赣南丘陵区典型林分水源涵养功能评价

艾彪; 黄云; 朱元皓; 谢泽阳; 黄琼瑶; 郑博福; 朱锦奇

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.01.028

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

赣南丘陵区典型林分水源涵养功能评价

试验与调查研究

- 赣南丘陵区典型林分水源涵养功能评价
- Evaluation of Water Conservation Capacity of Litter and Soil Layer in Typical Forest Stands in Hilly Region of Southern Jiangxi Province
- 水土保持通报 2021年41卷第1期页码：197-205
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 南昌大学资源环境与化工学院, 鄱阳湖环境与资源利用教育部重点实验室,江西,南昌,330031
  2. 江西生态文明研究院,江西,南昌,330031
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  科技重点研发计划课题“南方丘陵山地屏障带生态系统服务格局及演变机制”（2017YFC05056）
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.01.028
  中图分类号： S715;S714.7
- 纸质出版：2021
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
艾彪, 黄云, 朱元皓, 等. 赣南丘陵区典型林分水源涵养功能评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(1):197-205.

Ai Biao, Huang Yun, Zhu Yuanhao, et al. Evaluation of Water Conservation Capacity of Litter and Soil Layer in Typical Forest Stands in Hilly Region of Southern Jiangxi Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(1): 197-205.
艾彪, 黄云, 朱元皓, 等. 赣南丘陵区典型林分水源涵养功能评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(1):197-205. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.01.028.

Ai Biao, Huang Yun, Zhu Yuanhao, et al. Evaluation of Water Conservation Capacity of Litter and Soil Layer in Typical Forest Stands in Hilly Region of Southern Jiangxi Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(1): 197-205. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.01.028.

摘要

[目的

]

明确不同林分类型整体水源涵养能力的差异性，为赣南丘陵区水源涵养功能和生态系统服务的恢复提供理论依据。[方法

]

以赣南丘陵区江西省赣州市崇义县境内两种主要天然林（楠木和毛竹），以及两种典型人工经济果林地（脐橙和茶）为研究对象，利用水浸法和双环法对林分的枯落物层与土壤层的持水性进行测定，同时利用熵权法对枯落物层和土壤层的相关指标进行综合评价。[结果

]

①4种林分枯落物层蓄积量、最大持水量和有效拦蓄量范围分别为9.19~16.70，13.43~31.02，6.99~14.08 t/hm

；土壤非毛管孔隙度、有效持水量和最大持水量均值范围分别为5.80~10.05%，57.98~100.50，447.76~580.17 t/hm

，均为楠木林最大，茶林最小。②4种林地土壤初渗速率与稳渗速率变化趋势相一致，排列顺序为：毛竹林>楠木林>茶林>脐橙林。③在4种林分水源涵养能力综合评分中，两种天然林要高于两种经济果林。④土壤稳渗速率是影响林分整体水源涵养能力最显著的指标，其次为枯落物最大持水量和有效拦蓄量，而土壤容重的影响最低。[结论

]

赣南丘陵区两种天然林水源涵养能力高于两种经济果林，而该区域人工经济果林水源涵养能力的大幅度降低将进一步导致土地退化，加速水土流失，是区域可持续发展的重要生态风险隐患之一。

Abstract

[Objective] The variation in water conservation capacity in different stands was studied to provide a theoretical basis for the restoration of the water conservation function and ecosystem services in Southern Jiangxi Province.[Methods] All experiments were conducted in Chongyi County

Ganzhou City

Jiangxi Province. Two main natural forests

Phoebe zhennan and Phyllostachys heterocycla

and two typical artificial economic fruit forests

Citrus sinensis and Camellia sinensis

were selected. The water holding capacity of the litter layer and soil layer was measured by the water immersion and double ring methods. Related indices of the litter layer and soil layer were evaluated by the entropy weight method.[Results] ① The litter volume

maximum water holding capacity

and effective interception capacity of the four kinds of stand were 9.19-16.70

13.43-31.02

and 6.99-14.08 t/ha

respectively. The average ranges of soil noncapillary porosity

effective water holding capacity

and maximum water holding capacity were 5.49%-10.05%

57.98-100.50 t/ha

and 447.76-580.17 t/ha

respectively. All traits in the P. zhennan forest were found to be greater than in the other stands

and the lowest were in the C. sinensis forest. ② Four stands had similar changed tendencies of soil initial infiltration rate and stable infiltration rate. The order was P. heterocycla forest > P. zhennan forest > C. sinensis forest > C. sinensis forest. ③ The comprehensive scores of the water conservation capacity of the natural forests (P. zhennan forest and P. heterocycla forest) were higher than those of the economic forests. ④ The water conservation capacity of the stand was mostly affected by soil steady infiltration rate

followed by maximum water holding capacity and effective retention capacity of the litter

while the soil bulk density was the lowest.[Conclusion] The water conservation capacity of natural forests is higher than that of economic fruit forests in the hilly area of South Jiangxi Province. The land degradation and accelerated soil erosion are driven by the reduction of the water conservation capacity of artificial economic forests in this area

leading to an important ecological risk to the sustainable development of this region.

关键词

Keywords

references

熊壮,叶文,张树斌,等.西双版纳热带季节雨林与橡胶林凋落物的持水特性[J].浙江农林大学学报,2018,35(6):1054-1061.

王利,于立忠,张金鑫,等.浑河上游水源地不同林型水源涵养功能分析[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(3):249-255.

郭宇嘉,牛庆花,陆贵巧,等.承德市第三乡林场不同林分类型枯落物和土壤的持水特性[J].水土保持通报,2018,38(3):38-44.

Song Xiang, Yan Changzhen, Xie Jiali, et al. Assessment of changes in the area of the water conservation forest in the Qilian Mountains of China's Gansu province, and the effects on water conservation[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2012,66(8):2441-2448.

张彪,李文华,谢高地,等.森林生态系统的水源涵养功能及其计量方法[J].生态学杂志,2009,28(3):529-534.

Xie Gaodi, Li Wenhua, Xiao Yu, et al. Forest ecosystem services and their values in Beijing[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2010,20(1):51-58.

丁访军,王兵,钟洪明,等.赤水河下游不同林地类型土壤物理特性及其水源涵养功能[J].水土保持学报,2009,23(3):179-183,231.

罗佳,田育新,周小玲,等.不同造林模式水源涵养功能研究[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2017,37(3):79-85.

潘春翔,李裕元,彭亿,等.湖南乌云界自然保护区典型生态系统的土壤持水性能[J].生态学报,2012,32(2):538-547.

张杰,陈晓安,汤崇军,等.典型水土保持措施对红壤坡地柑橘园水土保持效益的影响[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(24):165-173.

张海波,张明阳,王克林,等.南方丘陵山地带水源涵养功能变化特征[J].农业现代化研究,2014,35(3):345-348.

肖海兵,李忠武,聂小东,等.南方红壤丘陵区土壤侵蚀-沉积作用对土壤酶活性的影响[J].土壤学报,2016,53(4):881-890.

袁再健,马东方,聂小东,等.南方红壤丘陵区林下水土流失防治研究进展[J].土壤学报,2020,57(1):12-21.

白晋华,胡振华,郭晋平.华北山地次生林典型森林类型枯落物及土壤水文效应研究[J].水土保持学报,2009,23(2):84-89.

徐洪亮,满秀玲,盛后财.大兴安岭不同类型落叶松天然林水源涵养功能研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(4):92-96.

刘宇,郭建斌,王彦辉,等.宁夏六盘山不同密度华北落叶松人工林枯落物水文效应[J].北京林业大学学报,2016,38(8):36-44.

石媛,鲁绍伟,陈波,等.河北雾灵山不同密度油松人工林枯落物及土壤水文效应[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(3):92-97.

马国飞,满苏尔·沙比提,张雪琪.托木尔峰自然保护区台兰河上游不同植被类型的水源涵养功能[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(1):210-216,224.

陈波,孟成生,赵耀新,等.冀北山地不同海拔华北落叶松人工林枯落物和土壤水文效应[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(3):216-221.

丁霞,程昌锦,漆良华,等.丹江口库区湖北水源区不同密度马尾松人工林水源涵养能力[J].生态学杂志,2019,38(8):2291-2301.

Dunkerley D. Percolation through leaf litter:What happens during rainfall events of varying intensity?[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2015,525:737-746.

孙艳红,张洪江,杜士才,等.四面山不同林地类型土壤特性及其水源涵养功能[J].水土保持学报,2009,23(5):109-112,117.

彭玉华,郑威,谭长强,等.广西壮族自治区的台湾桤木混交造林水源涵养功能评价[J].水土保持通报,2019,39(5):98-105,112.

贾剑波,刘文娜,余新晓,等.半城子流域3种林地枯落物的持水能力[J].中国水土保持科学,2015,13(6):26-32.

Leer R. Forest Hydrology[M]. New York:Columbia University Press, 1980.

Zhao Jie, Wan Songze, Li Zhi'an, et al. Dicranopteris-dominated understory as major driver of intensive forest ecosystem in humid subtropical and tropical region[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2012,49:78-87.

龙春玲,刘腾飞,于芬,等.厚壁毛竹与毛竹叶片的光学解剖结构比较分析[J].安徽农业大学学报,2015,42(1):39-44.

杨霞,陈丽华,康影丽,等.辽东低山区5种典型水源涵养林枯落物持水特性[J].生态学杂志,2019,38(9):2662-2670.

杨吉华,张永涛,李红云,等.不同林分枯落物的持水性能及对表层土壤理化性状的影响[J].水土保持学报,2003,17(2):141-144.

王燕,王兵,赵广东,等.江西大岗山3种林型土壤水分物理性质研究[J].水土保持学报, 2008,22(1):151-153.

孙艳红,张洪江,程金花,等.缙云山不同林地类型土壤特性及其水源涵养功能[J].水土保持学报,2006,20(2):106-109.

浏览量

1246

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

甘肃省兴隆山天然林下苔藓凋落物蓄积量及持水特性

晋西黄土丘陵区不同人工林枯落物持水特性研究

大兴安岭典型针阔混交林区土壤持水效应

小兴安岭不同森林类型枯落物储量及其持水特性比较

浙江省天台县不同森林类型枯落物及土壤水文特性