河南农业大学 资源与环境学院,河南,郑州,450002
纸质出版:2021
移动端阅览
张锋, 陈伟强, 马月红, 等. 基于景观结构的黄河沿岸土地利用生态风险时空变化分析——以河南省为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(2):250-257.
Zhang Feng, Chen Weiqiang, Ma Yuehong, et al. Spatial and Temporal Change of Land Use Ecological Risk Along Yellow River Based on Landscape Structure—A Case Study in He'nan Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(2): 250-257.
张锋, 陈伟强, 马月红, 等. 基于景观结构的黄河沿岸土地利用生态风险时空变化分析——以河南省为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(2):250-257. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.02.033.
Zhang Feng, Chen Weiqiang, Ma Yuehong, et al. Spatial and Temporal Change of Land Use Ecological Risk Along Yellow River Based on Landscape Structure—A Case Study in He'nan Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(2): 250-257. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.02.033.
[目的] 探究黄河流域沿岸城市土地利用生态风险时空变化特征,为土地景观资源保护、生态系统优化与生态环境保护、管控措施制定等提供理论依据。[方法] 以河南省黄河沿岸7个城市为研究区,在GIS与Fragstats软件技术支持下,基于2005,2010,2015以及2018年4期土地利用数据,将研究区划分为1 737个6 km×6 km的生态评价单元,根据景观扰动指数与景观脆弱指数构建生态风险评价模型,借助土地转移矩阵与空间自相关分析方法,对研究区内土地利用变化、生态风险时空变化特征及空间关联格局进行评价。[结果] ①2005—2018年,研究区域内建设用地面积增加,且增长趋势较快;其他几类用地面积均有不同程度的减少;耕地是建设用地增加的主要来源,林地、草地和水域主要转化为耕地。②在研究时段内,研究区域土地利用生态风险在空间上呈现出显著的正相关性,存在空间集聚特征,且“高—高”、“低—低”是生态风险主要的空间聚集模式。③2005—2018年,生态风险最小值和最大值大致呈N形变化;4个时期内高风险区分布区域大致相同,呈条状和块状分布,条状高风险区大多分布在黄河沿岸,块状高风险区大多分布在农村居民点零散分布的平原区;低和较低风险区大多分布在研究区域四周以及西南大部分区域。[结论] 研究时段内,低风险区和中等风险区面积在逐年增加,较低风险区面积先减少后增加,高风险区和较高风险区面积在逐年减少。各风险区主要向相邻风险区转化,仅有少量地区出现跨区转移,说明研究区土地利用生态风险变化相对稳定,生态风险急剧变化的区域较小。
[Objective] The spatial and temporal change of land use ecological risk along Yellow River was studied in order to provide theoretical basis for the protection of landscape resource
ecosystem optimization and the establishment of ecological environment protection and control measures.[Methods] Seven cities along the Yellow River in He'nan Province were taken as the research area. With the technical support of GIS and Fragstats software
based on the land use data in 2005
2010
2015 and 2018
the research areas were divided into 1 737 ecological evaluation units with area of 6 km×6 km. According to the ecological risk assessment model constructed by the landscape disturbance index and the landscape vulnerability index
the land use change
temporal and spatial changes of ecological risk and spatial correlation pattern in the study area were evaluated by land transfer matrix and spatial autocorrelation analysis method.[Results] ① From 2005 to 2018
the area of construction land within the study area increased rapidly
whilel other types of land area decreased in varying degrees. The increase of construction land was mainly from cultivated land
and woodland
grassland and waters were mainly converted into cultivated land. ② During the research period
the ecological risk of land use in the study area showed a significant positive correlation in space
with characteristics of spatial agglomeration. "High-high" and "low-low" were the main spatial agglomeration patterns of ecological risk. ③ From 2005 to 2018
the minimum and maximum values of ecological risk varied in "N" type roughly. The distribution areas of the high-risk areas were roughly the same over the four periods
with strip and block distributions. The strip high-risk areas were mainly distributed along the Yellow River
while the block high-risk areas were mainly distributed in plain areas with scattered rural settlements. Low and relative low risk areas were mostly distributed around the study area and the southwest area.[Conclusion] During the research period
the areas of low risk and medium risk area increased year by year. Relative low risk areas decreased firstly and then increased. While high risk area and relative high risk area decreased year by year. Each risk area was mainly transformed into adjacent risk area
only a small number of areas had cross-regional transfer
indicating that the ecological risk change of land use within the study area was relatively stable
and the area with rapid change was small.
王洁,摆万奇,田国行.土地利用生态风险评价研究进展[J].自然资源学报,2020,35(3):576-585.
郑杰,王志杰,喻理飞,等.基于景观格局的草海流域生态风险评价[J].环境化学,2019,38(4):784-792.
刘焱序,王仰麟,彭建,等.基于生态适应性循环三维框架的城市景观生态风险评价[J].地理学报,2015,70(7):1052-1067.
李雅婷,赵牡丹,张帅兵,等.基于景观结构的眉县土地利用生态风险空间特征[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(5):220-225,233.
南颖,吉喆,冯恒栋,等.基于遥感和地理信息系统的图们江地区生态安全评价[J].生态学报,2013,33(15):4790-4798.
于淑会,周向莉,卿冀川,等.河北滨海盐碱土地生态安全评价[J].中国生态农业学报,2017,25(5):778-786.
卢江林,李阳兵.基于土地利用/覆被变化的贵阳市红枫湖水源保护区生态风险演变[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(6):229-233,239.
王卫林,叶燎原,杨昆,等.山地城镇化建设背景下的土地利用生态风险分析[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(6):358-362.
苏浩,吴次芳.基于景观结构的农林交错带土地利用生态风险时空分异研究[J].经济地理,2017,37(5):158-165.
吴楠,张永福,李瑞.基于景观指数的干旱区河谷县域土地利用生态风险分析及预测[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(2):207-212.
娄妮,王志杰,何嵩涛.基于景观格局的阿哈湖国家湿地公园景观生态风险评价[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(1):233-239.
汪翡翠,汪东川,张利辉,等.京津冀城市群土地利用生态风险的时空变化分析[J].生态学报,2018,38(12):4307-4316.
任志远,孙艺杰,吴林筱.1990-2012年榆林市土地生态风险综合评价[J].中国生态农业学报,2017,25(5):656-664.
马晨阳,甄江红,冯琰玮,等.基于城市扩展的呼和浩特市综合生态风险评价[J].生态学杂志,2019,38(11):3472-3479.
余敦,梁珍宝,肖志娟,等.基于景观生态思维的南昌市土地生态风险时空特征分析[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(1):213-220.
李青圃,张正栋,万露文,等.基于景观生态风险评价的宁江流域景观格局优化[J].地理学报,2019,74(7):1420-1437.
奚世军,蔡沛伶,安裕伦.2000-2018年贵州喀斯特山区小流域综合生态风险变化及其驱动因素[J].生态与农村环境学报,2020,36(9):1106-1114.
周汝佳,张永战,何华春.基于土地利用变化的盐城海岸带生态风险评价[J].地理研究,2016,35(6):1017-1028.
谢花林.基于景观结构的土地利用生态风险空间特征分析:以江西兴国县为例[J].中国环境科学,2011,31(4):688-695.
吕乐婷,张杰,孙才志,等.基于土地利用变化的细河流域景观生态风险评估[J].生态学报,2018,38(16):5952-5960.
0
浏览量
1428
下载量
6
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621