粤北山区社会-生态-经济系统恢复力及其协调度

唐波; 肖欣

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.05.032

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

粤北山区社会-生态-经济系统恢复力及其协调度

试验研究

- 粤北山区社会-生态-经济系统恢复力及其协调度
- Resilience and Coordination Degree of Social-Ecological-Economic System in Mountainous Areas of Northern Guangdong Province
- 水土保持通报 2020年40卷第5期页码：218-226
- 作者机构：
  
  中山大学新华学院资源与城乡规划系,广东,广州,510520
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  广东省哲学社会科学“十三五”规划项目“一带一路背景下珠三角城市经济脆弱性研究：机制，格局与管理”（GD17YGL10）;中山大学新华学院科研启动基金（2017QN001）;大学生创新创业训练计划（S201913902019）;2016年广东省特色重点学科“公共管理”建设项目（2017STSZD01）
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.05.032
  中图分类号： F301;X820.3
- 纸质出版：2020
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
唐波, 肖欣. 粤北山区社会-生态-经济系统恢复力及其协调度[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020,40(5):218-226.

Tang Bo, Xiao Xin. Resilience and Coordination Degree of Social-Ecological-Economic System in Mountainous Areas of Northern Guangdong Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2020, 40(5): 218-226.
唐波, 肖欣. 粤北山区社会-生态-经济系统恢复力及其协调度[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020,40(5):218-226. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.05.032.

Tang Bo, Xiao Xin. Resilience and Coordination Degree of Social-Ecological-Economic System in Mountainous Areas of Northern Guangdong Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2020, 40(5): 218-226. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.05.032.

摘要

[目的] 对粤北山区5市的社会—生态—经济系统的恢复力进行测度和协调度评价，为欠发达地区的可持续发展提供理论基础。[方法] 以恢复力的视角构建了社会—生态—经济耦合系统的理论框架和评价体系，并建立二元和三元协调度模型。[结果] ①社会—经济—生态系统恢复力总体上升，社会子系统和经济子系统恢复力增速较为缓慢，生态子系统恢复力有所下降；②社会—经济—生态系统恢复力等级空间明显，社会子系统恢复力等级升高，呈现“四周高中间低”的特点，经济系统恢复力呈现出“东高西低”的特征，生态子系统恢复力等级出现了下降的趋势。③生态—经济系统濒临失调，社会—生态系统基本协调，社会—经济系统初级协调；社会—生态—经济系统协调度仍然处于轻度失调阶段。[结论] 粤北地区耦合系统的恢复力有待提高，特别是生态系统恢复力。后期应该注重社会—生态—经济系统的协调和和互动能力。

Abstract

[Objective] The resilience and coordination degree of the social-ecological-economic system of five cities in the mountainous areas of northern Guangdong Province were measured to provide a theoretical basis for the sustainable development of underdeveloped areas.[Methods] From the perspective of resilience

this study constructed a theoretical framework and evaluation method of the social-ecological-economic coupling system

and established binary and ternary coordination-degree models.[Results] ① The resilience of the social-economic-ecological system generally increased; the resilience of the social and economic subsystems increased relatively slowly

whereas the resilience of the ecological subsystem decreased. ② The resilience level of the social-economic-ecological system was obvious. For example

the resilience level of the social subsystem increased

and exhibited the characteristics of being high in the surrounding areas and low in the central area. In contrast

the resilience level of the economic system exhibited a downward trend

and was high in the east and low in the west. ③ The ecological-economic system was on the verge of maladjustment

the social-ecological system was basically coordinated

and the social-economic system was primary coordinated; hence

the social-ecological-economic system was in the stage of slight maladjustment.[Conclusion] The resilience of the coupling system in Northern Guangdong Province needs to be improved

especially with respect to the ecosystem. In the future

close attention should be given to the coordination and interaction of the social-ecological-economic system in Northern Guangdong Province.

关键词

Keywords

references

Holling C S. Resilience and stability of ecological systems[J]. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1973,4(1):1-23.

Ruiz-Ballesteros E. Social-ecological resilience and community-based tourism:An approach from Agua Blanca, Ecuador[J]. Tourism Management, 2011,32(3):655-666.

陈亚慧.神农架林区社会-生态系统恢复力测度与影响机理[D].武汉:华中师范大学,2018.

Dawson J, Maher P T, Slocombe D S. Climate change, marine tourism and sustainability in the Canadian Arctic:Contributions from systems and complexity approaches[J]. Tourism in Marine Environments, 2007,4(2):69-83.

Blancas F J, Caballero R, González M, et al. Goal programming synthetic indicators:An application for sustainable tourism in Andalusian coastal counties[J]. Ecological Economics, 2010,69(11):2158-2172.

孙晶,王俊,杨新军.社会-生态系统恢复力研究综述[J].生态学报,2007,27(12):5371-5381.

杨新军,石育中,王子侨. 道路建设对秦岭山区社会-生态系统的影响:一个社区恢复力的视角[J]. 地理学报,2015,70(8):1313-1326.

周晓芳.从恢复力到社会-生态系统:国外研究对我国地理学的启示[J].世界地理研究,2017,26(4):156-167.

周晓芳.社会-生态系统恢复力的测量方法综述[J].生态学报,2017,37(12):4278-4288.

陈娅玲.陕西秦岭地区旅游社会-生态系统脆弱性评价及适应性管理对策研究[D].陕西西安:西北大学,2013.

王群,陆林,杨兴柱.国外旅游地社会-生态系统恢复力研究进展与启示[J].自然资源学报,2014,29(5):894-908.

陈娅玲,杨新军.西藏旅游社会-生态系统恢复力研究[J].西北大学学报(自然科学版),2012,42(5):827-832.

杨美玲,李同昇,米文宝,等.宁夏限制开发区生态脆弱性评价及分类发展模式[J].水土保持通报,2014,34(4):236-242.

陈佳,杨新军,王子侨,等.乡村旅游社会-生态系统脆弱性及影响机理:基于秦岭景区农户调查数据的分析[J].旅游学刊,2015,30(3):64-75.

杨莹,林琳,钟志平,等.基于应对公共健康危害的广州社区恢复力评价及空间分异[J].地理学报,2019,74(2):266-284.

王群,陆林,杨兴柱.千岛湖社会-生态系统恢复力测度与影响机理[J].地理学报,2015,70(5):779-795.

武剑,杨爱婷.基于SPA的广东省区域经济脆弱性及障碍因素研究[J].经济地理,2012,32(9):32-38.

展亚荣,盖美.滨海旅游地社会-生态系统恢复力测度及协调发展研究[J].地域研究与开发,2018,37(5):158-164.

刘焱序,傅伯杰,王帅,等.空间恢复力理论支持下的人地系统动态研究进展[J].地理学报,2020,75(5):891-903.

王群,陆林,杨兴柱.千岛湖社会-生态系统恢复力测度与影响机理[J].地理学报,2015,70(5):779-795.

许明军,杨子生.西南山区资源环境承载力评价及协调发展分析:以云南省德宏州为例[J].自然资源学报,2016,31(10):1726-1738.

唐波,李燕芬.粤北山区农村旅游扶贫经济效应与发展路径[J].南方农村,2018,34(5):39-45.

刘焱序,王仰麟,彭建,等.耦合恢复力的林区土地生态适宜性评价:以吉林省汪清县为例[J].地理学报,2015,70(3):476-487.

浏览量

716

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

烟台市水资源与社会经济可持续协调度分析

基于农户尺度的社会-生态系统对干旱的恢复力研究--以甘肃省榆中县为例

中国城市土地集约利用与生态环境协调发展评价研究

甘肃省古浪县土地利用与社会经济协调度评价

武威市绿洲区耕地集约利用综合评估