云南师范大学 地理学部, 云南省高原地理过程与环境变化重点实验室,云南,昆明,650500
纸质出版:2020
移动端阅览
陈进豪, 范弢, 户红红. 滇东海峰岩溶盆地石漠化坡地土壤机械组成和有机碳的变化特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020,40(5):33-39.
Chen Jinhao, Fan Tao, Hu Honghong. Change Characteristics of Soil Mechanical Composition and Organic Carbon in Rocky Desertification Sloping Land in Haifeng Karst Basin in Eastern Yunnan Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2020, 40(5): 33-39.
陈进豪, 范弢, 户红红. 滇东海峰岩溶盆地石漠化坡地土壤机械组成和有机碳的变化特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020,40(5):33-39. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.05.006.
Chen Jinhao, Fan Tao, Hu Honghong. Change Characteristics of Soil Mechanical Composition and Organic Carbon in Rocky Desertification Sloping Land in Haifeng Karst Basin in Eastern Yunnan Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2020, 40(5): 33-39. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.05.006.
[目的] 探讨滇东海峰自然保护区岩溶盆地内小生境裂隙土壤异质性特征,为该区水土流失的治理提供科学支持。[方法] 通过野外取样结合比重计法、团聚体湿筛法等方法,分析海峰石漠化坡地不同小生境裂隙土壤机械组成、水稳性团聚体和有机碳随深度的变化特征。[结果] ①地表小生境和地下裂隙在空间上具有一定的关联,结合小生境类型和裂隙形态初步将采样裂隙分类命名为土面漏斗、石沟裂隙和石坑小生境。②土面漏斗、石沟裂隙和石坑小生境由于裂隙形态、小生境类型以及有无根系等因素导致土壤性质存在异质性。石坑小生境砂粒含量显著高于土面漏斗和石沟裂隙(p<0.05),粉砂粒含量显著低于石沟裂隙,表层有机碳含量显著低于石沟裂隙(p<0.05);土面漏斗砂粒含量显著高于石沟裂隙,粉砂粒含量显著低于石沟裂隙,表层有机碳含量显著低于石沟裂隙。③土面漏斗、石沟裂隙和石坑小生境的土壤稳定性随土层深度的增加逐渐变差,为土壤的漏失提供便利。深根系植被介入裂隙—土壤系统,改善土壤性质,增强土壤抗侵蚀能力。[结论] 海峰岩溶盆地小生境裂隙土壤性质存在异质性,应加强对小生境的保护和利用,种植深根系植被,改善土壤理化性质,增强土壤抗侵蚀能力。
[Objective] The objective of this study was to explore the heterogeneity characteristics of the niche fissure soil in the Haifeng karst basin. The purpose was to provide scientific support for the control of Haifeng natural reserve soil erosion at the study area.[Methods] Through field sampling combined with a hydrometer method and aggregate wet sieve method
the soil mechanical composition
water-stable aggregates
and organic carbon of different niche fissures in the rocky desertification sloping land were analyzed.[Results] ① The surface niche and the underground fissure had a certain spatial correlation. Based on the niche type and fissure shape
the sampling fissures were initially classified as soil funnel
stone ditch fissure
and stone pit niche. ② Soil surface funnel
stone ditch fissure
and stone pit niche were heterogeneous because of such factors as fissure shape
niche type
and presence or absence of a root system. The content of sand particles in the stone pit niche was significantly higher than that of the soil surface funnel and stone ditch fissure (p<0.05)
and the content of silt grains was significantly lower than that in the stone ditch fissure. The surface organic carbon content was significantly lower than that of the stone ditch fissure (p<0.05). The sand content of the funnel was significantly higher than that of the stone ditch fissure
the silt content was significantly lower than that of the stone ditch fissure
and the surface organic carbon content was significantly lower than that of the stone ditch fissure. ③ The soil stability of the soil surface funnel
stone ditch fissure
and stone pit niche gradually deteriorated with the increase of the soil layer depth
which was convenient for soil loss. Deep root vegetation intervened in the fissure soil system to improve the soil properties and enhance the resistance to soil erosion.[Conclusion] The nature of the niche fissure soil in the Haifeng karst basin is heterogeneous. The protection and utilization of the niche should be strengthened
and deep root vegetation should be planted to improve the physical and chemical properties of the soil and enhance soil erosion resistance.
刘方,王世杰,罗海波,等.喀斯特森林生态系统的小生境及其土壤异质性[J].土壤学报,2008,45(6):1055-1062.
廖洪凯,龙健,李娟,等.喀斯特地区不同植被下小生境土壤矿物组成及有机碳含量空间异质性初步研究[J].中国岩溶,2010,29(4):434-439.
罗海波,刘方,刘元生,等. 喀斯特石漠化地区不同植被群落的土壤有机碳变化[J]. 林业科学,2009,45(9):24-28.
廖洪凯,龙健,李娟.不同小生境对喀斯特山区花椒林表土团聚体有机碳和活性有机碳分布的影响[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(1):156-160.
张信宝,王世杰,贺秀斌,等.碳酸盐岩风化壳中的土壤蠕滑与岩溶坡地的土壤地下漏失[J].地球与环境,2007,35(3):202-206.
王恒松,熊康宁,刘云.喀斯特区地下水土流失机理研究[J].中国水土保持,2009(8):11-14.
魏兴萍,袁道先,谢世友.运用
137
Cs与土壤营养元素探讨重庆岩溶槽谷区山坡土壤的流失和漏失[J].水土保持学报,2010,24(6):16-19.
雷俐,魏兴琥,徐喜珍,等.粤北岩溶山地土壤垂直渗漏与粒度变化特征[J].地理研究,2013,32(12):2204-2214.
杨宇琼,戴全厚,严友进,等.黔中喀斯特坡地浅层裂隙土壤机械组成对降雨的响应[J].应用生态学报,2019,30(2):545-552.
唐益群,张晓晖,周洁,等.喀斯特石漠化地区土壤地下漏失的机理研究:以贵州普定县陈旗小流域为例[J].中国岩溶,2010,29(2):121-127.
曹建华,邓艳,杨慧,等.喀斯特断陷盆地石漠化演变及治理技术与示范[J].生态学报,2016,36(22):7103-7108.
王宇,张华,张贵,等.喀斯特断陷盆地环境地质分区及功能[J]. 中国岩溶,2017,36(3):283-295.
鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000:30-34.
Gardner W R. Representation of soil aggregate-size distribution by a logarithmic-normal distribution[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1956,20(2):151-153.
van Bavel C H M. Mean weight-diameter of soil aggregates as a statistical index of aggregation[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1950,14(C):20-23.
李鹏,李占斌,张晓霞,等.复垦土地土壤有效微量元素分布特征研究[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(3):126-130.
麦积山,郑江坤,赵廷宁,等.北川震后滑坡体表层土壤颗粒组成及团聚体空间变化特征[J].山地学报,2019,37(1):30-40.
王大力,尹澄清.植物根孔在土壤生态系统中的功能[J].生态学报,2000,20(5):869-874.
曹建华,蒋忠诚,杨德生,等.我国西南岩溶区土壤侵蚀强度分级标准研究[J].中国水土保持科学,2008,6(6):1-7,20.
廖洪凯,龙健,李娟,等.西南地区喀斯特干热河谷地带不同植被类型下小生境土壤碳氮分布特征[J].土壤,2012,44(3):421-428.
Six J, Bossuyt H, Degryze S, et al. A history of research on the link between (micro)aggregates, soil biota, and soil organic matter dynamics[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2004,79(1):7-31.
Dexter A R. Advances in characterization of soil structure[J]. Soil and Tillage Research,1988,11(3/4):199-238.
王浩,姚昕,杨慧,等.岩溶区不同土地覆被方式对土壤团聚体有机碳的影响[J].生态环境学报,2017,26(9):1506-1513.
唐菡,谌芸,刘枭宏,等. 喀斯特坡地拉巴豆地埂篱根及根-土复合体力学特性[J]. 生态学报,2019,39(16):6114-6125.
余芹芹,乔娜,胡夏嵩,等.植物根-土复合体固坡力学效应及模型研究现状与进展[J]. 中国水土保持,2011(7):51-54.
Danjon F, Fourcaud T, Bert D. Root architecture and wind-firm-ness of mature Pinus pinaster[J]New Phytologist, 2005,168(2):387-400.
0
浏览量
984
下载量
4
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621