1. 山东泰山森林生态系统国家定位研究站, 山东农业大学 林学院,山东,泰安,271018
2. 淮河水利委员会 淮河流域水土保持监测中心站,安徽,蚌埠,233001
纸质出版:2021
移动端阅览
高睿瑜, 张芷温, 李文龙, 等. 2018-2019年河南省兰考县土地利用变化对耕地风蚀的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(1):112-117.
Gao Ruiyu, Zhang Zhiwen, Li Wenlong, et al. Effects of Cultivated Land on Wind Erosion of Annual Land Use Change at Lankao County, He'nan Province During 2018-2019[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(1): 112-117.
高睿瑜, 张芷温, 李文龙, 等. 2018-2019年河南省兰考县土地利用变化对耕地风蚀的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(1):112-117. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.01.016.
Gao Ruiyu, Zhang Zhiwen, Li Wenlong, et al. Effects of Cultivated Land on Wind Erosion of Annual Land Use Change at Lankao County, He'nan Province During 2018-2019[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(1): 112-117. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.01.016.
[目的
]
探索淮河流域黄泛平原风沙预防区耕地风蚀现状、年度动态及其变化原因,为区域风蚀研究与治理提供科学依据。[方法
]
选取河南省兰考县为研究对象,通过高分辨率遥感影像解译2018,2019年土地利用信息,采用耕地风蚀模型计算风蚀模数,分析土地利用年度变化对耕地风蚀的影响。[结果
]
①2018-2019年,兰考县土地利用以水浇地为主,出现土地利用变化的区域面积为21.40 km
2
,水浇地动态度为-1.54%,主要变化类型为水浇地转为其他林地,面积7.19 km
2
。②兰考县耕地风蚀主要为微度,其次为轻度。2018-2019年,轻度侵蚀面积减少17.04 km
2
,动态度为-12.13%。③ 2018-2019年,兰考县耕地风蚀变化的主要原因是水浇地面积、空间位置的变化,因水浇地转出导致侵蚀减少的面积为3.36 km
2
,主要位于仪封乡、城关镇等区域;因水浇地转入造成侵蚀增加的面积为0.98 km
2
,主要位于仪封乡、葡萄架乡等区域。[结论
]
淮河流域黄泛平原风沙预防区土地利用结构、耕地风蚀特点鲜明,水浇地变化直接影响耕地风蚀。因此,区域应多关注耕地风蚀治理及耕地合理利用。
[Objective] The current situation and annual dynamic change of wind erosion on cultivated land in the Yellow River alluvial area of the Huaihe River basin were studied to provide a scientific basis for regional wind erosion research and control.[Methods] Lankao County
He'nan Province
was selected as the research area to interpret the land use information in 2018 and 2019 using high-resolution remote-sensing images. The wind erosion model of cultivated land was used to calculate the modulus of wind erosion
and the effects on wind erosion of cultivated land of annual land-use change were analyzed.[Results] ① In 2018-2019
the major type of land use at Lankao County was irrigated land
and the area of land use change was 21.40 km2. The dynamic degree of irrigated land was -1.54%. The main change in land use was from irrigated land to forest land (7.19 km2). ② The main wind erosion intensity on cultivated land at Lankao City was mild erosion
followed by light erosion. The erosion area was reduced by 17.04 km2
and the dynamic degree was -12.13%. ③ During 2018-2019
the changes in wind erosion on cultivated land at Lankao County were closely related to the changes in the area and spatial location of the irrigated land. The area of erosion reduction caused by the rotation of irrigated land was 3.36 km2
mainly located in Yifeng Township
Chengguan Town and other areas. The area increased by 0.98 km2 due to the transfer of irrigated land
which was mainly located in Yifeng township
Putaojia Town and other areas.[Conclusion] The characteristics of land use and wind erosion on cultivated land in the Yellow River alluvial area of the Huaihe River basin are distinct
and the changes in irrigated land directly affect cultivated land wind erosion. Therefore
more attention should be paid to controlling the wind erosion of cultivated land and using the cultivated land effectively.
王友胜.淮河流域黄泛区风水侵蚀格局及其驱动因子研究[D].山东泰安:山东农业大学,2012.
宋胜明.黄泛区不同耕地类型土壤理化特性及其风蚀影响因子研究[D].山东泰安:山东农业大学,2017.
冯精金,史明昌,姜群鸥.潮白河流域土地利用/覆被变化对土壤侵蚀的影响[J].中国水土保持科学,2019,17(3):121-132.
毛旭芮,杨建军,曹月娥,等.土壤结皮面积与结皮分布对风蚀影响的风洞模拟研究[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(3):1-7.
Kouchami-Sardoo I, Shirani H, Esfandiarpour-Boroujeni I, et al. Application of a Bayesian belief network model for assessing the risk of wind erosion:A test with data from wind tunnel experiments[J].Aeolian Research,2019,41:100543.
Feizi Z, Ayoubi S, Mosaddeghi M R, et al. A wind tunnel experiment to investigate the effect of polyvinyl acetate, biochar, and bentonite on wind erosion control[J]. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 2019,65(8):1049-1062.
梁会,田美荣,钱金平,等.基于风蚀模型的宁夏土壤风蚀特征及影响因素[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(1):34-40.
袁利,张春强,张芷温,等.淮河流域黄泛平原风沙区水土流失格局[J].中国水土保持,2019(12):10-13.
王旭洋,郭中领,常春平,等.中国北方农牧交错带土壤风蚀时空分布[J].中国沙漠,2020,40(1):12-22.
徐涛,蒙仲举,党晓宏,等.乌兰布和沙漠绿洲农田不同土地利用方式地表风蚀特征研究[J].土壤,2018,50(3):606-612.
康玉梅,常春平,王仁德,等.北方农牧交错带缓坡耕地土壤风蚀特征[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(5):55-58.
朱震达.湿润及半湿润地带的土地风沙化问题[J].中国沙漠,1986,6(4):5-16,2.
李福兴.黄淮海平原砂地土壤的基本特性及其改造利用的初步研究:以山东省夏津县黄河故道区为例[J].中国沙漠,1989,9(1):50-63.
李孝永,匡文慧.北京城市土地利用/覆盖变化及其对雨洪调节服务的影响[J].生态学报,2020,40(16):5525-5533.
李茂娟,李天奇,朱连奇,等.50年来东北黑土区土地利用变化对沟蚀的影响:以克东地区为例[J].地理研究,2019,38(12):2913-2926.
黄凯旋,刘扬,董晓健,等.基于土地利用变化的三峡库区(湖北段)土壤侵蚀消长研究[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(1):1-6,20.
宋胜明,刘霞,张荣华,等.黄泛风沙区耕地土壤风蚀影响因子的通径分析[J].水土保持通报,2017,37(3):249-253.
皮泓漪,张萌雪,夏建新.黄土高原退耕区土地利用变化及土壤侵蚀分析:以宁夏泾源县为例[J].应用基础与工程科学学报,2020,28(3):522-534.
刘金巍,靳甜甜,刘国华,等.黑河中上游地区2000-2010年土地利用变化及水土保持服务功能[J].生态学报,2014,34(23):7013-7025.
中华人民共和国水利部.土壤侵蚀分类分级标准:SL 190-2007[S].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2008.
张乐.鲁西北黄泛区土壤侵蚀研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2019.
0
浏览量
1293
下载量
4
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621