草原天路沿线生态环境对游客踩踏干扰的响应

魏红磊; 贾巨才; 李继峰; 李陇堂; 薛晨浩; 贾贺男

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.04.008

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

草原天路沿线生态环境对游客踩踏干扰的响应

试验研究

- 草原天路沿线生态环境对游客踩踏干扰的响应
- Response of Ecological Environment Along Grassland Travel Route to Tourists' Trampling Disturbance
- 水土保持通报 2020年40卷第4期页码：53-59
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 河北北方学院法政学院,河北,张家口,075000
  2. 河北北方学院生态建设与产业发展研究中心,河北,张家口,075000
  3. 河北师范大学资源与环境科学学院,河北,石家庄,050024
  4. 宁夏大学资源环境学院,宁夏,银川,750021
  5. 西北民族大学管理学院,甘肃,兰州,730030
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目“宁夏沙漠型旅游景区旅游环境容量与预警系统研究”（41261026）;国家社会科学基金项目“人地耦合视角下京津冀生态涵养区生态环境适应性评价与社会力量参与治理研究”（19BSH077）;河北省高等学校人文社会科学研究项目“首都‘两区’建设背景下冀西北生态旅游视觉景观质量评价与保护机制研究”（SQ201026）;张家口市科技局软科学项目“张家口地区旅游资源数量特征分析”（1711062I）;河北省创新能力提升计划项目（20557679D）
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.04.008
  中图分类号： F590.3
- 纸质出版：2020
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
魏红磊, 贾巨才, 李继峰, 等. 草原天路沿线生态环境对游客踩踏干扰的响应[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020,40(4):53-59.

Wei Honglei, Jia Jucai, Li Jifeng, et al. Response of Ecological Environment Along Grassland Travel Route to Tourists' Trampling Disturbance[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2020, 40(4): 53-59.
魏红磊, 贾巨才, 李继峰, 等. 草原天路沿线生态环境对游客踩踏干扰的响应[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020,40(4):53-59. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.04.008.

Wei Honglei, Jia Jucai, Li Jifeng, et al. Response of Ecological Environment Along Grassland Travel Route to Tourists' Trampling Disturbance[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2020, 40(4): 53-59. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.04.008.

摘要

[目的] 研究沿线生态环境对游客踩踏干扰的响应，为其可持续发展和生态环境保护提供理论依据。[方法] 以河北省张家口市草原天路为例，采用既成事实法在草原天路沿线选取3条样带，分析其植被覆盖度减少率、植被高度降低率、土壤硬度、地表覆盖度响应指数的变化所反映的生态环境对踩踏干扰的响应。[结果] ①游客踩踏干扰范围遵循由游步道边缘向两侧递减的规律，但受自然风光和最佳拍照位置的影响，在山顶环形游憩带表现出不同强度的游客活动，反映在植被高度上差异较明显。②植被覆盖度呈现出由游步道边缘向两侧逐渐递增的关系。③土壤硬度整体上呈现出从游步道边缘向两侧递减的规律。④地表覆盖度响应指数整体上处于中等程度干扰。[结论] 未来草原天路旅游开发要从紧抓机遇创新绿色发展之路，加强管理构建生态文明景区和分流管控完善景区交通系统方面入手，切实做到旅游开发和生态保护协调发展。

Abstract

[Objective] The response of ecological environment to trampling disturbance by tourists was studied in order to provide theoretical support for sustainable tourism development and ecological environment protection. [Methods] Taking grassland travel route in Zhangjiakou

Hebei Province， as an example

three transects were selected along the grassland travel route

and the vegetation cover

vegetation height

soil hardness and surface coverage were analyzed to reflect the response of the ecological environment to the trampling disturbance. [Results] ① The disturbance decreased from the edge of the travel route to both sides. However

due to the natural scenery of scenic spots and the observation deck development

tourists' activities of different intensities were found on the recreational belt around the top of the mountain

which were reflected in the differences in vegetation height. ② The vegetation coverage increased gradually from the edge of the footpath to both sides. ③ The soil hardness decreased from the edge of travel route to both sides. ④ The overall surface coverage was at a moderate level of disturbance. [Conclusion] In the future

the development of tourism in grassland travel route should be strengthened by grasping the opportunity to innovate the road of green development and to construct ecological civilized scenic spots

and divert and control the traffic system to improve the traffic of scenic spots

so as to achieve the coordinated development of tourism development and ecological protection.

关键词

Keywords

references

Meinecke E P.A Report on the Effect of Excessive Tourist Travel on the California Redwood Parks[M]. Sacramento, CA:California State Printing Office, 1928.

Bates G H. The Vegetation of Footpaths, Sidewalks, Cart-Tracks and Gateways[J]. Journal of Ecology, 1935,23(2):470-487.

Cole D N. Estimating the susceptibility of wildland vegetation to trailside alteration[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 1978,15(1):281.

Cole D N. Disturbance and recovery of trampled montana grassland and forests in Montana[C]. Ogden, Utah:USDA Forest Service, 1988.

Sun D. Trampling resistance, recovery and growth rate of eight plant species[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 1992,38(4):265-273.

Sun D, Liddle M J. Field occurrence, recovery, and simulated trampling resistance and recovery of two grasses[J]. Biological Conservation, 1991,57(2):187-203.

Cole D N, Bayfield N G. Recreational trampling of vegetation standard experimental procedures[J]. Biological Conservation, 1993,63(3):209-215.

Waston A E, Niccolucci M J, Williams D R. Hikers and recreational stock users:Predicting and managing recreation conflicts in three wildernesses[C]. USDA Forest Service Intermountain Research Station, 1993.

Liddle M J. Recreation and the environment:The ecology of recreation impacts(section 2):Vegetation and wear[R]. Australia, Griffith University, Brisbane:School of Australian Environmental Studies, Working Paper, 1988.

刘儒渊,曾家琳.登山步道游憩冲击之长期监测:以玉山国家公园塔塔加步道为例[J].资源科学,2006,28(3):120-127.

程占红,张金屯,上官铁梁,等.芦芽山自然保护区旅游开发与植被环境的关系(Ⅰ):植被环境质量分析[J].生态学报.2002,2(10):1765-1773.

席建超,胡传东,武国柱,等.六盘山生态旅游区旅游步道对人类践踏干扰的响应研究[J].自然资源学报.2008,23(2):274-284.

武国柱.六盘山生态旅游区核心景区对人类旅游践踏干扰的响应研究[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2009.

黄晓霞,张勇,和克俭,等.高寒草甸对旅游踩踏的抗干扰响应能力[J].草业学报,2014,23(2):333-339.

李陇堂,薛晨浩,张至楠.沙漠型景区游步道沿线生态环境对踩踏干扰的响应[J].中国沙漠,2015,35(4):1048-1056.

李陇堂,薛晨浩,魏红磊.基于模拟试验沙漠景区沙丘植被对游客踩踏干扰的响应研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2015,29(9):113-118.

史坤博,王文瑞,杨永春,等.旅游活动对甘南草原植被的影响:以桑科草原旅游点为例[J].干旱区研究,2015,32(6):1220-1228.

金亚征,郑志新,常美花,等.旅游活动对草原植被、土壤环境的影响及控制对策[J].草业科学,2017,34(2):310-320.

刘海,黄跃飞,朱运海.旅游活动对庐山景区植被变化的影响:基于空间信息技术方法[J].华中师范大学学报(自然科学版),2019,53(3):425-432.

丁翃羽.旅游活动对额济纳胡杨林保护区植物群落的影响[D].北京:北京林业大学,2019.

范宝祥,周忠发,薛冰清,等.短时间高强度旅游活动下洞穴空气环境变化特征及其影响因素分析:以绥阳大风洞为例[J].地球与环境,2020,48(1):46-57.

Cole D N. Ecological Impacts of Wilderness Recreation and Their Management[M]//Hendee J C, Stankey G H, Lucas R C. Wilderness Management, 1990.

浏览量

1058

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

黑河下游额济纳绿洲生态环境变化特征及生态恢复与重建

渭河宝鸡市区段生态治理工程综合评价

三峡库区消落带的植被生态工程

石羊河下游民勤绿洲恢复地下水位生态需水量研究

利用马尔可夫模型预测福州市植被动态变化