,2018,29(12):4080-4088.

肖翠,解雪峰,吴涛,等.浙江西门岛湿地景观格局与人为干扰度动态变化[J].应用生态学报,2014,25(11):3255-3262.

徐煖银,孙思琦,薛达元,等.基于地形梯度的赣南地区生态系统服务价值对人为干扰的空间响应[J].生态学报,2019,39(1):97-107.

周建国.耦合环境异质性与人为干扰的云南西部地区保护优先区研究[D].云南昆明:云南大学,2019.

王劲峰,徐成东.地理探测器:原理与展望[J].地理学报,2017,72(1):116-134.

戴尔阜,王亚慧.横断山区产水服务空间异质性及归因分析[J].地理学报,2020,75(3):607-619.

刘光旭,王小军,相爱存,等.赣江中上游地区土地利用变化空间分异与驱动因素[J].应用生态学报,2021,32(7):2545-2554.

戴尔阜,王亚慧,马良,等.中国典型山地土地利用变化与资源生态效应[J].自然杂志,2018,40(1):33-40.

浏览量

1071

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

吉林省西部地区新增耕地变化及其驱动机制的多尺度探测

2000—2024年黄河源园区生态环境质量变化及其驱动因素

中国耕地流转的时空演变特征及其驱动因素

青海省2000—2024年生态环境质量演变及其驱动因素

基于可解释性机器学习的九寨沟景区滑坡易发性评价及驱动力分析