不同植被格局对梁峁坡-沟坡的侵蚀动力作用机制

于国强; 贾莲莲; 朱冰冰; 张霞

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.04.002

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

不同植被格局对梁峁坡-沟坡的侵蚀动力作用机制

试验研究

- 不同植被格局对梁峁坡-沟坡的侵蚀动力作用机制
- Regulation Mechanism of Vegetation Pattern on Erosion Dynamics in Hill-gully Slopes
- 水土保持通报 2020年40卷第4期页码：10-16
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 中国地质调查局干旱-半干旱区地下水与生态重点实验室,陕西,西安,710054
  2. 黄河水利委员会黄河上中游管理局,陕西,西安,710021
  3. 陕西师范大学地理科学与旅游学院,陕西,西安,710061
  4. 省部共建西北旱区生态水利国家重点实验室(西安理工大学),陕西,西安,710048
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  陕西省创新能力支撑计划项目“旱区地下水文过程与表生生态重点科技创新团队”（2019TD-040）;中国地质调查局项目（DD20190504）;陕西省自然科学基础研究计划项目（2015JQ4099）;国家自然科学基金项目（5177920,1601285）
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.04.002
  中图分类号： S157.1
- 纸质出版：2020
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
于国强, 贾莲莲, 朱冰冰, 等. 不同植被格局对梁峁坡-沟坡的侵蚀动力作用机制[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020,40(4):10-16.

Yu Guoqiang, Jia Lianlian, Zhu Bingbing, et al. Regulation Mechanism of Vegetation Pattern on Erosion Dynamics in Hill-gully Slopes[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2020, 40(4): 10-16.
于国强, 贾莲莲, 朱冰冰, 等. 不同植被格局对梁峁坡-沟坡的侵蚀动力作用机制[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020,40(4):10-16. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.04.002.

Yu Guoqiang, Jia Lianlian, Zhu Bingbing, et al. Regulation Mechanism of Vegetation Pattern on Erosion Dynamics in Hill-gully Slopes[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2020, 40(4): 10-16. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.04.002.

摘要

[目的] 探究不同植被格局对梁峁坡—沟坡的侵蚀动力作用机制，为进一步揭示草地坡面侵蚀规律和植被减蚀效应研究提供科学依据。[方法] 以梁峁坡—沟坡为研究对象，采用室内降雨模拟降雨和三维激光扫描技术，分析不同植被格局对梁峁坡—沟坡侵蚀动力作用机制。[结果] 径流流速和含沙量共同影响着坡面侵蚀动力过程，径流流速是主要影响因素。坡面的侵蚀产沙来源主要位于沟坡内，不同植被格局下梁峁坡与沟坡产沙比例的不同，反映了植被调控侵蚀的范围和强度的不同。草带位于梁峁坡中下部时，不但能够有效降低梁峁坡的侵蚀程度，而且能够有效抑制和减缓沟坡内的径流流速，大幅度降低梁峁坡下部和沟坡内的侵蚀程度。[结论] 不同植被格局可以通过影响径流流速和含沙量来调控梁峁坡—沟坡侵蚀动力。

Abstract

[Objective] The regulation mechanism of different vegetation patterns on erosion dynamics in hill-gully slope was studied in order to provide a scientific basis for further revealing the law of erosion in grassland slope and the effects of vegetation on erosion reduction. [Methods] The regulation mechanism of different vegetation patterns on the erosion dynamics on a hill-gully slope was analyzed with rainfall simulation and three-dimensional laser scanning technology on a hill-gully slope model. [Results] Both runoff velocity and sediment concentration affected the dynamic process of slope erosion

and runoff velocity was the dominant factor. The gully-slope area was the main erosional sediment source. The scope and degree of vegetation regulation impacts with different patterns could be reflected by sediment yield ratios of hillslope to gully-slope. The grass strip located at the middle and lower part of the hillslope not only reduced the erosion degree effectively on the hillslope

but also retarded runoff velocity on the gully-slope greatly which would alleviate the erosion at the lower part of hillslope and gully slope. [Conclusion] Different vegetation patterns regulate the erosion dynamics in hill-gully slope by affecting the runoff velocity and sediment concentration.

关键词

Keywords

references

唐克丽.中国水土保持[M].北京:科学出版社,2004.

García-Ruiz J M, Lana-Renault N, Begueria S, et, al. From plot to regional scales:Interactions of slope and catchment hydrological and geomorphic processes in the Spanish Pyrenees[J]. Geomorphology, 2010,120(3/4):248-257.

Fu Bojie, Liu Yu, Lü Yihe, et al. Assessing the soil erosion control service of ecosystems change in the Loess Plateau of China[J]. Ecological Complexity, 2011,8(4):284-293.

Pan Chengzhong, Shangguan Zhouping. The effects of ryegrass roots and shoots on loess erosion under simulated rainfall[J]. Catena, 2007,70(3):350-355.

García-Ruiz J M. The effects of land uses on soil erosion in Spain:A review[J]. Catena, 2010,81(1):1-11.

Nadal-Romero E, Lasanta T, Regüés D, et al. Hydrological response and sediment production under different land cover in abandoned farmland fields in a Mediterranean mountain environment[J]. Boletíndde la Asociación de Geógrafos Españoles, 2011,201(55):303-323.

Best A C. The size distribution of raindrops[J]. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 1950,76(327):16-36.

张琪琳,王占礼,王栋栋,等.黄土高原草地植被对土壤侵蚀影响研究进展[J].地球科学进展,2017,32(10):1093-1101.

秦伟,曹文洪,郭乾坤,等.植被格局对侵蚀产沙影响的研究评述[J].生态学报,2017,37(14):4905-4912.

游珍,李占斌,蒋庆丰.植被在坡面的不同位置对降雨产沙量影响[J].水土保持通报,2006,26(6):28-31.

丁文峰,李勉.不同坡面植被空间布局对坡沟系统产流产沙影响的试验[J].地理研究,2010,29(10):1870-1878.

Zhang Xia, Yu Guoqiang, Li Zhanbin, et al. Experimental study on slope runoff erosion and sediment under different vegetation types[J]. Water Resources Management, 2014,28(9):2415-2433.

Rey F. Effectiveness of vegetation barriers for marly sediment trapping[J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 2004,29(9):1161-1169.

Zhou Ji, Fu Bojie, Gao Guangyao, et al. Effects of precipitation and restoration vegetation on soil erosion in a semi-arid environment in the Loess Plateau, China[J]. Catena, 2016,137(137):1-11.

Li Grag, Abrahams A D, Atkinson J F. Correction factors in the determination of mean velocity of overland flow[J]. Earth surface Processes and Landforms, 1996,21(6):509-515.

Pan Chengzhong, Shangguan Zhouping, Ma Lan. Assessing the dye-tracer correction factor for documenting the mean velocity of sheet flow over smooth and grassed surfaces[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2015,29(26):5369-5382.

Darboux F, Davy P H, Gascuel-Odoux C, et al. Evolution of soil surface roughness and flow path connectivity in overland flow experiments[J]. Catena, 2001,46(2):125-139.

Nearing M A, Simanton R, Norton D, et al. Soil erosion by surface water flow on a stony, semiarid hillslope[J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 1999,24(8):677-686.

Wang Bing, Zhang Guanghui, Shi Yangyang, et al. Soil detachment by overland flow under different vegetation restoration models in the Loess Plateau of China[J]. Catena, 2014,116(5):51-59.

Foster G R, Huggins L F, Meyer L D. A laboratory study of rill hydraulics(Ⅰ):Velocity relationships[J]. Transactions of ASAE, 1984,27(3):790-796.

Jin K, Cornelis W M, Gabriels D, et al. Residue cover and rainfall intensity effects on runoff soil organic carbon losses[J]. Catena, 2009,78(1):81-86.

Wei Wei, Chen Liding, Fu Bojie, et al. The effect of land uses and rainfall regimes on runoff and soil erosion in the semi-arid loess hilly area, China[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2007,335(3):247-258.

张霞.黄土区地貌与植被格局的侵蚀动力过程试验研究[D].陕西西安:西安理工大学,2018.

Zhang Guanghui, Hu Jianjun. Effects of patchy distributed Artemisia capillaris on overland flow hydrodynamic characteristics[J]. International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 2019,7(1):81-88.

王升,王全九,董文财,等.黄土坡面不同植被覆盖度下产流产沙与养分流失规律[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(4):23-27.

卫伟,贾福岩,陈利顶,等.黄土丘陵区坡面水蚀对降雨和下垫面微观格局的响应[J].环境科学,2012,33(8):2674-2679.

Gumiere S J, Bissonnais Y L, Raclot D, et al. Vegetated filter effects on sedimentological connectivity of agricultural catchments in erosion modelling:A review[J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 2011,36(1):3-19.

邹军,张明礼,杨浩.退耕还林(草)与水土保持若干问题的研究进展[J].土壤通报,2012,43(2):506-512.

程圣东,李占斌,李鹏,等.不同草被格局坡面水土-养分流失动力过程试验研究[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(5):58-61.

吴秀芹,蔡运龙.土地利用/土地覆盖变化与土壤侵蚀关系研究进展[J].地理科学进展,2003,22(6):576-584.

陈浩,王开章.黄河中游小流域坡沟侵蚀关系研究[J].地理研究,1999,18(4):363-372.

浏览量

1123

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

冀北辽河源自然保护区森林景观格局与环境的关系

油蒿群落不同恢复阶段的土壤水分空间异质性及植被特征

水力侵蚀下砒砂岩坡面植被格局对土壤颗粒空间分布的影响

基于kNDVI与结构方程模型的洞庭湖区植被覆盖时空变化及驱动机制分析

北京市门头沟区群发性坡面泥石流成因及防治措施