1. 西南林业大学 生态与环境学院,云南,昆明,650224
2. 西南林业大学 石漠化研究院,云南,昆明,650224
3. 新平县县级自然保护区管护局, 云南 新平,653499
纸质出版:2021
移动端阅览
赵雨田, 陈奇伯, 黎建强, 等. 计划烧除对云南松林枯落物蓄积特征及持水性能的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(2):99-104.
Zhao Yutian, Chen Qibo, Li Jianqiang, et al. Effects of Prescribed Burning on Accumulation and Water Holding Capacity of Litters in Pinus Yunnanensis Forest[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(2): 99-104.
赵雨田, 陈奇伯, 黎建强, 等. 计划烧除对云南松林枯落物蓄积特征及持水性能的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(2):99-104. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.02.013.
Zhao Yutian, Chen Qibo, Li Jianqiang, et al. Effects of Prescribed Burning on Accumulation and Water Holding Capacity of Litters in Pinus Yunnanensis Forest[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(2): 99-104. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.02.013.
[目的
]
探讨计划烧除对枯落物蓄积特征及持水性的影响,为科学实施森林计划烧除措施和评价计划烧除的生态环境效应提供理论支撑。[方法
]
枯落物蓄积量采用样方调查法计算,枯落物持水量采用室内浸泡法测定,枯落物年输入动态调查采用野外定位收集器法。[结果
]
①计划烧除样地燃烧剩余物蓄积量为3.84 t/hm
2
,仅为未烧除样地枯落物蓄积量的21%;未烧除样地枯落物蓄积量为18.64 t/hm
2
。②计划烧除样地燃烧剩余物最大持水量14 t/hm
2
,未烧样地分枯落物最大持水量60.62 t/hm
2
,计划烧除和未烧除样地枯落物层持水量与浸泡时间符合对数函数关系,枯落物层吸水速率与浸泡时间呈幂函数关系。③计划烧除和未烧除样地枯落物年输入总量相似,最大输入量在4月,占全年增加量的20%~24%,1 a后计划烧除样地的有效持水量恢复到未烧除样地的73%。[结论
]
云南松林计划烧除后,短期内枯落物蓄积量减少,枯落物持水能力降低,枯落物输入量无显著差别。
[Objective] The influence of prescribed burning on accumulation and water holding capacity of litters in Pinus yunnanensis forest was investigated
in order to provide a scientific basis for predicting the environmental effects of prescribed fire.[Methodes] The litter accumulation amounts and hydrological characters were tested and compared between the unburned and burned forests by prescribed fire. Litter accumulation amounts were obtained by field positioning collector methods and the hydrological character was investigate indoor immersion method.[Results] ① The volume of combustion residue after prescribed fire sample plot was 3.84 t/hm2
which was only 21% of the volume of litter in the unburned sample plot
and the volume of litter in the unburned sample plot was 18.64 t/hm2. ② The maximum water-holding capacity of forest litters after prescribed fire was 14 t/hm2
which was significantly lower than that in unburned forest with the total maximum water-holding capacity of 60.62 t/hm2. The water-holding capacity of the litter layer and soaking time in both unburned and prescribed burned sample land showed a significantly logarithmic relationship
and the immersion time and the absorption rate of forest litters showed a significantly power function relationship with the immersion time. ③ The maximum amount of litter input was in April
accounting for 20%-24% of the annual increase. After 1 year
the effective water-holding capacity in the prescribed burnt land was restored to 73%.[Conclusion] After the prescribed fire
the litter storage and the waster holding capacity can decrease in short term. However
with the natural recovery
the water conservation of the litter of Pinus yunnanensis forest can gradually recover.
胡海清,魏书精,魏书威,等.气候变暖背景下火干扰对森林生态系统碳循环的影响[J].灾害学,2012,27(4):37-41.
杨达,吴志伟,梁宇,等.火干扰对森林碳库影响的量化研究进展[J].世界林业研究,2015,28(1):37-42.
宋利臣,何平平,崔晓阳.重度林火对大兴安岭土壤生境因子的影响[J].生态学杂志,2015,34(7):1809-1814.
杨健,孔健健,刘波.林火干扰对北方针叶林林下植被的影响[J].植物生态学报,2013,37(5):474-480.
韩春兰,邵帅,王秋兵,等.兴安落叶松林火干扰后土壤有机碳含量变化[J].生态学报,2015,35(9):3023-3033.
罗旭,贺红士,梁宇,等.林火干扰对大兴安岭主要林分类型地上生物量预测的影响模拟研究[J].生态学报,2016,36(4):1104-1114.
孙龙燕,李士美,李伟,等.林火对植物根围丛枝菌根真菌多样性的影响[J].生态学报,2016,36(10):2833-2841.
Fox D M, Martin N, Carrega P, et al. Increases in fire risk due to warmer summer temperatures and wildland urban interface changes do not necessarily lead to more fires[J]. Applied Geography, 2015,56:1-12.
朱教君,刘足根.森林干扰生态研究[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(10):1703-1710.
Straaten O V, Doamba S W M F, Corre M D, et al. Impacts of burning on soil trace gas fluxes in two wooded savanna sites in Burkina Faso[J]. Journal of Arid Environments, 2019, 165:132-140.
Serdar, Yowhan S, Ender, et al. Impacts of low-intensity prescribed fire on microbial and chemical soil properties in a Quercus frainetto forest[J]. Journal of Forestry Research, 2018,29(3):687-696.
Salverson W G, Walker R F, Fecko R M, et al. Influences of mechanized thinning and prescribed fire on natural regeneration in an uneven-aged Jeffrey pine stand[J]. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 2011, 30(7):654-676.
Muqaddas B, Lewis T. Temporal variations in litterfall biomass input and nutrient return under long-term prescribed burning in a wet sclerophyll forest, Queensland, Australia[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2020, 706:136035.
王秋华,单保君,龚家平,等.滇中地区云南松纯林计划烧除研究[J].江西农业大学学报,2018,40(2):235-240.
朱利英,赵春章,莫旭,等.计划烧除攀枝花苏铁林区地面覆盖物对苏铁生长和土壤理化性质的影响[J].应用与环境生物学报,2012,18(3):381-390.
张东,邵社刚,赵辉.晋西黄土丘陵沟壑区主要人工林枯落物水文特性研究[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2014,42(5):97-101.
兰亚男,孙旭,秦富仓,等.阴山北麓不同林分类型枯落物层持水性能研究[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(6):151-157.
张志兰,郑云泽,于秀娟.重庆市几种常见经济林凋落物持水性能研究[J].中国水土保持,2019(2):59-62.
Moriondo M, Good P, Durao R, et al. Potential impact of climate change on fire risk in the Mediterranean area[J]. Climate Research, 2006,31(1):85-95.
曾建军,史正涛.城市水源地5种森林枯落物水文效应特征[J].水土保持通报,2016,36(1):38-43.
方斌,黄俊文,赵洋毅,等.滇中地区典型林分林地凋落物及土壤水文效应[J].防护林科技,2016(6):18-21.
张宝琦,王忠禹,杨艳芬,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区典型灌木林地枯落物的蓄积特征及持水性能[J].水土保持通报,2019,39(4):76-81.
孙欧文,蔡建国,吴家森,等.浙江省典型森林类型枯落物及林下土壤水文特性[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(1):118-123.
张引,黄永梅,周长亮,等.冀北山地5个海拔梯度油松林枯落物与土壤水源涵养功能研究[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(2):126-131.
唐禾,陈永华,张建国,等.抚育间伐对麻栎次生林枯落物持水性的影响[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(4):104-109.
王玲,赵广亮,周红娟,等.八达岭林场不同密度油松人工林枯落物水文效应[J].生态环境学报,2019,28(9):1767-1775.
陈进,徐明,邹晓,等.贵阳市不同林龄马尾松林凋落物储量及持水特性[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(6):146-151.
赵鸿雁,吴钦孝.黄土高原几种枯枝落叶吸水机理研究[J].防护林科技,1996(4):15-18.
张雨雪,胡伟芳,罗敏,等.闽江口秋茄凋落叶分解碳氮磷元素动态特征与水解酶活性[J].生态学报,2019,39(12):4242-4254.
0
浏览量
790
下载量
4
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621