黄土丘陵区生物结皮土壤温度年内动态特征及其对土壤水分的响应

王闪闪; 赵允格; 杨光; 任伟; 杨凯; 张子辉

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.06.006

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

黄土丘陵区生物结皮土壤温度年内动态特征及其对土壤水分的响应

水土保持试验研究

- 黄土丘陵区生物结皮土壤温度年内动态特征及其对土壤水分的响应
- Annual Dynamic of Soil Temperature of Biocrusts and Its Responses to Soil Moisture in Loess Hilly Region
- 水土保持通报 2020年40卷第6期页码：36-42
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室, 陕西杨陵,712100
  2. 中国科学院大学,北京,100049
  3. 吴起县气象局, 陕西吴起,717600
  4. 西北农林科技大学资源环境学院, 陕西杨凌,712100
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目“黄土高原生物结皮对坡面水土流失过程的影响及模拟”（41830758），“黄土高原生物结皮水土保持效应对干扰的响应及协同机理”41571268）
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.06.006
  中图分类号： S152.8
- 纸质出版：2020
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
王闪闪, 赵允格, 杨光, 等. 黄土丘陵区生物结皮土壤温度年内动态特征及其对土壤水分的响应[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020,40(6):36-42.

Wang Shanshan, Zhao Yunge, Yang Guang, et al. Annual Dynamic of Soil Temperature of Biocrusts and Its Responses to Soil Moisture in Loess Hilly Region[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2020, 40(6): 36-42.
王闪闪, 赵允格, 杨光, 等. 黄土丘陵区生物结皮土壤温度年内动态特征及其对土壤水分的响应[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020,40(6):36-42. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.06.006.

Wang Shanshan, Zhao Yunge, Yang Guang, et al. Annual Dynamic of Soil Temperature of Biocrusts and Its Responses to Soil Moisture in Loess Hilly Region[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2020, 40(6): 36-42. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.06.006.

摘要

[目的] 明确黄土丘陵区粉砂质壤土上生物结皮土壤温度年内动态以及其与土壤水分的关系，为进一步理解生物结皮在黄土丘陵区生态系统中的功能提供科学依据。[方法] 于2016年1月1日至2018年12月31日在陕西省吴起县退耕封禁地进行野外长期定位监测试验。[结果] ①生物结皮土壤温度具有明显的年内动态。一般生物结皮层月均温最高出现在6月，为27.1℃；结皮层下5 cm土壤月均温最高在7月，为22.7℃；生物结皮层和结皮层下5 cm土壤月均温均在1月最低，分别为-1.7和-1.4℃。②生物结皮层和结皮层下5 cm土壤温度日动态均为正弦曲线。生物结皮层和结皮层下5 cm土壤温度最大日较差均出现在6月，分别为32.0和17.2℃；10月生物结皮层温度日较差最小，为17.3℃，1月结皮层下5 cm土壤温度日较差最低为8.5℃。③年内生物结皮土壤温度与气温呈显著正相关；3-10月生物结皮土壤温度与土壤水分呈显著负相关，11-12月生物结皮土壤温度与土壤水分呈显著正相关。④1月和7月土壤含水量的增加导致生物结皮层和结皮层下5 cm土壤温度日较差下降。[结论] 黄土丘陵区粉砂质壤土上生物结皮土壤温度与土壤含水量密切相关，且不同月份土壤水分对生物结皮土壤温度的影响程度不同。

Abstract

[Objective] The relationship between temperature dynamics of biological soil crusts (biocrusts) and soil moisture on silty loam in the loess hilly region of China was clarified in order to provide scientific basis for further understanding the function of biocrusts.[Methods] A field monitoring experiment was conducted in the abandoned farmland in Wuqi County

Shaanxi Province from January 1 st

2016 to December 31 st

2018.[Results] ① Soil temperature of biocrusts had obvious dynamic within a year. During the observation period

the highest temperature of biocrusts layer occurred in June with an average temperature of 27.1℃

the highest temperature of 5 cm soil under biocrusts layer was 22.7℃ in July. The lowest temperature of biocrusts layer and 5 cm soil in January were -1.7℃ and -1.4℃

respectively. ② The diurnal dynamics of soil temperature in the biocrusts layer and 5 cm soil were changed in a sinusoidal curve throughout the year. The maximum diurnal temperature range appeared in June

and biocrusts layer and 5 cm soil were 32.0℃ and 17.2℃

respectively. The minimum diurnal temperature range of biocrusts layer was 17.3℃ in October

while 5 cm soil was 8.5℃ in January. ③ The soil temperature of biocrusts throughout the year was significantly positively correlated with air temperature

the soil temperature of biocrusts from March to October was significantly negatively correlated with soil moisture

and the soil temperature of biocrusts from November to December was significantly positively correlated with soil moisture. ④ The increase of soil water content (SWC) in January and July resulted in a decrease in diurnal temperature range of biocrusts layer and 5 cm soil.[Conclusion] The soil temperature of biocrusts on silty loam in the loess hilly region of China was closely related to the soil moisture

and the influence of soil moisture on the soil temperature of biocrusts was different in different months.

关键词

Keywords

references

Belnap J, Weber B, Büdel B. Biological soil crusts:an organizing principle in Drylands[M]. Berlin:Springer-Verlag, 2016:3-13.

Bowker M A, Reed S C, Maestre F T, et al. Biocrusts:the living skin of the earth[J]. Plant and Soil, 2018, 429(1/2):1-7.

Belnap J. Surface disturbances:their role in accelerating desertification[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 1995, 37(1/3):39-57.

Kidron G J, Tal S Y. The effect of biocrusts on evaporation from sand dunes in the Negev Desert[J]. Geoderma, 2012, 179/180:104-112.

杨永胜,卜崇峰,高国雄.毛乌素沙地生物结皮对土壤温度的影响[J].干旱区研究, 2012, 29(2):352-359.

Xiao Bo, Wang Huifang, Fan Jun, et al. Biological soil crusts decrease soil temperature in summer and increase soil temperature in winter in semiarid environment[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2013,58:52-56.

邵明安,王全九,黄明斌.土壤物理学[M].北京:高等教育出版社, 2006:162-185.

王铄,王全九,樊军,等.土壤导热率测定及其计算模型的对比分析[J].农业工程学报,2012,28(5):78-84.

王新平,李新荣,张景光,等.沙漠地区人工固沙植被对土壤温度与土壤导温率的影响[J].中国沙漠,2002,22(4):344-349.

赵允格,许明祥,王全九,等.黄土丘陵区退耕地生物结皮对土壤理化性状的影响[J].自然资源学报,2006,21(3):441-448.

张慧智,史学正,于东升,等.中国土壤温度的季节性变化及其区域分异研究[J].土壤学报,2009,46(2):227-234.

王闪闪,赵允格,石亚芳,等.短期放牧干扰对黄土丘陵区生物结皮土壤氮素累积的影响[J].应用生态学报,2017,28(12):3848-3854.

刘振华,赵英时.土壤水热耦合模型的研究[J].水土保持通报,2007,27(5):87-92.

贾东于,文军,张堂堂,等.黄土高原降水对土壤含水量和导热率的影响[J].高原气象,2014,33(3):712-720.

崔广心,李毅.含水土结冰温度的初步研究[J].冰川冻土,1993,15(2):317-321.

杨兴国,马鹏里,王润元,等.陇中黄土高原夏季地表辐射特征分析[J].中国沙漠,2005,25(1):55-62.

张勇,薛林贵,高天鹏,等.荒漠植物种子萌发研究进展[J].中国沙漠,2005,25(1):106-112.

浏览量

894

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

黄土丘陵沟壑区退耕地植被恢复中的土壤水分变化研究

宁夏盐池平沙地主要植物群落土壤水分季节动态

榆林风沙草滩区物种多样性研究

不同密度刺槐林在蒸腾旺季的蒸腾特征

不同剂量秸秆还田的保墒效果及其对玉米产量的影响