郑州轻工业大学 环境设计系,河南,郑州,450002
纸质出版:2020
移动端阅览
贾琦. 河南省巩义市土地利用演化及其生态系统服务价值响应[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020,40(6):249-258.
Jia Qi. Evolution of Land Use and its Response of Ecosystem Service Value in Gongyi City of He'nan Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2020, 40(6): 249-258.
贾琦. 河南省巩义市土地利用演化及其生态系统服务价值响应[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020,40(6):249-258. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.06.036.
Jia Qi. Evolution of Land Use and its Response of Ecosystem Service Value in Gongyi City of He'nan Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2020, 40(6): 249-258. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.06.036.
[目的] 从格网尺度探讨河南省巩义市1990-2019年区域土地利用演化及其生态系统服务价值(ESV)响应特征,为同类地区的快速城镇化地区生态系统保护和国土空间规划提供决策依据。[方法] 以河南省巩义市1990-2019年4期土地利用解译数据为基础,在格网尺度下,基于修正后的生态系统服务价值当量,估算巩义市生态系统服务价值,并深入探讨其空间自相关特征。[结果] ①研究期间,巩义市建设用地增幅最高,与此相反,水域和灌木林则出现大幅减少,两者降幅分别为-45.17%和-10.09%。用地类型转移方面,水域和耕地转出面积最多,主要转出类型分别为耕地和建设用地。②生态系统服务价值整体呈现出波动式下跌的趋势,近30 a共减少了34.851亿元。水域、乔木林和耕地是巩义市ESV的主要组成部分。从变化特征来看,水域ESV跌幅明显,共减少了35.549亿元。以水文调节和气候调节为主的调节服务在区域ESV构成中占主导地位,同时其近30 a来的损失率也处于高位。③空间探索性分析发现,ESV近30 a出现了大幅下降,区域城镇化进程对生态系统影响的负面效应显著,北部以水域、耕地和建设用地为主的ESV高值区和低值区变化较明显,南部以林地和高覆盖度草地为主的生态资源集中区则变化相对稳定。1990年ESV较高区域集中在黄河、伊洛河沿线及南部伏羲山等地,而ESV较低区域则主要以巩义市区及东西地形较为平坦区域一带;2000年以后,高值片区快速减少且多集中在黄河沿线;2000-2010年,主城区低值ESV区域受快速城镇扩张影响逐步蔓延,在城区及巩义-芝田镇-回郭镇、巩义-竹林镇-米河镇等西向和东向两条带状片区已形成ESV低值集聚区。[结论] 巩义市建设用地扩张加剧,由此引发的区域生态系统持续下降,且空间分布与人类社会经济发展紧密相关。
[Objective] Based on the scale of network unit
the regional land use evolution and its ecosystem service value response characteristics from 1990 to 2019 were studied in order to provide decision-making basis for ecosystem protection and land spatial planning in rapid urbanization area represented by Gongyi City.[Methods] Based on the interpretation data of land use from 1990 to 2019 and the modified ESV equivalent at the grid scale
the ecosystem service value was estimated at Gongyi City
He'nan Province
and its spatial auto-correlation characteristics were discussed.[Results] ① During the study period
the growth rate of construction land in Gongyi City was the highest
on the contrary
the water area and shrubbery decreased significantly
with a decline of -45.17% and -10.09% respectively. In terms of land type transfer
the area of water and cultivated land was the most
and the main transfer out types were cultivated land and construction land. ② The value of ecosystem services showed a fluctuating downward trend
with a total decrease of 3.485 billion yuan in the past 30 years. Water area
arbor forest and cultivated land were the main components of ESV in Gongyi City. From the perspective of change characteristics
ESV in water area decreased significantly
with a total decrease of 3 554.9 million yuan. The regulation services dominated by hydrological regulation and climate regulation played a leading role in the composition of regional ESV
and its loss rate in the past 30 years was at a high level. ③ Spatial exploratory analysis showed that ESV had declined significantly in recent 30 years
and the negative effects of regional urbanization process on ecosystem were significant. The changes of high and low value areas of ESV in the north were mainly water area
cultivated land and construction land
while those in the south were mainly forestland and high coverage grassland
which were relatively stable. In 1990
the higher ESV areas were concentrated along the Yellow River
Yiluo River and Fuxi Mountain in the south
while the areas with lower ESV were mainly Gongyi City and the areas with relatively flat terrains in the east and the west. After 2000
the areas with higher ESV were rapidly reduced and mostly concentrated along the Yellow River. During 2000-2010
the low value ESV area in the main urban area gradually spread under the influence of rapid urban expansion. The low value concentration area of ESV had been formed in the urban area and the west and east oriented two belt areas of Gongyi City-Zhitian Town-Huiguo Town and Gongyi City-Zhulin Town-Mihe Town.[Conclusion] The expansion of construction land in Gongyi City is intensified
which leads to the continuous decline of regional ecosystem
and the spatial distribution is closely related to the development of human society and economy.
侯鹏,王桥,申文明,等.生态系统综合评估研究进展:内涵、框架与挑战[J].地理研究,2015,34(10):1809-1823.
李方一."千年生态系统评估"对生态人类学的借鉴意义[J].中央民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2009,36(2):46-51.
王洁,摆万奇,田国行.土地利用生态风险评价研究进展[J].自然资源学报,2020,35(3):576-585.
宁佳,邵全琴.黄土高原土地利用及生态系统服务时空变化特征研究[J].农业环境科学学报,2020,39(4):774-785.
Geange S, Townsend M, Clark D, et al. Communicating the value of marine conservation using an ecosystem service matrix approach[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2019, 35(2):150-163.
王大菊,卫海燕,贺敏,等.基于土地利用的三峡库区生态系统服务价值时空格局分析[J].长江流域资源与环境,2020,29(1):90-100.
王磊,何冬梅,江浩,等.江苏滨海湿地生态系统服务功能价值评估[J].生态科学,2016,35(5):169-175.
赵丽,张蓬涛,周智.环首都贫困区土地利用变化对生态系统的影响及驱动因素分析:以河北涞水县为例[J].中国农业资源与区划,2013,34(5):74-81.
邓伟,周渝,张勇,等.重庆市生态保护红线区生态系统服务价值时空演变特征及其驱动[J].长江流域资源与环境,2020,29(1):79-89.
Kalfas D G, Zagkas D T, Dragozi E I, et al. Estimating value of the ecosystem services in the urban and peri-urban green of a town Florina-Greece, using the CVM[J]. The International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 2020, 27(1):310-321.
刘愿理,廖和平,李靖,等.生态脆弱区土地利用多功能空间格局特征及影响因素分析[J].中国土地科学,2020,34(2):75-83.
马丽君,程久苗,程建,等.土地利用隐性转型影响因素分析[J].中国土地科学,2019,33(7):81-90.
Tanner M K, Moity N, Costa M T, et al. Mangroves in the Galapagos:Ecosystem services and their valuation[J]. Ecological Economics, 2019, 160(6):12-24.
李子君,刘金玉,姜爱霞,等.基于土地利用的祊河流域生态系统服务价值动态变化[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(2):269-275,283.
朱增云,阿里木江·卡斯木.干旱区绿洲城市生态系统服务价值空间自相关格局分析与模拟[J].生态与农村环境学报,2019,35(12):1531-1540.
杨莹,侯凯旋,岳卫峰,等.基于复合系统相互作用关系的水资源承载力研究:以巩义市为例[J].北京师范大学学报(自然科学版),2019,55(5):669-676.
谢高地,张彩霞,张雷明,等.基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J].自然资源学报,2015,30(8):1243-1254.
田俊峰,王彬燕,程利莎,等.政策主导下的区域土地利用转型过程与机制:以中国东北地区为例[J].地理研究,2020,39(4):805-821.
王颖,顾朝林.基于格网分析法的城市弹性增长边界划定研究:以苏州市为例[J].城市规划,2017,41(3):25-30.
宋文飞,李国平,韩先锋.生态系统服务价值化:经济理论脉络及现代解读[J].科技管理研究,2015,35(9):244-249.
谢高地,肖玉,甄霖,等.我国粮食生产的生态服务价值研究[J].中国生态农业学报, 2005, 13(3):10-13.
郭椿阳,高尚,周伯燕,等.基于格网的伏牛山区土地利用变化对生态服务价值影响研究[J].生态学报,2019,39(10):3482-3493.
张利国,鲍丙飞,杨胜苏.我国农业可持续发展空间探索性分析[J].经济地理,2019,39(11):159-164.
刘耀林,郝弘睿,谢婉婷,等.基于生态系统服务价值的土地利用空间优化[J].地理与地理信息科学,2019,35(1):69-74.
0
浏览量
799
下载量
1
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621