四川省汶川县下庄沟“8·20”泥石流成因分析及堵江范围预测

罗玉婷; 唐川; 熊江; 陈明; 张宪政

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.06.028

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

四川省汶川县下庄沟“8·20”泥石流成因分析及堵江范围预测

水土保持试验研究

- 四川省汶川县下庄沟“8·20”泥石流成因分析及堵江范围预测
- Cause Analysis of “8·20” Debris Flow and Forecast of River-blocking Range in Xiazhuang Gully of Wenchuan County, Sichuan Province
- 水土保持通报 2020年40卷第6期页码：193-199
- 作者机构：
  
  成都理工大学地质灾害防治与地质环境保护国家重点实验室,四川,成都,610059
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家重点研发计划项目“强震区地质灾害动态演化机制与长期效应”（2017YFC1501004）;国家自然科学基金项目“急陡沟道泥石流起动—侵蚀—冲出模型研究”（41672299）
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.06.028
  中图分类号： P642.23
- 纸质出版：2020
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
罗玉婷, 唐川, 熊江, 等. 四川省汶川县下庄沟“8·20”泥石流成因分析及堵江范围预测[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020,40(6):193-199.

Luo Yuting, Tang Chuan, Xiong Jiang, et al. Cause Analysis of “8·20” Debris Flow and Forecast of River-blocking Range in Xiazhuang Gully of Wenchuan County, Sichuan Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2020, 40(6): 193-199.
罗玉婷, 唐川, 熊江, 等. 四川省汶川县下庄沟“8·20”泥石流成因分析及堵江范围预测[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020,40(6):193-199. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.06.028.

Luo Yuting, Tang Chuan, Xiong Jiang, et al. Cause Analysis of “8·20” Debris Flow and Forecast of River-blocking Range in Xiazhuang Gully of Wenchuan County, Sichuan Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2020, 40(6): 193-199. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.06.028.

摘要

[目的] 探究四川省汶川县下庄沟2019年"8·20"泥石流成因、形成过程及堵江特征，为该区域泥石流灾害防治预警提供科学参考。[方法] 结合野外调查与遥感影像对泥石流物源供给条件及泥石流形成、侵蚀搬运与堵江过程进行了分析，并采用FLO-2D模型开展不同降雨强度下的泥石流堵江范围分析。[结果] 震后泥石流流域部分崩滑体物源持续补给沟道物源，致使沟道物源不断累积，短历时强降雨形成径流不断侵蚀沟道物源，形成沟道启动型泥石流。下庄沟"8·20"泥石流大量碎屑物质搬运出沟口后形成顺河长度达280 m，横河最大宽度110 m的堰塞体，堵江模式为堰塞坝全堵。堵江范围分析结果显示：5年一遇降雨频率下物源滞留在沟道中，无堵江现象；20年一遇降雨频率下，泥石流基本堵断杂谷脑河，极易形成堵江现象；在50年一遇降雨频率下，泥石流完全堵断杂谷脑河，形成堰塞湖。[结论] 下庄沟与杂谷脑河垂直交汇，且沟口建有水电站的引水坝，极易形成堰塞坝堵江现象。在汛期降雨强度较大时仍可能会暴发泥石流造成堵江，今后的泥石流防治还需加强防洪预警等减灾措施。

Abstract

[Objective] The origin

formation process and characteristics of the "8·20" debris flow at Xiazhuang gully

Wenchuan

Sichuan Province in 2019 was explored in order to provide a scientific reference for the prevention and early warning of debris flow disasters in the region.[Methods] Based on field surveys and remote sensing images

debris flow source supply conditions

debris flow formation

erosion transport and river blockage process were analyzed. And FLO-2D model was used to analyze the extent of Xiazhuang debris flow blockage under different rainfall intensities.[Results] After the earthquake

part of the debris flow in the debris flow basin continued to erode the source of the channel

resulted in the accumulation of gully material source. Runoff formed by short-duration heavy rainfall continuously eroded the gully material source and formed a channel-initiated debris flow. A large amount of debris from the "8·20" debris flow in Xiazhuang gully was transported out of the ditch

and formed a dammed body with a length of 280 m along the river and a maximum width of 110 m across the river. The blocking mode of the river was full blockage of the dam. Under the frequency of 5-year rainfall

the material source would stay in the channel without blocking the river. Under the frequency of 20-year rainfall

the debris flow basically would block the Zagunao river and form a blocking phenomenon. Under the frequency of rainfall once in 50 years

the debris flow would completely block the Zagunao river and form a dammed lake.[Conclusion] Xiazhuang gully and Zagunao river intersect vertically

and the diversion dam of a hydropower station is built at the mouth of the gully

which is easy to form the phenomenon of dam blocking. During the flood season

when the rainfall intensity is high

debris flows may still cause river blockage. In the future

the prevention and control of debris flows need to strengthen flood prevention and early warning and other disaster reduction measures.

关键词

Keywords

references

许冲,戴福初,姚鑫.汶川地震诱发滑坡灾害的数量与面积[J].科技导报,2009,27(11):79-81.

黄润秋,李为乐.汶川地震触发崩塌滑坡数量及其密度特征分析[J].地质灾害与环境保护,2009,20(3):1-7.

Tang Chuan, Zhu Jing, Li W L, et al. Rainfall-triggered debris flows following the Wenchuan earthquake[J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2009,68(2):187-194.

唐川.汶川地震区暴雨滑坡泥石流活动趋势预测[J].山地学报,2010,28(3):341-349.

胡卸文,韩玫,梁敬轩,等.汶川震区桃关沟2013-07-10泥石流成灾机理[J].西南交通大学学报,2015,50(2):286-293.

Tang Chuan, Zhu Jing, Ding Jun, et al. Catastrophic debris flows triggered by a 14 August 2010 rainfall at the epicenter of the Wenchuan earthquake[J]. Landslides, 2011,8(4):485-497.

王珊珊,胡瑞林,童立强.中国喜马拉雅山地区滑坡堵江编目及空间特征分析[J].工程地质学报,2015,23(3):361-372.

董骁.崩滑堵江灾害链成灾模式及风险评估研究[D].四川成都:成都理工大学,2016.

陈春光,姚令侃,刘翠容,等.泥石流堵河条件的研究[J].水利学报,2013,44(6):648-656.

刘翠容.泥石流堵塞大河判据及沿河线减灾对策[D].四川成都:西南交通大学,2014.

Tang C, Westen C J V. Atlas of Wenchuan-Earthquake Geohazards:Analysis of co-seismic and post-seismic Geohazards in the area affected by the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake[M]. Beijiang:Science Press, 2018.

向国萍,张丹丹,常鸣,等.七盘沟堰塞体溃决后水动力特征及沟内泥石流启动条件分析[J].水电能源科学,2015,33(4):143-146.

杨秀元,蔡玲玲,田运涛.四川汶川七盘沟泥石流现状与危险性评价[J].人民长江,2014,45(S1):60-63.

唐川,齐信,丁军,等.汶川地震高烈度区暴雨滑坡活动的遥感动态分析[J].地球科学(中国地质大学学报),2010,35(2):317-323.

熊江,唐川,龚凌枫,等.强震区泥石流物源演化指标选取及规律分析[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(1):360-365.

周伟,唐川,周春花.汶川震区暴雨泥石流激发雨量特征[J].水科学进展,2012,23(5):650-655.

Chen Ningsheng, Yang Chenglin, Zhou Wei, et al. The critical rainfall characteristics for torrents and debris flows in the Wenchuan earthquake stricken area[J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2009,6(4):362-372.

郭志学,曹叔尤,刘兴年,等.泥石流堵江影响因素试验研究[J].水利学报,2004(11):39-45.

唐海,唐川,陈明,等.强震区泥石流防治工程效果数值模拟分析[J].水土保持通报,2019,39(4):196-201.

浏览量

867

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

北京市南港沟泥石流发育特征及孕灾成因

强震区泥石流防治工程效果数值模拟分析

长江中游城市群降碳-减污-扩绿-增长耦合协调的时空演变及影响机制

城乡融合背景下秦巴山区县域“三生”空间时空演变

基于CiteSpace的中国荒漠植物多样性研究现状与热点分析