北京市2010-2019年水资源生态足迹和生态承载力

岳晨; 刘峰; 杨柳; 高昀; 郭斯嘉

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.03.038

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

北京市2010-2019年水资源生态足迹和生态承载力

试验研究

- 北京市2010-2019年水资源生态足迹和生态承载力
- Ecological Footprint and Ecological Carrying Capacity of Water Resources in Beijing City During 2010-2019
- 水土保持通报 2021年41卷第3期页码：291-295
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 中国地质科学院水文地质环境地质研究所,河北,石家庄,050061
  2. 自然资源部地热与干热岩勘查开发技术创新中心,河北,石家庄,050061
  3. 中国地质大学(北京),北京,100083
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家重点研发项目子课题“深部碳酸盐岩热储层天然构造及人工干预下综合评价技术”（2019YFB150410302）;中国地质调查项目“雄安新区资源环境承载能力综合监测和透明雄安数字平台建设（中国地质科学院水文地质环境地质研究所）”（DD20189144，DD20190128）
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.03.038
  中图分类号： TV211.1
- 纸质出版：2021
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
岳晨, 刘峰, 杨柳, 等. 北京市2010-2019年水资源生态足迹和生态承载力[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(3):291-295.

Yue Chen, Liu Feng, Yang Liu, et al. Ecological Footprint and Ecological Carrying Capacity of Water Resources in Beijing City During 2010-2019[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(3): 291-295.
岳晨, 刘峰, 杨柳, 等. 北京市2010-2019年水资源生态足迹和生态承载力[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(3):291-295. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.03.038.

Yue Chen, Liu Feng, Yang Liu, et al. Ecological Footprint and Ecological Carrying Capacity of Water Resources in Beijing City During 2010-2019[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(3): 291-295. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.03.038.

摘要

[目的

]

定量评价北京市水资源生态承载状态，为地区可持续发展提供科学依据。[方法

]

以水资源生态足迹作为理论基础，叠加生态承载力模型，以北京市2010—2019年数据为主，分析了北京市水资源生态足迹、生态承载力和水资源负载指数的动态变化。[结果

]

北京市2010—2019年水资源生态足迹总趋势非常平稳，其值范围为0.28~0.32 hm

/人。北京市人均水资源生态承载力在0.04~0.12 hm

/人之间，受降水影响较大。但随着南水北调外来水的输入，该项指标受降水影响的程度有所降低。万元GDP水资源生态足迹呈现上下波动的趋势，整体变幅与北京市年均降水量变化趋势一致。北京市历年来水资源呈现明显赤字，负载指数也远高于10，水资源生态压力大。[结论

]

北京市近几年积极采取措施缓解水资源状况取得了一定成效，但目前北京市水资源形势依然比较严峻。南水北调外调水虽然从很大程度上缓解了北京市严重缺水的局面，但由于北京市水资源存量资本消耗严重，外来水对北京市水资源生态承载力的改善有限。提高水资源利用率，合理调整产业结构，依然是北京可持续发展的主要措施。

Abstract

[Objective] The ecological carrying capacity of water resources in Beijing City was evaluated in order to provide a scientific basis for sustainable development of the region. [Methods] Based on the theory of ecological footprint

the model of ecological carrying capacity of water resources and data from 2010 to 2019 in Beijing City

ecological footprint

ecological carrying capacity

and load index of water resources were analyzed. [Results] From 2010 to 2019

the general trend of the ecological footprint for water resources in Beijing City was very stable

and values ranged from 0.28 hm2/person to 0.32 hm2/person. The per capita ecological carrying capacity of water resources ranged from 0.04 hm2/person to 0.12 hm2/person and was greatly affected by precipitation. The influence of precipitation on ecological carrying capacity of water resources decreased with the input of external water from the south to north water transfer project. The tendency of the ecological footprint of ten thousand-yuan GDP fluctuated up and down

and was consistent with precipitation. Water resources showed a significant deficit

and the load index of water was much higher than 10

with the ecological pressure of water resources being great. [Conclusion] The government of Beijing City has taken active measures to increase the efficient use of water resources in recent years

and some positive results have been achieved. However

the situation regarding water resources in Beijing City is still grim. Although water transfer from south to north has alleviated the serious water shortage in Beijing City to a large extent

the results for ecological carrying capacity have been limited due to the serious consumption of water resources stock capital. Reasonable adjustments to the industrial structure

and further improved use of water resources may become important measures to promote sustainable development in Beijing City.

关键词

Keywords

references

William E R. Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity:what urban economics leaves outs[J]. Environment & Urbanization, 1992,4(2):121-130.

Wackenagel M, William E R. Our ecological footprint:reducing human impact on the earth[M]. Cabriola Isoland, B.C.:New Society Publishers, 1996:2-17.

Wackenagel M. An evaluation of the ecological footprint[J]. Ecological Economics, 1999,31(3):315-320.

李培月,钱会,吴健华,等.银川市2008年水资源生态足迹研究与分析[J].南水北调与水利科技,2010,8(1):69-71.

门宝辉,蒋美彤.基于生态足迹法的水资源承载力研究:以北京市为例[J].南水北调与水利科技,2019,17(5):29-36.

Haberl H, Erb K H, Krausmann F. How to calculate and interpret ecological footprints for long periods of time:the case of Austria 1926-1995[J]. Ecological Economics, 2001,38(1):25-45.

Wackernagel M, Chad M, Erb K H. Ecological foot-print time series of Austria, the Philippines, and South Korea for 1961-1969[J]. Land Use Policy, 2004,21(3):261-269.

孟丽红,叶志平,袁素芬,等.江西省2007-2011年水资源生态足迹和生态承载力动态特征[J].水土保持通报,2015,35(1):256-261.

陈正雷,陈星.山东省水生态足迹时空分布与驱动效应研究[J].人民黄河,2020,42(4):76-80.

周子琴,苏维词,郑群威.2007—2016年贵州省水资源生态足迹的演化特征[J].水土保持通报,2019,39(2):227-233.

宋亚洲,韩宝平,朱国平,等.基于生态足迹的江苏省渔业资源可持续利用评价[J].水生态学杂志,2010,31(2):17-22.

张天海,刘刚,唐立娜,等.基于时间序列计算的厦门市生态足迹动态研究[J].安全与环境学报,2018,18(2):800-806.

焦士兴.河南省水生态足迹测度及其驱动效应分析[J]. 水文,2020,40(1):91-96.

朱晛亭,宁立波,孙丽苹,等.安阳市地热开发区浅层地下水资源生态足迹研究[J].湖南师范大学学报(自然科学版),2018,41(3):9-15.

吕金波.以水为魂的首都城市:北京[J].化石,2020(1):46-50.

王洪波.基于改进型生态足迹模型的北京市生态足迹分析与评价[D].北京:首都经济贸易大学,2013.

焦士兴,陈林芳,王安周,等.中原城市群水资源生态足迹变化及驱动研究[J].人民黄河,2020,11:124-128.

黄林楠,张伟新,姜翠玲,等.水资源生态足迹计算方法[J].生态学报,2008,28(3):1279-1286.

雷亚君,张永福,张敏惠,等.新疆水资源生态足迹核算与预测[J].干旱地区农业研究,2017,35(5):142-150.

李玉平,王晓妍,朱琛,等.邢台市水资源生态足迹核算与预测研究[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(3):227-230.

王先庆,李博,李进,等.基于生态足迹模型的水资源可持续利用分析[J].人民长江,2019,50(5):107-112.

张军,张仁陟,周冬梅.基于生态足迹法的疏勒河流域水资源承载力评价[J].草业学报,2012,21(4):267-274.

庄庆威,吴世新,罗格平,等.新疆绿洲变化与资源配置协调性分析[J].干旱区地理, 2020,43(5):1298-1306.

张军,周冬梅,张仁陟.黑河流域2004—2010年水足迹和水资源承载力动态特征分析[J].中国沙漠,2012,32(6):1779-1785.

浏览量

1400

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

北京市红门川流域径流对防护林结构变化的响应

北京市“7·21”特大暴雨对城市水土保持和监测工作的启示

北京市3个区域油松枯落物保水功能对比分析

基于选择试验法的北京市城乡居民耕地保护支付意愿研究

基于最小累积阻力差值模型的北京市生态安全格局构建