1. 曲靖师范学院 文化旅游学院,云南,曲靖,655011
2. 云南师范大学 旅游与地理科学学院,云南,昆明,650092
纸质出版:2020
移动端阅览
童彦, 潘玉君, 张梅芬, 等. 云南省城市化与水资源的耦合协调发展研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020,40(6):243-248.
Tong Yan, Pan Yujun, Zhang Meifen, et al. Coupling and Coordinated Development of Urbanization and Water Resources in Yunnan Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2020, 40(6): 243-248.
童彦, 潘玉君, 张梅芬, 等. 云南省城市化与水资源的耦合协调发展研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020,40(6):243-248. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.06.035.
Tong Yan, Pan Yujun, Zhang Meifen, et al. Coupling and Coordinated Development of Urbanization and Water Resources in Yunnan Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2020, 40(6): 243-248. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.06.035.
[目的] 研究城市化系统与水资源的相互作用,为正确评价城市化与水资源耦合协调关系提供科学依据,进而为促进区域人口、资源、经济及生态环境的协调发展提供决策参考。[方法] 运用耦合协调发展相关研究成果,从人口城市化、土地城市化和社会城市化3方面构建城市化评价指标体系;从水资源禀赋、水资源压力和水资源管理3方面构建水资源评价指标体系,进而构建城市化与水资源耦合协调发展评价指标体系。以2008-2017年相关数据为支撑,定量测算云南省多年城市化与水资源耦合度、发展度和协调度,并根据协调发展类型划分标准对研究时段内云南省城市化与水资源的协调发展类型和对比类型进行划分,并在此基础上对二者的协调状态进行评估;同时在GIS技术支持下,分别以2008和2017年为时间节点,揭示不同时段云南省各市(州)城市化与水资源协调发展的空间格局特征与空间格局的变化特征。[结果] ①从时间序列特征看,云南省城市化与水资源协调发展先后经历了2个阶段,即磨合阶段和协调阶段;②自2013年起由城市化滞后向水资源滞后转变;③从空间格局特征看,呈现以昆明市为中心,从中部"协调型"逐步转变为边缘"失调型"的空间格局。[结论] 云南省城市化与水资源之间的相互依赖程度高,协调发展与总体发展趋势良好,但空间差异显著;城市化进程促进了水资源效率提高,同时水资源对经济社会发展支撑能力的提高又有效推动了城市化进程。
[Objective] The interaction between urbanization system and water resource system was studied in order to provide a scientific basis for the correct evaluation of the coupling and coordination relationship between urbanization and water resources
and to provide decision reference for promote the coordinated development of regional population
resources
economy and ecological environment.[Methods] Apply coupling and coordination research achievement
the urbanization evaluation index system was established from three aspects of population urbanization
land urbanization and social urbanization build. Water resource evaluation index system was established from water resources levels
water resource stress and water resource management
and then the coupling and coordination evaluation index system about urbanization and water resources was established. Based on the relevant data from 2008 to 2017
the coupling degree development index and coordinated development degree between urbanization and water resources in Yunnan Province was quantitatively calculated. According to the classification of coordinated development types
the coordinated development types and comparison types in Yunnan Province during the study period were divided
and the coordination status was evaluated. At the same time
with the support of GIS technology
taking 2008 and 2017 as the time points
the spatial pattern characteristics and spatial pattern of variation characteristics between urbanization and water resources in different cities (states) in Yunnan Province were studied.[Results] ① From the characteristics of time series
the coordinated development of urbanization and water resources experienced two phases
namely
run-in phase and coordination phase.② The urbanization lag had shifted to water resources lag since 2013 in Yunnan Province. ③ From the feature of spatial pattern
the spatial pattern with Kunming City as the center gradually changed from the central "coordination" to the edge "disorder".[Conclusion] There is a high degree of interdependence between urbanization and water resources in Yunnan Province. The coordinated development and overall development trend is good
but the spatial difference of the coordinated development types is significant. The process of urbanization has promoted the efficiency of water resources
at the same time
the improvement of support of water resources for economic and social development effectively promoted the process of urbanization.
钱易,唐孝炎.环境保护与可持续发展[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2013,4-7.
张胜武,石培基,王祖静.干旱区内陆河流域城市化与水资源环境系统交互耦合分析:以石羊河流域为例[J].经济地理,2012,32(8):142-148.
Srinivasan V, Seto K C, Emerson R, et al. The impact of urbanization on water vulnerability:A coupled human-environment system approach for Chennai, India[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2013,23(1):229-239.
冯文文,郭梦,钱会,等.西安市城市化与水资源环境耦合关系研究及预测[J].水资源与水工程学报,2019,30(4):113-123.
张勇,郭纯青.广西北部湾经济区水资源支撑能力与城市化系统关系研究[J].节水灌溉,2018,23(10):54-58.
李欢,李景保,王凯.湖南省水贫困与城市化水平测度及其时空耦合协调研究[J].水资源与水工程学报,2019,30(4):105-112.
海霞,李伟峰,王朝,等.京津冀城市群用水效率及其与城市化水平的关系[J].生态学报,2018,38(12):4245-4256.
华佳,柏双友,李治阳,等.淮安市用水指标与城市化指标关联性分析及用水潜力预测[J].中国水利水电科学研究院学报,2018,16(4):257-264.
丛东来,于少鹏,陈曦,等.哈尔滨市水资源开发利用与城镇化发展的响应关系[J].水土保持通报,2020,40(1):269-296.
童彦,潘玉君,施玉.基于耕地压力指数的云南粮食产能安全动态分析[J].农业现代化研究,2012,33(1):100-103.
顾世祥,谢波,周云,等.云南水资源保护与开发研究[J].水资源保护,2007,23(1):91-94.
童彦,朱海燕,施玉.云南省水资源利用的时空变化特征与区域差异分析[J].国土与自然资源研究,2014,36(5):60-61.
童彦,施玉,朱海燕,等.云南水资源与经济社会发展协调度的空间格局研究[J].节水灌溉,2016,21(6):75-79.
童彦,朱海燕,施玉.云南人口城市化与土地城市化协调度的空间格局分析[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(3):286-289.
童彦,潘玉君,张梅芬,等.云南人口城市化与土地城市化耦合协调发展研究[J].世界地理研究,2020,29(1):121-130.
马颖忆,陆玉麒,柯文前,等.泛亚高铁建设对中国西南边疆地区与中南半岛空间联系的影响[J].地理研究,2015,34(5):825-837.
刘静玉,刘玉振,邵宁宁,等.河南省新型城镇化的空间格局演变研究[J].地域研究与开发,2012,31(5):143-147.
陈凤桂,张虹欧,吴旗韬,等.我国人口城镇化与土地城镇化协调发展研究[J].人文地理,2010,25(5):53-58.
范辉,刘卫东,吴泽斌,等.浙江省人口城市化与土地城市化的耦合协调关系评价[J].经济地理,2014,34(12):21-28.
张明斗,莫冬燕.城市土地利用效益与城市化的耦合协调性分析:以东北三省34个地级市为例[J].资源科学,2014,36(1):8-16.
李德胜,王占岐,蓝希.环鄱阳湖城市群人口城市化与土地城市化协调度评价[J].国土资源科技管理,2016,33(1):16-23.
徐建华.计量地理学[M].2版.北京:高等教育出版社,2014,123-125.
林珍铭,夏斌.熵视角下的广州城市生态系统可持续发展能力分析[J].经济地理,2013,68(1):45-47.
杨洋,王晨,章立玲,等.基于国家规划的新型城镇化状态定量评估指标体系构建及应用[J].经济地理,2015,35(7):51-58.
吴文恒,牛叔文,郭晓东,等.中国人口与资源环境耦合的演进分析[J].自然资源学报,2006,21(6):853-861.
孙东琪,张京祥,张明斗,等.长江三角洲城市化效率与经济发展水平的耦合关系[J].地理科学进展,2013,32(7):1060-1071.
崔木花.中原城市群9市城镇化与生态环境耦合协调发展[J].经济地理,2015,35(7):72-78.
0
浏览量
885
下载量
6
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621