云南省高原地理过程与环境变化重点实验室, 云南师范大学 地理学部,昆明,650500
纸质出版:2021
移动端阅览
何停, 范弢, 徐宗恒, 等. 滇东石漠化坡地浅层裂隙漏失土壤的抗剪强度及其影响因素[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(3):31-39.
He Ting, Fan Tao, Xu Zongheng, et al. Loss Soil Shear Strength and Its Influencing Factors in Shallow Fractures of Rocky Desertification Slopes in Eastern Yunnan Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(3): 31-39.
何停, 范弢, 徐宗恒, 等. 滇东石漠化坡地浅层裂隙漏失土壤的抗剪强度及其影响因素[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(3):31-39. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.03.005.
He Ting, Fan Tao, Xu Zongheng, et al. Loss Soil Shear Strength and Its Influencing Factors in Shallow Fractures of Rocky Desertification Slopes in Eastern Yunnan Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(3): 31-39. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.03.005.
[目的] 探讨滇东岩溶断陷盆地植被恢复对改善浅层裂隙土壤理化性质及增强土壤抗剪强度的影响,为减缓土壤漏失,有效遏制该区石漠化态势提供科学参考。[方法] 通过野外调查取样和室内土壤团聚体湿筛、土壤抗剪试验等方法,分析云南松次生林、小铁仔灌丛裂隙土壤基本性质、土壤抗剪性能的垂直变化特征。[结果] ①植被恢复能改善裂隙土壤理化性质,但随着土层深度的变化出现差异。两对比群落裂隙土壤中有机质、砂粒含量、水稳性团聚体(>0.25 mm)随着土层深度的加深呈递减趋势,土壤黏粒含量、水稳性团聚体(<0.25 mm)呈递增趋势;云南松次生林裂隙土壤砂粒(55.46%)、有机质(19.63 g/kg)、水稳性团聚体(76.51%)含量>小铁仔灌丛裂隙(50.16%,11.31 g/kg,67.57%),粉粒(17.55%)、黏粒(26.99%)、小颗粒团聚体(23.49%)含量<小铁仔灌丛裂隙(22.56%,27.27%,31.43%)。②两对比群落裂隙土壤黏聚力都随着土壤黏粒、水稳性细颗粒团聚体的增多而增大(p<0.05),土壤内摩擦角随着砂粒、有机质、水稳性大颗粒团聚体的减少而逐渐减小(p<0.05)。③两对比群落裂隙土壤抗剪强度随土层深度的加深而减小,但云南松群落在提升浅层裂隙土壤抗剪性能上要优于灌丛群落,尤其是在中层和深层裂隙土壤,云南松群落抗剪强度大于小铁仔灌丛,两对比群落裂隙的抗剪强度差异性极显著(p<0.01)。[结论] 在滇东断陷盆地石漠化地区,乔林群落更有助于改善中层和深层土壤理化性质,提高土壤抗剪强度,减缓浅层裂隙土壤漏失效应更显著。
[Objective] The influence of vegetation restoration on soil physical and chemical properties of shallow fissures and soil shear strength in karst-faulted basins in Eastern Yunnan Province was explored in order to provide a scientific reference for the mitigation of soil loss and the effective control of rocky desertification in this area. [Methods] The vertical variation characteristics of soil properties and soil shear resistance in the shrub crannies of a secondary forest of Pinus yunnanensis and Myrsine africanan shrub were analyzed by field sampling
indoor wet screening of soil aggregates and soil shear test. [Results] ① Vegetation restoration could improve the physical and chemical properties of fractured soil
but there were differences with changes in soil depth. Organic matter
sand content
and water stable aggregates (>0.25 mm) in the fissured soil of two different vegetation communities decreased with increasing soil depth
while the clay content and water stable aggregates (<0.25 mm) increased with soil depth. The contents of sand particles (55.46%)
organic matter (19.63 g/kg)
and water stable aggregates (>0.25 mm
76.51%) in cracked soil of a secondary forest of P. yunnanensis were more than M. africanan shrub (50.16%
11.31 g/kg
67.57%
respectively). The contents of silt (17.55%)
clay (26.99%)
and small water stable aggregates (23.49%) were more than M. africanan shrub (22.56%
27.27%
31.43%). ② The cohesion of fractured soil in both communities increased with the increaseing water stable aggregates (>0.25 mm) (p<0.05)
and the friction angle of soil decreased with decreasing aggregates of sand
organic matter
and water stable aggregates (<0.25 mm) (p<0.05). ③ The shear strength of the fissured soil in the two communities decreased with increasing soil depth
and the secondary forest of P. yunnanensis community was better than the shrub community in improving the shear strength of the shallow fissured soil
especially in the middle and deep fissured soil. The shear strength of the secondary forest of P. yunnanensis > M. africanan shrub fissure. The difference in shear strength of the fissured soil in the two communities was very significant (p<0.01). [Conclusion] In the rocky desertification region of the fault basin in Eastern Yunnan Province
the arbor community is more helpful in improving the physical and chemical properties of the middle and deep soil
improving soil shear strength
and alleviating the loss of shallow fissured soil.
王宇,张贵.滇东岩溶石山地区石漠化特征及成因[J].地球科学进展,2003,18(6):933-938.
Worthington S R H. Diagnostic hydrogeologic characteristics of a Karst aquifer(Kentucky, USA)[J]. Hydrogeology Journal, 2009,17(7):1665-1678.
Fackrell J K, Glenn C R, Thomas D, et al. Stable isotopes of precipitation and groundwater provide new insight into groundwater recharge and flow in a structurally complex hydrogeologic system:West Hawai'i, USA[J]. Hydrogeology Journal, 2020,28(4):1191-1207.
Wang Jianxiu, Zou Baoping, Liu Yan, et al. Erosion-creep-collapse mechanism of underground soil loss for the karst rocky desertification in Chenqi village, Puding County, Guizhou, China[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2014,72(8):2751-2764.
Zhang Xinbao, Bai Xiaoyong, He Xiubin. Soil creeping in the weathering crust of carbonate rocks and underground soil losses in the Karst mountain areas of Southwest China[J]. Carbonates and Evaporites, 2011,26(2):149-153.
Fu Z Y, Chen H S, Zhang W, et al. Subsurface flow in a soil-mantled subtropical dolomite karst slope:A field rainfall simulation study[J]. Geomorphology, 2015,250:1-14.
Zhou Jie, Tang Yiqun, Yang Ping, et al. Inference of creep mechanism in underground soil loss of karst conduits (Ⅰ):Conceptual model[J]. Natural Hazards, 2012,62(3):1191-1215.
陈晨,杨苑君,陈奇伯,等.典型石漠化区土壤理化性质对其抗剪性能的影响[J].西部林业科学,2020,49(2):91-98.
Dai Quanhou, Peng Xudong, Zhao Longshan, et al. Effects of underground pore fissures on soil erosion and sediment yield on karst slopes[J]. Land Degradation & Development, 2017,28(7):1922-1932.
高华端,孙泉忠,袁勇.喀斯特地区不同土地利用类型土壤侵蚀特征研究[J].水土保持通报,2010,30(2):92-96.
Fattet M, Fu Y, Ghestem M, et al. Effects of vegetation type on soil resistance to erosion:Relationship between aggregate stability and shear strength[J]. Catena, 2011,87(1):60-69.
胡芳,杜虎,曾馥平,等.典型喀斯特峰丛洼地不同植被恢复对土壤养分含量和微生物多样性的影响[J].生态学报,2018,38(6):2170-2179.
胡阳,邓艳,蒋忠诚,等.典型岩溶山区植被恢复对土壤团聚体分布及稳定性的影响[J].水土保持通报,2015,35(1):61-67.
冯娜,刘冬冬,赵荣存,等.岩溶山地植被恢复中碳酸盐岩红土入渗特征及其影响因素[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(6):162-169.
张海东,于东升,董林林,等.侵蚀红壤恢复区植被垂直结构对土壤恢复特征的影响[J].土壤,2014,46(6):1142-1148.
吕文凯,周金星,万龙,关颖慧,等.滇东岩溶断陷盆地水资源脆弱性评价[J].地球学报,2020,12(17):1-11.
李强,蒲俊兵,黄妮,等.断陷盆地生态环境地质分异及石漠化演变机理的研究途径[J].地球科学进展,2017,32(9):899-907.
毛瑢,孟广涛,周跃.云南省金沙江流域水土流失防治对策研究[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(1):184-185.
Lukina N V, Orlova M A, Bakhmet O N, et al. The influence of vegetation on the forest soil properties in the Republic of Karelia [J]. Eurasian Soil Science, 2019,52(7):793-807.
王震洪,段昌群,文传浩,等.滇中3种人工林群落控制土壤侵蚀和改良土壤效应[J].水土保持通报,2001,21(2):23-27.
李焱秋,戴全厚,任青青,等.喀斯特浅层裂隙土壤垂向渗透性及影响因素[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(3):150-155.
张晓勉,张金池,王云南,等.钱塘江源头主要植被类型土壤抗剪强度研究[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(4):79-84.
王楠,赵友朋,郭晓平,等.土壤含水率和干容重对不同植被类型边坡土壤抗剪强度的影响[J].水土保持通报,2018,38(6):88-94.
李想,王瑄,盛世博,等.不同土地利用方式土壤抗剪强度及其影响因子分析[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(5):102-106.
吴丽萍,陈洪松,付智勇,等.喀斯特岩溶裂隙对地下径流和氮素垂直渗漏的影响[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(5):64-71.
Yan Youjin, Dai Quanhou, Wang Xiangdong, et al. Response of shallow karst fissure soil quality to secondary succession in a degraded karst area of Southwestern China [J]. Geoderma, 2019,348:76-85.
雷俐,魏兴琥,徐喜珍,等.粤北岩溶山地土壤垂直渗漏与粒度变化特征[J].地理研究,2013,32(12):2204-2214.
杨宇琼,戴全厚,严友进,等.黔中喀斯特坡地浅层裂隙土壤机械组成对降雨的响应[J].应用生态学报,2019,30(2):545-552.
徐宗恒,黄丽苹,杨正辉,等.不同根系含量对山原红壤抗剪强度的影响[J].水土保持通报,2019,39(5):54-59.
张晓明,王玉杰,夏一平,等.重庆缙云山典型植被原状土抗剪强度的灰色关联度分析与评价[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(2):145-147.
Su Lijun, Zhou Wanhuan, Chen Weibin, et al. Effects of relative roughness and mean particle size on the shear strength of sand-steel interface [J]. Measurement, 2018,122:339-346.
孙泉忠,郭菁,王钰,等.岩溶地区不同利用方式土壤土力学特性垂直变化特征[J].中国岩溶,2013,32(3):287-291.
0
浏览量
756
下载量
4
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621