1. 武汉工程大学 光电信息与能源工程学院,湖北,武汉,430000
2. 武汉新烽光电股份有限公司,湖北,武汉,430000
纸质出版:2020
移动端阅览
桂晗亮, 张春萍, 武治国, 等. HSPF在热带沿海流域水文模拟中的应用[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020,40(6):115-120.
Gui Hanliang, Zhang Chunping, Wu Zhiguo, et al. Aplication of HSPF in Hydrological Simulation in Tropical Coastal Watershed[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2020, 40(6): 115-120.
桂晗亮, 张春萍, 武治国, 等. HSPF在热带沿海流域水文模拟中的应用[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020,40(6):115-120. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.06.017.
Gui Hanliang, Zhang Chunping, Wu Zhiguo, et al. Aplication of HSPF in Hydrological Simulation in Tropical Coastal Watershed[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2020, 40(6): 115-120. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.06.017.
[目的
]
探究HSPF模型在热带沿海流域的适用性和不确定性,为该模型在不同流域和地区的应用提供科学参考。[方法
]
以位于热带沿海地区的三亚河流域为例,建立HSPF模型,选取2017-2019年径流量对模型进行率定和验证;通过Morris筛选法分析了水文过程中8个参数的敏感度,并与国内外研究不同流域的参数敏感度相对大小进行对比;同时利用MC-LHS方法对不同降雨量下模型的不确定性进行分析。[结果
]
HSPF模型能够很好地模拟研究区域实际的水文过程,率定期和验证期的NSE分别为0.93和0.98,相对误差(R
e
)分别为0.87%和0.21%;地下水日消退系数为最敏感参数,而下层土壤蒸发系数和地下水出流中进入深层的比例对径流模拟的影响几乎可以忽略。[结论
]
参数敏感度相对大小体现空间差异性。模型模拟的不确定性与降雨量之间的相关性明显。降雨量越大,模型模拟的不确定性和置信区间就越大,模型就越不稳定。
[Objective] The applicability and uncertainty of HSPF model in tropical coastal basins was explored in order to provide scientific reference for the application of HSPF model in different basins and regions.[Methods] Taking the Sanya river basin located in the tropical coastal region as a study area
a HSPF model was established
and the flow from 2017 to 2019 was selected to calibrate and verify the model. The sensitivity of 8 parameters in the hydrological process was analyzed by Morris screening method
and compared with the relative sensitivity of parameters in different watersheds studied at home and abroad. Meanwhile
the uncertainty of the model under different rainfall conditions were analyzed by MC-LHS method.[Results] The HSPF model could simulate the actual hydrological process in the study area very well. The NSE of the periodic and validation period was 0.93 and 0.98 respectively
and the Re was 0.87% and 0.21%
respectively. Among which
base groundwater recession was the most sensitive parameter
while the influence of lower zone evapotranspiration parameter and proportion of groundwater flow into deep was almost negligible.[Conclusion] The relative sensitivity of the parameters reflected the spatial differences. The uncertainty of model simulation is significantly correlated with rainfall
the greater the rainfall is
the greater the uncertainty and confidence interval of the model simulation are
and the more unstable the model is.
罗定贵,张巍,郑一,等.基于WARMF模型的杭埠-丰乐河流域泥沙模拟的初步研究[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),2008,44(2):224-232.
张丽红. HSPF模型径流参数优化及不确定性研究[D].浙江杭州:浙江大学,2016.
宋文博.伊通河流域非点源污染模拟及不确定分析[D].吉林长春:吉林大学,2016.
李兆富,刘红玉,李燕. HSPF水文水质模型应用研究综述[J].环境科学,2012,33(7):2217-2223.
Ourania Tzoraki, Nikolaos P. Nikolaidis. A generalized framework for modeling the hydrologic and biogeochemical response of a Mediterranean temporary river basin[J]. 2007, 346(3):112-121.
Diaz-Ramirez J N, Perez-Alegria L R, McAnally W H. Hydrology and sediment modeling using BASINS/HSPF in a tropical island watershed[J]. Transactions of the Asabe, 2008,51(5):1555-1565.
李燕,李兆富,席庆. HSPF径流模拟参数敏感性分析与模型适用性研究[J].环境科学,2013,34(6):2139-2145.
程晓光,张静,宫辉力.半干旱半湿润地区HSPF模型水文模拟及参数不确定性研究[J].环境科学学报,2014,34(12):3179-3187.
Iskra I, Droste R. Parameter Uncertainty of a Watershed Model[J]. Canadian Water Resources Journal, 2008,33(1):5-22.
庞树江,王晓燕,马文静.多时间尺度HSPF模型参数不确定性研究[J].环境科学,2018,39(5):2030-2038.
罗川,李兆富,席庆,等. HSPF模型水文水质参数敏感性分析[J].农业环境科学学报,2014,33(10):1995-2002.
Francos A. Sensitivity analysis of distributed environmental simulation models:Understanding the model behavior in hydrological studies at the catchment scale[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safty, 2003,79(2):205-218.
Chen Ying, Xu Chongyu, Chen Xingwei, et al. Uncertainty in simulation of land-use change impacts on catchment runoff with multi-time scales based on the comparison of the HSPF and SWAT models[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2019,573:486-500.
刘仙.基于BASINS/HSPF模型的岩溶槽谷区地下水模拟研究:以重庆青木关地下河系统为例[D].重庆:西南大学,2009.
邢可霞,郭怀成,孙延枫,等.基于HSPF模型得滇池流域非点源污染模拟[J].中国环境科学,2004,24(2):229-232.
Camp M V, Walraevens K. Pumping test interpretation by combination of Latin hypercube parameter sampling and analytical models[J]. Computers & Geosciences, 2008,35(10):2065-2073.
Donigian A S. Watershed model calibration and validation:The HSPF experience[J]. Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation, 2002,8:44-73.
董延军,李杰,郑江丽,等.流域水文水质模拟软件(HSPF)应用指南[M].河南郑州:黄河水利出版社,2009.
Liew M W V, Arnold J G, Garbrecht J D. Hydrologic simulation on agricultural watersheds:Choosing between two models[J]. Transactions of the Asabe, 2003, 46(6):1539-1551.
Diaz-Ramirez J N, Mcanally W H, Martin J L. Sensitivity of simulating hydrologic processes to gauge and radar rainfall data in subtropical coastal catchments[J]. Water Resources Management, 2012, 26(12):3515-3538.
Shen Zhenyao, Hong Qian, Yu Hong, et al. Parameter uncertainty analysis of the non-point source pollution in the Daning River watershed of the Three Gorges Reservoir Region, China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2008, 405(1/3):195-205.
龙银平,张耀南,赵国辉,等.SWAT模型水文过程模拟的数据不确定性分析:以青海湖布哈河流域为例[J].冰川冻土,2012,34(03):660-667.
Albek M, Ulker B, Albke E. Hydrological modeling of Seydi Suyu. Watershed(Turkey)with HSPF[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2004, 285(1/4):260-271.
Luo Chuan, Li Zhaofu, Liu Hongyu, et al. Differences in the responses of flow and nutrient load to isolated and coupled future climate and land use changes[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2019, 256:109918.
0
浏览量
1293
下载量
2
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621