1. 禹州市农业技术推广中心, 河南 禹州,461670
2. 农业部作物高效用水原阳科学观测试验站, 河南 原阳,453514
3. 河南省农业科学院 植物营养与资源环境研究所,河南,郑州,450002
4. 河南省土壤肥料站,河南,郑州,450008
纸质出版:2020
移动端阅览
康永亮, 武继承, 郑惠玲, 等. 长期施用保水剂对小麦生长和水分利用的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020,40(4):83-90.
Kang Yongliang, Wu Jicheng, Zheng Huiling, et al. Effects of Long-term Application of Water Absorbent on Winter Wheat Growth and Water Use efficiency[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2020, 40(4): 83-90.
康永亮, 武继承, 郑惠玲, 等. 长期施用保水剂对小麦生长和水分利用的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020,40(4):83-90. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.04.012.
Kang Yongliang, Wu Jicheng, Zheng Huiling, et al. Effects of Long-term Application of Water Absorbent on Winter Wheat Growth and Water Use efficiency[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2020, 40(4): 83-90. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.04.012.
[目的
]
开展保水剂长期施用对作物增产和水分利用效率的研究,为探索浅山丘陵旱作区资源利用效率和生产效率的关键提升技术提供科学依据。[方法
]
采取田间定位试验的方法于2011—2019年在河南省农科院节水农业禹州基地进行了不同保水剂用量对小麦产量与水分利用的影响研究。试验设置未施保水剂(CK)、保水剂15 kg/hm
2
(F)、保水剂30 kg/hm
2
(T)、保水剂45 kg/hm
2
(V)等4个处理。[结果
]
①同一年份施用保水剂处理随小麦生长发育土壤耗水量略有增加,各处理表现为:V > T > F > CK;不同年份之间,贫水年土壤耗水量相对较大,富水年增减不一,表现为:2019年 > 2014年 > 2015年 > 2011年 > 2012年 > 2016年 > 2018年 > 2013年 > 2017年。②小麦总耗水量与生育期降水量趋势基本一致,即不同年份之间丰水年小麦总耗水量较大,贫水年总耗水量较小。③施用保水剂处理有利于改善小麦生长发育,提高单位群体数量、株高、穗长、小穗数、穗粒数和千粒质量,减少不孕穗。④小麦产量表现为:V > T > F > CK,保水剂处理较CK增产2.31%~19.20%。随着施用年限延长,F处理至第4 a后对小麦的增产幅度趋于稳定,T处理的增产率随施用年限的增加逐步提升,V处理则表现为先增再减再逐步提高的过程。⑤单位净收益、水分利用效率与产量的趋势一致。水分利用效率不同年份间表现为先降低再升高(2012—2016年),再降低再升高(2017—2019年)的过程。与土壤耗水量变化趋势一致,与贫水年降水量、总耗水量的变化趋势相反。并以V处理的水分利用效率提高幅度最大,较CK提高1.70~4.51 kg/(hm
2
·mm)。⑥小麦产量、水分利用效率、土壤耗水量、总耗水量之间呈显著的正相关关系。[结论
]
基于不同降水年型、小麦产量、水分利用效率、净收益等综合考虑,小麦最佳的保水剂用量为45 kg/hm
2
。
[Objective] The effects of long-term application of water absorbent on crop yield and water use efficiency were investigated in order to provide scientific basis for exploring the key technologies to improve the resource use and production efficiency in dryland of shallow hilly regions. [Methods] Field experiment was conducted in Yuzhou base of He'nan Academy of Agricultural Sciences from 2011 to 2019
to study the effects of different amounts of water absorbent on winter wheat yield and water use efficiency. Four treatments were set up including no water absorbent (CK)
15 kg/hm2 (F)
30 kg/hm2 (T)
and 45 kg/hm2 (V) water absorbent. [Results] ① The soil water consumption increased slightly with winter wheat growth and development of wheat under the application of water absorbent in the same year
and the soil water consumption showed as: V > T > F > CK. In different years
the soil water consumption in the poor water years was relatively larger
and the increase and decrease in the rich water years was different as follows: 2019 > 2014 > 2015 > 2011 > 2012 > 2016 > 2018 > 2013 > 2017. ② The trend of total water consumption of wheat was basically consistent with that of precipitation in growth period
and the total water consumption of wheat in wet year was larger than that in poor water years. ③ The application of water absorbent treatment was beneficial to improve the growth and development of wheat
which could increase the number of unit population
plant height
spike length
spikelet number
grain number per spike and 1 000-grain weight
and reduce sterility. ④ The yield of winter wheat was as follows: V > T > F > CK. The yield of water absorbent treatments was 2.31% to 19.20% higher than that of CK. With the extension of the application years
the yield increase of treatment F tended to be stable after 4 years. The yield increase rate of treatment T increased gradually with the increase of application years
while that of V treatment increased first and then decreased and then increased gradually. ⑤ The net income and water use efficiency of winter wheat had the same tendency with the yield. Water use efficiency showed a process of decreasing first
then increasing (2012—2016)
then decreasing and then increasing (2017—2019). It was consistent with the trend of soil water consumption
while opposite to the trend of precipitation and total water consumption in the poor water years. Compared with CK
the water use efficiency of V treatment increased by 1.70~4.51 kg/(hm2·mm). ⑥ There was a significant positive correlation among wheat yield
water use efficiency
soil water consumption and total water consumption. [Conclusion] Based on the comprehensive consideration of different precipitation types
wheat yield
water use efficiency and net income
the optimal amount of water absorbent for winter wheat is 45 kg/hm2.
杨连利,李仲瑾,邓娟利.保水剂的研究进展及发展新动向[J].材料导报,2005,19(6):42-44.
李秧秧,黄占斌.节水农业中化控技术的应用研究[J].节水灌溉,2001(3):4-6.
Sojka R E, Bjorneberg D L, Entry J A, et al. Polyacrylamide in agriculture and environmental land management[J]. Advances in Agronomy, 2007,92:75-162.
杨永辉,武继承,吴普特,等.秸秆覆盖与保水剂对土壤结构、蒸发及入渗过程的作用机制[J].中国水土保持科学,2009,7(5):70-75.
董英,郭绍辉,詹亚力.聚丙烯酰胺的土壤改良效应[J].高分子通报,2004(5):83-87.
牛育华,李仲瑾,郝明德.保水剂在黄土高原旱地农业应用效果研究[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(3):11-12.
武继承,王志和,何方,等.不同技术措施对降水利用和土壤养分的影响[J].华北农学报,2005,20(6):73-76.
武继承,杨稚娟,何方,等.试论河南省旱地节水农业发展的有效途径[J].河南农业科学,2006(1):5-8.
黄凤球,杨立光,黄承武,等.化学节水技术在农业上的应用效果研究[J].水土保持研究,1996,3(3):118-124.
黄占斌,万惠娥,邓西平,等.保水剂在改良土壤和作物抗旱节水中的效应[J].土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报,1999,5(4):52-55.
管秀娟,武继承.不同土壤水分条件下保水剂对小麦幼苗生理特性的影响[J].河南农业科学,2010(8):28-32.
杨永辉,武继承,吴普特,等.保水剂用量对小麦不同生育期根系生理特性的影响[J].应用生态学报,2011,22(1):73-78.
周岩,武继承,张彤,等.2种保水剂对砂土土壤持水性能的影响[J].河南农业科学,2012,41(2):78-81,92.
杨永辉,李宗军,武继承,等.不同水分条件下保水剂对土壤持水与供水能力的影响[J].中国水土保持科学,2012,10(6):58-63.
宋海燕,汪有科,汪星,等.保水剂用量对土壤水分的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2009,27(3):33-36.
杨永辉,武继承,韩庆元,等.保水剂对土壤孔隙影响的定量分析[J].中国水土保持科学,2011,9(6):88-93.
杨永辉,丁晋利,武继承,等.不同水分条件下保水剂对土壤结构的影响[J].土壤通报,2012,43(5):1065-1072.
武继承,王志勇,史福刚.保水剂的发展现状及其在节水农业中的地位[J].云南大学学报,2006,21(5):47-50.
任岩岩,武继承.保水剂对土壤性质及土壤微生物的影响研究进展[J].河南农业科学,2009(4):13-15.
杨永辉,武继承,吴普特,等.保水剂对小麦生长及生理特性的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2011,29(3):133-137.
杨永辉,武继承,何方,等.保水剂用量对冬小麦光合特性及水分利用的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2009,27(4):131-135.
武继承,郑惠玲,史福刚,等.不同水分条件下保水剂对小麦产量和水分利用的影响[J].华北农学报,2007,22(5):40-42.
武继承,杨永辉,郑惠玲,等.不同水分条件对小麦-玉米两熟制作物生长和水分利用的影响[J].华北农学报,2010,25(1):126-130.
武继承,管秀娟,杨永辉.地面覆盖和保水剂对冬小麦生长和降水利用的影响[J].应用生态学报,2011,22(1):86-92.
杨永辉,武继承,李宗军,等.保水剂对冬小麦生长及水分利用效率的影响[J].华北农学报,2011,26(3):173-178.
雷巧,韩燕来,谭金芳,等.不同水分条件下保水剂对冬小麦产量及水分利用效率的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料,2014(3):78-83.
杨永辉,武继承,张洁梅,等.不同保墒耕作措施对小麦、玉米耗水特征及周年水分利用的影响[J].华北农学报,2017,32(3):103-110.
李中阳,吕谋超,樊向阳,等.不同类型保水剂对冬小麦水分利用效率和根系形态的影响[J].应用生态学报,2015,26(12):3753-3758.
马燕会,尹宝重,郭丽果,等.河北省麦田保水剂筛选及其节水效果评价[J].作物杂志,2015(2):111-117.
张艳,马洪义.不同剂量保水剂对小麦光合及产量的影响[J].青岛农业大学学报(自然科学版),2008,25(4):265-267.
0
浏览量
914
下载量
4
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621