1. 宁夏大学 经济管理学院,宁夏,银川,750021
2. 宁夏大学 资源环境学院,宁夏,银川,750021
3. 苏交科集团(甘肃)交通规划设计有限公司,甘肃,兰州,730030
纸质出版:2020
移动端阅览
王亚娟, 张小红, 温胜强, 等. 宁夏原州区生态移民村生境景观连接度变化及其驱动因素[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020,40(4):259-265.
Wang Yajuan, Zhang Xiaohong, Wen Shengqiang, et al. Changes of Habitat Landscape Connectivity and Driving Factors of Ecological Migration Villages in Yuanzhou District of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2020, 40(4): 259-265.
王亚娟, 张小红, 温胜强, 等. 宁夏原州区生态移民村生境景观连接度变化及其驱动因素[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020,40(4):259-265. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.04.035.
Wang Yajuan, Zhang Xiaohong, Wen Shengqiang, et al. Changes of Habitat Landscape Connectivity and Driving Factors of Ecological Migration Villages in Yuanzhou District of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2020, 40(4): 259-265. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.04.035.
[目的] 分析生态移民土地利用过程中生境景观连接度变化及其驱动因素,为生态移民的生态风险管理及移民可持续性提供科学依据。[方法] 以宁夏原州区“十二五”时期4个生态移民村(丰泽、金轮、和润及泉港)为例,基于2016年高分影像数据,同时参考移民前谷歌地球2010年数据和第二次全国土地调查数据(2010年),经野外GPS校验,通过计算障碍影响指数和生境景观连接度指数,分析生态移民村土地利用生境景观分异。[结果] 丰泽村和金轮村的生境景观连接度呈下降态势,和润村和泉港村呈上升态势。4个生态移民村的变化趋势明显,但极高连接度和高连接度比例很小。生态移民村生境景观变化驱动力主要为人为因素,建设用地占用耕地、园地普遍,其中泉港村与和润村建设用地面积年均增长率分别高达27.49%和21.28%,同时金轮村、和润村、泉港村无后备土地资源,生态压力突出。[结论] 4个生态移民村人口密度增大导致建设用地占用耕地明显,生态用地被分割,移民的非农活动比重大造成耕地撂荒,景观破碎化和孤岛化现象明显,生境景观呈现出不稳定状态,生态压力增加。
[Objective] The changes of habitat landscape connectivity and its driving factors in the process of land use of ecological migration were analyzed
in order to provide scientific basis for ecological risk management and sustainability of ecological migration. [Methods] Four eco-migration villages (Fengze
Jinlun
Herun and Quangang) in Yuanzhou District of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region during the 12th five-year plan period were taken as examples. Based on the high-resolution image data of 2016
Google Earth data (2010) and the second national land survey data (2010)before migration
the landscape differentiation in ecological immigrant village was analyzed by calculating the barrier impact index and the landscape connectivity index
after field verification by GPS. [Results] The landscape connectivity of Fengze and Jinlun villages was declining
while that of Herun and Quangang village was on the rise. The change trend of each immigration village was obvious
but the proportion of extremely high and high connectivity was very small. The driving forces of the landscape connectivity change in ecological immigration villages were mainly human factors. Construction land occupied cultivated land and garden land widely in general
and the average annual growth rate of construction land area in Quangang village and Herun village were up to 27.49% and 21.28%
respectively. In addition
Jinlun
Herun and Quangang village had no reserve land resources
and thus
the ecological pressure was prominent. [Conclusion] The increase of population density in the four eco-migration villages resulted in the obvious occupation of cultivated land for construction and the division of ecological land. The ratio of non-agricultural activity of immigrants was significant
resulting in the abandonment of cultivated land
the fragmentation and isolation of landscape
the instability of habitat landscape and the increase of ecological pressure.
Liu Xiaoping, Chen Xiao, Hua Kaiping, et al. Effects of land use change on ecosystem services in arid area ecological migration[J]. Chinese Geographical Science,2018,28(5):894-906.
龙花楼.论土地整治与乡村空间重构[J].地理学报,2013,68(8):1019-1028.
王鹏,王亚娟,刘小鹏,等.基于PSR模型的生态移民安置区土地利用系统健康评价:以红寺堡区为例[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(6):270-276.
邰秀军,畅冬妮,郭颖.宁夏生态移民居住安置方式的减贫效果分析[J].干旱区资源与环境,2017,31(4):47-53.
贾耀锋.中国生态移民效益评估研究综述[J].资源科学,2016,38(8):1550-1560.
唐宏,张新焕,杨德刚.农户生态移民意愿及影响因素研究:基于新疆三工河流域的农户调查[J].自然资源学报,2011,26(10):1658-1669.
刘小鹏,王亚娟.中国生态移民与生态环境关系研究进展[J].宁夏大学学报(自然科学版),2013,34(2):173-176.
陈晓,刘小鹏,王鹏,等.旱区生态移民空间冲突的生态风险研究:以宁夏红寺堡区为例[J].人文地理,2018,33(5):106-113.
王鹏,王亚娟,刘小鹏,等.基于景观结构的生态移民安置区生态风险评价:以宁夏红寺堡区为例[J].生态学报,2018,38(8):1-11.
Uezu A, Metzger, J P, Vielliard, J M L. Effects of structural and functional connectivity and patch size on the abundance of seven Atlantic forest bird species[J]. Biological Conservation, 2005,123(4):507-519.
Taylor P D, Fahrig L, Henein K, et al. Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure[J]. Oikos, 1993,68(3):571-573.
With K A, Gardner R H, Turner M G. Landscape connectivity and population distributions in heterogeneous environments[J]. Oikos, 1997,78(1):151-169.
陈春娣,贾振毅,吴胜军,等.基于文献计量法的中国景观连接度应用研究进展[J].生态学报,2017,37(10):3243-3255.
陈利顶,傅伯杰.景观连接度的生态学意义及其应用[J].生态学杂志, 1996,15(4):37-42.
温胜强.宁南生态移民安置区生境景观连接度分异研究:以原州区为例[D].宁夏银川:宁夏大学,2018.
李纪宏,刘雪华.基于最小费用距离模型的自然保护区功能分区[J].自然资源学报,2006,21(2):217-224.
欧维新,袁薇锦.基于景观连接度的盐城滨海湿地丹顶鹤生境斑块重要性评价[J].资源科学,2015,37(4):823-831.
刘世梁,杨珏婕,安晨,等.基于景观连接度的土地整理生态效应评价[J].生态学杂志,2012,31(3):689-695.
张利,陈亚恒,门明新,等.基于GIS的区域生态连接度评价方法及应用[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(8):218-226.
齐珂,樊正球.基于图论的景观连接度量化方法应用研究:以福建省闽清县自然森林为例[J].生态学报,2016,36(23):7580-7593.
吴晶晶,栗云召,于良巨,等.黄河三角洲自然湿地景观连接度动态变化及其驱动因素分析[J].生态环境学报,2018,27(1):71-78.
吴昌广,周志翔,王鹏程,等.基于最小费用模型的景观连接度评价[J].应用生态学报,2009,20(8):2042-2048.
李平星,陈东,樊杰.基于最小费用距离模型的生态可占用性分析:以广西西江经济带为例[J].自然资源学报,2011,26(2):227-236.
杜志博,李洪远,孟伟庆.天津滨海新区湿地景观连接度距离阈值研究[J].生态学报,2019,39(17):1-11.
蒙吉军,王晓东,尤南山,等.黑河中游生态用地景观连接性动态变化及距离阈值[J].应用生态学报,2016,27(6):1715-1726.
李菲菲,马社刚,李浩,等.扎龙自然保护区丹顶鹤巢址景观连接度评价[J].野生动物学报,2018,39(2):323-328.
王淼.基于最小耗费距离模型的生态连接度评价:以西山区为例[D].云南昆明:昆明理工大学,2017.
Solomon K R, Giesy J P, La point T W, et al. Ecological risk assessment of Atrazine in North American surface waters[J]. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 1996,15(1):31-76.
武剑锋,曾辉,刘雅琴.深圳地区景观生态连接度评估[J].生态学报,2008,28(4):1691-1701.
张利,陈亚恒,门明新,等.基于GIS的区域生态连接度评价方法与应用[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(8):218-226.
王亚娟,王鹏,韩文文,等.宁夏中部干旱带生态移民过程生态风险时空分异:以红寺堡区为例[J].干旱区地理,2018,41(4):817-825.
温胜强,刘小鹏,王亚娟.生态移民安置区土地利用景观格局的稳定性研究:以宁夏回族自治区红寺堡区为例[J].水土保持通报,2018,38(1):319-327.
0
浏览量
748
下载量
1
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621