河南农业大学 风景园林与艺术学院,河南,郑州,450002
纸质出版:2021
移动端阅览
罗英菡, 刘畅, 田国行. 城市发展与河网演变间的相互作用——以郑州市主城区为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(2):258-266.
Luo Yinghan, Liu Chang, Tian Guohang. Interaction Between Urban Development and River Network Evolution—A Case Study in Main Urban Area of Zhengzhou City[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(2): 258-266.
罗英菡, 刘畅, 田国行. 城市发展与河网演变间的相互作用——以郑州市主城区为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(2):258-266. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.02.034.
Luo Yinghan, Liu Chang, Tian Guohang. Interaction Between Urban Development and River Network Evolution—A Case Study in Main Urban Area of Zhengzhou City[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(2): 258-266. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.02.034.
[目的] 对河南省郑州市主城区城市发展与河网演变间的相互作用进行分析,为合理调节城市水资源提供科学依据。[方法] 以郑州市主城区为研究对象,基于1994,2002,2009和2019年遥感影像数据,计算河网特征指数并建立耦合协调模型,定量分析河网演变及其与城市发展间的相互作用关系。[结果] 城市发展与河网演变间的相互影响表现在城市发展对河网的破坏与促进作用和河网对城市发展的支撑与约束作用。城市发展导致河网密度降低,走向单一,结构简化,但河网是城市形态的骨架并提供物质基础,当河网承受能力趋于阈值时会反向约束城市发展,进而引起对河网的修复。郑州市主城区城市发展与河网耦合协调度变化可分为波动、磨合和稳发展3个阶段:初期城市的高强度发展使两者协调度迅速下降;中期开始注重河网的修护,人工水系的建设巩固了河网结构,期间受地形影响,城区主体避开西南丘陵地区向东部平原地区扩展;后期水系的治理与修复成效显著,协调度提升到初级协调等级并有逐步提升趋势。[结论] 人工水利措施的干预可缓解城市发展对河网的影响,但河网的修复成效落后于城市发展进程,仍需加强对河网的修复与保护。
[Objective] The interaction between urban development and river network evolution in the main urban area of Zhengzhou City
He'nan Province was analyzed in order to provide scientific basis for rational regulation of urban water resources.[Methods] Taking the main urban area of Zhengzhou City as the research area
based on remote sensing image data in 1994
2002
2009 and 2019
the characteristic index of river network was calculated and the coupling coordination model was established to quantitatively analyze the evolution of river network and the interaction between river network and urban development.[Results] The interaction between urban development and river network evolution was manifested in the destruction and promotion of urban development on river network and the supporting and restricting functions of river network on urban development. Urban development led to the decrease of river network density
the single linear trend and simplified structure
but river network was the skeleton of urban form and material basis. When the bearing capacity of river network tended to the threshold
the urban development would be restrained in reverse
which caused the attention to the river network restoration. The change of coordination degree between urban development and river network could be divided into three stages:fluctuation
running-in and stable development:in the early stage
the high intensity development of the city made the coordination degree of the two decline rapidly. In the middle period
people began to pay attention to the repair and maintenance of river network
and the construction of artificial water system consolidated the structure of river network. Affected by the topography
the main urban areas avoided the southwest hilly areas to the east plain area expansion. In the later stage
the control and restoration of the water system achieved remarkable results
and the coordination degree was upgraded to the primary coordination level with the trend of gradual improvement.[Conclusion] The intervention of artificial water conservancy measures can alleviate the impact of urban development on river network
but the restoration effect of river network lags behind the process of urban development
therefor
it is still necessary to strengthen the restoration and protection of river network.
杨凯,袁雯,赵军,等.感潮河网地区水系结构特征及城市化响应[J].地理学报,2004,59(4):557-564.
袁雯,杨凯,唐敏,等.平原河网地区河流结构特征及其对调蓄能力的影响[J].地理研究,2005,24(5):717-724.
Hollis G E, Luckett J K. The response of natural river channels to urbanization:Two case studies from Southeast England[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 1976,30(4):351-363.
Yang Long, Tian Fuqiang, Niyogi Dev. A need to revisit hydrologic responses to urbanization by incorporating the feedback on spatial rainfall patterns[J]. Urban Climate, 2015,12(2):128-140.
田国行.城市绿地景观规划的理论与方法[D].北京:中国农业大学,2005.
Surian Nicola, Rinaldi Massimo. Morphological response to river engineering and management in alluvial channels in Italy[J]. Geomorphology, 2003,50(4):307-326.
Steele M K, Heffernan J B, Bettez N, et al. Convergent surface water distributions in US cities[J]. Ecosystems, 2014, 17(4):685-697.
Napieralski Jacob A, Carvalhaes Thomaz. Urban stream deserts:Mapping a legacy of urbanization in the United States[J]. Applied Geography, 2016,67(2):129-139.
袁雯,杨凯,吴建平.城市化进程中平原河网地区河流结构特征及其分类方法探讨[J].地理科学,2007,27(3):401-407.
蒋祺,郑伯红.城市用地扩展对长沙市水系变化的影响[J].自然资源学报,2019,34(7):1429-1439.
Yang Liu, Xu Youpeng, Han Longfei, et al. River networks system changes and its impact on storage and flood control capacity under rapid urbanization[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2016,30(13):2401-2412.
韩龙飞,许有鹏,雷超桂,等.长江三角洲水系退化研究(英文)[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2016,26(6):694-706.
张振龙.新疆城镇化与水资源耦合协调发展研究[D].新疆乌鲁木齐:新疆大学,2018.
王玮,唐德善,金新,等.基于系统动态耦合模型的河湖水系连通与城市化系统协调度分析[J].水电能源科学,2015,33(7):20-24.
徐涵秋.利用改进的归一化差异水体指数(MNDWI)提取水体信息的研究[J].遥感学报,2005,33(5):589-595.
陈希孺.变点统计分析简介[J].数理统计与管理,1991,10(1):55-58.
吴雷,许有鹏,徐羽,等.平原水网地区快速城市化对河流水系的影响[J].地理学报,2018,73(1):104-114.
王启名,杨昆,许泉立,等.滇池流域土地利用格局变化的地形梯度效应[J].水土保持通报,2017,37(4):106-113,118.
刘永婷.城市发展对嘉兴市水系连通影响及其与水资源耦合关系研究[D].安徽芜湖:安徽师范大学,2018.
陈东景,徐中民.西北内陆河流域生态安全评价研究:以黑河流域中游张掖地区为例[J].干旱区地理,2002,25(3):219-224.
李晨昱.西安城市水系演变与城市发展的关系研究[D].陕西西安:西安理工大学,2017.
崔子豪.西安市城市化过程与用水耦合关系研究[D].陕西西安:西安理工大学,2017.
廖重斌.环境与经济协调发展的定量评判及其分类体系:以珠江三角洲城市群为例[J].热带地理,1999,19(2):3-5.
王洋,王少剑,秦静.中国城市土地城市化水平与进程的空间评价[J].地理研究,2014,33(12):2228-2238.
白天.漯河城市地表景观对雨洪资源时空分配的影响[D].河南郑州:河南农业大学,2019.
王恒伟,严金明,陈萌.快速城市化地区土地资源承载力空间分异研究:以广东东莞市为例[J].西南大学学报(自然科学版),2016,38(11):141-148.
胡艳芳,田国行.郑州市水系整治的生态学途径探讨[J].西南林业大学学报,2011,31(5):67-71.
乔标,方创琳.城市化与生态环境协调发展的动态耦合模型及其在干旱区的应用[J].生态学报,2005,25(11):211-217.
0
浏览量
1044
下载量
2
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621