1. 甘肃省基础地理信息中心,甘肃,兰州,730000
2. 昆明理工大学 国土资源工程学院,云南,昆明,650032
纸质出版:2021
移动端阅览
李娟, 龚纯伟. 祁连山国家公园植被覆盖变化地形分异效应[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(3):228-237.
Li Juan, Gong Chunwei. Effects of Terrain Factors on Vegetation Cover Change in National Park of Qilian Mountains[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(3): 228-237.
李娟, 龚纯伟. 祁连山国家公园植被覆盖变化地形分异效应[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(3):228-237. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.03.031.
Li Juan, Gong Chunwei. Effects of Terrain Factors on Vegetation Cover Change in National Park of Qilian Mountains[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(3): 228-237. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.03.031.
[目的] 分析祁连山国家公园不同时间植被覆盖变化情况以及不同高程、坡度、坡向等地形条件下植被覆盖变化的空间分异性,为祁连山生态环境修复和保护提供参考依据和数据支撑。[方法] 利用祁连山2006,2014,2019年3期遥感影像,采用像元二分模型估算植被覆盖度,结合趋势分析法和地形面积修正法,对不同地形条件下植被覆盖空间分异性及变化特征进行分析。[结果] ①祁连山植被覆盖度空间分布格局为西北部低,东南部高,总体以较低植被覆盖度为主。2006—2019年,祁连山植被覆盖度整体呈增加趋势,增加面积约占46.7%,减少面积约占33.3%,植被恢复状况较好,其中,低和较低植被覆盖度面积减小,其他等级植被覆盖度面积均有不同程度的增加。②祁连山植被覆盖变化在不同高程范围内存在明显差异:3 200 m以下中低海拔区域呈增加趋势,2 200 m以下低海拔区域增加特别明显;3 700 m以上中高海拔区域则呈减少趋势,且海拔越高减少趋势越明显。③随着坡度的增加,祁连山植被覆盖变化趋势由增加转为稳定再转为减少。坡度15°以下区域呈增加趋势;坡度25°以上区域呈减少趋势;坡度40°以上区域减少趋势尤其明显;坡度15°~25°范围内分布相对稳定。④从坡向来看,除平地外,祁连山植被覆盖变化类型在其他坡向上的差异较小。[结论] 祁连山植被覆盖变化在高程、坡度等地形条件下差异明显,坡向的地形效应不明显。
[Objective] The change in vegetation cover at different time and the spatial variability of vegetation cover change due to different terrain factors such as elevation
slope
and aspect were analyzed in order to provide reference and data support for the restoration and protection of the ecological environment of the national park of Qilian Mountains. [Methods] Based on remote sensing images of the Qilian Mountains in 2006
2014
and 2019
the pixel dichotomy model was used to estimate vegetation cover
combined with the trend analysis method and the terrain area correction method in order to analyze the spatial distribution and variation characteristics of vegetation cover under different terrain conditions. [Results] ① Vegetation cover was low in the northwest and high in the southeast of Qilian Mountains. Most of the regions were covered with lower vegetation cover. Vegetation cover showed an increasing trend from 2006 to 2019. The increasing areas accounted for about 46.7% of the total area
and the decreasing areas accounted for about 33.3% of the total area. Vegetation recovery was good during this period. The area of low and lower vegetation cover decreased
while the areas of other cover levels increased to varying degrees. ② There were significant differences in vegetation cover at different elevation ranges: The low-middle elevation areas below 3 200 meters showed an increasing trend
and the low elevation areas below 2 200 meters increased significantly
while the middle-high elevation areas above 3 700 meters showed a decreasing trend. The decreasing trend was more obvious at higher altitudes. ③ As slope increased
the trend in vegetation cover change shifted from increasing to stable
and then turned to decreasing in the steep slopes. The vegetation cover change showed an increasing trend in the areas below 15° and a decreasing trend in the areas above 25°
and the decreasing trend was particularly obvious above 40°. For areas with slopes ranging between 15° and 25°
the distribution of types of vegetation cover change was relatively stable. ④ For the different slope aspects
there were no obvious distribution differences for different vegetation cover change types except in the flat land area. [Conclusion] The effects of elevation and slope factors on vegetation cover change were obvious. However
the effect of aspect factor was not obvious.
桂娟,王旭峰,李宗省,等.典型冰冻圈地区植被变化对人类活动的响应研究:以祁连山为例[J].冰川冻土,2019,41(5):1235-1243.
李卓,张继超,孙然好,等.气候和地形对植被覆盖动态演化的影响研究[J].生态科学,2017,36(6):35-43.
Meyer W B, Li B L T. Human population growth and global land-use/cover change[J]. Annual Review of Ecology & Systematics, 1992,23(23):39-61.
Mu Shaojie, Yang Hongfei, Li Jianlong, et al. Spatio-temporal dynamics of vegetation coverage and its relationship with climate factors in Inner Mongolia, China[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2013,23(2):231-246.
李苗苗,吴炳方,颜长珍.密云水库上游植被覆盖度的遥感估算[J].资源科学,2004,26(4):153-159.
李娟,龚纯伟.兰州市南北两山植被覆盖度动态变化遥感监测[J].测绘科学,2011,36(2):175-177.
谭清梅,刘红玉,张华兵,等.基于遥感的江苏省滨海湿地景观植被覆盖度分级研究[J].遥感技术与应用,2013,28(5):934-940.
王朗,傅伯杰,吕一河,等.生态恢复背景下陕北地区植被覆盖的时空变化[J].应用生态学报,2010,21(8):2109-2116.
丁永建,叶佰生.祁连山中部地区40年来气候变化及其对径流的影响[J].冰川冻土,2000,22(3):193-199.
戴声佩,张勃,王海军,等.基于SPOT NDVI的祁连山草地植被覆盖时空变化趋势分析[J].地理科学进展,2010,29(9):1075-1080.
赵婷,白红英,邓晨晖,等.2002-2016年秦岭山地植被覆盖变化地形分异效应[J].生态学报,2019,9(12):4499-4509.
孟浩斌,周启刚,李明慧,等.基于MODIS像元尺度的三峡库区植被覆盖度变化的地形分布特征[J].长江流域资源与环境,2020,29(8):1790-1799.
陈学兄,毕如田,张小军,等.太原市城区植被覆盖变化地形分异效应[J].水土保持通报,2020,40(5):299-309.
熊俊楠,张昊,彭超,等.汶川地震灾区植被覆盖度变化与地形因子的关系[J].水土保持通报,2018,38(3):24-31.
陈京华,贾文雄,赵珍,等.1982-2006年祁连山植被覆盖的时空变化特征研究[J].地球科学进展,2015,30(7):834-845.
邱丽莎,张立峰,何毅,等.2000-2017年祁连山植被动态变化遥感监测[J].遥感信息,2019,34(4):97-107.
付建新,曹广超,郭文炯.1998-2017年祁连山南坡不同海拔、坡度和坡向生长季NDVI变化及其与气象因子的关系[J].应用生态学报,2020,31(4):1203-1212.
张禹舜,贾文雄,赵一飞,等.基于CASA模型研究祁连山地区植被净初级生产力的时空变化[J].西北植物学报,2014,34(10):2085-2091.
吴昀昭,田庆久. ETM
+
数据绝对反射率反演方法分析[J].测绘科学,2004,19(2):27-31.
李娟.兰州市南北两山植被覆盖度动态变化遥感监测[J].矿山测量,2010,23(1):34-37.
彭继达,张春桂.基于高分一号遥感影像的植被覆盖遥感监测:以厦门市为例[J].国土资源遥感,2019,31(4):137-142.
朱林富,谢世友,杨华,等.基于MODIS EVI的重庆植被覆盖变化的地形效应[J].自然资源学报,2017,32(12):2023-2033.
魏建瑛,徐建英,樊斐斐.卧龙自然保护区植被覆盖度变化及其对地形因子的响应[J].长江流域资源与环境, 2019,28(2):440-449.
0
浏览量
1115
下载量
11
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621