1. 江苏省城市规划设计研究院,江苏,南京,210023
2. 武汉大学 资源与环境科学学院,湖北,武汉,430079
纸质出版:2020
移动端阅览
谭华清, 张金亭, 周希胜. 基于最小累计阻力模型的南京市生态安全格局构建[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020,40(3):282-288.
Tan Huaqing, Zhang Jinting, Zhou Xisheng. Construction of Ecological Security Patterns Based on Minimum Cumulative Resistance Model in Nanjing City[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2020, 40(3): 282-288.
谭华清, 张金亭, 周希胜. 基于最小累计阻力模型的南京市生态安全格局构建[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020,40(3):282-288. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.03.041.
Tan Huaqing, Zhang Jinting, Zhou Xisheng. Construction of Ecological Security Patterns Based on Minimum Cumulative Resistance Model in Nanjing City[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2020, 40(3): 282-288. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.03.041.
[目的
]
构建科学合理的生态安全格局,为生态文明建设背景下统筹推进市域国土空间可持续发展提供参考。[方法
]
基于生物多样性、水资源安全、地质灾害规避对江苏省南京市生态用地重要性进行定量评价,进而识别生态源地;参考PM
2.5
浓度、夜间灯光数据对物种迁徙的影响构建修正后的生态阻力面;通过最小累计阻力模型(MCR)构建区域生态安全格局。[结果
]
南京市生态源地面积490.3 km
2
,基本涵盖国家级和省级自然保护地,识别结果较为合理。修正后生态阻力面的阻力值范围在0~43 854.6之间,阻力值较大的区域位于鼓楼区、秦淮区、建邺区东部等长江南岸,浦口区中部、玄武区中部、江宁区东北部等区域阻力较小,能够较好地表征区域生态过程差异。依托生态源地、缓冲区、生态廊道等核心组分,形成了“一带三区多轴”的南京市生态安全格局框架。[结论
]
改进后的生态安全格局构建方法行之有效,以此构建的生态安全格局框架与现有《南京市主体功能区实施规划》更加契合。
[Objective] A scientific and reasonable ecological security pattern was constructed in order to provide a reference for the coordinated promotion of sustainable development of regional land and space through ecological civilization construction.[Methods] Based on biodiversity
water resource security
and geological hazard avoidance
the importance of ecological land in Nanjing City of Jiangsu Province was quantitatively evaluated to identify ecological resources. A modified ecological resistance surface was constructed by considering the influence of PM2.5 and nighttime light on species migration. A regional ecological security pattern was built by the minimum cumulative resistance model.[Results] The ecological resources of the 490.3 km2 ecological land were identified
and the national and provincial nature reserves of Nanjing City were located within the ecological area. The identification results were reasonable. The revised resistance range of the ecological resistance surface was 0-43 854.6. The high-resistance area was located on the south bank of the Yangtze River
such as the Gulou
Qinhuai
and Eastern Jianye Districts. The low-resistance area was located in the center of Pukou
Xuanwu
and the northeast of Jiangning District. The revised resistance could characterize the differences of the regional ecological processes accurately. Relying on the core components of the ecological resource areas
buffer zones
and ecological corridors
the ecological security pattern framework ("one belt
three zones
and multiple axes") of Nanjing was established.[Conclusion] The improved method of constructing an ecological security pattern was effective
and the established ecological security pattern framework is consistent with the existing main function zone implementation plan of Nanjing City.
叶鑫,邹长新,刘国华,等.生态安全格局研究的主要内容与进展[J].生态学报,2018,38(10):3382-3392.
Li Yangfan, Li Yi, Zhou Yan, et al. Investigation of a coupling model of coordination between urbanization and the environment [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2012,98:127-133.
Grimm N B, Faeth S H, Golubiewski N E, et al. Global change and the ecology of cities [J]. Science,2008,319(5864):756-760.
Asgarian A, Amiri B J, Sakieh Y. Assessing the effect of green cover spatial patterns on urban land surface temperature using landscape metrics approach [J]. Urban Ecosystems, 2015,18(1):209-222.
王媛,周长威.黔中城市群景观生态安全格局构建[J]. 生态与农村环境学报,2019,35(9):1111-1117.
陈德权,兰泽英,李玮麒.基于最小累积阻力模型的广东省陆域生态安全格局构建[J].生态与农村环境学报,2019,35(7):826-835.
黄木易,岳文泽,冯少茹,等.基于MCR模型的大别山核心区生态安全格局异质性及优化[J].自然资源学报,2019,34(4):771-784.
田雅楠,张梦晗,许荡飞,等.基于“源-汇”理论的生态型市域景观生态安全格局构建[J].生态学报,2019,39(7):2311-2321.
Loro M, Ortega E, Arce R M, et al. Ecological connectivity analysis to reduce the barrier effect of roads. An innovative graph-theory approach to define wildlife corridors with multiple paths and without bottlenecks [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2015,139:149-162.
张蕾,危小建,周鹏.基于适宜性评价和最小累积阻力模型的生态安全格局构建:以营口市为例[J].生态学杂志,2019,38(1):229-236.
Peng Jian, Yang Yang, Liu Yanxu, et al. Linking ecosystem services and circuit theory to identify ecological security patterns [J]. Science of The Total Environment,2018,644:781-790.
倪庆琳,丁忠义,侯湖平,等.基于电路理论的生态格局识别与保护研究:以宁武县为例[J].干旱区资源与环境,2019,33(5):67-73.
岳德鹏,于强,张启斌,等.区域生态安全格局优化研究进展[J].农业机械学报,2017,48(2):1-10.
彭建,赵会娟,刘焱序,等.区域生态安全格局构建研究进展与展望[J].地理研究,2017,36(3):407-419.
安冬,邓伟.基于敏感性分析的生态脆弱区生态安全格局构建:以陕西省榆林市为例[J].安徽农业科学,2016,44(7):127-131.
黄隆杨,刘胜华,方莹,等.基于“质量—风险—需求”框架的武汉市生态安全格局构建[J].应用生态学报,2019,30(2):615-626.
Zagas T, Raptis D, Zagas D. Identifying and mapping the protective forests of southeast Mt.Olympus as a tool for sustainable ecological and silvicultural planning,in a multi-purpose forest management framework [J]. Ecological Engineering, 2011,37(2):286-293.
佘宇晨,陈彩虹,贺丹,等.基于MCR模型和Kriging的海口市景观格局优化分析[J].西北林学院学报,2016,31(3):233-238.
黄鑫,曹学章,张明,等.基于最小累积阻力模型的内蒙古胜利煤田景观生态安全格局构建[J]. 生态与农村环境学报,2019,35(1):55-62. [20] 王玉莹,金晓斌,沈春竹,等.东部发达区生态安全格局构建:以苏南地区为例[J].生态学报,2019,39(7):2298-2310. [21] 郝月,张娜,杜亚娟,等.基于生境质量的唐县生态安全格局构建[J].应用生态学报,2019,30(3):1015-1024. [22] 谢高地,鲁春霞,肖玉,等.青藏高原高寒草地生态系统服务价值评估[J].山地学报,2003,21(1):50-55. [23] 周锐,王新军,苏海龙,等.平顶山新区生态用地的识别与安全格局构建[J].生态学报,2015,35(6):2003-2012. [24] 李益敏,丁扬,魏苏杭.基于GIS技术的县域生态用地重要性评价:以泸水县为例[J].中国农业资源与区划,2017,38(5):48-56. [25] 李桂媛,杨凡星,李悦.基于生态安全的湖北省秭归县城镇适度规模研究[J].地域研究与开发,2017,36(1):153-157. [26] 程迎轩,王红梅,刘光盛,等.基于最小累计阻力模型的生态用地空间布局优化[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(16):248-257. [27] 朱敏,谢跟踪,邱彭华.海口市生态用地变化与安全格局构建[J].生态学报,2018,38(9):3281-3290. [28] 李国煜,林丽群,伍世代,等.生态源地识别与生态安全格局构建研究:以福建省福清市为例[J].地域研究与开发,2018,37(3):120-125. [29] 韩世豪,梅艳国,叶持跃,等.基于最小累积阻力模型的福建省南平市延平区生态安全格局构建[J].水土保持通报,2019,39(2):192-198. [30] 官冬杰,赵祖伦,王秋艳,等.三峡库区景观生态安全格局优化研究:以重庆市开州区为例[J].水土保持通报,2018,38(2):171-177. [31] 陈昕,彭建,刘焱序,等.基于“重要性—敏感性—连通性”框架的云浮市生态安全格局构建[J].地理研究,2017,36(3):471-484.
0
浏览量
959
下载量
23
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621