2000-2018年皖南山区土壤侵蚀时空变化

管礼松; 郭伟玲; 李鑫; 蒋婷婷

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.02.015

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

2000-2018年皖南山区土壤侵蚀时空变化

试验研究

- 2000-2018年皖南山区土壤侵蚀时空变化
- Spatio-temporal Changes of Soil Erosion in Mountainous Area of Southern Anhui Province from 2000 to 2018
- 水土保持通报 2021年41卷第2期页码：114-121
- 作者机构：
  
  安徽理工大学空间信息与测绘工程学院,安徽,淮南,232001
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目“黄土丘陵沟壑区DEM采样间距与数据平滑对流域分布式侵蚀学坡长的影响研究”（41501294）
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.02.015
  中图分类号： S157.1
- 纸质出版：2021
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
管礼松, 郭伟玲, 李鑫, 等. 2000-2018年皖南山区土壤侵蚀时空变化[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(2):114-121.

Guan Lisong, Guo Weiling, Li Xin, et al. Spatio-temporal Changes of Soil Erosion in Mountainous Area of Southern Anhui Province from 2000 to 2018[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(2): 114-121.
管礼松, 郭伟玲, 李鑫, 等. 2000-2018年皖南山区土壤侵蚀时空变化[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(2):114-121. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.02.015.

Guan Lisong, Guo Weiling, Li Xin, et al. Spatio-temporal Changes of Soil Erosion in Mountainous Area of Southern Anhui Province from 2000 to 2018[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(2): 114-121. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.02.015.

摘要

[目的

]

精确评估皖南山区土壤侵蚀量并分析其时空变化特征，为区域水土流失综合治理提供科学依据。[方法

]

在GIS技术的支持下，利用研究区日降雨数据，30 m分辨率DEM，土壤数据和土地利用等数据，采用中国土壤流失方程（CSLE）估算皖南山区土壤侵蚀模数，并分析2000，2010和2018年近20 a研究区土壤侵蚀时空变化特征。[结果

]

2000—2010年土壤侵蚀模数增加了963.96 t/（km

·a），土壤侵蚀强度面积向高强度等级转移；2010—2018年土壤侵蚀模数减少了781.22 t/（km

·a），土壤侵蚀强度面积由高向低转移，总体上土壤侵蚀变化呈先增后减的趋势。皖南山区3期土壤侵蚀空间分布格局基本一致，池州市和铜陵市东南侧以及黄山市周边区域是水土流失重点防治区域。研究区内耕地以微度和轻度侵蚀为主，林地以中度及以下侵蚀为主，2010—2018年耕地和林地中度及以上侵蚀面积减小，水土保持措施成效显著。[结论

]

近年来皖南山区土壤侵蚀强度呈先增加后减少的趋势，总体上以轻度侵蚀为主，后续的水土流失治理仍需要加强。

Abstract

[Objective] Soil erosion in mountainous areas in Southern Anhui Province was accurately assessed and its temporal and spatial characteristics were analyzed

in order to provide a basis for comprehensive management of regional soil erosion.[Methods] With the support of GIS technology

the daily rainfall data

30 m resolution DEM

soil data and land use data were used to estimate the soil erosion modulus in the mountainous area of Southern Anhui Province. The Chinese soil loss equation (CSLE) was employed

the temporal and spatial changes of soil erosion in the study area in 2000

2010 and 2018 were analyzed.[Results] From 2000 to 2010

the soil erosion modulus increased by 963.96 t/(km2·a)

and the area of soil erosion intensity shifted to high intensity level. In contrast

from 2010 to 2018

the soil erosion modulus decreased by 781.22 t/(km2·a)

the area of soil erosion intensity shifted from high to low

and the overall soil erosion change showed a trend of first increase and then decrease. The spatial distribution pattern of soil erosion in the three periods of the mountainous area in Southern Anhui Province was basically the same. The southeast side of Chizhou City

Tongling City

and the surrounding areas of Huangshan City were key areas for soil erosion prevention and control. In the study area

the cultivated land was mainly eroded slightly and lightly

while the forest land was mainly eroded at moderate or lower levels. The area of cultivated land and woodland eroded at moderate and higher level decreased in 2010-2018

and the effects of soil and water conservation measures were remarkable.[Conclusion] In recent years

the intensity of soil erosion in the mountainous area of Southern Anhui Province increased first and then decreased. Generally speaking

mild erosion is the main erosion type

and the subsequent soil erosion control still needs to be strengthened.

关键词

Keywords

references

WANG, Zhi-Jie, et al. The efficiency of large-scale afforestation with fish-scale pits for revegetation and soil erosion control in the steppe zone on the hill-gully Loess Plateau[J]. Catena, 2014, 115:159-167.

水利部发布2018年全国水土流失动态监测成果[J].中国水土保持.2019(7):7.

中华人民共和国水利部. SL190-2007土壤侵蚀分类分级标准[S].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2008.

程琳,杨勤科,谢红霞,等.基于GIS和CSLE的陕西省土壤侵蚀定量评价方法研究[J].水土保持学报,2009,23(5):61-66.

Wischmeier W H, Smith D D. Predicting Rainfall Eosion Losses from Cropland East of the Rocky Mountains:A Guide for Soil and Water Conservation Planning[M]//Usda:Agricultral Handbook. 1978.

Renard K G, Foster, G R, Weesies G A, et al. Predicting Rainfall Eosion by Water:A Guide to Conservation PLanning with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation(RUSLE)[M]//Usda:Agricultral Handbook. 1997.

Liu Baoyuan, Zhang Keli, Xie Yun, An Empirical Soil loss Equation, in Proc of 12th ISCO[M]. Beijing:Tsinghua Press, 2002.

程先富,余芬.安徽省土壤侵蚀空间分布及其与环境因子的关系[J].地理研究,2010,29(8):1461-1470.

赵明松,李德成,张甘霖,等.基于RUSLE模型的安徽省土壤侵蚀及其养分流失评估[J].土壤学报,2016,53(1):28-38.

张乃夫,刘霞,朱继鹏,等.安徽新安江流域土壤侵蚀敏感性评价及空间分异特征[J].中国水土保持科学,2014,12(6):8-15.

王略,屈创,赵国栋.基于中国土壤流失方程模型的区域土壤侵蚀定量评价[J].水土保持通报,2018,38(1):122-125.

孙禹,哈斯额尔敦,杜会石.基于GIS的东北黑土区土壤侵蚀模数计算[J].中国水土保持科学,2015,13(1):1-7.

王凯,夏燕秋,马金辉,等.基于CSLE和高分辨率航空影像的孤山川流域土壤侵蚀定量评价[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(1):26-32.

顾也萍,王长荣.新构造运动对安徽土壤分布的影响[J].长江流域资源与环境,1998(1):3-5.

刘宝元,郭索彦,李智广,等.中国水力侵蚀抽样调查[J].中国水土保持,2013(10):26-34.

Liu Baoyuan, Xie Yun, Li Zhiguang, et al. The assessment of soil loss by water erosion in China[J]. International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 2020,8(2):430-439.

殷水清,章文波,谢云,等.基于高密度站网的中国降雨侵蚀力空间分布[J].中国水土保持,2013(10):45-51.

谢云,刘宝元,章文波.侵蚀性降雨标准研究[J].水土保持学报,2000,14(4):6-11.

Sharpley A N, Williams J R. Epic-erosion/productivity Impact Calculator (1.1):Model Determination[M]. US:United States Department of Agriculture, 1989.

Mccool D K, Brown L C, Foster G R, et al. Revised slope steepness factor for the universal soil loss equation[J]. Transactions of the Asae, 1987,30(5):1387-1396.

Liu Baoyuan. Slope gradient effects on soil loss for steep slopes[J]. Transactions of the Asae, 1994,37(6):1835-1840.

张宏鸣,王猛,杨勤科,等.坡度截断对分布式土壤侵蚀学坡长提取的影响[J].武汉大学学报(信息科学版),2018,43(11):1753-1760.

张宏鸣,杨勤科,王猛,等.沟道截断对分布式土壤侵蚀学坡长提取的影响[J].水利学报,2017,48(5):568-575.

张宏鸣,杨勤科,刘晴蕊,等.基于GIS的区域坡度坡长因子提取算法[J].计算机工程,2010,36(9):246-248.

浏览量

1111

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

2007—2020年白沙河流域土壤水力侵蚀时空变化

降雨与植被对大别山“林改园”区土壤侵蚀的影响

藏东南干旱河谷区土壤抗蚀性和水土流失过程模拟

2010—2023年秦岭北麓（西安段）土壤侵蚀特征

土壤改良剂在防治南方红壤区土壤侵蚀中的应用研究进展