1. 太原师范学院 汾河流域科学发展研究中心,山西,晋中,030619
2. 陕西师范大学 地理科学与旅游学院,陕西,西安,710119
3. 太原师范学院 管理系,山西,晋中,030619
纸质出版:2021
移动端阅览
苏迎庆, 刘庚, 赵景波, 等. 2006-2018年汾河流域土地生态安全预警测度及时空格局演变[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(1):144-151.
Su Yingqing, Liu Geng, Zhao Jingbo, et al. Land Ecological Security Early Warning Measure and Spatial-Temporal Pattern Evolution in Fenhe River Basin During 2006-2018[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(1): 144-151.
苏迎庆, 刘庚, 赵景波, 等. 2006-2018年汾河流域土地生态安全预警测度及时空格局演变[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(1):144-151. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.01.021.
Su Yingqing, Liu Geng, Zhao Jingbo, et al. Land Ecological Security Early Warning Measure and Spatial-Temporal Pattern Evolution in Fenhe River Basin During 2006-2018[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(1): 144-151. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.01.021.
[目的] 开展汾河流域土地生态安全预警研究,为流域土地资源科学合理利用及可持续发展提供参考。[方法] 采用乘算模型、空间自相关及地理探测器方法分析2006-2018年流域土地生态安全警度的时空格局演化特征及主导因子。[结果] ①2006-2018年汾河流域土地生态安全警度演变趋势为向上开口抛物线的曲线特征,且由“较不安全”向“临界安全”状态转变。②空间上土地生态安全警度呈现“大集聚,小分散”的特征,并经历“下降-提高”的过程。③警度空间自相关由“正相关-负相关-正相关”转变,与流域土地生态安全警度时空格局分布基本一致。④影响流域土地生态安全的主导因子为经济发展水平、环境保护投入与治理力度、土地利用效率。[结论] 未来应优化汾河流域生产、生活、生态空间布局,建立流域生态补偿机制,加大环境保护与科研投入力度促进流域的生态安全水平的提高。
[Objective] The early warning on the ecological security of watershed land in Fenhe River was studied to provide references for the scientific and rational utilization and sustainable development of watershed land resources.[Methods] The spatial and temporal pattern evolution characteristics and leading factors of land ecological security alertness in the basin from 2006 to 2018 were analyzed using a multiplier model
spatial autocorrelation
and a geographic detector.[Results] ① From 2006 to 2018
the evolution trend of the land ecological security alarm degree in the Fenhe River basin was a parabolic curve with upward opening
and it changed from the "less safe" to the "critically safe" state. ② Spatially
the ecological security alert degree of land was characterized by "large agglomeration and small dispersion" and underwent the process of "decline to increase." ③ The change in spatial autocorrelation of alertness experienced the process of "positive-correlation-negative-correlation-positive correlation
" which was basically consistent with the spatial and temporal distribution of the ecological security alertness of the watershed land. ④ The leading factors affecting the land ecological security of the river basin for many years were the level of economic development
investment and governance of environmental protection
and land use efficiency.[Conclusion] In the future
the layout of production
living
and ecological space in the Fenhe River basin should be optimized. The ecological compensation mechanism of the basin should be established. Investment in environmental protection and scientific research should be increased to promote the ecological security level of the basin.
Su Shiliang, Chen Xia, Degloria S D, et al. Integrative fuzzy set pair model for land ecological security assessment:A case study of Xiaolangdi Reservoir Region, China[J]. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2010,24(05):639-647.
彭建,赵会娟,刘焱序,等.区域生态安全格局构建研究进展与展望[J].地理研究,2017,36(3):407-419.
Li Jiaxiu, Chen Yaning, Xu Changchun, et al. Evaluation and analysis of ecological security in arid areas of Central Asia based on the emergy ecological footprint(EEF)model[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019,235:664-677.
韦宇婵,张丽琴.河南省土地生态安全警情时空演变及障碍因子[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(3):238-246.
Li Sucui, Wu Xiao, Zhao Yanling, et al. Incorporating ecological risk index in the multi-process MCRE model to optimize the ecological security pattern in a semi-arid area with intensive coal mining:A case study in Northern China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020,247:119143.
李昊,李世平,银敏华.中国土地生态安全研究进展与展望[J].干旱区资源与环境,2016,30(9):50-56.
张成,黄芳芳,尚国琲.土地生态安全预警系统设计与实现[J].中国生态农业学报(中英文),2020,28(6):931-944.
黄烈佳,杨鹏.长江经济带土地生态安全时空演化特征及影响因素[J].长江流域资源与环境,2019,28(8):1780-1790.
Zhang Li, Chen Ying, Wang Shutao, et al. Assessment and early warning of land ecological security in rapidly urbanizing coastal area:A case study of Caofeidian new district, Hebei, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2015,26(8):2445-2454.
张洪,王安琦,宋贝扬.基于OWA的大理市土地生态安全评价研究[J].地理科学,2017,37(11):1778-1784.
马世五,谢德体,张孝成,等.三峡库区重庆段土地生态状况时空格局演变特征[J].生态学报,2018,38(23):8512-8525.
Xie Hualin, He Yafen, Choi Yongrok, et al. Warning of negative effects of land-use changes on ecological security based on GIS[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020,704:135427.
刘秀丽,郭丕斌,张勃,等.采煤与脆弱生态复合区生态安全评价:以山西为例[J].干旱区研究,2018,35(3):677-685.
何珍珍,王宏卫,杨胜天,等.塔里木盆地中北部绿洲生态安全评价[J].干旱区研究,2018,35(4):963-970.
李京京,吕哲敏,石小平,等.基于地形梯度的汾河流域土地利用时空变化分析[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(7):230-236.
郭利刚,冯珍珍,刘庚,等.基于物元模型的汾河流域土地生态安全评价[J].生态学杂志,2020,39(6):2061-2069.
山西省统计局.山西省统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2006-2018.
中华人民共和国统计局.中国县(市)社会经济统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2006-2018.
张凤太,王腊春,苏维词.基于物元分析-DPSIR概念模型的重庆土地生态安全评价[J].中国环境科学,2016,36(10):3126-3134.
麦丽开·艾麦提,满苏尔·沙比提,张雪琪,等.基于PSR-EEES模型的叶尔羌河平原绿洲生态安全预警测度[J].中国农业大学学报,2020,25(2):130-141.
魏小芳,赵宇鸾,李秀彬,等.基于"三生功能"的长江上游城市群国土空间特征及其优化[J].长江流域资源与环境,2019,28(5):1070-1079.
王富喜,毛爱华,李赫龙,等.基于熵值法的山东省城镇化质量测度及空间差异分析[J].地理科学,2013,33(11):1323-1329.
吕广斌,廖铁军,姚秋昇,等.基于DPSIR-EES-TOPSIS模型的重庆市土地生态安全评价及其时空分异[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(6):249-258,266.
李俊翰,高明秀.滨州市生态系统服务价值与生态风险时空演变及其关联性[J].生态学报,2019,39(21):7815-7828.
邓楚雄,钟小龙,谢炳庚,等.洞庭湖区土地生态系统的服务价值时空变化[J].地理研究,2019,38(4):844-855.
王劲峰,徐成东.地理探测器:原理与展望[J].地理学报,2017,72(1):116-134.
孙泽乾,杨晓霞,曾于珈.基于地理探测器的重庆市旅游发展水平空间分异影响因子研究[J].西南师范大学学报(自然科学版),2019,44(4):57-63.
马勇,童昀,任洁,等.公众参与型环境规制的时空格局及驱动因子研究:以长江经济带为例[J].地理科学,2018,38(11):1799-1808.
0
浏览量
1829
下载量
9
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621