在腾格里沙漠东南缘应用沙漠造林器栽植柠条的试验研究

唐希明; 李敏岚; 屈建军; 宋乃平; 孟晨

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.02.018

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

在腾格里沙漠东南缘应用沙漠造林器栽植柠条的试验研究

试验研究

- 在腾格里沙漠东南缘应用沙漠造林器栽植柠条的试验研究
- Cultivation of Caragana Korshinskii in Southeastern Edge of Tengger Desert
- 水土保持通报 2021年41卷第2期页码：135-141
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 中卫市自然资源局中卫市治沙林场, 宁夏中卫 7550001
  2. 宁夏大学西北土地退化与生态恢复国家重点实验室培育基地,宁夏,银川,750021
  3. 中国科学院西北生态环境资源研究院敦煌戈壁荒漠生态与环境研究站/沙漠与沙漠化重点实验室,甘肃,兰州,730000
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  宁夏回族自治区重点研发计划项目“可装备化防沙治沙新材料新技术新工艺研发”（2019BFG02010）
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.02.018
  中图分类号： S728.3
- 纸质出版：2021
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
唐希明, 李敏岚, 屈建军, 等. 在腾格里沙漠东南缘应用沙漠造林器栽植柠条的试验研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(2):135-141.

Tang Ximing, Li Minlan, Qu Jianjun, et al. Cultivation of Caragana Korshinskii in Southeastern Edge of Tengger Desert[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(2): 135-141.
唐希明, 李敏岚, 屈建军, 等. 在腾格里沙漠东南缘应用沙漠造林器栽植柠条的试验研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(2):135-141. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.02.018.

Tang Ximing, Li Minlan, Qu Jianjun, et al. Cultivation of Caragana Korshinskii in Southeastern Edge of Tengger Desert[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(2): 135-141. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.02.018.

摘要

[目的] 探究在腾格里沙漠东南缘应用沙漠造林器栽植苗木的保水效果，观测其沙漠造林器是否更有利于苗木成活，同时为提高沙漠地区苗木栽植成活率提供科学支持。[方法] 通过采用对比两种栽植方式（铁锹和沙漠造林器）下不同土层土壤含水量，并使用相应公式计算，从土壤有效含水量、土壤水分亏缺程度、土壤水分变异系数等方面进行综合分析，评定哪种栽植方式更好。[结果] ①在草方格内进行人工栽植，采用沙漠造林器会大大降低各土层土壤水分的损耗风险，并且造林器作用下的土壤含水量均高于铁锹，最高达1.42倍，最低是1.04倍。②两种栽植方式深度不同，以致柠条根系所在土层不同，进而对水分的利用策略不同。铁锹组柠条主要利用15—40 cm土层土壤水，造林器组柠条主要利用20—50 cm土层土壤水。造林器组柠条根系所对应的土层土壤水分亏缺程度较轻，更有利于柠条的初期生长。③铁锹栽植苗木成活率为45%～55%，沙漠造林器栽植苗木成活率为70%～75%，提高了25%左右。沙漠造林器栽植苗木成活率更高。[结论] 从土壤水分保持以及对应的所栽柠条成活率等方面综合来看，相比铁锹栽植，使用沙漠造林器栽植柠条效果更好。

Abstract

[Objective] The water retention effect of planting seedlings with desert planters on the southeastern edge of the Tengger Desert was explored to observe whether the desert planters are more conducive to the survival of seedlings

in order to provide scientific support for improving the survival rate of seedlings in desert areas.[Methods] Soil water content of different soil layers under two planting methods (shovel and desert afforestation device) was compared. The corresponding formula was used to calculate effective soil water content

soil water deficit degree and soil moisture variation coefficient

to comprehensively assess which planting method was better.[Results] ① The risk of soil moisture loss in each soil layer could be greatly reduced by using desert afforestation devices in grass square

and the soil moisture content under the action of afforestation devices was higher than that of shovel

with the highest being 1.42 times and the lowest being 1.04 times. ② The depths of the two planting methods were different

so that the roots of Caragana korshinskii distributed differently in soil layers

and thus the water use strategies were different. Caragana korshinskii in the shovel group mainly used soil water in the 15-40 cm soil layer

while Caragana korshinskii in the afforestation group mainly used soil water in the 20-50 cm soil layer. The soil moisture deficit of Caragana korshinskii roots in the afforestation group was less

which was more conducive to the initial growth of Caragana korshinskii. ③ In terms of the survival rate of planted seedlings

the survival rate of seedlings planted by shovel was 45%-55%; the survival rate of seedlings planted by desert afforestation tools was 70%-75%

which was increased by about 25%. The survival rate of seedlings planted by desert afforestation tools was higher.[Conclusion] According to soil moisture retention and the survival rate of the planted Caragana korshinskii

compared with shovel planting

the effect of planting Caragana korshinskii with desert afforestation equipment is better.

关键词

Keywords

references

刘海鹰.防沙治沙造林技术[J].现代农业科技,2014(11):182-183.

屈建军,凌裕泉,俎瑞平,等.半隐蔽格状沙障的综合防护效益观测研究[J].中国沙漠,2005,25(3):329-335.

马瑞,王继和,屈建军,等.不同结构类型棉秆沙障防风固沙效应研究[J].水土保持学报,2010,24(2):48-51.

Borges A R, Viegas D X. Shelter effect on a row of coal piles to prevent wind erosion[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics.1988,29(1/3):145-154.

Sang-Joon Lee, Ki-Chul Park, Cheol-Woo Park. Wind tunnel observations about the shelter effect of porous fences on the sand particle movements[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2002,36(9):1453-1463.

胡英娣.方格沙障麦草致腐因素与防腐方法的研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,1988(1):82-91.

李敏岚,屈建军,唐希明,等.高密度聚乙烯(HDPE)蜂巢式沙障对土壤水分的影响[J].中国沙漠,2020,40(1):136-144.

白成栋,高治军.毛乌素沙漠直播造林技术研究[J].宁夏农林科技,2011,52(12):83-84.

郭小丽.毛乌素沙地柠条植苗造林试验初报[J].现代农业科技,2019(14):135-138.

黄子琛,沈渭寿.干旱区植物的水分关系与耐旱性[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2000.

杨磊,卫伟,莫保儒,等.半干旱黄土丘陵区不同人工植被恢复土壤水分的相对亏缺[J].生态学报,2011,31(11):3060-3068.

何秀珍,宋乃平,刘孝勇,等.荒漠草原区不同类型草地土壤水分特征研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2012,26(4):117-122.

刘新平,张铜会,赵哈林,等.流动沙丘干沙层厚度对土壤水分蒸发的影响[J].干旱区地理,2006,29(4):523-526.

赵亚楠,于露,周玉蓉,等.宁夏东部荒漠草原灌丛引入对土壤水分动态及亏缺的影响[J].生态学报,2020,40(4):1305-1315.

陈洪松,邵明安,王克林.黄土区荒草地和裸地土壤水分的循环特征[J].生态学报,2005,16(10):1853-1857.

刘鑫.晋西黄土区不同立地类型下土壤水分时空异质性研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2007.

Wang Xinping, Cui Yan, Pan Yanxia, et al. Effects of rainfall characteristics on infiltration and redistribution patterns in revegetation-stabilized desert ecosystems[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2008, 358(1/2):134-143.

刘新平,张铜会,赵哈林,等.流动沙丘降雨入渗和再分配过程[J].水利学报,2006,37(2):166-171.

侯连涛,焦念元,韩宾,等.不同覆盖方式对土壤水分分布的影响[J].灌溉排水学报,2007,26(1):47-50.

赵文智,程国栋.干旱区生态水文过程研究若干问题评述[J].科学通报,2007(1):1851-1857.

王志,王蕾,刘连友,等.毛乌素沙地沙丘干沙层水分特征初步研究[J].干旱区研究,2006,23(1):89-92.

Wang X P, Berndtsson R, Li X R, et al. Water balance change for a revegetated xerophyte shrub area/Changement du bilan hydrique d'une zone replantée d'arbustes xérophiles[J]. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 2004, 49(2):283-295.

Xu Qing, Li Harbin, Chen Jiquan, et al. Water use patterns of three species in subalpine forest, Southwest China:The deuterium isotope approach[J]. Ecohydrology, 2011,4(2):236-244.

Jia Guodong, Yu Xinxiao, Deng Wenping. Seasonal water use patterns of semi-arid plants in China[J]. The Forestry Chronicle, 2013,89(2):169-177.

Jia Zhiqing, Zhu Yajuan, Liu Liying. Different water use strategies of juvenile and adult

Caragana intermedia

plantations in the Gonghe Basin, Tibet Plateau[J]. PLoS One, 2012,7(9):e45902.

浏览量

830

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

典型黄土区人工林土壤水分与养分的区域特征

融雪期微地形对土壤水分时空分布的影响及短期预测

西安至延安高速铁路沿线黄土区植被的承载力评价

宽叶雀稗种植对稳定型崩岗崩壁表层土壤水热动态的影响

基于Hydrus-1D模型的宁夏河东沙地固定沙丘花棒林土壤水分动态模拟