华中科技大学 公共管理学院,湖北,武汉,430074
纸质出版:2021
移动端阅览
柳梦琪, 曾忠平. 基于熵权TOPSIS法的武汉市土地利用多功能性评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(2):314-321.
Liu Mengqi, Zeng Zhongping. Evaluation of Multi-functionality of Land Use Based on Entropy-weight TOPSIS Method in Wuhan City[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(2): 314-321.
柳梦琪, 曾忠平. 基于熵权TOPSIS法的武汉市土地利用多功能性评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(2):314-321. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.02.041.
Liu Mengqi, Zeng Zhongping. Evaluation of Multi-functionality of Land Use Based on Entropy-weight TOPSIS Method in Wuhan City[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(2): 314-321. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.02.041.
[目的
]
从经济、社会、生态3个维度对武汉市2005—2017年土地利用多功能性及其障碍度进行评价,以提高土地利用效率,促进区域土地合理利用,实现区域可持续发展。[方法
]
根据目标层—指标层—要素层框架构建评价指标体系,运用熵权TOPSIS法确定指标权重并计算障碍度。[结果
]
①研究期间武汉市土地利用综合功能呈现总体上升的态势,功能协调性呈Z型式下降,功能变化优势度呈波浪式下降,土地利用日益多样化。②经济、社会、生态功能有着不同程度的增长,其中经济功能、社会功能均经历了低级—中级—良好—优质的发展阶段,整体增长快速;生态功能经历了低级—中级—优质的发展阶段,虽小有波动,但总体大幅增长。③经济功能、社会功能障碍度有所下降,而生态功能的障碍度不断上升。其中,SO
2
年均浓度、经济密度、人均GDP、卫生机构密度、人均水资源量等障碍因子影响较大。[结论
]
武汉市应当注重生态功能的提升,转变经济发展方式,推进产业升级,实施清洁生产,减少三废污染,同时注重水资源的保护,实现土地的可持续利用。
[Objective] The multi-functionality of land use and its obstacles in Wuhan City during 2005-2017 was evaluated in terms of economy
society and ecology in order to improve the efficiency of land use and promote the rational regional land use and achieve regional sustainable development.[Methods] According to the target layer
index layer and element layer framework
an evaluation index system was constructed
and the entropy weight TOPSIS method was used to determine the index weight and calculate the obstacle degree.[Results] ① During the study period
the comprehensive function of land use in Wuhan City showed an overall upward trend
the coordination of functions showed a Z-shaped decline
the dominance of functional changes showed a wavy decline
and land use became increasingly diversified. ② The economic
social and ecological functions had different growth levels. Among them
the economic and social functions experienced low-intermediate-good-quality development stages
and the overall growth was rapid; the ecological functions experienced low-intermediate-quality development. At this stage
although there were small fluctuations
the overall growth was substantial. ③ The degree of economic and social dysfunction declined
while dysfunction of ecological functions continued to rise.[Conclusion] Wuhan City should pay attention to the improvement of ecological functions
transform the economic development mode
promote industrial upgrading
implement cleaner production
reduce the pollution of the three wastes
and pay attention to the protection of water resources and realize the sustainable use of land.
Maier L, Shobayashi M. Multifunctionality:Towards an Analytical Framework[M]. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 2001.
Oostindie H, Roep D, Renting H. Definitions, references and interpretations of the concept of multifunctionality in the Netherlands[J]. European Series on Multifunctionality, 2006,10:41-81.
Pérez-Soba M, Petit S, Jones L, et al. Land Use Functions:A Multifunctionality Approach to Assess the Impact of Land Use Changes on Land Use Sustainability[M]//Sustainability Impact Assessment of Land Use Changes. Berlin Heidelberg:Springer, 2008:375-404.
Antonio G, Alberto G. A comprehensive assessment of multifunctional agricultural land use systems in Spain using a multi-dimensional evaluative model[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2007,120(1):82-91.
Van Huylenbroeck G, Durand G. Multifunctionality and Rural Development:A General Framework[M]//Multifunctional Agriculture:A New Paradigm for European Agriculture and Rural Development Aldershot (UK):Ashgate Publishing, 2003:1-16.
Stockdale A, Barker A. Sustainability and the multifunctional landscape:An assessment of approaches to planning and management in the Cairngorms National Park[J]. Land Use Policy, 2009,26(2):479-492.
Liang Xinyuan, Jin Xiaobin, Ren Jie, et al. A research framework of land use transition in Suzhou City coupled with land use structure and landscape multifunctionality[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2020,737:139932.
Xue Z, Zhen L, Miah M G, et al. Impact assessment of land use functions on the sustainable regional development of representative Asian countries:A comparative study in Bangladesh, China and Japan[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019,694:133689.
Reidsma P, Konig H, Feng S, et al. Methods and tools for integrated assessment of land use policies on sustainable development in developing countries[J]. Land Use Policy, 2011,28(3):604-617.
刘愿理,廖和平,李涛,等.山区土地利用多功能时空分异特征及影响因素分析[J].农业工程学报,2019,35(21):271-279.
刘超,许月卿,刘焱序,等.基于系统论的土地利用多功能分类及评价指标体系研究[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),2018,54(1):181-188.
王枫,董玉祥.基于灰色关联投影法的土地利用多功能动态评价及障碍因子诊断:以广州市为例[J].自然资源学报,2015,30(10):1698-1713.
甄霖,曹淑艳,魏云洁,等.土地空间多功能利用:理论框架及实证研究[J].资源科学,2009,31(4):544-551.
高洁芝,郑华伟,刘友兆.基于熵权TOPSIS模型的土地利用多功能性诊断[J].长江流域资源与环境,2018,27(11):2496-2504.
李灿,张凤荣,朱泰峰,等.基于熵权TOPSIS模型的土地利用绩效评价及关联分析[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(5):217-227.
邱根胜,邹水木,刘日华.多指标决策TOPSIS法的一种改进[J].南昌航空工业学院学报(自然科学版),2005,19(3):1-3,37.
雷勋平, Robin Qiu,刘勇.基于熵权TOPSIS模型的区域土地利用绩效评价及障碍因子诊断[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(13):243-253.
0
浏览量
998
下载量
6
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621