1. 山东农业大学 林学院,山东,泰安,271018
2. 山东农业大学 水利土木工程学院,山东,泰安,271018
纸质出版:2020
移动端阅览
贾艳艳, 王少杰, 刘福胜, 等. 黄河三角洲高效生态经济区土地利用变化及其与生境质量的相关性[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020,40(6):213-220.
Jia Yanyan, Wang Shaojie, Liu Fusheng, et al. Land Use Change and Its Correlation with Habitat Quality in High Efficiency Eco-economic Zone of Yellow River Delta[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2020, 40(6): 213-220.
贾艳艳, 王少杰, 刘福胜, 等. 黄河三角洲高效生态经济区土地利用变化及其与生境质量的相关性[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020,40(6):213-220. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.06.031.
Jia Yanyan, Wang Shaojie, Liu Fusheng, et al. Land Use Change and Its Correlation with Habitat Quality in High Efficiency Eco-economic Zone of Yellow River Delta[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2020, 40(6): 213-220. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.06.031.
[目的] 对黄河三角洲高效生态经济区(以下简称"黄三角经济区")的生境质量开展研究,揭示人类活动对该区域生态环境的影响,为该区生态保护与发展提供一定参考。[方法] 基于2000,2010和2018年土地利用数据,采用InVEST模型、土地利用程度指数和双变量空间自相关模型等方法,分析黄三角经济区生境质量演变特征及其与土地利用变化的相关性。[结果] ①耕地和湿地为主要用地类型,建设用地和湿地不断增加,以耕地、草地、未利用地向建设用地和湿地转换为主要变化方向;②黄三角经济区生境质量整体上处于中等以上水平,中等、较高和高生境质量的面积达82%以上,并且生境质量趋于提升,但呈现较低、中等、较高减少,而高、低生境质量持续增加的"中段缩减,两端增长"发展特征;③黄三角经济区生境质量呈显著空间异质性,以湿地为主的滨海及黄河沿岸区域生境质量较高,而建设用地和耕地分布区生境质量较低;④土地利用程度与生境质量呈显著负相关性,且相关性不断增强。[结论] 在黄三角经济区高等级生境质量区应加强连通性保护,在生境退化严重的建成区应加强绿色空间建设以改善生境质量。
[Objective] The habitat quality of the high-efficiency eco-economic zone in Yellow River delta (YRD) was studied in order to reveal the impact of human activities on the ecological environment of the region and provide references for the ecological protection and development of the YRD.[Methods] Based on the land use data of the YRD in 2000
2010 and 2018
the InVEST model
land use degree index and bivariate space autocorrelation model were used to analyze the spatial-temporal evolution characteristics of habitat quality and its correlation with land use change.[Results] ① Cultivated land and wetland were the main land use types of YRD. Construction land and wetland increased continuously. The main change direction was from cultivated land
grassland and unused land to wetland and construction land. ② The habitat quality of the YRD was above medium level on the whole. Medium
medium-high and high grades areas accounted for more than 82%
and the habitat quality kept improving. However
the habitat quality showed a "mid-course reduction and two-end growth" trend
in which the habitat quality of medium-low
medium and medium-high decreased while the habitat quality of high and low increased continuously. ③ The habitat quality of the YRD showed a significant spatial heterogeneity. The habitat quality of coastal and along the Yellow River areas dominated by wetland was higher
while that of construction land and cultivated land distribution area was lower. ④ There was a significant negative correlation between land use degree and habitat quality
and the correlation was increasing.[Conclusion] The connectivity protection should be strengthened for the high-grade habitat in YRD
and green space construction shuold be strengthened for the built-up areas with serious habitat degradation to improve the habitat quality.
钟莉娜,王军.基于InVEST模型评估土地整治对生境质量的影响[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(1):250-255.
包玉斌,刘康,李婷,等.基于InVEST模型的土地利用变化对生境的影响:以陕西省黄河湿地自然保护区为例[J].干旱区研究,2015,32(3):622-629.
Newbold T, Hudson L N, Hill S L L, et al. Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity[J]. Nature, 2015,520(7545):45-50.
唐尧,祝炜平,张慧,等. InVEST模型原理及其应用研究进展[J].生态科学,2015,34(3):204-208.
Leh M D K, Matlock M D, Cummings E C, et al. Quantifying and mapping multiple ecosystem services change in West Africa[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2013,165:6-18.
Bhagabati N K, Ricketts T, Sulistyawan T B S, et al. Ecosystem services reinforce Sumatran tiger conservation in land use plans[J]. Biological Conservation, 2014,169:147-156.
Baral H, Keenan R J, Sharma S K, et al. Spatial assessment and mapping of biodiversity and conservation priorities in a heavily modified and fragmented production landscape in North-central Victoria, Australia[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2014,36:552-562.
王耕,常畅,韩冬雪,等.老铁山自然保护区景观格局与生境质量时空变化[J].生态学报,2020,40(6):1910-1922.
王惠,许月卿,刘超,等.基于地理加权回归的生境质量对土地利用变化的响应:以河北省张家口市为例[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),2019,55(3):509-518.
薛晓玉,王晓云,段含明,等.基于土地利用变化的祁连山地区生境质量时空演变分析[J].水土保持通报,2020,40(2):278-284.
张淑敏,张宝雷.国家战略背景下黄河三角洲地区国土开发适宜性格局[J].资源科学,2016,38(5):837-846.
翟俊,金点点,陈妍,等.黄河三角洲高效生态经济区生态变化、问题与对策[J].资源科学,2020,42(3):517-526.
周方文,马田田,李晓文,等.黄河三角洲滨海湿地生态系统服务模拟及评估[J].湿地科学,2015,13(6):667-674.
Li Xiaowei, Hou Xiyong, Song Yang, et al. Assessing changes of habitat quality for shorebirds in stopover sites:A case study in Yellow River delta, China[J]. Wetlands, 2019,39(1):67-77.
张文静,孙小银,单瑞峰.基于InVEST模型研究山东半岛沿海地区土地利用变化及其对生境质量的影响[J].环境生态学报,2019,1(5):15-23.
张帅,董会忠,曾文霞.土地生态系统脆弱性时空演化特征及影响因素:以黄河三角洲高效生态经济区为例[J].中国环境科学,2019,39(4):1696-1704.
Richard S, Rebecca C K, Spencer W, et al. InVEST 3.3.0 User's Guide[M/OL]. 2015. http://data.naturalcapitalproject.org/nightly-build/invest-users-guide/html/.
陈妍,乔飞,江磊.基于InVEST模型的土地利用格局变化对区域尺度生境质量的影响研究:以北京为例[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),2016,52(3):553-562.
胡和兵,刘红玉,郝敬锋,等.城市化流域生态系统服务价值时空分异特征及其对土地利用程度的响应[J].生态学报,2013,33(8):2565-2576.
Sun Xiaoyin, Jiang Zhai, Liu Fei, et al. Monitoring spatio-temporal dynamics of habitat quality in Nansihu Lake basin, eastern China, from 1980 to 2015[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2019,102:716-723.
Anselin L. Local indicators of spatial association:LISA[J]. Geographical Analysis, 1995,27(2):93-115.
Wartenberg D. Multivariate spatial correlation:A method for exploratory geographical analysis[J]. Geographical Analysis, 1985,17(4):263-283.
李俊翰,高明秀.滨州市生态系统服务价值与生态风险时空演变及其关联性[J].生态学报,2019,39(21):7815-7828.
Jia Yanyan, Tang Xiaolan, Liu Wei. Spatial-temporal evolution and correlation analysis of ecosystem service value and landscape ecological risk in Wuhu City[J]. Sustainability, 2020,12(7):2803.
王燕,高吉喜,金宇,等.基于2005-2015年土地利用变化和InVEST模型的内蒙古巴林右旗农牧交错带生境质量研究[J].生态与农村环境学报,2020,36(5):654-662.
刘航东.刁口河生态调水对黄河口故道湿地的影响分析[C].湖北恩施:2019(第七届)中国水生态大会,2019.
张学儒,周杰,李梦梅.基于土地利用格局重建的区域生境质量时空变化分析[J].地理学报,2020,75(1):160-178.
0
浏览量
1049
下载量
13
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621