1. 海南大学 林学院 热带特色林木花卉遗传与种质创新教育部重点实验室,海南,海口,570228
2. 海南省热带珍稀名贵树种工程研究中心,海南,海口,570228
3. 海南五指山森林生态系统国家定位观测研究站,海南,海口,570228
4. 海南省建设项目规划设计研究院有限公司,海南,海口,570203
纸质出版:2021
移动端阅览
涂志华, 周凌峰, 黄艳萍, 等. 海南岛黎母山国家自然保护区热带云雾林土壤酶活性的根际效应[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(3):1-7.
Tu Zhihua, Zhou Lingfeng, Huang Yanping, et al. Rhizosphere Effects of Soil Enzyme Activities in Tropical Cloud Forests in Limushan National Nature Reserve on Hainan Island[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(3): 1-7.
涂志华, 周凌峰, 黄艳萍, 等. 海南岛黎母山国家自然保护区热带云雾林土壤酶活性的根际效应[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(3):1-7. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.03.001.
Tu Zhihua, Zhou Lingfeng, Huang Yanping, et al. Rhizosphere Effects of Soil Enzyme Activities in Tropical Cloud Forests in Limushan National Nature Reserve on Hainan Island[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(3): 1-7. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.03.001.
[目的] 探讨热带云雾林土壤酶活性的季节动态规律及根际效应,为从土壤酶学角度出发研究热带云雾林水土保持生态功能提升提供科学依据。[方法] 采用抖落法采集3种优势树种岭南青冈、罗浮锥、细枝柃根际和非根际土壤样品,对土壤酶活性季节动态变化进行研究,并分析不同树种根际土壤酶的根际效应及其与土壤养分的关系。[结果] ①热带云雾林不同树种根际与非根际土壤酶活性季节动态变化明显,呈单峰型变化趋势,峰值出现在雨季8月;岭南青冈、罗浮锥土壤酶活性差异不显著,但显著大于细枝柃。②根际土壤酶活性均高于非根际土壤,表现为正根际效应。土壤酶根际效应表现为:酸性磷酸酶 > 脲酶 > 过氧化氢酶 > 蔗糖酶;不同树种酸性磷酸酶、脲酶、蔗糖酶根际效应差异不显著,而过氧化氢酶根际效应表现为岭南青冈、罗浮锥显著大于细枝柃。③土壤酶活性与土壤N,P,K养分含量呈显著正相关,与土壤含水量、pH值相关性不显著。[结论] 热带云雾林主要优势树种土壤酶活性呈现明显的季节动态变化,根际效应显著,N,P,K养分限制可能是土壤酶活性及其季节变化的主导控制因子。
[Objective] The seasonal dynamics of soil enzyme activities on the rhizosphere of tropical cloud forests in Limushan National Nature Reserve were quantified in order to provide a scientific basis for improving the ecological functions of soil and water conservation in tropical cloud forests from the perspective of soil enzymology. [Methods] The activity of invertase
urease
catalase
and acid phosphatase in rhizosphere and non-rhizosphere soils was measured. Samples were collected using the shaking off method in the dominant tree species (Cyclobalanopsis championii
Castanopsis fabri
Eurya loquaiana) in tropical cloud forests. Relationships between the seasonal dynamics of soil enzyme activities and soil nutrients were also analyzed. [Results] ① The seasonal dynamics of soil enzyme activities in rhizosphere and non-rhizosphere soils of different tree species varied significantly with season
showed a single peak trend
reached a maximum in August of rainy season. The levels of soil enzyme activities in rhizosphere and non-rhizosphere soils of C. championii
and C. fabri were not significantly different
but were significantly higher than for E. loquaiana. ② The level of enzyme activities in rhizosphere soil were significantly higher than in non-rhizosphere soil for different tree species in tropical cloud forests. These results indicated a positive rhizosphere effect that followed the order of acid phosphatase > urease > catalase > invertase. The rhizosphere effects of acid phosphatase
urease
and invertase were not significantly different among different dominant tree species
while the rhizosphere effects of catalase in C. championii
and C. fabri were higher than in E. loquaiana. ③ The level of soil enzyme activities had a significant positive correlation with soil nitrogen(N)
phosphorus (P)
potassium (K)
and had no significant correlation with soil water content and pH value. [Conclusion] Soil enzyme activities in rhizosphere soil and non-rhizosphere soil in different trees in tropical cloud forests exhibited seasonal dynamics
and the rhizosphere effect was significant. Rhizosphere enrichment occurred for dominant tree species. N
P
and K nutrient limitations may be the dominant controlling factors affecting soil enzyme activity and its seasonal variation.
Kuzyakov Y. Priming effects:Interactions between living and dead organic matter[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2010,42(9):1363-1371.
Yin Liming, Dijkstra F A, Wang Peng, et al. Rhizosphere priming effects on soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics among tree species with and without intraspecific competition[J]. New Phytologist, 2018,218(3):1036-1048.
范周周,卢舒瑜,王娇,等.岩溶与非岩溶区不同林分根际土壤微生物及酶活性[J].北京林业大学学报,2018,40(7):55-61.
田平雅,沈聪,赵辉,等.银北盐碱区植物根际土壤酶活性及微生物群落特征[J].土壤学报,2020,57(1):217-226.
Yuan Ye, Dai Xiaoqin, Fu Xiaoli, et al. Differences in the rhizosphere effects among trees, shrubs and herbs in three subtropical plantations and their seasonal variations[J]. European Journal of Soil Biology, 2020,100:103218.
Lu Jiayu, Yang Jinfeng, Keitel C, et al. Rhizosphere priming effects of
Lolium perenne
and
Trifolium repens
depend on phosphorus fertilization and biological nitrogen fixation[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2020,150:108005.
王小平,肖肖,唐天文,等.连香树人工林根系分泌物输入季节性变化及其驱动的根际微生物特性研究[J].植物研究,2018,38(1):47-55.
Dijkstra F A, Carrillo Y, Pendall E, et al. Rhizosphere priming:a nutrient perspective[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2013,4(1):216.
Wang Xiaohong, Dijkstra F A, Yin Liming, et al. Rhizosphere priming effects in soil aggregates with different size classes[J]. Ecosphere, 2020,11(2):e03027.
李丽娟,谢婷婷,张松林,等.三峡库区消落带4种适生植物根际与非根际土壤养分与酶活性特征研究[J].生态学报,2020,40(21):7611-7620.
韩国君,何明珠,黄海霞,等.黄土高原种植不同人工牧草对土壤酶活性的影响[J].水土保持通报,2019,39(3):19-24.
刘捷豹,陈光水,郭剑芬,等.森林土壤酶对环境变化的响应研究进展[J].生态学报,2017,37(1):110-117.
裴丙,朱龙飞,冯志培,等.太行山南麓5个林龄侧柏人工林土壤酶活性季节变化[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(2):170-175,182.
朱海强,李艳红,李发东.艾比湖湿地典型植物群落土壤酶活性季节变化特征[J].应用生态学报,2017,28(4):1145-1154.
Bubb P, May I, Miles L, et al. Cloud Forest Agenda[R]. UK:UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, 2004.
Hernández-Vargas G, Sánchez-Velásquez L R, López-Acosta J C, et al. Relationship between soil properties and leaf functional traits in early secondary succession of tropical montane cloud forest[J]. Ecological Research, 2019,34(1):213-224.
Campos C A. Response of soil surface CO
2
-C flux to land use changes in a tropical cloud forest(Mexico)[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2006,234(1/2/3):305-312.
龙文兴,丁易,臧润国,等.海南岛霸王岭热带云雾林雨季的环境特征[J].植物生态学报,2011,35(2):137-146.
康勇,熊梦辉,黄瑾,等.海南岛霸王岭热带云雾林木本植物功能性状的分异规律[J].生态学报,2017,37(5):1572-1582.
李超,邵晓莉,王旭,等.海南岛热带云雾林植物枝条和叶片氮、磷、可溶性糖分配规律[J].生态学杂志,2018,37(5):1341-1348.
程毅康,张辉,王旭,等.功能多样性和谱系多样性对热带云雾林群落构建的影响[J].植物生态学报,2019,43(3):217-226.
Chaudhary D R, Gautam R K, Yousuf B, et al. Nutrients, microbial community structure and functional gene abundance of rhizosphere and bulk soils of halophytes[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2015,91:16-26.
鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析方法[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,2000.
关松荫.土壤酶及其研究法[M].北京:农业出版社,1986.
Dien V T M,曾健勇,满秀玲.樟子松天然林土壤碳氮含量与水解酶活性坡位差异及月动态[J].林业科学,2020,56(2):40-47.
黄娜,周苡,吴晓妮,等.滇池流域富磷退化山区主要优势植物对土壤酶活性的影响[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(4):171-176.
姬秀云,李玉华.黄土高原植被恢复对不同粒径土壤团聚体中酶活性的影响[J].水土保持通报,2018,38(1):24-28,35.
0
浏览量
866
下载量
3
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621