1. 吉林农业大学 资源与环境学院,吉林,长春,130118
2. 中国科学院 东北地理与农业生态研究所,黑龙江,哈尔滨,150081
纸质出版:2020
移动端阅览
丁超, 胡伟, 严月, 等. 中国东北漫川漫岗典型黑土区沟道侵蚀特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020,40(5):72-78.
Ding Chao, Hu Wei, Yan Yue, et al. Gully Characteristics Based on Observations in Typical Rolling-Hill Mollisol Region of Northeast China[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2020, 40(5): 72-78.
丁超, 胡伟, 严月, 等. 中国东北漫川漫岗典型黑土区沟道侵蚀特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020,40(5):72-78. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.05.012.
Ding Chao, Hu Wei, Yan Yue, et al. Gully Characteristics Based on Observations in Typical Rolling-Hill Mollisol Region of Northeast China[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2020, 40(5): 72-78. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.05.012.
[目的
]
通过对450 km
2
黑土区进行实测调查,旨在评估研究区沟道侵蚀现状。[方法
]
选取沟道侵蚀严重的450 km
2
的漫川漫岗黑土区为调查区域,首先在谷歌卫星影像上进行侵蚀沟识别和定位,再对侵蚀沟立体形态进行实地测量。[结果
]
①研究区土地利用以耕地为主,耕地、建设用地、林地、草地分别占研究区总面积的85%,8%,6%,1%。②研究区坡耕地占86%,坡度0.25°~3.0°占64%,大于5°的占12%。③共有侵蚀沟1 049条,其中耕地中侵蚀沟577条,占总侵蚀沟条数的55%;沟壑密度1.2 km/km
2
,按沟壑密度衡量沟蚀强度为中度;沟壑面积比例为2.89%,以此界定沟蚀强度为剧烈。④研究区侵蚀沟平均长度、宽度、深度和面积分别为996,13.1,2.7 m和2.4 hm
2
。[结论
]
漫川漫岗黑土区沟道侵蚀严重,主要危害坡耕地,但侵蚀沟相对较小,易于治理。
[Objective] The present situation of gully erosion in a black soil area (450 km2) was evaluated to provide the basis for the hazard assessment and scientific prevention and control of erosion gully in the black soil area of Northeast China.[Methods] We selected an undulating hilly region that was seriously affected by gully erosion as the research area for a field survey. We first located the erosion gullies on a Google satellite image and then measured their three-dimensional shape in-situ.[Results] ① Land in the study area is mainly used for farming. The results showed that cultivated land
construction land
forest land
and grassland accounted for 85%
8%
6%
and 1% of the total area
respectively. ② Cultivated land on slopes accounted for 86% of the total cultivated land area; 64% of the slopes in these areas had a gradient of between 0.25° and 3.0°
and 12% had a gradient of > 5°. ③ We found 1 049 erosion gullies in the research area
55% of which were on cultivated land (577 gullies). The gully density was 1.2 km/km2 and the gully erosion intensity was moderate. The proportion of the gully area was 2.89% of the total study area
which indicated an intense erosion gully. ④ The average length
width
depth
and area of the erosion gullies were 996
13.1
2.7 m
and 2.4 hm2
respectively.[Conclusion] Gully erosion is serious in the study area of undulating hills
and mainly affects sloping cultivated land; however
the scale of erosion gullies is relatively small and the gullies can be easily managed.
孟令钦,李勇.东北黑土区坡耕地侵蚀沟发育机理初探[J].水土保持学报,2009,23(1):7-11.
胡伟,樊华,李浩,等.黑土区治理后侵蚀沟道融雪侵蚀观测研究[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(5):84-90.
李智广,王岩松,刘宪春,等.我国东北黑土区侵蚀沟道的普查方法与成果[J].中国水土保持科学,2013,11(5):9-13.
尚建勋,朱悦.东北黑土区侵蚀沟专项治理的几点思考[J].中国水土保持,2017(11):16-18.
李浩,张兴义,刘爽,等.典型黑土区村级尺度侵蚀沟演变[J].中国水土保持科学,2012,10(2):21-28.
李智广,刘宪春,刘建祥,等.第一次全国水利普查水土保持普查方案[J].水土保持通报,2010,30(3):87-91.
中华人民共和国水利部,中华人民共和国国家统计局.第一次全国水利普查公报[J].中国水利,2013(7):1-3.
中华人民共和国水利部.黑土区水土流失综合防治技术标准:SL 446-2009[S].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2009:16.
杜书立,李浩,陈强,等.典型黑土区侵蚀沟空间分布特征及主要影响因子分析:以黑龙江省引龙河农场为例[J].土壤与作物,2013,2(4):177-182.
闫业超,张树文,岳书平.克拜东部黑土区侵蚀沟遥感分类与空间格局分析[J].地理科学,2007,27(2):193-199.
Li Hao, Cruse R M, Liu Xiaobing, et al. Effects of topography and land use change on gully development in typical Mollisol region of Northeast China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2016,26(6):779-788.
胡天然,王树力.东北黑土区乌裕尔河流域侵蚀沟变化过程及影响因素[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2018,42(1):113-119.
姜芸,王军,张莉.东北典型黑土区侵蚀沟形态及分布特征[J].农业工程学报,2020,36(7):157-165.
白建宏.东北黑土区侵蚀沟分级初探[J].中国水土保持,2017(10):41-42.
Liu xiaobing, Li Hao, Zhang Shengmin,et al. Gully erosion control practices in northeast China:A review[J]. Sustainability, 2019,11(18):5065.
张兴义,祁志,张晟旻,等.东北黑土区农田侵蚀沟填埋复垦工程技术[J].中国水土保持科学,2019,17(5):128-135.
张信宝.关于中国水土流失研究中若干理论问题的新见解[J].水土保持通报,2019,39(6):302-306.
朱淼淼.辽宁土石山区侵蚀沟道综合治理技术模式研究[J].中国水土保持,2019(7):37-39.
秦伟,左长清,范建荣,等.东北黑土区侵蚀沟治理对策[J].中国水利,2014(20):37-41.
0
浏览量
904
下载量
3
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621