太行山南麓不同植被类型土壤呼吸特征及其温度敏感性

陈玮

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.02.012

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

太行山南麓不同植被类型土壤呼吸特征及其温度敏感性

试验研究

- 太行山南麓不同植被类型土壤呼吸特征及其温度敏感性
- Soil Respiration and Its Temperature Sensitivity of Different Vegetation Types at Southern Foothill of Taihang Mountains
- 水土保持通报 2021年41卷第2期页码：92-98
- 作者机构：
  
  山西农业大学资源环境学院, 山西太谷,030801
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  山西农业大学科技创新基金项目“基于RS的太原矿山环境动态监测与评价研究”（2017007）
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.02.012
  中图分类号： S714
- 纸质出版：2021
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
陈玮. 太行山南麓不同植被类型土壤呼吸特征及其温度敏感性[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(2):92-98.

Chen Wei. Soil Respiration and Its Temperature Sensitivity of Different Vegetation Types at Southern Foothill of Taihang Mountains[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(2): 92-98.
陈玮. 太行山南麓不同植被类型土壤呼吸特征及其温度敏感性[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(2):92-98. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.02.012.

Chen Wei. Soil Respiration and Its Temperature Sensitivity of Different Vegetation Types at Southern Foothill of Taihang Mountains[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(2): 92-98. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.02.012.

摘要

[目的

]

探讨不同植被类型土壤呼吸特征及其温度敏感性，为陆地生态系统碳循环研究提供理论支持。[方法

]

以太行山南麓裸地、草地、灌丛、林地为研究对象，采用长期定位观测和室内化验分析相结合的方法，研究不同季节土壤水热因素、呼吸特征及其温度敏感性。[结果

]

不同植被类型的土壤温度变化较大，均表现为1月初最低，8月下旬最高，8月以后土壤温度呈逐渐降低模式，相同月份土壤温度大致表现为：裸地>草地>灌丛>林地，局部有所波动。不同植被类型的土壤呼吸速率具有明显差异，季节变化特征一致；其中，土壤呼吸、异养呼吸和自养呼吸速率季节变化特征一致（倒V形变化规律），大致表现为：夏季 > 秋季 > 春季 > 冬季。不同植被类型的土壤呼吸湿度敏感性大致表现为：裸地

草地

灌丛

林地。由此说明植被类型是影响土壤呼吸温度敏感性的重要因素，并且夏季和秋季土壤呼吸Q

显著高于春季和冬季。相关性分析表明土壤pH值与温度敏感性（Q

）呈显著负相关（p

0.05），与有机碳含量呈显著正相关（p

0.05）。不同植被类型土壤异养呼吸夏季的贡献率最高，春季的贡献率最低，贡献率依次表现为：夏季>秋季>冬季>春季，自养呼吸贡献率随季节的变化呈逐渐增加趋势。[结论

]

异养呼吸对土壤总呼吸的贡献率大于自养呼吸，微生物参与下的异养呼吸成为土壤呼吸中最主要的组成部分。

Abstract

[Objective] Soil respiration and its temperature sensitivity of different vegetation types were studied

in order to provide theoretical support for the assessment of terrestrial ecosystem carbon cycle.[Methods] Soil hydrothermal factors

respiration characteristics and temperature sensitivity in different seasons were studied in bare land

grassland

shrub and woodland at the southern foothill of Taihang Mountains by long-term location observation and laboratory analysis.[Results] Soil temperature of different vegetation types varied greatly with seasons

with the lowest value in the early January and the highest value in the late August. After August

soil temperature gradually decreased with time. The soil temperature in the same month was generally showed an oreder of bare land > grassland > shrubland > forestland

with the local fluctuations. Soil respiration rate of different vegetation types was significantly different and the seasonal variation characteristics were consistent. Among them

soil respiration

heterotrophic respiration and autotrophic respiration had the same seasonal variation characteristics (inverted V-shaped variation)

which roughly showed as follows:summer > autumn > spring > winter. Soil respiration humidity sensitivity of different vegetation types was as follows:bare land < grassland < shrubland < forestland

indicating that vegetation types were the important driving factor for soil respiration temperature sensitivity. Q10 in summer and autumn was significantly higher than that in spring and winter. Correlation analysis showed that Q10 was significantly negatively correlated with pH value(p<0.05)

and negatively correlated with the bulk density; Soil organic carbon was positively correlation with Q10 (p<0.05). Moreover

the contribution rate of soil heterotrophic respiration was the highest in summer and the lowest in spring. The contribution rate of soil heterotrophic respiration was as follows:in summer > in autumn > in winter > in spring

and the contribution rate of autotrophic respiration gradually increased with season.[Conclusion] Heterotrophic respiration contributed more to soil respiration than autotrophic respiration

and soil heterotrophic respiration with microbial participation is the most important component of soil respiration.

关键词

Keywords

references

Olsson P, Linder S, Giesler R, et al. Fertilization of boreal forest reduces both autotrophic and heterotrophic soil respiration[J]. Global Change Biology, 2010,11(10):1745-1753.

Allison S D, Czimczik C I, Treseder K K. Microbial activity and soil respiration under nitrogen addition in Alaskan boreal forest[J]. Global Change Biology, 2010,14(5):1156-1168.

Nocentini A, Monti A. Comparing soil respiration and carbon pools of a maize-wheat rotation and switchgrass for predicting land-use change-driven SOC variations[J]. Agricultural Systems, 2019,4(6):209-217.

Wen Li, Wang Jinlan, Zhang Xiaojiao, et al. Effect of degradation and rebuilding of artificial grasslands on soil respiration and carbon and nitrogen pools on an alpine meadow of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2018,111(21):134-142.

Wertin T M, Young K, Reed S C. Spatially explicit patterns in a dryland's soil respiration and relationships with climate, whole plant photosynthesis, and soil fertility[J]. Oikos, 2018,3(5):12-18.

Tian Qiuxiang, Wang Dongya, Tang Yanan, et al. Topographic controls on the variability of soil respiration in a humid subtropical forest[J]. Biogeochemistry, 2019,145(1/2):177-192.

Zhao Fazhu, Wang Jieying, Zhang Lu, et al. Understory plants regulate soil respiration through changes in soil enzyme activity and microbial C, N, and P stoichiometry following afforestation[J]. Forests, 2018,9(7):436-441.

Wang Dong, Chen Xinli, Chen Han, et al. Contrasting effects of thinning on soil CO

emission and above-and belowground carbon regime under a subtropical Chinese fir plantation[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019,690(10):361-369.

Yu Haiqing, Li Yong, Oshunsanya S O, et al. Re-introduction of light grazing reduces soil erosion and soil respiration in a converted grassland on the Loess Plateau, China[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2019,280(8):43-52.

张成芳,李德生,魏佳宇,等.3种城郊防护林土壤呼吸与温湿度的关系[J].江苏农业科学,2020,48(5):243-249.

刘顺,杨洪国,罗达,等.川西亚高山不同森林类型土壤呼吸和总硝化速率的季节动态[J].生态学报,2019,39(2):550-560.

李新鸽,韩广轩,朱连奇,等.降雨量改变对黄河三角洲滨海湿地土壤呼吸的影响[J].生态学报,2018,39(13):4806-4820.

王新友,马全林,靳虎甲,等.石羊河下游人工梭梭林土壤呼吸变化特征及其与水热因子的关系[J].干旱区地理,2019,42(3):570-580.

陈毅,闫文德,郑威,等.模拟氮沉降凋落物管理对樟树人工林土壤呼吸的影响[J].生态学报,2018,38(21):313-322.

徐丽,杨雁茹,张军辉,等.模拟氮沉降增加对中国陆地生态系统土壤呼吸的影响[J].生态学杂志,2019,38(5):1560-1569.

温超,单玉梅,晔薷罕,等.氮和水分添加对内蒙古荒漠草原放牧生态系统土壤呼吸的影响[J].植物生态学报,2019,43(2):80-92.

马志良,赵文强,刘美,等.土壤呼吸组分对气候变暖的响应研究进展[J].应用生态学报,2018,29(10):321-330.

李新鸽,韩广轩,朱连奇,等.降雨引起的干湿交替对土壤呼吸的影响:进展与展望[J].生态学杂志,2019,38(2):567-575.

康静,任海燕,王悦骅,等.短花针茅荒漠草原土壤呼吸对长期增温和氮素添加的响应[J].干旱区资源与环境,2019,33(5):153-159.

徐昳晅,同小娟,张劲松,等.太行山南麓刺槐人工林土壤呼吸与土壤温度间的滞后关系[J].北京林业大学学报,2019,41(4):78-87.

丁梦凯,胡晓农,曹建华,等.桂林毛村不同土地利用方式下土壤呼吸空间变异特征[J].环境科学,2019,40(2):924-933.

贾洪雷,李森森,王刚,等.玉米立茬与粉碎秸秆覆盖对生长季土壤呼吸的影响[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(8):154-163.

王红,王邵军,李霁航.西双版纳高檐蒲桃群落土壤呼吸的季节动态及主要影响因子分析[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2018,38(1):111-116.

赵龙飞,李德生,滕达,等.城市绿化景观土壤呼吸变化规律及影响因素[J].生态与农村环境学报,2019,35(7):885-891.

吴夏,潘谋成,曹建华,等.典型岩溶区土壤呼吸作用的昼夜变化特征及其影响因素[J].中国岩溶,2019,38(2):157-163.

胡同欣,胡海清,孙龙.中度火干扰对兴安落叶松林土壤呼吸的影响[J].生态学报,2018,15(8):2915-2924.

浏览量

1195

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

塔里木河下游土壤种子库的季节差异分析

黔中喀斯特地区5种林型冬季土壤呼吸研究

黄土丘陵区坡地侵蚀对土壤呼吸的影响

四川丘陵区典型边坡土壤酶活性的季节动态

长江中游城市群降碳-减污-扩绿-增长耦合协调的时空演变及影响机制