山水林(草)田湖人生命共同体健康评价及治理对策——以长江三峡水库重庆库区为例

苏维词; 杨吉

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.05.031

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

山水林(草)田湖人生命共同体健康评价及治理对策——以长江三峡水库重庆库区为例

试验研究

- 山水林(草)田湖人生命共同体健康评价及治理对策——以长江三峡水库重庆库区为例
- Health Assessment and Countermeasures on Mountains-Rivers-Forests (Grasslands)-Farmlands-Lakes-Human Life Communities -A Case Study at Chongqing Area of Three Gorges Reservoir of Yangtze River
- 水土保持通报 2020年40卷第5期页码：209-217
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 重庆师范大学地理与旅游学院, 重庆沙坪坝,401331
  2. 贵州省山地资源研究所,贵州,贵阳,550001
  3. 成都市高新区公园城市建设局,四川,成都,610000
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  教育部人文社会科学规划项目“三峡库区城乡融合发展的多维测度及优化路径研究”（20YJAZH093）;贵州省科技支撑项目“两湖一库流域山水林田湖生命共同体健康评价及调控技术途径研究”（黔科合支撑S[2020]4Y008号）;国家十三五重点研发计划（2016YFC04007008）
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.05.031
  中图分类号： X32
- 纸质出版：2020
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
苏维词, 杨吉. 山水林(草)田湖人生命共同体健康评价及治理对策——以长江三峡水库重庆库区为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020,40(5):209-217.

Su Weici, Yang Ji. Health Assessment and Countermeasures on Mountains-Rivers-Forests (Grasslands)-Farmlands-Lakes-Human Life Communities -A Case Study at Chongqing Area of Three Gorges Reservoir of Yangtze River[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2020, 40(5): 209-217.
苏维词, 杨吉. 山水林(草)田湖人生命共同体健康评价及治理对策——以长江三峡水库重庆库区为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020,40(5):209-217. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.05.031.

Su Weici, Yang Ji. Health Assessment and Countermeasures on Mountains-Rivers-Forests (Grasslands)-Farmlands-Lakes-Human Life Communities -A Case Study at Chongqing Area of Three Gorges Reservoir of Yangtze River[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2020, 40(5): 209-217. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.05.031.

摘要

[目的] 研究库区山水林（草）田湖人生命共同体的健康状况，分析各自然子系统之间及其与人类活动的相互作用和相互影响，为生态保护与绿色发展，生态文明建设及构建和谐库区提供参考依据。[方法] 以长江三峡水库重庆库区（以下简称“重庆库区”）21个区县为例，构建生命共同体健康评价指标体系；运用3S等技术获取相关地理基础数据，结合社会经济统计资料，通过系统聚类分析，对重庆库区山水林（草）田湖人生命共同体的健康状况进行评价和分级。[结果] ①重庆库区山水林（草）田湖人生命共同体整体处于亚健康状态；②重庆库区山子系统的特征体现了其本底的脆弱性、不稳定性和低承载力；③重庆库区人子系统中，县域经济社会发展相对滞后，人的生活生产发展与生态保护矛盾突出；④重庆库区林（草）子系统结构及其生态服务功能有待提升优化。[结论] 未来一段时期内，山水林（草）田湖人系统修复治理工作要聚焦林（草）、田、湖与人子系统，进一步加强基础研究和应用技术研究，以便更科学地实现山水林（草）田湖人生命共同体系统的统筹共治、健康管理与持续经营。

Abstract

[Objective] The health status and existing problems of the mountains-rivers-forests (grasslands)-farmlands-lakes-human life communities at Chongqing area in the Three Gorges reservoir (hereinafter called Chongqing reservoir area) were studied

and the interactions between the subsystems and humans was discussed in order to provide a reference for the ecological protection

green development

ecological civilization construction

and harmonious development of the reservoir area.[Methods] Twenty one counties (districts) of Chongqing City in the Three Gorges reservoir of the Yangtze River(abbreviated as “Chongqing reservior area”) were used as examples. For these

we constructed the health evaluation index system of life community from the perspective of mountains-rivers-forests (grasslands)-farmlands-lakes-human

and evaluated the health status of the communities. These were divided into four health types with the clustering analysis method based on the relevant geographic data using 3S technology and socioeconomic statistical data.[Results] ① As a whole

the ecological system for the mountains-rivers-forests (grasslands)-farmlands-lakes-human life community in Chongqing reservoir area was classified in the sub-health group. ② The features of the “mountain” subsystem reflected the vulnerability

instability

and low carrying capacity of the ecological environment in the Chongqing reservoir area. ③ The “human” subsystem showed that the development of the county's economy and society was lagging behind and there was an obvious conflict between socioeconomic development and ecological protection. ④ The structure and function of the “forest and grassland” subsystem need upgrading and optimizing.[Conclusion] In the future

the restoration and management of the lakeside systems of mountain forests (grasslands) should be focused on the forest (grassland)

field

lake

and human subsystems

along with further strengthening of the basic and applied technological research in the area

in order to achieve more scientifically integrated governance

health management

and sustainable management for the mountains-rivers-forests (grasslands)-farmlands-lakes-human community system.

关键词

Keywords

references

吕思思,苏维词,赵卫权,等.山水林田湖生命共同体健康评价:以红枫湖区域为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2019,28(8):1987-1997.

刘威尔,宇振荣.山水林田湖生命共同体生态保护和修复[J].国土资源情报,2016(10):37-39.

Holling C S. Understanding the Complexity of Economic, Ecological, and Social Systems[J]. Ecosystems, 2001,4(5):390-405.

Uehara T, Cordier M, Hamaide B. Fully dynamic input-output/system dynamics modeling for ecological-economic system analysis[J]. Sustainability, 2018,10(6):1765-1772.

Boyd I L. The Art of Ecological Modeling[J]. Science, 2012,337(6092):306-307.

Schaeffer D J, Cox D K. Establishing ecosystem threshold criteria[M]//Norton B G, Costanza R, Haskell B. Ecosystem Health:New Goals for Environmental Management. Washington DC:Island Press, 1992:157-169.

Uehara T. Ecological threshold and ecological economic threshold:Implications from an ecological economic model with adaptation[J]. Ecological Economics, 2013,93(6):374-384.

Rapport D J, Costanza R, McMichael A J.. Assessing Ecosystem Health[J]. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 1998,13(10):397-402.

Jerry M S, Mariano B, Annalee Y, et al. Developing Ecosystem Health Indicators in Centro Habana:A Community-based Approach[J].Ecosystem Health,2001,7(1):15-26.

Jennifer Gentry-Shields, Jamie Bartram. Human health and the water environment:Using the DPSEEA framework to identify the driving forces of disease[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2014(468/469):306-314.

蒋卫国,潘英姿,侯鹏,等.洞庭湖区湿地生态系统健康综合评价[J].地理研究,2009,28(6):1665-1672.

曹欢,苏维词.基于模糊数学综合评价法的喀斯特生态系统健康评价[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(3):148-154.

宁立新,马兰,周云凯,等.基于PSR模型的江苏海岸带生态系统健康时空变化研究[J].中国环境科学, 2016,36(2):534-543.

潘竟虎,刘晓.基于空间主成分和最小累积阻力模型的内陆河景观生态安全评价与格局优化:以张掖市甘州区为例[J].应用生态学报,2015,26(10):217-227.

张峰,杨俊,席建超,等.基于DPSIRM健康距离法的南四湖湖泊生态系统健康评价[J].资源科学,2014,36(4):831-839.

邵田,张浩,邬锦明,等.三峡库区(重庆段)生态系统健康评价[J].环境科学研究,2008,21(2):99-104.

李建国,刘金萍,刘丽丽,等.基于灰色极大熵原理的三峡库区(重庆段)生态系统健康评价[J].环境科学学报,2010,30(11):2344-2352.

秦趣,张美竹,杨琴,等.重庆三峡库区生态经济区县域生态系统健康评价[J].长江科学院院报2013,30(12):14-19.

洪惠坤,廖和平,魏朝富,等.基于改进TOPSIS方法的三峡库区生态敏感区土地利用系统健康评价[J].生态学报,2015,35(24):8016-8027.

王雨辰.习近平"生命共同体"概念的生态哲学阐释[J].社会科学战线,2018(2):1-7.

黄国勤.树立正确生态观统筹山水林田湖草系统治理[J].中国井冈山干部学院学报,2017(6):128-132.

李月臣,刘春霞,赵纯勇,等.重庆市三峡库区水土流失特征及类型区划分[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(1):17-21.

重庆市水利局.2017重庆市水土保持公报[Z].重庆:重庆市水利局,2017.

齐静,袁兴中,刘红,等.重庆市三峡库区水源涵养重要功能区生态系统服务功能时空演变特征[J].水土保持通报, 2015,35(3):256-260.

朱光福,周超,赵军峰.新时代库区高质量发展的新难题和破解路径:以长江三峡库区为例[J].西部论坛,2020(1):90-99.

张胜,尚文超,等.长江经济带绿色发展,重庆如何发挥示范作用[N].光明日报,https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1651537531194998998&wfr=spider&for=pc.

杨吉,苏维词.重庆市地表起伏度及其对农业生产的影响分析[J].中国农业资源与区划,2016,37(7):140-149.

郭晓娜,苏维词,李强,等.三峡库区(重庆段)地表起伏度及其对生态系统服务价值的影响J].生态与农村环境学报,2016,32(6):887-894.

官冬杰,苏维词.城市生态系统健康评价方法及其应用研究[J].环境科学学报,2006,26(10):1716-1722.

祝新亚,李许坚.基于聚类分析和判别分析的中国主要省市综合实力状况评价[J].北方经济,2011(8):18-20.

重庆统计局、国家统计局重庆调查总队.重庆统计年鉴(2019)[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2020.

蒋兴国,郑杰,许登奎.祁连山山水林田湖草保护修复调查研究之二:祁连山生态环境与可持续发展存在的问题[J].边疆经济与文化,2018(3):31-34.

潘真真,苏维词,王建伟.重庆城市生态化水平评价方法及应用[J].长江科学院院报,2016,33(7) 34-38,45.

山水林田湖草系统治理战略规划研究项目启动.中国绿色时报[N].2019-01-09,http://www.forestry.gov.cn/

白春礼,以创新驱动提升山水林田湖草系统治理能力,中国绿色时报[N].2018,11,2

宋伟,韩赜,刘琳.山水林田湖草生态问题系统诊断与保护修复综合分区研究:以陕西省为例[J].生态学报,2019,39(23):8975-8989.

邹长新,王燕,王文林,等.山水林田湖草系统原理与生态保护修复研究[J].生态与农村环境学报,2018,34(11):961-967.

余新晓,贾国栋.统筹山水林田湖草系统治理,带动水土保持新发展[J].中国水土保持, 2019(1):11-14.

浏览量

1246

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

基于生态足迹模型的喀斯特高原山地生态系统健康评价研究

纵向岭谷区高速公路沿线生态系统健康评价

太原市城市生态系统健康评价及其趋势预测

基于小班水平的东洞庭湖区域马尾松林健康评价

东阳江流域生态系统健康评价